It is not just about birds: what do acoustic indices reveal about a Costa Rican tropical rainforest?

References

• Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SLL, et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature. 2015;520(7545):45–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira HM, Navarro LM, Martins IS. Global biodiversity change: the bad, the good, and the unknown. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2012;37:25–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sueur J, Pavoine S, Hamerlynck O, et al. Rapid acoustic survey for biodiversity appraisal. PLoS One. 2008;3:4065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumstein DT, Mennill DJ, Clemins P, et al. Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus. J Appl Ecol. 2011;48:758–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL. Principles of animal communication. 2nd ed. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pijanowski BC, Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Dumyahn SL, et al. Soundscape ecology: the science of sound in the landscape. BioSci. 2011;61(3):203–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sueur J, Farina A. Ecoacoustics: the ecological investigation and interpretation of environmental sound. Biosemiotics. 2015;8(3):493–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldridge A, Guyot P, Moscoso P, et al. Sounding out ecoacoustic metrics: avian species richness is predicted by acoustic indices in temperate but not tropical habitats. Ecol Indic. 2018;95(1):939–952.
   Google Scholar
• Pieretti N, Farina A, Morri D. A new methodology to infer the singing activity of an avian community: the acoustic complexity index (ACI). Ecol Indic. 2011;11:868–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Pijanowski BC, Doucette J, et al. A primer of acoustic analysis for landscape ecologists. Landsc Ecol. 2011;26(9):1233–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasten EP, Gage SH, Fox J, et al. The remote environmental assessment laboratory’s acoustic library: an archive for studying soundscape ecology. Ecol Inform. 2012;12:50–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towsey M, Wimmer J, Williamson I, et al. The use of acoustic indices to determine avian species richness in audio-recordings of the environment. Ecol Inform. 2014;21:110–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sueur J, Farina A, Gasc A, et al. Acoustic indices for biodiversity assessment and landscape investigation. Acta Acust. 2014;100:772–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasc A, Sueur J, Pavoine S, et al. Biodiversity sampling using a global acoustic approach: contrasting sites with microendemics in New Caledonia. PLoS One. 2013;8:e65311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelman NT, Asner GP, Hart PJ, et al. Multi-trophic invasion resistance in Hawaii: bioacoustics, field surveys, and airborne remote sensing. Ecol Appl. 2007;17:2137–2144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller S, Axel AC, Tucker D, et al. Connecting soundscape to landscape: which acoustic index best describes landscape configuration? Ecol Indic. 2015;58:207–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mammides C, Goodale E, Dayananda SK, et al. Do acoustic indices correlate with bird diversity? Insights from two biodiverse regions in Yunnan Province, south China. Ecol Indic. 2017;82:470–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depraetere M, Pavoine S, Jiguet F, et al. Monitoring animal diversity using acoustic indices: implementation in a temperate woodland. Ecol Indic. 2012;13(1):46–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbrass AJ, Rennett P, Williams C, et al. Biases of acoustic indices measuring biodiversity in urban areas. Ecol Indic. 2017;83:169–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsinos YG, Mazaris AD, Papadimitriou KD, et al. Spatiotemporal variability in human and natural sounds in a rural landscape. Landsc Ecol. 2008;23:945–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo W, Gage SH, Kasten EP. Analysis and interpretation of variability in soundscapes along an urban-rural gradient. Landsc Urban Plan. 2011;103: 259–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi J, Gage SH, Joo W, et al. Soundscape characteristics of an environment: a new ecological indicator of ecosystem health. In: Ji W, editor. Wetland and water resource modeling and assessment. New York (NY): CRC Press; 2008. p. 201–211.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker D, Gage S, Williamson I, et al. Linking ecological condition and the soundscape in fragmented Australian forests. Landsc Ecol. 2014;29:745–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burivalova Z, Towsey M, Boucher T, et al. Using soundscapes to detect variable degrees of human influence on tropical forests in Papua New Guinea. Conserv Biol. 2018;32:205–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng M, Butler N, Woods N. Soundscapes as a surrogate measure of vegetation condition for biodiversity values: a pilot study. Ecol Indic. 2018;93:1070–1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez WE, Isaza CV, Daza JM. Identifying disturbed habitats: a new method from acoustic indices. Ecol Inform. 2018;45:16–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do Nascimento L, Campos-Cerqueira M, Bearda K. Acoustic metrics predict habitat type and vegetation structure in the Amazon. Ecol Indic. 2020;117:106679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscoso P. The use of acoustic analyses to evaluate ecological and social impacts of habitat degradation in contemporary conservation biology [dissertation]. Sussex (UK): University of Sussex; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Holdridge L. Life zone ecology. San José (Costa Rica): Centro Científico Tropical; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• TEC. Atlas de Costa Rica. Repositorio TEC [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2018]. Available from: https://repositoriotec.tec.ac.cr/handle/2238/6749?show=full
   Google Scholar
• Oviedo PE, Hernández AA, Fournier L. Caracterización de la vegetación alrededor de los senderos del sector Quebrada González, Parque Nacional Braulio Carrillo, Costa Rica. Uniciencia. 2009;23(1):41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Retamosa-Izaguirre MI, Segura-Sequeira D, Barrantes-Madrigal J, et al. Vegetation, bird and soundscape characterization: a case study in Braulio Carrillo National Park, Costa Rica. Biota Colomb. 2021;22(1):57–73.
   Google Scholar
• Farina A, Pieretti N, Piccioli L. The soundscape methodology for long-term bird monitoring: a Mediterranean Europe case-study. Ecol Inform. 2011;6:354–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez‐Giraldo C, Bedoya CL, Morán‐Vásquez RA, et al. Ecoacoustics in the rain: understanding acoustic indices under the most common geophonic source in tropical rainforests. Remote Sens Ecol Conserv. 2022;6(3):248–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon CE, Weaver W. A mathematical model of communication. Urbana (IL): University of Illinois Press; 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Pielou EC. The interpretation of ecological data: a primer on classification and ordination. New York (NY): Wiley; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L. Random Forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45(1):5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaw A, Classification WM. Regression by randomForest. R News. 2002;2(3):18–22.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing [software]. Version 3.6. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Pijanowski BC. Soundecology: soundscape ecology. R Package Version. 2018;1(3):3.
   Google Scholar
• Sueur J, Aubin T, Simonis C. Seewave, a free modular tool for sound analysis and synthesis. Bioacoustics. 2008;18(2):213–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindt R, Coe R. Tree diversity analysis: a manual and software for common statistical methods for ecological and biodiversity studies. World Agrofor Cent. Vol 1. 2005. 207 p.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn M. Caret: classification and Regression Training [online software]. version 6.0–86. Astrophysics Source Code Library; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Wimmer J, Towsey M, Roe P, et al. Sampling environmental acoustic recordings to determine bird species richness. Ecol Appl. 2013;23(6):1419–1428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxton R, McKenna M, Clapp M, et al. Efficacy of extracting indices from large-scale acoustic recordings to monitor biodiversity. Conserv Biol. 2018;32(5):1174–1184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross SRJ, Friedman NR, Yoshimura M, et al. Utility of acoustic indices for ecological monitoring in complex sonic environments. Ecol Indic. 2021;121:107114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farina A. Ecoacoustics: a quantitative approach to investigate the ecological role of environmental sounds. Math. 2018;7(1):21.
   Google Scholar
• Machado RB, Aguiar LMDS, Jones G. Do acoustic indices reflect the characteristics of bird communities in the savannas of Central Brazil? Landsc Urban Plan. 2017;162: 36–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retamosa M, Ramírez-Alán O, De La OJ. Acoustic indices applied to biodiversity monitoring in a Costa Rica dry tropical forest. J Ecoacoust. 2018;2: TNW2NP.
   Google Scholar
• Sueur J. Cicada acoustic communication: potential sound partitioning in a multispecies community from Mexico (Hemiptera: cicadomorpha: cicadidae). Biol J Linnean Soc. 2002;75(3):379–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradfer-Lawrence T, Bunnefeld N, Gardner N, et al. Rapid assessment of avian species richness and abundance using acoustic indices. Ecol Indic. 2020;115:106400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gage SH, Farina A. Ecoacoustics challenges. In: Ecoacoustics: the ecological role of sounds. Farina A., Gage, SH. Editors. Oxford (UK): Wiley. 2017. p. 313–320.
   Google Scholar
• Aide TM, Hernández-Serna A, Campos-Cequeira M, et al. Species richness (of insects) drives the use of acoustic space in the tropics. Remote Sens. 2017;9:1096.
   Google Scholar
• Darras K, Pütz P, Rembold K, et al. Measuring sound detection spaces for acoustic animal sampling and monitoring. Biol Conserv. 2016;201:29–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royle JA. Modelling sound attenuation in heterogeneous environments for improved bioacoustic sampling of wildlife populations. Methods Ecol Evol. 2018;9(9):1939–1947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slabbekoorn H. Habitat-dependent ambient noise: consistent spectral profiles in two African forest types. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004;116(6):3727–3733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar