The status of research ethics in social work

References

• Agarwal, A., Durairajanayagam, D., Tatagari, S., Estevas, S. C., Harlev, A., Henkel, R., … Bashiri, A. (2016). Bibliometrics: Tracking research impact by selecting appropriate metrics. Asian Journal of Andrology, 18, 296–309. doi:10.4103/1008-682X.171582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. S., Martinson, B. C., & De Vries, R. (2007). Normative dissonance in science: Results from a national survey of U.S. scientists. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2, 3–14. doi:10.1525/jer.2007.2.4.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. S., Shaw, M. A., Steneck, N. H., Konkle, E., & Kamata, T. (2013). Higher education: Handbook of theory and research. M. B. In Paulson (Ed.), (Vol. 28, pp. 217–262). Berlin, Germany: Springer Science + Business.
   Google Scholar
• Antes, A. L., Wang, X., Mumford, M. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., & Devenport, L. D. (2010). Evaluating the effects that existing instruction on responsible conduct of research has on ethical decision making. Academic Medicine, 85, 519–526. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181cd1cc5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badger, L., Black, P., Brewer, L., Clark, J., Essex, E., Gelman, S., . R., … Shore, N. (2006). National statement on research integrity in social work. Council on Social Work Education. Retrieved from https://www.cswe.org/Research-Statistics/Responsible-Conduct-of-Research/National-Statement-on-Research-Integrity-in-Social
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, M. A. (2008). Harming through protection? New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 768–769. doi:10.1056/NEJMp0800372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekelman, J. E., Li, Y., & Gross, C. P. (2003). Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 454–465. doi:10.1001/jama.289.4.454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin, S. (2010). Why cognitive therapy needs social work. In W. Borden (Ed.), Reshaping theory in contemporary social work: Toward a critical pluralism in clinical practice (pp. 34–47). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blee, K. M., & Currier, A. (2011). Ethics beyond the IRB: An introductory essay. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 401–413. doi:10.1007/s11133-011-9195-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouter, L. M., Tijdink, J., Axelsen, N., Martinson, B. C., & Ter Riet, G. (2016). Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: Results from a survey among participants of four world conferences on research integrity. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1, 17. doi:10.1186/s41073-016-0024-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun, M., & Roussos, A. J. (2012). Psychotherapy researchers: Reported misbehaviors and opinions. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7, 25–29. doi:10.1525/jer.2012.7.5.25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, D. R., & Miller, F. G. (2006). A public health perspective on research ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32, 729–733. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.015891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarivate Analytics (date of publication unknown). It’s time to get the facts. Retrieved from http://images.info.science.thomsonreuters.biz/Web/ThomsonReutersScience/%7bd6b7faae-3cc2-4186-8985-a6ecc8cce1ee%7d_Crv_WoS_Upsell_Factbook_A4_FA_LR_edits.pdf?product=web-of-science&_ga=1.32852222.1746037467.1493220190
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. J. (2009). Why social work practitioners need research ethics knowledge. Social Work, 54, 5–7. doi:10.1093/sw/54.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. J. (2016). Social work ethics: Decision making & accountability. Brockton, MA: Western Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. J., & Walker, R. (2011). Research ethics in victimization studies: Widening the Lens. Violence Against Women, 17, 1489–1508. doi:10.1177/1077801211436167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, C. H., & Bouesseau, M. C. (2008). How do we know the research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcome assessment in research ethics review. BMC Medical Ethics, 9, 6. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-9-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook, A. F., Hoas, H., & Joyner, J. C. (2013). The protector and the protected: What regulators and researchers can learn from IRB members and subjects. Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics, 3, 51–65. doi:10.1353/nib.2013.0014
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cottey, A. (2016). Reducing ethical hazards in knowledge production. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22, 367–389. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9651-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coughlin, S. S., Barker, A., & Dawson, A. (2012). Ethics and scientific integrity in public health, epidemiological and clinical research. Public Health Reviews, 34(1), 1–13. doi:10.1007/BF03391657
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Couzin-Frankel, J. (2015). University of Minnesota suspends psychiatric drug studies enrollment. Science. Retrieved from http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/03/university-minnesota-suspends-psychiatric-drug-studies-enrollment
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, R., Anderson, M. A., & Martinson, B. C. (2006). Normal misbehavior: Scientists talk about the ethics of research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1, 43–50. doi:10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wet, K. (2010). The importance of ethical appraisal in social science research: Reviewing a faculty of humanities’ research ethics committee. Journal of Academic Ethics, 8, 301–314. doi:10.1007/s10805-010-9118-8
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Human Services. (2009). Code of federal regulations. Title 45: public welfare. Part 46: Protection of human subjects. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html
   Google Scholar
• Dwan, K., Altman, D. G., Arnaiz, J. A., Bloom, J., Chan, A. W., Cronin, E., … Williamson, P. R. (2008). Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoSONE, 3(8), e3081. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., & Mauther, M. (2002). Ethics and feminist research: Theory and practice. In M. Mauthner, M. Birch, J. Jessop, & T. Miller (eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 14–31). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, C. (2015). University of Minnesota blasted for deadly clinical trial. Mother Jones. Retrieved from http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2015/04/dan-markingson-university-minnesota-clinical-trials-astrazeneca
   Google Scholar
• Emanuel, E. J., Grady, C., Crouch, R. A., Lie, R. K., Miller, F. G., & Wendler, D. (2008). The oxford textbook of clinical research ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PloSONE, 4(5), e5738. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 17028–17033. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212247109
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A., & Master, Z. (2016). Multisite research ethics review: Problems and potential solutions. Bioethique Online, 5/7. Retrieved from http://www.bioethiqueonline.ca/5/7/
   Google Scholar
• Heitman, E., Olsen, C. H., Anestidou, L., & Bulger, R. E. (2007). New graduate students’ baseline knowledge of the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82, 838–845. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfand, B. T., Mongiu, A. K., Roehrborn, C. G., Donnell, R. F., Bruskewitz, R., Kaplan, S. A., … McVary, K. T. (2009). Variation in institutional review board (IRB) responses to a standard protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled surgical trial. Journal of Urology, 181, 2674–2679. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirshon, J. M., Krugman, S. D., Witting, M. D., Furuno, J. P., Limcangco, M. R., Perisse, A. R., & Rasch, E. K. (2002). Variability in institutional review board assessment of minimal-risk research. Academic Emergency Medicine, 9, 1417–1420. doi:10.1197/aemj.9.121417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, D. R., Lacasse, J. R., & Benson, O. (2011). Influential publications in social work discourse: The 100 most highly cited articles in disciplinary Journals: 2000-09. British Journal of Social Work, 42, 765–782. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M. O., McMillen, C. J., & Pollio, D. E. (2003). Teaching evidence-based practice: Toward a new paradigm for social work education. Research on Social Work Practice, 13, 234–259. doi:10.1177/1049731502250404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israel, M. (2015). Research ethics and integrity for social scientists (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Januszewski, A., Nichols, R., & Yeamen, A. R. J. (2000). Philosophy, methodology, and research ethics. TechTrends, 45, 24–27. doi:10.1007/BF02763485
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, J. P. (2001). Moving from compliance to conscience. What we can and should improve on in the ethics of clinical research. Archives of Internal Medicine, 161, 925–928. doi:10.1001/archinte.161.7.925
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kimberly, M. B., Hoehn, S., Feudtner, C., Nelson, R. M., & Schreiner, M. (2006). Variations in standards of research compensation and child assent practices: A comparison of 69 institutional review board-approved informed permission and assent forms for 3 multicenter pediatric trials. Pediatrics, 117, 1706–1711. doi:10.1542/peds.2002-1233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacasse, J. R., & Leo, J. (2010). Ghostwriting at elite academic medical centers in the United States. PLOS Medicine, 7(2), e10000230. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievrouw, L. A. (1989). The invisible college reconsidered: Bibliometrics and the development of scientific communication theory. Communication Research, 16, 615–628. doi:10.1177/009365089016005004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lifton, R. J. (1988). The Nazi doctors: Medical killing and the psychology of genocide. New York City, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbach, J., Acholonu, U., Clark, S., & Camargo, C. A. (2007). Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard, observational, pediatric research protocol. Academic Emergency Medicine, 14, 377–380. doi:10.1197/j.aem.2006.11.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeece, C. A., & Thyer, B. A. (2004). Evidence-based practice and social work. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 1, 7–25. doi:10.1300/J394v01n01_02
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McSkimming, M. J., Sever, B., & King, R. S. (2000). The coverage of ethics in research methods textbooks. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 11, 51–63. doi:10.1080/10511250000084751
   Google Scholar
• NASW. (2017). Code of ethics of the national association of social workers. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=ms_ArtLqzeI%3d&portalid=0
   Google Scholar
• The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1978). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC, USA: Department of Health, Education and Welfare; DHEW Publications OS78-0012. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, S. G., Hayes, T. P., Brehaut, J. C., McDonald, M., Weijer, C., Sagniur, R., & Fergusson, D. (2015). A scoping review of empirical research relating to quality and effectiveness of research ethics review. PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0133639. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendlebury, D. A. (2009). The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators. Archivum Immunologiae De Therapiae Experimentalis, 57, 1–11. doi:10.1007/s00005-009-0008-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ProQuest (n.d.). Who we are. Retrieved from http://www.proquest.com/about/who-we-are.html
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. (2010). Rethinking research ethics. The American Journal of Bioethics, 5, 7–28. doi:10.1080/15265160590900678
   Google Scholar
• Schrag, B. (2005). Teaching research ethics: Can web-based instruction satisfy appropriate pedagogical objectives? Science and Engineering Ethics, 11, 347–366. doi:10.1007/s11948-005-0004-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seife, C. (2015). Research misconduct identified by the US Food And Drug Administration: Out of sight, out of mind, out of the peer-reviewed literature. Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine, 175, 567–577. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7774
   Google Scholar
• Shadbolt, N., Brody, T., Carr, L., & Harnard, S. (2006). The open research web: A preview of the optimal and the inevitable. In N. Jacobs (Ed.), Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects, Chapter 21. Oxford, UK: Chandos Publishing. Retrieved from https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/262453/
   Google Scholar
• Shah, S., Whittle, A., Wilfond, B., Gensler, G., & Wendler, D. (2004). How do institutional review boards apply the federal risk and benefit standards for pediatric research? Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 476–482. doi:10.1001/jama.291.4.476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieber, J. E. (2004). Empirical research on research ethics. Ethics & Behavior, 14, 397–412. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1404_9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikes, P. (2013). Working together for critical research ethics. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 43, 516–536. doi:10.1080/03057925.2013.797765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silberman, G., & Kahn, K. L. (2011). Burdens on research imposed by institutional review boards: The state of evidence and its implications for regulatory reform. Milbank Quarterly, 89, 599–627. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00644.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, H., Hull, S. C., & Sugarman, J. (2001). Variability among institutional review boards’ decisions within the context of a multicenter trial. Critical Care Medicine, 29, 235–241. pmid: 11246299 doi: 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smalley, J. B., Merritt, M. W., Al-Khatib, S. M., McCall, D., Staman, K. L., & Stepnowsky, C. (2015). Ethical responsibilities toward indirect and collateral participants in pragmatic clinical trials. Clinical Trials, 12, 476–484. doi:10.1177/1740774515597698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C., Butler, L., & Kingsley, D. (2006). The publishing imperative: The pervasive influence of publication metrics. Learned Publishing, 19, 277–290. doi:10.1155/2012/490647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, A. M., Casadevall, A., Steen, R. G., & Fang, F. C. (2014). Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications. eLife, 3, 1–10. doi:10.7554/eLife.02956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, J. (2014). UMN: How many deaths have occurred during your clinical trials? Scientific American. Retrieved from https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/molecules-to-medicine/umn-how-many-deaths-have-occurred-during-your-clinical-trials/
   Google Scholar
• Velasquez, M., Moberg, D., Meyer, M. J., Shanks, T., McLean, M. R., DeCosse, D., … Hanson, K. O. (2009).( date of publication unknown). A Framework for Thinking Ethically. Retrieved from https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/a-framework-for-ethical-decision-making/
   Google Scholar
• Vernon, R., Pittman-Munke, P., Vakalahi, H., Adkins, L. F., & Pierce, D. (2009). Distance education programs in social work: Current and emerging trends. Journal of Social Work Education, 45, 263–279. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2009.200700081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weijer, C., & Emanuel, E. J. (2000). Protecting communities in biomedical research. Science, 289, 1142–1144. doi:10.1126/science.289.5482.1142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittle, A., Shah, S., Wilfond, B., Gensler, G., & Wendler, D. (2004). Institutional review board practices regarding assent in pediatric research. Pediatrics, 113, 1747–1752. doi:10.1542/peds.113.6.1747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar