The Diffusion of Evidence-Based Practice: Reviewing the Evidence-Based Practice Networks in the United States and German-Speaking Countries

References

• Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of disciplines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, A. (2006). Reconceptualizing knowledge accumulation in sociology. American Sociologist, 37, 57–66. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27700460
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D. R. (1992). A structural analysis of social work journal network. Journal of Social Service Research, 15, 153–168. doi:10.1300/J079v15n03_09
   Google Scholar
• Barber, J. G., & Dunston, R. (2004). Evidence-based practice in Australia. In B. A. Thyer & M. A. F. Kazi (Eds.), International perspectives on evidence-based practice in social work (pp. 183–196). Birmingham, England: Venture Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barner, J. R., Holosko, M. J., & Thyer, B. A. (2014). American social work and psychology faculty members’ scholarly productivity: A controlled comparison of citation impact using the h-Index. British Journal of Social Work, 44, 2448–2458. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Retrieved from https://gephi.org/publications/gephi-bastian-feb09.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bavelas, A. (1950). Communication patterns in task‐oriented groups. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 725–730. doi:10.1121/1.1906679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, A. (2007). What is scientific progress? Noûs, 41, 64–89. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00638.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanke, B., Bandemer, S. v., Nullmeier, F., & Wewer, G. (2005). Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform [Handbook of administrative reform] (3rd ed.). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Bledsoe, S. E., Weissman, M. M., Mullen, E. J., Ponniah, K., Gameroff, M. J., Verdeli, H., … Wickramaratne, P. (2007). Empirically supported psychotherapy in social work training programs: Does the definition of evidence matter? Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 449–455. doi: 10.1177/1049731506299014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, M., & Klein, W. C. (1995). Publications and citations: A study of faculty at leading schools of social work. Journal of Social Work Education, 31, 377–387. doi: 10.1080/10437797.1995.10672273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonacich, P. (2007). Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Social Networks, 29, 555–564. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2007.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27, 55–71. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (2006). A Graph-theoretic perspective on centrality. Social Networks, 28, 466–484. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2005.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing social networks. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179–255. doi:10.1002/aris.1440370106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrmann, S., & Thiessen, B. (Eds.). (2016). Wirkungen Sozialer Arbeit. Potentiale und Grenzen der Evidenzbasierung für Profession und Disziplin [Impact of social work. Potentials and limitations of evidence-based practice for the profession and discipline]. Opladen, Germany: Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 2389–2404. doi:10.1002/asi.21419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brekke, J. S. (2012). Shaping a science of social work. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 455–464. doi:10.1177/1049731512441263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briar-Lawson, K. (2012). Critical realism: Response to Longhofer and Floersch. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 523–528. doi:10.1177/1049731512454015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, I. R., Epstein, I., & Sainz, A. (1997). The use of social science sources in social work practice journals: An application of citation analysis. Social Work Research, 21, 45–56. doi:10.1093/swr/21.1.45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffin, M., & Friedrich, B. (2004). Evidence-based treatments in child abuse and neglect. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 1097–1113. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambless, D. L., Baker, M. J., Baucom, D. H., Beutler, L. E., Calhoun, K. S., Crits-Christoph, P., … Haaga, D. A. F. (1998). Update on empirically validated therapies, II. The Clinical Psychologist, 51, 3–16. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9cd0/1d8fcd52cec4d9389d5846c18e69c6f6f8e6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 7–18. Retrieved from https://www.div12.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Defining-Empirically-Supported-Therapies-1.pdf
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., & Hicks, D. (2004). Tracing knowledge diffusion. Scientometrics, 59, 199–211. doi:10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018528.59913.48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. doi:10.1002/asi.21525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education (2008). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/File.aspx?id=41861
   Google Scholar
• Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges; Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, B. (1994). Tiered citation and measures of document similarity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 537–538. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199408)45:7<537::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, P. M. (2011). Open access, readership, citations: A randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing. FASEB Journal, 25, 2129–2134. doi:10.1096/fj.11-183988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Solla Price, D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149, 510–515. doi:10.1126/science.149.3683.510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewe, B. (2013). Reflexive Sozialarbeit im Spannungsfeld von evidenzbasierter Praxis und demokratischer Rationalität—Plädoyer für die handlungslogische Entfaltung reflexiver Professionalität [Reflexive social work in the field of tension of evidence-based practice and democratic rationality—Plea for the action-logic evolvement of reflexive professionality]. In R. Becker-Lenz (Ed.), Professionalität in der Sozialen Arbeit. Standpunkte, Kontroversen, Perspektiven [Professionality in social work. Standpoints, controversies, perspectives] (3rd ed., pp. 94–116). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Dewe, B., & Otto, H.-U. (2012). Reflexive Sozialpädagogik. Grundstrukturen eines neuen Typs dienstleistungsorientierten Professionshandelns [Reflexive social pedagogy. Foundation of a new type of service-oriented professional action]. In W. Thole (Ed.), Grundriss Soziale Arbeit. Ein einführendes Handbuch [Layout of social work. An introducing handbook] (4th ed., pp. 197–218). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Downing, K. (1996). Probation training, cognition and crime: Uses and abuses of theory. Social Work Education, 15(4), 65–75. doi:10.1080/02615479611220351
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, W. M. (2016). Strict slaves of slogans: Response to “The Social Work Cartel.” Research on Social Work Practice, 26, 494–497. doi:10.1177/1049731515615679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, M. G., & Borgatti, S. P. (2013). The dual-projection approach for two-mode networks. Social Networks, 35, 204–210. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2012.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, M. G., & Valente, T. W. (2016). Bridging, brokerage and betweenness. Social Networks, 44, 202–208. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2015.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. (1992). Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 268, 2420–2425. doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farley, A. J., Feaster, D., Schapmire, T. J., D’Ambrosio, J. G., Bruce, L. E., Oak, C. S., & Sar, B. K. (2009). The challenges of implementing evidence based practice: Ethical considerations in practice, education, policy, and research. Social Work & Society, 7, 246–259. Retrieved from http://www.socwork.net/sws/article/view/76/135
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, M. (2013). Beyond evidence-based policy and practice: Reshaping the relationship between research and practice. Social Work & Social Sciences Review, 16(2), 20–36. doi:10.1921/903160201
   Google Scholar
• Fruchterman, T. M. J., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and Experience, 21, 1129–1164. doi:10.1002/spe.4380211102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. (1999). Evidence-based practice: An alternative to authority-based practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 80, 341–350. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.1214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. (2001). Social work: An authority-based profession. Research on Social Work Practice, 11, 166–175. doi:10.1177/104973150101100203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. (2006). Evidence-based practice and policy: Choices ahead. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 338–357. doi:10.1177/1049731505284205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. (2010). Evidence-based practice and the ethics of discretion. Journal of Social Work, 11, 26–48. doi:10.1177/1468017310381306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. (2013). Social work practice: A critical thinker’s guide (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. (2015). Integrating research and practice: Distractions, controversies, and options for moving forward. Research on Social Work Practice, 25, 510–522. doi:10.1177/1049731514544327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation: Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies. Science, 178, 471–479. doi:10.1126/science.178.4060.471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. (1994a). The relationship between citing and cited publication: A question of relatedness. Retrieved from http://wokinfo.com/essays/relationship-cited-publications/#ref.8
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. (1994b). Scientography: Mapping the tracks of science. Retrieved from http://wokinfo.com/essays/scientography-mapping-science/
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. (1998). Random thoughts on citationology. Its theory and practice. Scientometrics, 43, 69–76. doi:10.1007/BF02458396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. (2001). From bibliographic coupling to co-citation analysis via algorithmic historio-bibliography. Retrieved from http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/drexelbelvergriffith92001.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, L. (2003). Evidence-based practice for the helping professions: A practical guide with integrated multimedia (Vol. 1). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, L. E., & Gambrill, E. D. (1999). Critical thinking for social workers: Exercises for the helping professions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gmür, M. (2003). Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation. Scientometrics, 57, 27–57. doi:10.1023/A:1023619503005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J. A. M. (2001). Evidence-based healthcare: How to make health policy and management decisions (2nd ed). New York, NY: Churchill Livingston.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. (2000). The role of theory in evidence-based health promotion practice. Health Education Research, 15, 125–129. doi:10.1093/her/15.2.125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, S. A. (2009). How citation distortions create unfounded authority: Analysis of a citation network. British Medical Journal, 339(2680), 210–213. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 19–30. doi:10.1037//1040-3590.12.1.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt, G., & Rennie, D. (2002). Users’ guides to the medical literature: A manual for evidence-based clinical practice. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Harter, S. P., Nisonger, T. E., & Weng, A. (1993). Semantic relationships between cited and citing articles in library and information science journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44, 543–552. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199310)44:9<543::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library & Information Science Research, 18, 323–342. doi:10.1016/S0740-8188(96)90003-1
   Google Scholar
• Healy, K. (2013). A co-citation network for philosophy. Retrieved from https://kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2013/06/18/a-co-citation-network-for-philosophy/
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. J. (1997). Science studies: An advanced introduction. New York, NY: NYU press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569–16572. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, D. R., Lacasse, J. R., & Benson, O. (2012). Influential publications in social work discourse: The 100 most highly cited articles in disciplinary journals: 2000–09. British Journal of Social Work, 42, 765–782. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., Barker, K., & Lioi, J. (2009). Research on social work practice: A bibliometric evaluation of the first decade. Research on Social Work Practice, 20, 11–20. doi:10.1177/1049731509332877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M. O., Himle, J., Jenson, J. M., & Vaughn, M. G. (2009). Revisioning social work clinical education: Recent developments in relation to evidence-based practice. Journal of Evidence-based Social Work, 6, 256–273. doi:10.1080/15433710802686963
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howard, M. O., & Jensen, J. (1999). Clinical practice guidelines: Should social work develop them? Research on Social Work Practice, 9, 283–301. doi:10.1177/104973159900900302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M. O., McMillen, C. J., & Pollio, D. F. (2003). Teaching evidence-based practice: Toward a new paradigm for social work education. Research on Social Work Practice, 13, 234–259. doi:10.1177/1049731502250404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüttemann, M. (2006). Evidence-based practice—Ein Beitrag zur Professionalisierung Sozialer Arbeit? [Evidence-based practice—A contribution to the professionalization of social work?]. Neue Praxis, 36, 156–167.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Science. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). Evidence-based medicine has been hijacked: A report to David Sackett. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 73, 82–86. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.02.012
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1999). International knowledge flows: Evidence from patent citations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8, 105–136. doi:10.1080/10438599900000006
   Google Scholar
• James, S. (2016). “Inside the belly of the beast”—Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der evidenzbasierten Praxis [“Inside the belly of the beast”—Opportunities and limitations of evidence-based practice]. In S. Borrmann & B. Thiessen (Eds.), Wirkungen Sozialer Arbeit. Potentiale und Grenzen der Evidenzbasierung für Profession und Disziplin [Impact of social work. Potentials and limitations of evidence-based practice for profession and discipline] (pp. 143–160). Opladen, Germany: Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Jenson, J. M. (2005). Connecting science to intervention: Advances, challenges, and the promise of evidence-based practice. Social Work Research, 29, 131–135. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42659593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenson, J. M. (2007). Evidence-based practice and the reform of social work education: A response to Gambrill and Howard and Allen-Meares. Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 569–573. doi:10.1177/1049731507300236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, R. (2005). Analysing discourse. An approach from the sociology of knowledge. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 6. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/19/41
   Google Scholar
• Kindler, H. (2005). Evidenzbasierte Diagnostik in der Sozialen Arbeit [Evidence-based diagnosis in social work]. Neue Praxis, 35, 540–545.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, S. A., & Reid, W. J. (2002). Science and social work: A critical appraisal. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). Manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford, England: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2015). An automatic method for extracting citations from Google Books. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66, 309–320. doi:10.1002/asi.23170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreisberg, N., & Marsh, J. C. (2016). Social work knowledge production and utilisation: An international comparison. British Journal of Social Work, 46, 599–618. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcu147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambers, H. (2012). Theorien Sozialer Arbeit: Ein Überblick und Vergleich [Social work theories: An overview and comparison]. Stuttgart, Germany: UTB.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. (2007). Should co-occurrence data be normalized? A rejoinder. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 2411–2413. doi:10.1002/asi.20691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., & Milojevic S. (2015). Scientometrics. In M. Lynch (Ed.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (pp. 322–327). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.85030-8
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., & Vaughan, L. (2006). Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: Extending ACA to the web environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 1616–1628. doi:10.1002/asi.20335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligon, J., Thyer, B. A., & Cobb, A. (2012). Academic affilitations of social work journal article authors. Journal of Social Work Education, 48, 613–622. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2012.201000150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey, D., & Kirk, S. A. (1992). The role of social work journals in the development of a knowledge base for the profession. Social Service Review, 66, 295–310. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/30012167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Rousseau, R. (2010). Knowledge diffusion through publications and citations: A case study using ESI-fields as unit of diffusion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 340–351. doi:10.1002/asi.21248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhofer, J., & Floersch, J. (2012). The coming crisis in social work: Some thoughts on social work and science. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 499–519. doi:10.1177/1049731512445509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macgowan, M. J. (2006). Evidence-based group work: A framework for advancing best practice. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 3, 1–21. doi:10.1300/J394v03n01_01
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. C. (2004). Theory-driven versus theory-free research in empirical social work practice. In H. E. Briggs & T. L. Rzepnicki (Eds.), Using evidence in social work practice: Behavioral perspectives (pp. 20–35). Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. C. (2012). Response: From fish and bicycles to a science of social work. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 465–467. doi:10.1177/1049731512441837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, M. A., Cobo, M. J., Herrera, M., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015). Analyzing the scientific evolution of social work using science mapping. Research on Social Work Practice, 25, 257–277. doi:10.1177/1049731514522101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeece, C. A., & Thyer, B. A. (2004). Evidence-based practice and social work. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 1, 7–25. doi:10.1300/J394v01n01_02
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNeill, T. (2006). Evidence-based practice in an age of relativism: Toward a model for practice. Social Work, 51, 147–156. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23721279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T. (2010). Netzwerkgesellschaft und Systemtheorie. Systemische Soziale Arbeit, 1, 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, E. J. (2016). Reconsidering the ‘idea’ of evidence in evidence-based policy and practice. European Journal of Social Work, 19, 310–335. doi:10.1080/13691457.2015.1022716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, E. J., Bledsoe, S. E., & Bellamy, J. L. (2008). Implementing evidence-based social work practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 18, 325–338. doi:10.1177/1049731506297827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers. (1996). Code of ethics. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/pubs/code/default.asp
   Google Scholar
• Noyons, E. C. (1999). Bibliometric mapping as a science policy and research management tool. Leiden, Netherlands: DSWO Press. Retrieved from https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/38308/noyons_1999.pdf?sequence=3
   Google Scholar
• Oevermann, U. (1996). Theoretische Skizze einer revidierten Theorie professionalisierten Handelns [Theoretical sketch of a revised theory of professional action]. In A. Combe & W. Helsper (Eds.), Pädagogische Professionalität: Untersuchungen zum Typus pädagogischen Handelns [Pedagogical professionality: Investigations of the pedagogical action type] (2nd ed., pp. 70–182). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Okpych, N. J., & Yu, J. L.-H. (2014). A historical analysis of evidence-based practice in social work: The unfinished journey toward an empirically grounded profession. Social Service Review, 88, 3–58. doi:10.1086/674969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., & Skvoretz, J. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks, 32(3), 245–251. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, H.-U. (2007). Zum aktuellen Diskurs um Ergebnisse und Wirkungen im Feld der Sozialpädagogik und Sozialarbeit—Literaturvergleich nationaler und internationaler Diskussion [About the current discourse about results and impact in the field of social pedagogy and social work—Literature review about the national and international discussions]. Berlin, Germany: Selbstverl.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, H.-U., Polutta, A., & Ziegler, H. (2009). Reflexive professionalism as a second generation of evidence-based practice: Some considerations on the special issue “What Works? Modernizing the Knowledge-Base of Social Work.” Research on Social Work Practice, 19, 472–478. doi:10.1177/1049731509333200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, H.-U., Polutta, A., & Ziegler, H. (2010). Zum Diskurs um evidenzbasierte Soziale Arbeit [About the discourse about evidence-based practice]. In H. U. Otto, A. Polutta, & H. Ziegler (Eds.), What Works—Welches Wissen braucht die Soziale Arbeit? Zum Konzept evidenzbasierter Praxis [What works—Which knowledge does social work need? About the concept of evidence-based practice] (pp. 7–28). Opladen, Germany: Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, H.-U., & Ziegler, H. (2006). Managerielle Wirkungsorientierung und der demokratische Nutzwert professioneller Sozialer Arbeit [Managerial impact orientation and the democratic utilizable value of professional social work]. In T. Badawia, H. Luckas, & H. Müller (Eds.), Das Soziale gestalten [Design the social] (pp. 96–112). Wiesbaden, Germany: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2002). Evidence-based policy: In search of a method. Evaluation, 8, 157–181. doi:10.1177/1358902002008002512
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London, England: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Perron, B. E., Victor, B. G., Hodge, D. R., Salas-Wright, C. P., Vaughn, M. G., & Taylor, R. J. (2016). Laying the foundations for scientometric research: A data science approach. Research on Social Work Practice. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1049731515624966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, H. P. F., Braam, R. R., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1995). Cognitive resemblance and citation relations in chemical engineering publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46, 9–21. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199501)46:1<9::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2003). Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: Horses for courses. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 57, 527–529. doi:10.1136/jech.57.7.527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, E. K., & Rosen, A. (2003). The structure and function of social work practice guidelines. In A. Rosen & E. K. Proctor (Eds.), Developing practice guidelines for social work interventions: Issues, methods, and research agenda (pp. 108–127). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, W. J. (1994). The empirical practice movement. Social Service Review, 68, 165–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, A., & Proctor, E. K. (Eds.). (2003). Developing practice guidelines for social work interventions: Issues, methods, and research agenda. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. (2015). Efforts to bridge the gap between research and practice in social work: Precedents and prospects: Keynote address at the bridging the gap symposium. Research on Social Work Practice, 25, 408–414. doi:10.1177/1049731514535852
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (2005). Research methods for social work (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, A., & Parrish, D. (2006). Views of evidence-based practice among faculty in master of social work programs: A national survey. Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 110–122. doi:10.1177/1049731506293059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312(7023), 71–72. doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett, D. L., Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, B. R. (1997). Evidence‐based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. London, England: Churchill Livingston.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett, D. L., Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, B. R. (2000). Evidence‐based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM (2nd ed.). London, England: Churchill Livingston.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. (2006). Auf dem Weg zur evidenzbasierten Sozialen Arbeit. Ein Impuls zu mehr und zu anderer Fachlichkeit [On the way to an evidence-based social work. An impulse to more and another professionality]. Blätter der Wohlfahrtspflege, 159, 99–103.
   Google Scholar
• Schrödter, M. (2005). Will the dodo bird also be hunting social work? In P. Sommerfeld & P. Herzog (Eds.), Evidence-based social work—Towards a new professionalism? (pp. 53–60). Bern, Switzerland: Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2013). Social network analysis: A handbook (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I. (2014). A science of social work? Response to John Brekke. Research on Social Work Practice, 24, 524–526. doi:10.1177/1049731514543408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, I. (2016). Science and social work: A sketch. European Journal of Social Work, 19, 336–353. doi:10.1080/13691457.2015.1074552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, B., & Chilvers, R. (2004). Evidence-based practice in England. In B. A. Thyer & M. A. F. Kazi (Eds.), International perspectives on evidence-based practice in social work (pp. 45–80). Birmingham, England: Venture Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R. M., & Borner, K. (2004). Mapping knowledge domains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(Suppl 1), 5183–5185. doi:10.1073/pnas.0307852100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shlonsky, A., & Gibbs, L. (2004). Will the real evidence-based practice please stand up? Teaching the process of evidence-based practice to the helping professions. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 4, 137–153. doi:10.1093/brief-treatment/mhh011
   Google Scholar
• Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 799–813. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:9<799::AID-ASI9>3.0.CO;2-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommerfeld, P. (2014). Social work as an action science: A perspective from Europe. Research on Social Work Practice, 24, 586–600. doi:10.1177/1049731514538523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommerfeld, P. (2016). Evidenzbasierung als ein Beitrag zum Aufbau eines professionellen Wissenskorpus in der Sozialen Arbeit [Evidence-based practice as a contribution to develop a professional knowledge corpus in social work]. In S. Borrmann & B. Thiessen (Eds.), Wirkungen Sozialer Arbeit. Potentiale und Grenzen der Evidenzbasierung für Profession und Disziplin [Impact of social work. Potentials and limitations of evidence-based practice for profession and discipline] (pp. 21–41). Opladen, Germany: Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Staub-Bernasconi, S. (2013). Der Professionalisierungsdiskurs zur Sozialen Arbeit (SA/SP) im deutschsprachigen Kontext im Spiegel internationaler Ausbildungsstandards [The professionalization discourse in social work in the German context in relation to the international education standards]. In R. Becker-Lenz (Ed.), Professionalität in der Sozialen Arbeit. Standpunkte, Kontroversen, Perspektiven [Professionality in social work. Standpoints, controversies, perspectives] (3rd ed., pp. 23–48). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Straus, S. E., & McAlister, F. A. (2000). Evidence-based medicine: A commentary on common criticisms. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 163, 837–841. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC80509/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Glasziou, P., & Haynes, R. B. (Eds.). (2005). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Churchill Livingston.
   Google Scholar
• Sundell, K., Soydan, H., Tengvald, K., & Anttila, S. (2010). From opinion-based to evidence-based social work: The Swedish case. Research on Social Work Practice, 20, 714–722. doi:10.1177/1049731509347887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 27–43. doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thyer, B. A. (2013). Evidence-based practice or evidence-guided practice: A rose by any other name would smell as sweet. Families in Society, 94, 79–84. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.4283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thyer, B. A. (2015). Preparing current and future practitioners to integrate research in real practice settings. Research on Social Work Practice, 25, 463–472. doi:10.1177/1049731514538105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2005). Towards knowledge societies. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001418/141843e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2014). Building inclusive knowledge societies. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002264/226425e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Valente, T. W., Coronges, K., Lakon, C., & Costenbader, E. (2008). How correlated are network centrality measures? Connections, 28, 16–26. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875682/
   Google Scholar
• Välimaa, J., & Hoffman, D. (2008). Knowledge society discourse and higher education. Higher Education, 56, 265–285. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9123-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, M. L., Gingras, Y., & Duhon, R. (2009). A new approach for detecting scientific specialties from raw cocitation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 240–246. doi:10.1002/asi.20987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2007). Some comments on the question whether co-occurrence data should be normalized. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 1701–1703. doi:10.1002/asi.20647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, S. A. (2001). Some considerations on the validity of evidence-based practice in social work. British Journal of Social Work, 31, 57–79. doi:10.1093/bjsw/31.1.57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32, 163–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, E. (2014). Finding knowledge paths among scientific disciplines. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65, 2331–2347. doi:10.1002/asi.23106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2009). Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 2107–2118. doi:10.1002/asi.v60:10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, H. (2003). Diagnose, Macht, Wissen und “What Works?”—Die Kunst dermaßen zu regieren [Diagnosis, power, knowledge and “what works?”—The art to govern insomuch]. Widersprüche, 23, 101–115.
   Google Scholar