The gastromyzophorous tadpoles of Atelopus elegans and A. palmatus (Anura: Bufonidae), with comments on oral and suction structures

References

• Frost DR. Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. Version 6.0. New York, USA: American Museum of Natural History; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Tapia EE, Coloma LA, Pazmiño-Otamendi G, et al. Rediscovery of the nearly extinct longnose harlequin frog Atelopus longirostris (Bufonidae) in Junín, Imbabura, Ecuador. Neotrop Biodivers. 2017;3(1):157–167.
   Google Scholar
• La Marca E, Lips KR, Lötters S, et al. Catastrophic population declines and extinctions in neotropical harlequin frogs (Bufonidae: atelopus). Biotropica. 2005;37(2):190–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2019-2. 2019 [cited 2019, Oct 27]. Available from: http://www.iucnredlist.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Altig R, Johnston GF. Guilds of anuran larvae: relationships among developmental modes, morphologies, and habitats. Herpetol Monogr. 1989;3:81–109.
   Google Scholar
• Lötters S. The neotropical toad genus Atelopus. Checklist - Biology - Distribution. Köln, Germany: M. Vences & F. Glaw; 1996. p. 143.
   Google Scholar
• Coloma LA, Lötters S. The Tadpole of Atelopus balios (Anura: bufonidae) from the Pacific Lowlands of Ecuador. Herpetologica. 1996;52(1):66–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mijares-Urrutia A, La Marca E. Los renacuajos de cuatro especies de Atelopus (Anura: bufonidae) de los Andes de Venezuela. Croizatia. 2005;6(1–2):33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Rueda-Solano LA, Vargas-Salinas F, Rivera-Correa M. The highland tadpole of the harlequin frog Atelopus carrikeri (Anura: bufonidae) with an analysis of its microhabitat preference. Salamandra. 2015;51(1):25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duellman WE, Lynch JD. Descriptions of Atelopus tadpoles and their relevance to Atelopodid classification. Herpetologica. 1969;25(4):231–240.
   Google Scholar
• Gascon C. The tadpole of Atelopus pulcher Boulenger (Annura, Bufonidae) from Manaus, Amazonas. Rev Bras Zool. 1989;6(2):235–239.
   Google Scholar
• Mebs D. Zur Fortpflanzung von Atelopus cruciger (Amphibia: salientia: bufonidae). Salamandra. 1980;16(2):65–81.
   Google Scholar
• Lescure J. Contribution à l’étude des Amphibiens de Guyane française IX. Le têtard gastromyzophore d’ Atelopus flavescens DUMÉRIL et BIBRON (Anura, Bufonidae). Amphibia-Reptilia. 1981;2:209–215.
   Google Scholar
• Boistel R, Grosjean S, Lötters S. Tadpole of Atelopus franciscus from French Guyana, with Comments on Other Larvae of the Genus (Anura: bufonidae). J Herpetol. 2005;39(1):148–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawor A, Rauhaus A, Karbe D, et al. Is there a chance for conservation breeding? Ex situ management, reproduction, and early life stages of the Harlequin toad Atelopus flavescens Duméril & Bibron, 1841 (Amphibia: anura: bufonidae). Amphib Reptil Conserv. 2012;5(3):29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Acosta-Galvis A, Rueda-Almonacid J, Velásquez-Álvarez Á-A, et al. Descubrimiento de una nueva especie de Atelopus (Bufonidae) para Colombia:¿ Una luz de esperanza o el ocaso de los sapos Arlequines. Rev la Acad Colomb Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Nat. 2006;30:279–290.
   Google Scholar
• Gray P, Cannatella DC. A New Species of Atelopus (Anura, Bufonidae) from the Andes of Northern Perú. Copeia. 1985;4:910–917.
   Google Scholar
• Lötters S, Haas W, Schick S, et al. On the systematics of the harlequin frogs (Amphibia: bufonidae: atelopus) from Amazonia. II: redescription of Atelopus pulcher (Boulenger, 1882) from the eastern Andean versant in Peru. Salamandra. 2002;38(3):165–184.
   Google Scholar
• Enciso-Calle MP, Viuche-Lozano A, Anganoy-Criollo M, et al. Rediscovery of Atelopus subornatus Werner, 1899 (Anura: bufonidae), with a redescription of the tadpole. Zootaxa. 2017;4344(1):160–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavilla EO, de Sa RO. De la Riva I. Description of the tadpole of Atelopus tricolor. J Herpetol. 1997;31(1):121–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starrett P. Observations on the life history of frogs of the family atelopodidae. Herpetologica. 1967;23(3):195–204.
   Google Scholar
• Lindquist E, Hetherington TE. Tadpoles and juveniles of the panamanian golden frog, Atelopus zeteki (Bufonidae), with information on development of coloration and patterning. Herpetologica. 1998;54(3):370–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coloma LA, Lötters S, Salas AW. Taxonomy of the Atelopus ignescens complex (Anura: bufonidae): designation of a neotype of Atelopus ignescens and recognition of Atelopus exiguus. Herpetologica. 2000;56(3):303–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lötters S. Tadpole of Atelopus mindoensis Peters (Anura, Bufonidae) from Northwestern Ecuador. Copeia. 2001;1:276–278.
   Google Scholar
• Coloma LA. Two new species of Atelopus (Anura: bufonidae) from Ecuador. Herpetologica. 2002;58(2):229–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan M. Internal and external anatomy of the abdominal disc of Atelopus (Bufonidae) larvae. Caldasia. 1997;19(1–2):61–69.
   Google Scholar
• Yánez-Muñoz MH, Veintimilla DA, Smith EN, et al. Descubrimiento de dos poblaciones sobrevivientes de sapos arlequín (Amphibia: Bufonidae: Atelopus) en los Andes de Ecuador. ACI Av en Ciencias e Ing. 2010;2(3):2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Coloma LA, Quiguango-Ubillús A. Atelopus elegans. En: centro Jambatu. 2011–2019. Anfibios de Ecuador. Quito, Ecuador: Fundación Otonga; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour T. The Vertebrata of Gorgona Island, Colombia. Bull Museum Comp Zool. 1905;46:98–102.
   Google Scholar
• Coloma LA Morphology, systematics, and phylogenetic relationships among frogs of the genus Atelopus (Anura: bufonidae) [PhD Thesis]. University of Kansas; 1997, Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Coloma LA, Lötters S. Atelopus palmatus. En: centro Jambatu. 2011–2019. Anfibios de Ecuador. Quito, Ecuador: Fundación Otonga; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gosner KL. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica. 1960;16:183–190.
   Google Scholar
• McDiarmid RW, Altig R. In: McDiarmid RW, Altig R, editors. Tadpoles: the biology of anuran larvae (Body Plan: Development and Morphology). Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1999. p. 444.
   Google Scholar
• Echlin P. Handbook of sample preparation for scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis. Springer Science & Business Media. In: Handbook of sample preparation for scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis. Springer Science & Business Media; 2011, Springer Science & Business Media, 19, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Centro Jambatu. Anfibios de Ecuador (2011–2019). SapoPediaEcuador: Centro Jambatu de Investigación y Conservación de Anfibios; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• AmphibiaWeb. Berkeley, CA: University of California. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Lannoo MJ. Integration: nervous and sensory systems. In: Mcdiarmid RW, Altig R, editors. Tadpoles: the biology of anuran larvae. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1999. p. 149–169.
   Google Scholar
• Aguayo R, Lavilla E, Vera M, et al. Living in Fast-Flowing Water: morphology of the gastromyzophorous tadpole of the bufonid Rhinella quechua (R. veraguensis Group). J Morphol. 2009;270:1431–1442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arifin U, Smart U, Hertwig S, et al. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of a taxonomically unstable ranid from Sumatra, Indonesia, reveals a new genus with gastromyzophorous tadpoles and two new species. Zoosystematics Evol. 2018;94(1):163–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan L, Hertwig S, Das I, et al. The anatomy and structural connectivity of the abdominal sucker in the tadpoles of Huia cavitympanum, with comparisons to Meristogenys jerboa (Lissamphibia: anura: ranidae). J Zool Syst Evol Res. 2015;54(1):46–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditsche P, Summers A. Aquatic versus terrestrial attachment: water makes a difference. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2014;5:2424–2439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budney L, Hall B. Comparative morphology and osteology of pelvic fin-derived midline suckers in lumpfishes, snailfishes and gobies. J Appl Ichthyol. 2010;26:167–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maie T, Schoenfuss H, Blob R. Performance and scaling of a novel locomotor structure: adhesive capacity of climbing gobiid fishes. J Exp Biol. 2012;215:3925–3936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfuss H, Maie T, Kawano S, et al. Performance across extreme environments: comparing waterfall climbing among amphidromous gobioid fishes from Caribbean and Pacific Islands. Cybium. 2011;35(4):361–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covich A, Crowl T, Hein C, et al. Predator-prey interactions in river networks: comparing shrimp spatial refugia in two drainage basins. Freshw Biol. 2009;54:450–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blob R, Kawano S, Moody K, et al. Morphological selection and the evaluation of potential tradeoffs between escape from predators and the climbing of waterfalls in the Hawaiian stream goby Sicyopterus stimpsoni. Integr Comp Biol. 2010;50:1185–1199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvajal J, Maldonado J, Urbano A. Climbing behavior of Cordylancistrus sp. in the Colombian Andes. Univ Sci. 2015;20(2):209–215.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez González JL, Rada M., Vargas-Salinas F. et al. The tadpoles of two Atelopus species (Anura: Bufonidae) from the Sierra Nevada of Santa Marta, Colombia, and comments on relevant morphological characters in their Neotropical congeners. South Am J Herpetol. Accepted.
   Google Scholar