Guard cell sizes and ploidy levels in Polylepis (Rosaceae)

References

• Adams KL, Wendel JF. Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005;8(2):135–141. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2005.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao Y, Wickett NJ, Ayyampalayam S, et al. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature. 2011;473(7345):97. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wet JMJ. Polyploidy and evolution in plants. Taxon. 1971;20(1):29–35. Available from: www.jstor.org/stable/1218531
   Google Scholar
• Tate JA, Soltis DE, Soltis PS. Polyploidy in plants. In T. Ryan Gregory (Ed.), The evolution of the genome. Academic Press; 2005. p. 371–426. Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, London, UK. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012301463-4/50009-7
   Google Scholar
• Masterson J. Stomatal size in fossil plants:</L> evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms. Science. 1994;264(5157):421–424. Available from: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/264/5157/421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss-Schneeweiss H, Emadzade K, Jang TS, et al. Evolutionary consequences constraints and potential of polyploidy in plants. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2013;140(2–4):137–150. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1159/000351727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Schemske DW, et al. Autopolyploidy in angiosperms: have we grossly underestimated the number of species? Taxon. 2007;56(1):13–30. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25065732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitter G. Revision der Gattung Polylepis. Bot Jahb Syst. 1911;565–656.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson BB. A revision of the genus Polylepis (Rosaceae: sanguisorbae). Smithsonian Contrib Bot. 1979;43:1–62. .
   Google Scholar
• Kessler M, Schmidt-Lebuhn AN. Taxonomical and distributional notes on Polylepis (Rosaceae). Org Divers Evol. 2006;6:67–70. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ode.2005.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boza TE, Kessler M. A monograph of the genus Polylepis (Rosaceae). Phytokeys. in prep.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Lebuhn AN, Kessler M, Kumar M. Promiscuity in the Andes: species relationships <J>in polylepis (Rosaceae, Sanguisorbeae) based on AFLP and morphology. Syst Bot. 2006;31:547–559. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1043/05-25.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EYY L, Stefanovic S, Dickinson TA. Reconstructing reticulation history in a phylogenetic framework and the potential of allopatric speciation in an agamic complex <J>in Crataegus (Rosaceae). Evolution. 2010;64:3593–3608. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01063.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson A, Rich TIMOTHYCG, Allen AM, et al. Hybridization and polyploidy as drivers of continuing evolution and speciation in Sorbus. Mol Ecol. 2010;19(8):1675–1690. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04585.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellecier J, Clermont S, Houston L, et al. Cytotype diversity in the Sorbus complex (Rosaceae) in Britain: sorting out the puzzle. Ann Bot. 2012;110:1185–1193. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcs185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson BB. Speciation and specialization of Polylepis in the Andes. In: Vuilleumier F, Monasterio M, editors. High altitude tropical biogeography. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1986. p. 304–316.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler M. The genus Polylepis (Rosaceae) in Bolivia. Candollea. 1995;50:131–171.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Lebuhn AN, Seltmann P, Kessler M. Consequences of the pollination system on genetic structure and patterns of species distribution in the Andean genus Polylepis (Rosaceae): a comparative study. Plant Syst Evol. 2007;266:91–103. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-007-0543-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Lebuhn AN, Fuchs J, Hertel D, et al. An Andean radiation: polyploidy in the tree genus <J>Polylepis (Rosaceae, Sanguisorbeae). Plant Biol. 2010;12:917–926. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00297.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugimoto-Shirasu K, Roberts K. “Big it up”: endoreduplication and cell-size control in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003;6(6):544–553. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2003.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaulieu JM, Leitch IJ, Patel S. Genome size is a strong predictor of cell size and stomatal density in angiosperms. New Phytol. 2008;179(4):975–986. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02528.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joly S, Bruneau A. Delimiting species boundaries in Rosa sect. Cinnamomeae (Rosaceae) in eastern North America. Syst Bot. 2007;32(4):819–836. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1043/06-69.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGoey BV, Chau K, Dickinson TA. Stomata size in relation to ploidy level in North American hawthorns (Crataegus, Rosaceae). Madroño. 2014;61(2):177–193.
   Google Scholar
• Brochmann C, Brysting AK, Alsos IG, et al. Polyploidy in arctic plants. Biol J Linn Soc. 2004;82:521–536. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00337.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung S, Elisens W, Skvarla J. Pollen Morphology and its phylogenetic significance in the tribe Sanguisorbeae (Rosaceae). Plant Syst Evol. 2010;285::135–148. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-009-0262-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler M, Kühn A, Solís VG, et al. Complex geographical distribution of ploidy levels in Polylepis australis (Rosaceae), an endemic tree line species in Argentina. Int J Plant Sci. 2014;175:955–961. Available from:
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quija-Lamina P, Segovia-Salcedo MC, Jadán M, et al. Estandarización de la metodología para el conteo cromosómico en especies del género Polylepis en el Ecuador. Rev Ecuatoriana de Med y Cienc Biológicas. 2010;31:33–49.
   Google Scholar
• Quijia-Lamina P, Jadán M, Proaño K, et al. Estudio Citogenetico de las especies del Genero Polylepis (P. incana y P. racemosa) en el Ecuador. Conference Ciencia y Tecnología; Ecuador; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Montalvo JL Determinación del número cromosómico de P. pauta y P. serícea presentes en la Provincia de Pichincha [Thesis]. Sangolquí. Escuela Politécnoca del Ejército; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Zurita CF, Segovia-Salcedo MC, Jadán M, et al. Análisis Cromosómico de la especie P. incana en tres poblaciones de la zona centro norte del Ecuador (El Inga, Papallacta, El Angel) a partir de meristemos radicales. Conference Ciencia y Tecnología; Ecuador; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Segovia-Salcedo MC New insight into the evolutionary history of the complex Andean genus Polylepis (Rosaceae: sanguisorbeae) and its implications for conservation and management [dissertation]. Florida (FI): University of Florida; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Segovia-Salcedo MC, Quijia-Lamina P. Citogeografía de cuatro especies de Polylepis (Rosaceae) en el Ecuador: información relevante para el manejo y conservación de los bosques andinos. In: Cuesta F, Sevink FJ, Llambi LDeditors. Avances en investigación para la conservación de los páramos andinos. Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador: CONDESAN; 2014. p. 467–485.
   Google Scholar
• Caiza JC, Vargas D, Olmedo C, et al. Morfometría y morfología de estomas y de polen como indicadores indirectos de poliploidía en especies del género Polylepis (Rosaceae) en Ecuador. Ecología Austral. 2018;28:175–187. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.18.28.1.1.528
   Google Scholar
• Stebbins GL. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. London: Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd.; 1971. p. viii-+ 216.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan D, Soltis D, Robertson A. Systematic and Evolutionary Implications of rbcL sequence variation in Rosaceae. Am J Bot. 1994;81:890–903. Available from: www.jstor.org/stable/2445770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishima M, Ohmido N, Fukui M, et al. Trends in site-number change of rDNA loci during polyploid evolution in Sanguisorba (Rosaceae). Chromosoma. 2002;110:550–558. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-001-0175-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boza TE, Quispe-Melgar H, Kessler M. Taxonomic reevaluation of the Polylepis sericea Complex (Rosaceae), with the description of a new species. Syst Bot. 2019;44(2):324–334. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1600/036364419X15562052252225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romoleroux K. Rosaceae 79. In: Harling G, Andersson L, editors. Flora of Ecuador. Vol. 56. Göteborg/Stockholm/Quito: University of Gothenburg/Riksmuseum/Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador; 1996. p. 1–159.
   Google Scholar
• Boza TE, Romoleroux K, Kessler M. Taxonomic revaluation of the Polylepis pauta and P. sericea (Rosaceae) from Ecuador. Phytotaxa. 2020454 (2): 111–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.454.2.3
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson TA, Lo E, Talent N. Polyploidy, reproductive biology, and Rosaceae: understanding evolution and making classifications. Plant Syst Evol. 2007;266(1–2):59–78. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-007-0541-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson T, Hibbs MS, Yoder AD, et al. The phylogeny of Rosoideae (Rosaceae) based on sequences of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA and the trnL/F region of chloroplast DNA. Int J Plant Sci. 2003;164:197–211. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/346163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr MS A phylogenetic and biogeographic analysis of Sanguisorbae (Rosaceae), with emphasis on the pleistocene radiation of the high andean genus Polylepis [dissertation]. Maryland (MD) University of Maryland; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Tate JA. Advances in the study of polyploidy since plant speciation. New Phytol. 2004;161(1):173–191. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00948.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza W, Cano A. El género Polylepis en el Perú Taxonomía, Morfología y Distribución. Editorial Académica Española; AV Akademikerverlag GmbH & Co. KG. Saarbrücken, Deutschland / Alemania. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Talent N, Dickinson TA. Endosperm formation in aposporous Crataegus (Rosaceae Spiraeoideae tribe Pyreae): parallels to Ranunculaceae and Poaceae. New Phytol. 2007;173(2):231–249. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01918.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson AH. Polyploidy evolutionary opportunity and crop adaptation. Genética. 2005;123:191–196. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-003-2742-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka Y. Evolution of polyploid Triticum wheats under cultivation: the role of domestication natural hybridization and allopolyploid speciation in their diversification. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011;52(5):750–764. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcr018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sattler MC, Carvalho CR, Clarindo WR. The polyploidy and its key role in plant breeding. Planta. 2016;243(2):281–296. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-015-2450-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield S, Lusty C, MacKinven A, eds. The world list of threatened trees. Cambridge: World Conservation Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Evans RC, Dickinson TA. North American black‐fruited hawthorns. II. Floral development of 10‐and 20‐stamen morphotypes in Crataegus section Douglasii (Rosaceae: maloideae). Am J Bot. 1996;83(8):961–978. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb12793.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enrico L, Funes G, Cabido M. Regeneration of Polylepis australis Bitt. in the mountains of central Argentina. For Ecol Manage. 2004;190(2–3):301–309. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2003.10.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renison D, Hensen I, Cingolani AM. Anthropogenic soil degradation affects seed viability in Polylepis australis mountain forests of central Argentina. For Ecol Manage. 2004;196(2–3):327–333. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.03.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menoyo E, Renison D, Becerra AG. Arbuscular mycorrhizas and performance of Polylepis australis trees in relation to livestock density. For Ecol Manage. 2009;258(12):2676–2682. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samaniego F, Kolár F, Urfus T, et al. Determination of apomixis by flow cytometry in two species of Lachemilla (Rosaceae) in Ecuador. Neotrop Biodivers. 2018;4(1):152–163. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23766808.2018.1542785
   Google Scholar