References

• Fjeldså J, Bowie RCK, Rahbek C. The role of mountain ranges in the diversification of birds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2012;43:249–265.10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadena CD, Klicka J, Ricklefs RE. Evolutionary differentiation in the Neotropical montane region: molecular phylogenetics and phylogeography of Buarremon brush-finches (Aves, Emberizidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007;44:993–1016.10.1016/j.ympev.2006.12.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonaccorso E. Historical biogeography and speciation in the Neotropical highlands: molecular phylogenetics of the jay genus Cyanolyca. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009;50:618–632.10.1016/j.ympev.2008.12.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winger BM, Bates JM. The tempo of trait divergence in geographic isolation: avian speciation across the Marañon valley of Peru: tempo of avian speciation across the Marañon. Evolution. 2015;69:772–787.10.1111/evo.2015.69.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves GR. Linearity of geographic range and its possible effect on the population structure of Andean birds. The Auk. 1988;105:47–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir JT. Implications of genetic differentiation in Neotropical montane forest birds. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 2009;96:410–433.10.3417/2008011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuchmann K, Del Hoyo J. Family Trochilidae (Hummingbirds). Handb. Birds World. 1999;5:468–680.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgely R, Greenfield P. The birds of ecuador: status, distribution, and taxonomy, Vol. 1. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Fjeldså J, Krabbe N. Birds of the High Andes. Svendborg: Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen and Apollo Books; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace AR. Island life : or, the phenomena and causes of insular faunas and floras, including a revision and attempted solution of the problem of geological climates [Internet]. 3rd and rev. ed. London : Macmillan; 1911. Available from: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/52127.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Crespo FI, Bleiweiss R. The northern limit of the hummingbird genus Oreotrochilus in South America. The Auk. 1982;2:376–378.
   Google Scholar
• Lönnberg E, Rendahl H. A contribution to the ornithology of Ecuador. Ark. För Zool. Stockh. 1922;14:1–87.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer W. Geología del Ecuador [Geology of Ecuador]. Quito: Ministerio de Educación; 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Woods S, Ortiz-Crespo F, Ramsay PM. Presence of giant hummingbird Patagona gigas and Ecuadorian Hillstar Oreotrochilus chimborazo jamesoni at the Ecuador-Colombia border. Cotinga. 1998;10:37–40.
   Google Scholar
• Smith GTC. A high altitude hummingbird on the Volcano Cotopaxi. Ibis. 1969;111:17–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solano-Ugalde A. High in the Andes: colonial nesting of Ecuadorian Hillstar (Oreotrochilus chimborazo: trochilidae) under a bridge. Ornitol. Colomb. 2008;6:86–88.
   Google Scholar
• Vuilleumier F. On the occurrence and identity of Oreotrochilus Chimborazo at the Guamani Pass. Ecuador. Ibis. 1976;118:425–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benítez V, Sánchez D, Larrea M. Evaluación ecológica rápida de la avifauna en el Parque Nacional Llanganates: un reporte de las evaluaciones ecológicas y socioeconómicas rápidas [Rapid environmental assessment of the avifauna of Llanganates National Park]. Quito: EcoCiencia Ministerio del Ambiente, Herbario Nacional de Ecuador, Museo de Ecuatoriano de Ciencias Naturales, Instituto Internacional de Reconstrucción Rural; 2000. p. 67–107.
   Google Scholar
• Beltrán K, Salgado S, Cuesta F, et al. Distribución espacial, sistemas ecológicos y caracterización florística de los páramos en el Ecuador [Spatial distribution, ecological systems and floristic characterization of the paramos of Ecuador]. Quito: EcoCiencia; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Ahlman R. Ecuadorian Hillstar by Roger Ahlman [Internet]. PBase- Roger Ahlman- Ecuadorian Hillstar; 2011 [cited 2015 Jun 7]. Available from: http://www.pbase.com/ahlman/image/134844820
   Google Scholar
• Gavrilets S. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species (MPB-41). Princeton: University Press Princeton; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Price T, 1953-. Speciation in birds. 2008 [cited 2014 Dec 23]. Available from: http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201300125044.
   Google Scholar
• Chesser RT. Evolution in the high Andes: the phylogenetics of Muscisaxicola ground-tyrants. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2000;15:369–380.10.1006/mpev.1999.0774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves JA, Weir JT, Smith TB. Diversification in Adelomyia hummingbirds follows Andean uplift. Mol. Ecol. 2011;20:4564–4576.10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05304.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanín C, Cadena CD, Maley JM, et al. Paraphyly of Cinclodes fuscus (Aves: Passeriformes: Furnariidae): implications for taxonomy and biogeography. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009;53:547–555.10.1016/j.ympev.2009.06.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheindt FE, Cuervo AM, Brumfield RT. Rampant polyphyly indicates cryptic diversity in a clade of Neotropical flycatchers (Aves: Tyrannidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2013;108:889–900.10.1111/bij.2013.108.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mata H, Fontana CS, Maurício GN, et al. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the eastern Tapaculos (Aves: Rhinocryptidae: Scytalopus, Eleoscytalopus): cryptic diversification in Brazilian Atlantic forest. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009;53:450–462.10.1016/j.ympev.2009.07.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes AM, Gonzalez J, Wink M, et al. Multilocus phylogeography of the wedge-billed woodcreeper Glyphorynchus spirurus (Aves, Furnariidae) in lowland Amazonia: widespread cryptic diversity and paraphyly reveal a complex diversification pattern. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013;66:270–282.10.1016/j.ympev.2012.09.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins MB, Stiles FG. A new species of Pygmy-Owl (Strigidae: Glaucidium) from the Pacific Slope of the Northern Andes. The Auk. 1999;116:305–315.10.2307/4089365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krabbe N. Arid valleys as dispersal barriers to high-Andean forest birds in Ecuador. Cotinga. 2008;29:28–30.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire JA, Witt CC, Remsen JV, et al. Molecular phylogenetics and the diversification of hummingbirds. Curr. Biol. 2014;24:910–916.10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire JA, Witt CC, Altshuler DL, et al. Phylogenetic systematics and biogeography of hummingbirds: bayesian and maximum likelihood analyses of partitioned data and selection of an appropriate partitioning strategy. Syst. Biol. 2007;56:837–856.10.1080/10635150701656360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, et al. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers. Distrib. 2011;17:43–57.10.1111/ddi.2010.17.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips SJ, Dudík M. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography. 2008;31:161–175.10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• eBird. eBird: an online database of bird distribution and abundance [Internet]. eBird; 2015. Available from: http://www.ebird.org
   Google Scholar
• Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, et al. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 2005;25:1965–1978.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barve N, Barve V, Jiménez-Valverde A, et al. The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecol. Model. 2011;222:1810–1819.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW, Chipman JW. Remote sensing and image interpretation. New York (NY): Wiley; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Myneni R, Hoffman S, Knyazikhin Y, et al. Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2002;83:214–231.10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00074-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buermann W, Saatchi S, Smith TB, et al. Predicting species distributions across the Amazonian and Andean regions using remote sensing data. J. Biogeogr. 2008;35:1160–1176.10.1111/jbi.2008.35.issue-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson RG, Raxworthy CJ, Nakamura M. Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. J. Biogeogr. 2007;34:102–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson AT, Papeş M, Soberón J. Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling. Ecol. Model. 2008;213:63–72.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomczynski P. A reagent for the single-step simultaneous isolation of RNA, DNA and proteins from cell and tissue samples. BioTechniques. 1993;15:536–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorenson MD, Ast JC, Dimcheff DE, et al. Primers for a PCR-based approach to mitochondrial genome sequencing in birds and other vertebrates. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1999;12:105–114.10.1006/mpev.1998.0602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball RT, Braun EL, Barker FK, et al. A well-tested set of primers to amplify regions spread across the avian genome. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009;50:654–660.10.1016/j.ympev.2008.11.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arèvalo E, Davis SK, Sites JW. Mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence and phylogenetic relationships among eight chromosome races of the Sceloporus grammicus complex (phrynosomatidae) in central Mexico. Syst. Biol. 1994;43:387–418.10.1093/sysbio/43.3.387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, et al. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4876–4882.10.1093/nar/25.24.4876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1451–1452.10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 2000;9:1657–1659.10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altshuler DL, Dudley R, McGuire JA. Resolution of a paradox: hummingbird flight at high elevation does not come without a cost. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004;101:17731–17736.10.1073/pnas.0405260101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchman JJ, Witt CC, McGuire JA, et al. DNA from a 100-year-old holotype confirms the validity of a potentially extinct hummingbird species. Biol. Lett. 2009;rsbl20090545. Available from: http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/roybiolett/early/2009/09/17/rsbl.2009.0545.full.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwickl DJ. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion [Internet] [Ph. D. dissertation]. The University of Texas at Austin; 2006. Available from: http://garli.googlecode.com
   Google Scholar
• Lewis PO, Holder MT, Swofford DL. Phycas: software for bayesian phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 2015;64:525–531.10.1093/sysbio/syu132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SYW, et al. Partitionfinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012;29:1695–1701.10.1093/molbev/mss020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 1981;17:368–376.10.1007/BF01734359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura M. Estimation of evolutionary distances between homologous nucleotide sequences. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1981;78:454–458.10.1073/pnas.78.1.454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 1985;22:160–174.10.1007/BF02101694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddison WP, Maddison DR. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://mesquiteproject.org
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2014. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics. 1992;131:479–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinforma. Online. 2007;1:47–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck JP, Rannala B. Frequentist properties of Bayesian posterior probabilities of phylogenetic trees under simple and complex substitution models. Syst. Biol. 2004;53:904–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklenář P, Lægaard S. Rain-shadow in the high Andes of Ecuador evidenced by páramo vegetation. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 2003;35:8–17.10.1657/1523-0430(2003)035[0008:RSITHA]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laegaard S. Influence of fire in the grass páramo vegetation of Ecuador. In: Balslev H and Luteyn JL, editors. Páramo: An Andean Ecosystem Under Human Influence. London: Academic Press; 1992. p. 151–170.
   Google Scholar
• Lauer W, Rafiqpoor MD, Theisen I. Physiographie, Vegetation und Syntaxonomie der Flora des Páramo de Papallacta (Ostkordillere Ecuador) [Physiography, vegetation and syntaxonomy of the flora of Paramo de Papallacta (Eastern Cordillera Ecuador)]. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag Wiesbaden GMBH; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Podwojewski P, Poulenard J, Zambrana T, et al. Overgrazing effects on vegetation cover and properties of volcanic ash soil in the páramo of Llangahua and La Esperanza (Tungurahua, Ecuador). Soil Use Manag. 2002;18:45–55.10.1079/SUM2002100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano P, Cleef AM, Bussmann RW. Phytogeography of the vascular páramo flora of Podocarpus National Park, south Ecuador. Arnaldoa. 2009;16:69–85.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Hammen T, Cleef A. Development of the high Andean páramo flora and vegetation. In: Vuilleumier F, Monasterio FM, editors. High altitude tropical biogeography. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1986. p. 153–201.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Hammen T. The pleistocene changes of vegetation and climate in tropical South America. J. Biogeogr. 1974;1:3–26.10.2307/3038066
   Google Scholar
• Hooghiemstra H, Wijninga VM, Cleef AM. The paleobotanical record of Colombia: implications for biogeography and biodiversity. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 2006;93:297–325.10.3417/0026-6493(2006)93[297:TPROCI]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleiweiss R. Slow rate of molecular evolution in high-elevation hummingbirds. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 1998;95:612–616.10.1073/pnas.95.2.612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zink RM. The role of subspecies in obscuring avian biological diversity and misleading conservation policy. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2004;271:561–564.10.1098/rspb.2003.2617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillimore AB, Owens IP. Are subspecies useful in evolutionary and conservation biology? Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2006;273:1049–1053.10.1098/rspb.2005.3425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petren K, Grant BR, Grant PR. A phylogeny of Darwin’s finches based on microsatellite DNA length variation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1999;266:321–329.10.1098/rspb.1999.0641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson RS. Los Coleópteros Carabidae del páramo en los Andes del Ecuador: sistemática, ecología y biogeografía [The coleopteran Carabidae of paramo in the Andes of Ecuador: systematics, ecology, and biogeography]. Coleopt. Bull. 2007;61:176–176.10.1649/0010-065X(2007)61[176:LCCDPE]2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar