Population genetic analysis of two Polylepis microphylla (Wedd.) Bitter (Rosaceae) forests in Ecuador

References

• Skole D, Tucker C. Tropical deforestation and habitat fragmentation in the Amazon: satellite data from 1978 to 1988. Science. 1993;260(5116):1905–1910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson EW, Jaiteh M, Levy MA, et al. The human footprint and the last of the wild: the human footprint is a global map of human influence on the land surface, which suggests that human beings are stewards of nature, whether we like it or not. BioScience. 2002;52(10):891–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad N, Brudving L, Clobert J, et al. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv. 2015;1(2):e1500052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amos W, Balmford A. When does conservation genetics matter? Heredity (Edinb). 2015;87(3):257–265. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bijlsma R, Loeschcke V. Genetic erosion impedes adaptive responses to stressful environments. Evol Appl. 2012;5(2):117–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Compton SG, Chen XY. Fragmentation can increase spatial genetic structure without decreasing pollen‐mediated gene flow in a wind-pollinated tree. Mol Ecol. 2011;20(21):4421–4432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teich I Análisis de la estructura genética espacial de especies arbóreas y su asociación con la variabilidad fenotípica y ambiental. Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad de Buenos Aires; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Caicedo AL, Schaal BA. Population structure and phylogeography of Solanum pimpinellifolium inferred from a nuclear gene. Mol Ecol. 2004;13(7):1871–1882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young A, Boyle T, Brown T. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996;11(10):413–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSalle R, Amato G. The expansion of conservation genetics. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5(9):702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamrick JL. Response of forest trees to global environmental changes. For Ecol Manage. 2004;197(1–3):323–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seltmann P, Hensen I, Renison D, et al. Biparental inbreeding depression, genetic relatedness and progeny vigour in a wind-pollinated treeline species in Argentina. Plant Ecol. 2009b;205(1):155–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, et al. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000;403(6772):853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter CR, Guayasamín JM, Wiens JJ. Explaining Andean megadiversity: the evolutionary and ecological causes of glassfrog elevational richness patterns. Ecol Lett. 2013;16(9):1135–1144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson EP, Marengo J, Villalva R, et al. Consequences of climate change for ecosystems and ecosystem services in the tropical Andes. In: Herzog SK, Martínez R, Jørgensen, editors. Climate change and biodiversity in the tropical Andes. São José dos Campos-Brazil: Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) and Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE);2011.1–14
   Google Scholar
• Åkesson CM, Matthews-Bird F, Bitting M, Åkesson CM, Matthews-Bird F, Bitting M, et al. 2,100 years of human adaptation to climate change in the High Andes. Nat Ecol Evol. 2020;4(1):66–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippok D, Beck SG, Renison D, et al. Forest recovery of areas deforested by fire increases with elevation in the tropical Andes. For Ecol Manage. 2013;295:69–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arango-Vélez N, Kattan GH. Effects of forest fragmentation on experimental nest predation in Andean cloud forest. Biol Conserv. 1997;81(1–2):137–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armenteras D, Gast F, Villareal H. Andean forest fragmentation and the representativeness of protected natural areas in the eastern Andes, Colombia. Biol Conserv. 2003;113(2):245–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensen I, Cierjacks A, Hirsch H, et al. Historic and recent fragmentation coupled with altitude affect the genetic population structure of one of the world’s highest tropical tree line species. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2012;21(4):455–464.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler M. The “Polylepis problem”: where do we stand? Ecotropica. 2002;8(2):97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler M Present and potential distribution of Polylepis (Rosaceae) forests in Bolivia. Biodiversity and Conservation of Neotropical Montane Forests. 1995;281–294.
   Google Scholar
• Renison D, Cingolani AM, Suarez R. Efectos del fuego sobre un bosquecillo de Polylepis australis (Rosaceae) en las montañas de Córdoba, Argentina. Rev Chil Hist Nat. 2002;75(4):719–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teich I, Cingolani AM, Renison D, et al. Do domestic herbivores retard Polylepis australis Bitt. woodland recovery in the mountains of Córdoba Argentina? For Ecol Manage. 2005;219(2):229–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cierjacks A, Salgado S, Wesche K, et al. Post‐fire population dynamics of two tree species in high-altitude Polylepis forests of central Ecuador. Biotropica. 2008;40(2):176–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjeldså J. Key areas for conserving the avifauna of Polylepis forests. Ecotropica. 2002;8(2):125–131.
   Google Scholar
• Gareca EE, Hermy M, Fjeldså J, et al. Polylepis woodland remnants as biodiversity islands in the Bolivian high Andes. Biodivers Conservat. 2010;19(12):3327–3346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enrico L, Funes G, Cabido M. Regeneration of Polylepis australis Bitt. in the mountains of central Argentina. For Ecol Manage. 2004;190(2–3):301–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romoleroux K, Cárate-Tandalla D, Erler R, et al. Plantas vasculares de los bosques de Polylepis en los páramos de Oyacachi. 1st. Quito-Ecuador: Centro de Publicaciones, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler M, Bosques de Polylepis. In: Moraes M, Øllgaard B, Kvist LP, editors. Botánica Económica de los Andes Centrales. La Paz-Bolivia: Universidad Mayor de San Andrés; 2006. p. 110–120.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler M, Schmidt-Lebuhn AN. Taxonomical and distributional notes on Polylepis (Rosaceae). Organ Divers Evol. 2006;6(1):67–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seltmann P, Cocucci A, Renison D, et al. Mating system, outcrossing distance effects and pollen availability in the wind-pollinated treeline species Polylepis australis Bitt. (Rosaceae) Basic Appl Ecol. 2009a;10(1):52–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boza Espinoza TE, Quispe-Melgar HR, Kessler M. Taxonomic reevaluation of the Polylepis sericea complex (Rosaceae), with the description of a new species. Systemat Bot. 2019;44(2):324–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boza Espinoza TE, Kessler M A monograph of the genus Polylepis (Rosaceae). Phytokeys. in prep.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson BBA. Revision of the genus Polylepis (Rosaceae: sanguisorbeae). Smithson Contrib Bot. 1979;43:1–62.
   Google Scholar
• Romoleroux K. Rosaceae 79. In: Harling G, Andersson L, editors. Flora of Ecuador. Göteborg: University of Gothenburg; 1996. p. 71–89.
   Google Scholar
• Argollo J, Soliz C, Villalba R. Potencialidad dendrocronológica de Polylepis tarapacana en los Andes Centrales de Bolivia. Ecología en Bolivia. 2004;39(1):5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Espinoza TEB, Romoleroux K, Kessler M. Taxonomic revaluation of the Polylepis pauta and P. sericea (Rosaceae) from Ecuador. Phytotaxa. 2020;454(2):111–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romoleroux K. Rosaceae. In: León-Yánez S, Valencia R, Pitman N, editors. Libro Rojo de las Plantas Endémicas del Ecuador. Quito-Ecuador: Publicaciones del Herbario QCA, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador; 2011. p. 748–750.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Report of the conference of the parties on its seventh session, held at Marrakesh from 29 October to 10 November 2001, addendum part two: action taken by the conference of the parties, Volume I; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Polylepis microphylla. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2004 [internet]. Romoleroux K, Pitman N. [ cited 2021 Feb 2]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2004.RLTS.T36206A9987050
   Google Scholar
• León-Yánez S, Valencia R, Pitman N, et al. Libro Rojo de las Plantas Endémicas del Ecuador. 2nd ed. Quito-Ecuador: Publicaciones del Herbario QCA, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bitter G. Revision der Gattung Polylepis. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik. 1911;45:564–656.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt‐Lebuhn AN, Fuchs J, Hertel D, et al. An Andean radiation: polyploidy in the tree genus Polylepis (Rosaceae, Sanguisorbeae). Plant Biol. 2010;12(6):917–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer AT, Ison JL, Ashley MV, et al. The paradox of forest fragmentation genetics. Conserv Biol. 2008;22(4):878–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llorens TM, Tapper SL, Coates DJ, et al. Does population distribution matter? Influence of a patchy versus continuous distribution on genetic patterns in a wind‐pollinated shrub. J Biogeograph. 2017;44(2):361–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Queiroz K. The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation: a conceptual unification and terminological recommendations. In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SH, editors. Endless forms: species and speciation. New York-USA: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen PM, León-Yánez S, editors. Catálogo de las Plantas Vasculares del Ecuador. St. Louis-USA: Missouri Botanical Garden Press; 1999. p. 633–668.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza W, Cano A. Diversidad del género Polylepis (Rosaceae, Sanguisorbeae) en los Andes peruanos. Revista Peruana de Biología. 2011;18(2):197–200.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle J, Doyle J. Preservation of plant samples for DNA restriction endonuclease analysis. Taxon. 1987;36(4):715–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris DJ, Crandall KA. Intragenomic variation within ITS1 and ITS2 of freshwater crayfishes (Decapoda: cambaridae): implications for phylogenetic and microsatellite studies. Mol Biol Evol. 2000;17(2):284–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Q, Zhang D, Duan Y, et al. Intraspecific divergences of Rhodiola alsia (Crassulaceae) based on plastid DNA and internal transcribed spacer fragments. Bot J Linnean Soc. 2012;168(2):204–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Tortuero E, Rusek J, Maayan I, et al. Genetic diversity of two Daphnia-infecting microsporidian parasites, based on sequence variation in the internal transcribed spacer region. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9(1):293.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hapsari L, Azrianingsih R, Arumingtyas EL. Genetic variability and relationship of banana cultivars (Musa L.) from East Java, Indonesia based on the internal transcribed spacer region nrDNA sequences. J Trop Biol Conserv. 2018;15:101–120.
   Google Scholar
• White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, et al. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis M, Gaelfand D, Sninsky J, et al., editors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego-USA: Academic Press; 1990. 315–322.
   Google Scholar
• Yang JY, Pak JH. Phylogeny of Korean Rubus (Rosaceae) based on ITS (nrDNA) and trnL/F intergenic region (cpDNA). J Plant Biol. 2006;49(1):44–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith TF, Waterman MS. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J Mol Biol. 1981;147(1):195–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004a;32(5):1792–1797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar RC. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004b;5(1):113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• evobiR: comparative and population genetic analyses [Internet]. Arlington(TX): R-project; [cited 2020 Jul 15]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=evobiR. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Marsjan PA, Oldenbroek JK Molecular markers, a tool for exploring genetic diversity. In: food and agriculture organization (FAO). The State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, first draft. Rome-Italy: FAO; 2006. p. 374.
   Google Scholar
• Nei M. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York (NY): Columbia University Press; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics. 1992;131(2):479–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir BS, Cockerham CC. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution. 1984;38(6):1358–1370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsinger KE, Weir BS. Genetics in geographically structured populations: definition, estimation and interpretation of F ST. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(9):639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Röhl A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16(1):37–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardulyn P. Trees and/or networks to display intraspecific DNA sequence variation? Mol Ecol. 2012;21(14):3385–3390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradis E, Pearse W. Analysis of haplotype networks: the randomized minimum spanning tree method. Meth Ecol Evolut. 2018;9(5):1308–1317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown AH, Briggs JD. Sampling strategies for genetic. In: Falk AD, Holsinger KE, editors. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991. p. 99–119.
   Google Scholar
• Ward SM, Jasieniuk M. Review: sampling weedy and invasive plant populations for genetic diversity analysis. Weed Sci. 2009;57(6):593–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao R, Cheng Z, Lu W, et al. Estimating genetic diversity and sampling strategy for a wild soybean (Glycine soja) population based on different molecular markers. Chinese Sci Bull. 2006;51(10):1219–1227.
   Google Scholar
• Hale ML, Burg TM, Steeves TE. Sampling for microsatellite-based population genetic studies: 25 to 30 individuals per population is enough to accurately estimate allele frequencies. PloS One. 2012;7(9):e45170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez OJ Introducción al diseño experimental. Quito-Ecuador: Giro Creativo; 2017
   Google Scholar
• Vranckx GU, Jacquemyn H, Muys B, et al. Meta‐analysis of susceptibility of woody plants to loss of genetic diversity through habitat fragmentation. Conserv Biol. 2012;26(2):228–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Lebuhn AN, Kessler M, Kumar M. Promiscuity in the Andes: species relationships in Polylepis (Rosaceae, Sanguisorbeae) based on AFLP and morphology. Systemat Bot. 2006;31(3):547–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright S. The genetical structure of populations. Ann Eugenics. 1951;15(1):323–354.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willing EM, Dreyer C, Van Oosterhout C. Estimates of genetic differentiation measured by FST do not necessarily require large sample sizes when using many SNP markers. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Lebuhn AN, Kumar M, Kessler M. An assessment of the genetic population structure of two species of Polylepis Ruiz & Pav. (Rosaceae) in the Chilean Andes. Flora-Morphol Distrib Funct Ecol Plants. 2006;201(4):317–325.
   Google Scholar
• Julio N, Sobral A, Dueñas JR, et al. RAPD and ISSR markers indicate diminished gene flow due to recent fragmentation of Polylepis australis woodlands in central Argentina. Biochem Syst Ecol. 2008;36(5–6):329–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragundi S, Hamrick JL, Parker K. Genetic insights into the historical distribution of Polylepis pauta (Rosaceae) in the northeastern Cordillera Oriental of Ecuador. Conserv Gene. 2011;12(3):607–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gareca EE, Breyne P, Vandepitte K, et al. Genetic diversity of Andean Polylepis (Rosaceae) woodlands and inferences regarding their fragmentation history. Bot J Linnean Soc. 2013;172(4):544–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis H, Schnek A. Curtis Biología. 7th edition in Spanish. Buenos Aires-Argentina: Editorial Médica Panamericana; 2008. Chapter 18, Principios básicos de la genética de poblaciones; p. 355.
   Google Scholar
• Ye Y, Li J, Wu C. Genetic diversity and population connectivity of the Asian green mussel Perna viridis in South China Sea, inferred from mitochondria DNA markers. Biochem Syst Ecol. 2015;61:470–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong MA, Wahlberg N, Van Eijk M, et al. Mitochondrial DNA signature for range-wide populations of Bicyclus anynana suggests a rapid expansion from recent refugia. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao M, Liu HL. Genetic diversity of Trichomonas vaginalis clinical isolates from Henan province in central China. Pathog Glob Health. 2015;109(5):242–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonan GB, Doney SC. Climate, ecosystems, and planetary futures: the challenge to predict life in Earth system models. Science. 2018;359(6375):eaam8328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis MB, Shaw RG. Range shifts and adaptive responses to quaternary climate change. Science. 2001;292(5517):673–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin JF, Hellmann JJ, Boggs CL, et al. Climate change hastens population extinctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2002;99( 9):6070–6607
   Google Scholar