2,519
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

The Ecuadorian Microbiome Project: a plea to strengthen microbial genomic research

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 223-237 | Received 28 Mar 2019, Accepted 02 Jun 2021, Published online: 27 Jun 2021

References

  • Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ. Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(12):6578–6583.
  • Wooley JC, Godzik A, Friedberg I. A primer on metagenomics. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010;6(2):e1000667.
  • van Dokkum PG, Conroy C. A substantial population of low-mass stars in luminous elliptical galaxies. Nature. 2010;468(7326):940.
  • McMahon S, Parnell J. Weighing the deep continental biosphere. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014;87(1):113–120.
  • Robbins RJ, Krishtalka L, Wooley JC. Advances in biodiversity: metagenomics and the unveiling of biological dark matter. Stand Genomic Sci. 2016;11(1):69.
  • Rinke C, Schwientek P, Sczyrba A, et al. Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter. Nature. 2013;499(7459):431.
  • Hug LA, Baker BJ, Anantharaman K, et al. A new view of the tree of life. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1(5):16048.
  • Gillespie DE, Rondon MR, Williamson LLHJ. Metagenomic libraries from uncultured microorganisms. In: Osborn AMSC, editor. Mol. Microb. Ecol. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2005. p. 261–279.
  • Timmis K, de Vos WM, Ramos JL, et al. The contribution of microbial biotechnology to sustainable development goals. Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;10(5):984–987.
  • Helmreich S. Species of biocapital. Sci Cult. (Lond). 2008;17(4):463–478.
  • Janzen DH. Hope for tropical biodiversity through true bioliteracy. Biotropica. 2010;42(5):540–542.
  • Janzen DH, Godfray HCJ, Knapp S. Now is the time. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004;359(1444):731–732.
  • Pedroza Flores R, Villalobos Monroy G, Reyes Fabela A. A critique on the concept of social accountability in higher education. J Educ Learn. 2015;4:1–9.
  • Ellis R, Waterton C, Wynne B. Taxonomy, biodiversity and their publics in twenty-first-century DNA barcoding. Public Underst. Sci. 2010;19(4):497–512.
  • Enriquez J, Martínez R. The biotechonomy (1.0): a rough map of bio-data flow. Harvard Business School Working Paper. 2002;3(28):1–21.
  • Vestergaard G, Schulz S, Schöler A, et al. Making big data smart—how to use metagenomics to understand soil quality. Biol Fertil Soils. 2017;53(5):479–484.
  • Xia J, Liu Y. Usage patterns of open genomic data. Coll Res Libr. 2013;74(2):195–206.
  • Bevan MW, Uauy C, Wulff BBH, et al. Genomic innovation for crop improvement. Nature. 2017;543(7645):346–354.
  • Khan R, Mittelman D. Consumer genomics will change your life, whether you get tested or not. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):120.
  • Milne R. From people with dementia to people with data: participation and value in Alzheimer’s disease research. Biosocieties. 2018;13(3):623–639.
  • Ibrahim MHA, Lebbe L, Willems A, et al. Chelatococcus thermostellatus sp. nov., a new thermophile for bioplastic synthesis: comparative phylogenetic and physiological study. AMB Express. 2016;6(1):39.
  • Mutreja A. Chapter 8 – Microbial genomics: diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. In: Kumar D, Antonarakis SBT-M, Hg, editors. Medical and Health Genomics. Oxford: Academic Press; 2016. p. 101–106.
  • Marx V. How some labs put more bio into biomaterials. Nat Methods. 2019;16(5):365–368.
  • Priefer C, Jörissen J, Frör O. Pathways to shape the bioeconomy. Resources. 2017;6(10):261–279.
  • De Las Rivas J, Bonavides-Martínez C, Campos-Laborie FJ. Bioinformatics in Latin America and SoIBio impact, a tale of spin-off and expansion around genomes and protein structures. Brief Bioinform. 2017;18(6):1091.
  • Thompson LR, Sanders JG, McDonald D, et al. A communal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity. Nature. 2017;551(7681):457.
  • Gilbert JA, Meyer F, Jansson J, et al. The Earth Microbiome Project: meeting report of the “1(st) EMP meeting on sample selection and acquisition” at Argonne national laboratory. Stand Genomic Sci. 2010;3:249–253.
  • Gilbert JA, Jansson JK, Knight R. The Earth Microbiome Project: successes and aspirations. BMC Biol. 2014;12(1):69.
  • Vogel TM, Simonet P, Jansson JK, et al. TerraGenome: a consortium for the sequencing of a soil metagenome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7(4):252.
  • Pylro V, Roesch L. The Brazilian Microbiome Project. In: Pylro VRL, editor. The Brazilian Microbiome, Current Status and Perspectives. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 1–6.
  • Montoya E, Keen HF, Luzuriaga CX, et al. Long-term vegetation dynamics in a megadiverse hotspot: the ice-age record of a pre-montane forest of central Ecuador. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:196.
  • Mittermeier R, Robles Gil P, Hoffmann M, et al. Hotspots revisited. Earth’s biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. Conserv Int. Mexico City: CEMEX S. A de C. V; 2004.
  • Lu Z. PubMed and beyond: a survey of web tools for searching biomedical literature. Database (Oxford). 2011;2011:baq036.
  • SimilarWeb LTD 2019. SimilarWeb.com – competitive Intelligence Tool [Internet]. [ cited 2019 Jan 16]. Available from: http://www.similarweb.com/.
  • Ismailova R, Inal Y. Accessibility evaluation of top university websites: a comparative study of Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkey. Univers Access Inf Soc. 2018;17(2):437–445.
  • Kagan S, Bekkerman R. Predicting purchase behavior of website audiences. Int J Electron. Commer. 2018;22(4):510–539.
  • Goncalves JR, de Oliveira DD, Sassi RJ. Classification of web history tools through web analysis. HCI cybersecurity Priv. Trust. Fist Int. Conf. Orlando, FL; 2019. p. 266–276.
  • Wang M, Pfleeger S, Adamson D, et al. Technology transfer of federally funded R&D: perspectives from a forum. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Science and Technology Policy Institute; 2003.
  • Król K, Halva J. Measuring efficiency of websites of agrotouristic farms from Poland and Slovakia. Econ Reg Stud. 2017;10:50–59.
  • David P, Martin P. Website traffic measurement and rankings: competitive intelligence tools examination. Int J Web Inf Syst. 2018;14(4):423–437.
  • Mbaye B, Gueye A, Banse D, et al. Africa’s online access: what data is getting accessed and where it is hosted? Innovations and interdisciplinary solutions for underserved areas. Bassioni G, Kebe CMF, Gueye A, et al., editors. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p.50–61.
  • Król K. Marketing potential of websites of rural tourism facilities in Poland. Econ Reg Stud. 2019;12(2):158–172.
  • Lorenz P, Eck J. Metagenomics and industrial applications. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3(6):510–516.
  • Rajan KS. Biocapital, the constitution of postgenomic life. Durham and London: Duke University Press; 2006.
  • Oldham P, Hall S, Forero O. Biological diversity in the patent system. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e78737–e78737.
  • Şener S, Sarıdoğan E. The effects of science-technology-innovation on competitiveness and economic growth. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2011;24:815–828.
  • Moser P. Patents and innovation: evidence from economic history. J Econ Perspect. 2013;27(1):23–44.
  • Zhu B, Habisch A, Thogersen J. The importance of cultural values and trust for innovation — a european study. Int J Innov. Manag. 2017;22(2):1850017.
  • Organisation EP Espacenet: patent search [Internet]. Munich: The European Patent Organization; [cited 2019 Mar 25]. Available from: worldwide.espacenet.com.
  • Fellows I. wordcloud: Word Clouds. [R package]. Version 2.6. 2018. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=wordcloud.
  • Feinerer I, Hornik K. tm: Text Mining Package. [R package]. Version 0.7–8. 2008. Available from: https://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/tm/.
  • R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing [Downloadable software]. Version 3.5.3. Viena: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Austria; 2020. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/.
  • Ribeiro B, Shapira P. Private and public values of innovation: a patent analysis of synthetic biology. Res Policy. 2020;49(1):103875.
  • Cohen WM, Goto A, Nagata A, et al. R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States. Res Policy. 2002;31(8–9):1349–1367.
  • Ryan JC, Daly TM. Barriers to innovation and knowledge generation: the challenges of conducting business and social research in an emerging country context. J Innov Knowl. 2019;4(1):47–54.
  • Tighe S, Afshinnekoo E, Rock TM, et al. Genomic methods and microbiological technologies for profiling novel and extreme environments for the Extreme Microbiome Project (XMP). Journal of Biomolecular Techniques : JBT. 2017;28(1):31–39..
  • Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, et al. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nature Methods. 2016;13(7):581–583.
  • Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7(5):335–336..
  • Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(8):852–857.
  • Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75(23):7537–7541. /10/02. 2009.
  • Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJJ, et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016;3(1):160018.
  • Mons B, Neylon C, Velterop J, et al. Cloudy, increasingly FAIR; revisiting the FAIR Data guiding principles for the European Open Science Cloud. Inf Serv Use. 2017;37:49–56.
  • Rojas Blanco DL. Vicisitudes del Protocolo de Nagoya en Colombia. Gestión y Ambiente. 2013;16:17–23.
  • Stulberg E, Fravel D, Proctor LM, et al. An assessment of US microbiome research. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1(1):15015.
  • Packer A. The SciELO open access: a gold way from the south. Can. J High Educ. 2010;39(3):111–126.
  • Clavero M. “Awkward wording. Rephrase”: linguistic injustice in ecological journals. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010;25(10):552–553.
  • Salager-Meyer F. Writing and publishing in peripheral scholarly journals: how to enhance the global influence of multilingual scholars? J English Acad Purp. 2014;13:78–82.
  • Pronskikh V. Linguistic privilege and justice: what can we learn from STEM? Philos. Pap. 2018;47:71–92.
  • Hidalgo CA, Hausmann R. The building blocks of economic complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(26):10570.
  • Feyen J, Van Hoof HB. An analysis of the relationship between higher education performance and socio-economic and technological indicators: the Latin American case study. MASKANA. 2013;4(2):1–20.
  • Magee SP. Lawyers as spam, congressional capture explains why U.S. lawyers exceed the optimum. In: Buckley FH, editor. Am. ilness, essays rule law. London: Yale University Press; 2013. p. 100–117.
  • Alves RJ, Weksler M, Oliveira JA, et al. Brazilian legislation on genetic heritage harms Biodiversity Convention goals and threatens basic biology research and education. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias. 2018;90(2):1279–1284.
  • Bockmann FA, Rodrigues MT, Kohsldorf T, et al. Brazil´s government attacks biodiversity. Science. 2018;360(6391):865.
  • Prathapan KD, Pethiyagoda R, Bawa KS, et al. When the cure kills—CBD limits biodiversity research. Science. 2018;360(6396):1405–1406.
  • Befort N. Going beyond definitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: the contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested fields. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2020;153:119923.
  • Aguilar A, Twardowski T, Wohlgemuth R. Bioeconomy for sustainable development. Biotechnol J. 2019;14(8):1800638.
  • Petersen A, Krisjansen I. Assembling ‘the bioeconomy’: exploiting the power of the promissory life sciences. J Sociol. 2015;51(1):28–46.
  • Goven J, Pavone V. The bioeconomy as political project: a Polanyian analysis. Sci Technol Hum Values. 2015;40(3):302–337.
  • Aguilar A, Wohlgemuth R, Twardowski T. Perspectives on bioeconomy. N Biotechnol. 2018;40:181–184.
  • Bush V. Science, the endless frontier: a report to the President on a program for postwar scientific research. Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office; 1945.
  • Roser M, Ortiz-Ospina E. Global rise of education [Internet]. OurWorldInData.org. 2019 [cited 2019 Mar 25]. Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/global-rise-of-education.
  • Paz y Miño C. Lo inédito de Inédita. Redacción Médica [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Mar 25]. Available from: https://www.edicionmedica.ec/opinion/lo-inedito-de-inedita-2028.
  • Fernández F. The impediment for the study of the biodiversity in Colombia. Caldasia. 2011;33:3–5.
  • Páez VP. Colombia’s tax on wildlife studies. Science. 2016;354(6309):191.
  • Rusch DB, Halpern AL, Sutton G, et al. The Sorcerer II global ocean sampling expedition: northwest Atlantic through eastern tropical Pacific. PLoS Biol. 2007;5(3):e77–e77.
  • Sharma AK, Zhaxybayeva O, Papke RT, et al. Actinorhodopsins: proteorhodopsin-like gene sequences found predominantly in non-marine environments. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10(4):1039–1056.
  • Cardenas PA, Cooper PJ, Cox MJ, et al. Upper airways microbiota in antibiotic-naïve wheezing and healthy infants from the tropics of rural Ecuador. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46803–e46803. /10/05. 2012.
  • Loire E, Chiari Y, Bernard A, et al. Population genomics of the endangered giant Galápagos tortoise. Genome Biol. 2013;14(12):R136–R136.
  • Colehour AM, Meadow JF, Liebert MA, et al. Local domestication of lactic acid bacteria via cassava beer fermentation. PeerJ. 2014;2:e479–e479.
  • Hong P-Y, Mao Y, Ortiz-Kofoed S, et al. Metagenomic-based study of the phylogenetic and functional gene diversity in Galápagos land and marine iguanas. Microb Ecol. 2015;69(2):444–456.
  • Bresciano JC, Salvador CA, Paz-y-Miño C, et al. Variation in the presence of anti-Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis bacteria of amphibians across life stages and elevations in Ecuador. Ecohealth. 2015;12(2):310–319.
  • McLellan SL, Fisher JC, Newton RJ. The microbiome of urban waters. Int Microbiol. 2015;18(3):141–149.
  • Trueba AF, Ritz T, Trueba G. The role of the microbiome in the relationship of asthma and affective disorders. In: Lyte M, editor. Microb. Endocrinol. interkingdom Signal Infect Dis Heal. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 263–288.
  • Bouhajja E, Agathos SN, George IF. Metagenomics: probing pollutant fate in natural and engineered ecosystems. Biotechnol Adv. 2016;34(8):1413–1426.
  • Nesme J, Achouak W, Agathos SN, et al. Back to the future of soil metagenomics. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:73.
  • Bouhajja E, McGuire M, Liles MR, et al. Identification of novel toluene monooxygenase genes in a hydrocarbon-polluted sediment using sequence- and function-based screening of metagenomic libraries. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;101(2):797–808.
  • Arrieta M-C, Arévalo A, Stiemsma L, et al. Associations between infant fungal and bacterial dysbiosis and childhood atopic wheeze in a nonindustrialized setting. J Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017/ 12/11. 2018;142(2):424–434.e10.
  • Barragan V, Olivas S, Keim P, et al. Critical knowledge gaps in our understanding of environmental cycling and transmission of Leptospira spp. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83(19):e01190–17.
  • Barragan V, Nieto N, Keim P, et al. Meta-analysis to estimate the load of Leptospira excreted in urine: beyond rats as important sources of transmission in low-income rural communities. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):71.
  • Ben-Yosef M, Zaada DSY, Dudaniec RY, et al. Host-specific associations affect the microbiome of Philornis downsi, an introduced parasite to the Galápagos Islands. Mol Ecol. 2017;26(18):4644–4656.
  • Pfeiffer S, Mitter B, Oswald A, et al. Rhizosphere microbiomes of potato cultivated in the high Andes show stable and dynamic core microbiomes with different responses to plant development. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016;93(2):93.
  • Carvajal-Aldaz DG, Guice JL, Page RC, et al. Simultaneous delivery of antibiotics neomycin and ampicillin in drinking water inhibits fermentation of resistant starch in rats. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2016;61(3):1600609.
  • Loayza Villa MF, Herrera Sevilla VL, Vivar-Diaz N. Detection of Helicobacter pylori DNA in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded gastric biopsies using laser microdissection and qPCR. In: Bishop-Lilly KA, editor. Diagnostic Bacteriol methods Protoc. New York: Springer New York; 2017. p. 71–88.
  • Gainza O, Ramírez C, Ramos AS, et al. Intestinal microbiota of white shrimp Penaeus vannamei under intensive cultivation conditions in Ecuador. Microb Ecol. 2018;75(3):562–568.
  • Suzuki TA, Martins FM, Nachman MW. Altitudinal variation of the gut microbiota in wild house mice. Mol Ecol. 2019;28(9):2378–2390.
  • Burgos FA, Ray CL, Arias CR. Bacterial diversity and community structure of the intestinal microbiome of Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) during ontogenesis. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2018;41(5):494–505.
  • Guo X, Stedtfeld RD, Hedman H, et al. Antibiotic resistome associated with small-scale poultry production in rural Ecuador. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52(15):8165–8172.
  • Wise EL, Pullan ST, Márquez S, et al. Isolation of Oropouche virus from febrile patient, Ecuador. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24(5):935–937.
  • Santos JC, Tarvin RD, O’Connell LA, et al. Diversity within diversity: parasite species richness in poison frogs assessed by transcriptomics. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2018;125:40–50.
  • Guerrero-Latorre L, Romero B, Bonifaz E, et al. Quito’s virome: metagenomic analysis of viral diversity in urban streams of Ecuador’s capital city. Sci Total Environ. 2018;645:1334–1343.
  • Lane-Petter W. The provision and use of pathogen-free laboratory animals. Proc R Soc Med. 1962;55:253–263.
  • Marchesi JR, Ravel J. The vocabulary of microbiome research: a proposal. Microbiome. 2015;3(1):31.
  • Lederberg J, McCray AT. ’Ome sweet ’omics - a genealogical treasury of words. Sci. 2001;15:8.
  • Whipps J, Lewis K, Cooke R. Mycoparasitism and plant disease control. In: Burge N, editor. Fungi Biol. Control Syst. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1988. p. 187.
  • Ursell LK, Metcalf JL, Parfrey LW, et al. Defining the human microbiome. Nutr Rev. 2012;70(Suppl 1):S38–S44.
  • Prescott SL. History of medicine: origin of the term microbiome and why it matters. Hum Microbiome J. 2017;4:24–25.
  • Handelsman J, Rondon MR, Brady SF, et al. Molecular biological access to the chemistry of unknown soil microbes: a new frontier for natural products. Chem Biol. 1998;5(10):5.
  • Handelsman J. Metagenomics: application of genomics to uncultured microorganisms. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004;68(4):669–685.
  • National Research Council (US). The new science of metagenomics: revealing the secrets of our microbial planet. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2007.