Avifaunal responses after two decades of Polylepis forest restoration in central Argentina

References

• Cuyckens GA, Christie DA, Domic AI, et al. Climate change and the distribution and conservation of the world’s highest elevation woodlands in the South American Altiplano. Global Planet Change. 2016;137:79–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch G, Körner C. Growth, demography and carbon relations of Polylepis trees at the world’s highest treeline. Funct Ecol. 2005;19:941–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjeldså J. The avifauna of the Polylepis woodlands of the Andean highlands: the efficiency of basing conservation priorities on patterns of endemism. Bird Conserv Int. 1993;3:37–55.
   Google Scholar
• Fjeldså J, Bowie R, Rahbek C. The role of mountain ranges in the diversity of birds. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2012;43:249–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell J, Brelsford A. Reassessing the causes of decline of Polylepis, a tropical subalpine forest. Ecotropica. 2004;10:155–158.
   Google Scholar
• Torres RC, Renison D, Hensen I, et al. Polylepis australis’ regeneration niche in relation to seed dispersal, site characteristics and livestock density. For Ecol Manage. 2008;254:255–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renison D, Hensen I, Suárez R, et al. Soil conservation in Polylepis mountain forests of Central Argentina: is livestock reducing our natural capital? Austral Ecol. 2010;35:435–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poca M, Cingolani AM, Gurvich DE, et al. La degradación de los bosques de altura del centro de Argentina reduce su capacidad de almacenamiento de agua. Ecol Austral. 2018;28:235–248.
   Google Scholar
• Bellis L, Pidgeon A, Alcántara C, et al. Influences of succession and erosion on bird communities in a South American highland wooded landscape. For Ecol Manage. 2015;349:85–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gareca EE, Hermy M, Fjeldså J, et al. Polylepis woodland remnants as biodiversity islands in the Bolivian high Andes. Biodivers Conserv. 2010;19:3327–3346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cingolani AM, Poca M, Giorgis MA, et al. Water provisioning services in a seasonally dry subtropical mountain: identifying priority landscapes for conservation. J Hydrol. 2015;525:178–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valencia BG, Bush MB, Coe AL, et al. Polylepis woodland dynamics during the last 20,000 years. J Biogeogr. 2018;45(5):1019–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renison D, Morales L, Cuyckens G, et al. Ecología y conservación de los bosques y arbustales de Polylepis: ¿qué sabemos y qué ignoramos? Ecol Austral. 2018;28:163–174.
   Google Scholar
• Cingolani AM, Renison D, Tecco P, et al. Predicting cover types in a mountain range with long evolutionary grazing history: a GIS approach. J Biogeogr. 2008;35:538–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores CE, Cingolani AM, von Müller A, et al. Habitat selection by reintroduced guanacos (Lama guanicoe) in a heterogeneous mountain rangeland of central Argentina. Rangeland J. 2012;34(4):439–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cingolani AM, Vaiereti MV, Giorgis MA, et al. Can livestock and fires convert the sub-tropical mountain rangelands of central Argentina into a rocky desert? Rangeland J. 2013;35(3):285–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cingolani AM, Renison D, Tecco P, et al. Cabido M Predicting cover types in a mountain range with long evolutionary grazing history: a GIS approach. J Biogeogr. 2008;35:538–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renison D, Hensen I, Suarez R. Landscape structural complexity of high-mountain Polylepis australis forests: a new aspect of restoration goals. Restor Ecol. 2011;19:390–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog SK, Soria R, Matthysen E. Seasonal variation in avian community composition in a high-Andean Polylepis (Rosaceae) forest fragment. Wilson J Ornithol. 2003;115:438–447.
   Google Scholar
• Sevillano-Ríos CS, Rodewald AD. Avian community structure and habitat use of Polylepis forests along an elevation gradient. Peer J. 2017;5:e3220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuyckens GA, Renison D. Ecología y conservación de los bosques montanos de Polylepis: una introducción al número especial. Ecol Austral. 2018;28:157–162.
   Google Scholar
• Sevillano-Ríos CS, Rodewald AD, Morales LV. Ecología y conservación de las aves asociadas con Polylepis: ¿qué sabemos de esta comunidad cada vez más vulnerable? Ecol Austral. 2018;28:216–228.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd H, Marsden SJ. Between patch bird movements within a high Andean Polylepis woodland/matrix landscape: implications for habitat restoration. Restor Ecol. 2011;19:74–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd H. Abundance and patterns of rarity of Polylepis birds in the Cordillera Vilcanota southern Peru: implications for habitat management strategies. Bird Conserv Int. 2008;18:164–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd H. Influence of within patch habitat quality on high Andean Polylepis bird abundance. Ibis. 2008;150:735–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthysen E, Collet F, Cahill J. Mixed flock composition and foraging behavior of insectivorous birds in undisturbed and disturbed fragments of high-Andean Polylepis woodland. Ornitol Neotrop. 2008;19:403–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renison D, Herrero L, Torres RC, et al. El rol de los voluntarios en la restauración ecológica del centro argentino. In: Ceccon E, Pérez DR, editors. Más allá de la ecología de la restauración: perspectivas sociales en América Latina y el Caribe. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Press; 2017. p. 55–76.
   Google Scholar
• Bremer L, Farley K. Does plantation forestry restore biodiversity or create green deserts? A synthesis of the effects of land-use transitions on plant species richness. Biodivers Conserv. 2010;19(14):3893–3915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George TL, Zack S. Spatial and temporal considerations in restoring habitat for wildlife. Restor Ecol. 2001;9(3):272–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García C, Renison D, Cingolani AM, et al. Avifaunal changes as a consequence of large‐scale livestock exclusion in the mountains of Central Argentina. J Appl Ecol. 2008;45(1):351–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellis L, Rivera L, Politi N, et al. Latitudinal patterns of bird richness, diversity and abundance in Polylepis australis mountain forest of Argentina. Bird Conserv Int. 2009;19:265–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cingolani AM, Renison D, Zak MR, et al. Mapping vegetation in a heterogeneous mountain rangeland using Landsat data: an alternative method to define and classify land-cover units. Remote Sens Environ. 2004;92(1):84–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilden O, Koskimies P, Pakarinen R, et al. Point count of breeding land birds. In: Koskimies P, Väisänen RA, editors. Monitoring bird populations. Finland Zoological Museum: Finnish Museum of Natural History Press; 1991. p. 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ralph CJ, Sauer JR, Droege S. Monitoring bird populations by point counts. Albany, California: Pacific Southwest Research Station; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Magurran AE. Measuring biological diversity. New Jersey, USA: Blackwells; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer Ø, Harper DA, Ryan PD. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron. 2019;4(1):9.
   Google Scholar
• Hill MO, Gauch HG. Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. In: van der Maarel E, editor. Classification and ordination. Dordrecht: Springer; 1980. p. 47–58.
   Google Scholar
• Dufrêne M, Legendre P. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr. 1997;67(3):345–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCune B, Grace JB, Urban DL. Analysis of ecological communities: MJM software design. Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd H, Marsden SJ. Bird community variation across Polylepis woodland fragments and matrix habitats: implications for biodiversity conservation within a high Andean landscape. Biodivers Conserv. 2008;17:2645–2660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn RR. Recovery of faunal communities during tropical forest regeneration. Conserv Biol. 2004;18(2):302–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fastré C, Strubbe D, Balderrama JA, et al. Bird species richness in High-Andean forest fragments: habitat quality and topography matter. Belgian J Zool. 2020;150(1):95–133.
   Google Scholar
• Fjeldså J. Polylepis forest-vestiges of a vanishing Andean ecosystem. Ecotropica. 2002;8:111–123.
   Google Scholar
• Renison D, Chartier MP, Menghi M, et al. Spatial variation in tree demography associated to domestic herbivores and topography: insights from a seeding and planting experiment. For Ecol Manage. 2015;335:139–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cierjacks A, Salgado S, Wesche K, et al. Post-fire population dynamics of two tree species in high altitude Polylepis forests of Central Ecuador. Biotropica. 2008;40:176–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domic AI, Camilo GR, Capriles JM. Small-scale farming and grazing reduce regeneration of Polylepis tomentella (Rosaceae) in the Semiarid Andes of Bolivia. Biotropica. 2014;46:106–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales LV, Sevillano-Ríos CS, Fick S, et al. Differential seedling regeneration patterns across forest-grassland ecotones in two tropical tree line species (Polylepis spp.). Austral Ecol. 2018;43(5):514–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevillano-Ríos CS, Rodewald AD. Responses of Polylepis birds to patch and landscape attributes in the High Andes. Neotrop Biodivers. 2021;7(1):5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kéry M, Schmidt B. Imperfect detection and its consequences for monitoring for conservation. Commun Ecol. 2008;9(2):207–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar