A Bibliometric Review of Publication Trends in the Application of Landscape Metrics in Urban and Regional Planning

References

• Bhaiswar, R., N. Meenakshi, and D. Chawla. 2021. Evolution of electronic word of mouth: A systematic literature review using bibliometric analysis of 20 years (2000–2020). FIIB Business Review 10 (3):215–31. doi: 10.1177/23197145211032408.
   Google Scholar
• Binoy, B. V., M. A. Naseer, P. P. Anil Kumar, and N. Lazar. 2021. A bibliometric analysis of property valuation research. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis. doi: 10.1108/IJHMA-09-2020-0115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connors, J. P., C. S. Galletti, and W. T. L. Chow. 2013. Landscape configuration and urban heat island effects: Assessing the relationship between landscape characteristics and land surface temperature in Phoenix, Arizona. Landscape Ecology 28 (2):271–83. doi: 10.1007/s10980-012-9833-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, L., A. J. Florczyk, S. Freire, T. Kemper, M. Melchiorri, M. Pesaresi, and M. Schiavina. 2021. Applying the degree of urbanisation to the globe: A new harmonised definition reveals a different picture of global urbanisation. Journal of Urban Economics 125:103312. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2020.103312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dramstad, W. E., M. S. Tveit, W. J. Fjellstad, and G. L. A. Fry. 2006. Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landscape and Urban Planning 78 (4):465–74. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eck, N. J. v., and L. Waltman. 2020. VOSviewer manual version 1.6.16. Univeristeit Leiden. November, 1–52. https://www.vosviewer.com/download/f-33t2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, R. T. T., and M. Godron. 1981. Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology. BioScience 31 (10):733–40. doi: 10.2307/1308780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman, R. T. T., and M. Godron. 1986. Landscape ecology. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, A. E., and P. Kedron. 2017. Landscape metrics: Past progress and future directions. Current Landscape Ecology Reports 2 (3):63–72. doi: 10.1007/s40823-017-0026-0.
   Google Scholar
• Gan, X., M. Zhu, J. Li, Q. Yang, and J. Huang. 2009. Effects of sensor spatial resolutions and classification themes on urban landscape analysis : A case study in Shanghai, China. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 35 (4):357–68. doi: 10.5589/m09-031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herold, M., N. C. Goldstein, and K. C. Clarke. 2003. The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: Measurement, analysis and modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment 86:286–302. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00075-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herold, M., J. Scepan, and K. C. Clarke. 2002. The use of remote sensing and landscape metrics to describe structures and changes in urban land uses. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 34 (8):1443–58. doi: 10.1068/a3496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanta, K. N. M., R. P. S. Kaurav, U. Sankar Allam, and P. Srivalli. 2021. Wildlife tourism: A synthesis of past, present and future research agenda. Enlightening Tourism. A Pathmaking JOURNAL 11 (2):390–137. doi: 10.33776/et.v11i2.5117.
   Google Scholar
• Kaushal, N., S. Ghalawat, and R. P. S. Kaurav. 2021. Nepotism concept evaluation: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Library Philosophy and Practice 2021:1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, F., H. Yin, and N. Nakagoshi. 2007. Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modeling of the amenity value of urban green space: A case study in Jinan City, China. Landscape and Urban Planning 79 (3-4):240–52. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar Jat, M., P. K. Garg, and D. Khare. 2008. Monitoring and modelling of urban sprawl using remote sensing and GIS techniques. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 10 (1):26–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2007.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazar, N., and K. Chithra. 2021. Comprehensive bibliometric mapping of publication trends in the development of building sustainability assessment systems. Environment, Development and Sustainability 23 (4):4899–923. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-00796-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., C. Song, L. Cao, F. Zhu, X. Meng, and J. Wu. 2011. Impacts of landscape structure on surface urban heat islands: A case study of Shanghai, China. Remote Sensing of Environment 115 (12):3249–63. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, R., B. Guneralp, W. Zipperer, and P. Marcotullio. 2014. The future of global urbanization and the environment. www.Thesolutionsjournal.Org. 2014. https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/ja/2014/ja_2014_zipperer_002.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McGarigal, K. 2000. Landscape metrics. https://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Conceptual Background/Landscape Metrics/Landscape Metrics.htm.
   Google Scholar
• McGarigal, K. 2004. FRAGSTATS conceptual foundation. http://www.edc.uri.edu/nrs/classes/nrs534/nrs_534_readings/fragstatsconceptoverview.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McGarigal, K., S. A. Cushman, and E. Ene. 2012. FRAGSTATS v4: Spatial pattern anaysis program for categorical and continuous maps. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html.
   Google Scholar
• McGarigal, K., and B. J. Marks. 1995. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Technical Report, PNW-GTR-351, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR. https://www.fs.usda.gov/pnw/publications/fragstats-spatial-pattern-analysis-program-quantifying-landscape-structure.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, A., C. Fernandes, J. F. Gonçalves, and P. Farinha-Marques. 2021. Research trends on integrative landscape assessment using indicators – A systematic review. Ecological Indicators 129:107815. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadkarni, R. R., and B. Puthuvayi. 2020. A comprehensive literature review of multi-criteria decision making methods in heritage buildings. Journal of Building Engineering 32:101814. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, K., and S. Joshi. 2021. Trends in destination choice in tourism research: A 25-year bibliometric review. FIIB Business Review 10 (4):371–22. doi: 10.1177/23197145211032430.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, J. P., E. A. Silva, and P. Pinho. 2016. Spatial metrics to study urban patterns in growing and shrinking cities. Urban Geography 37 (2):246–71. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2015.1096118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rempel, R. 2008. Patch analyst for ArcGIS. Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research. http://flash.lakeheadu.ca/∼rrempel/patch/.
   Google Scholar
• Satellite database, union of concerned scientists. 2005. https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/satellite-database.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. 2010. Urban form revisited — Selecting indicators for characterising European cities. Landscape and Urban Planning 96 (1):29–47. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Species, P. 2012. Principles of landscape ecology desirable species. Nature Education Knowledge 3 (10):34. https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/principles-of-landscape-ecology-13260702.
   Google Scholar
• Surwase, G., A. Sagar, B. S. Kademani, and K. Bhanumurthy. 2011. Co-citation analysis: An overview. BOSLA National Conference Proceedings, CDAC, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Tiede, D. 2003. V-LATE: Vector-based landscape analysis tools extension. University of Salzburg. http://www.geo.sbg.ac.at/larg/vlate.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Uuemaa, E., M. Antrop, J. Roosaare, R. Marja, and Ü. Mander. 2009. Landscape metrics and indices: An overview of their use in landscape research. Living Reviews in Landscape Research 3. doi: 10.12942/lrlr-2009-1.
   Google Scholar
• Uuemaa, E., Ü. Mander, and R. Marja. 2013. Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: A review. Ecological Indicators 28:100–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veloutsou, C., and C. Ruiz Mafe. 2020. Brands as relationship builders in the virtual world: A bibliometric analysis. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 39:100901. doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vishnu, C. R., R. Sridharan, and P. N. Ram Kumar. 2019. Supply chain risk management: Models and methods. International Journal of Management and Decision Making 18 (1):31–75. doi: 10.1504/IJMDM.2019.096689.
   Google Scholar
• Walz, U. 2011. Landscape structure, landscape metrics and biodiversity. Living Reviews in Landscape Research 5 (3). doi: 10.12942/lrlr-2011-3.
   Google Scholar
• Weng, Y. C. 2007. Spatiotemporal changes of landscape pattern in response to urbanization. Landscape and Urban Planning 81 (4):341–53. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, C., D. Haase, M. Su, Y. Wang, and S. Pauleit. 2020. Assessment of landscape changes under different urban dynamics based on a multiple-scenario modeling approach. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. 1–19. doi: 10.1177/2399808320910161..
   Google Scholar
• Zhan, Z., S. Su, R. Xiao, D. Jiang, and J. Wu. 2013. Identifying determinants of urban growth from a multi-scale perspective: A case study of the urban agglomeration around Hangzhou Bay, China. Applied Geography 45:193–202. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, W., G. Huang, and M. L. Cadenasso. 2011. Does spatial configuration matter? Understanding the effects of land cover pattern on land surface temperature in urban landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 102 (1):54–63. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar