A potential threat to the Pampas Biome: the introduction of American mink, Neovison vison (Schreber, 1777) in Uruguay

References

• Long JL. Introduced mammals of the world: their history, distribution and influence. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishers; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson CB, Valenzuela AEJ. Aquatic Mammals. In: Simberloff D, Rejmánek M, editors. Encyclopedia of biological invasions. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2011. p. 445–448.
   Google Scholar
• Valenzuela AEJ, Sepúlveda M, Cabello JM, et al. El visón americano en Patagonia: una revisión binacional sobre las perspectivas de investigación, históricas, socio-ecológicas y de manejo de este carnívoro exótico invasor. Mastozool Neotrop. 2016;23:289–304.
   Google Scholar
• Medina G. A Comparison of the diet and distribution of southern river otter (Lutra provocax) and mink (Mustela vison) in Southern Chile. J Zool. 1997;242(2):291–297.
   Google Scholar
• Fasola L, Muzio J, Chehébar C, et al. Range expansion and prey use of American mink in Argentinean Patagonia: dilemmas for conservation. Eur J Wildl Res. 2011;57(2):283–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela AEJ, Raya Rey A, Fasola L, et al. Trophic ecology of a top predator colonizing the southern extreme of South America: feeding habits of invasive American mink (Neovison vison) in Tierra del Fuego. Mamm Biol. 2013;78(2):104–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasola L, Valenzuela AEJ. Invasive carnivores in Patagonia: defining priorities for their management using the American mink (Neovison vison) as a case study. Ecol Austral. 2014;24(2):173.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald DW, Harrington LA. The American mink: the triumph and tragedy of adaptation out of context. N Z J Zool. 2003;30(4):421–441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonesi L, Palazón S. The American mink in Europe: status, impacts and control. Biol Cons. 2007;134(4):470–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepúlveda MA, Singer RS, Silva-Rodríguez EA. Invasive American mink: linking pathogen risk between domestic and endangered carnivores. EcoHealth. 2014;11(3):409–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreshkova N, Molenaar RJ, Vreman S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in farmed minks, the Netherlands, April and May 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(23):2001005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schüttler E, Klenke R, McGehee S, et al. Vulnerability of ground-nesting waterbirds to predation by invasive American mink in the Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve, Chile. Biol Conserv. 2009;142:1450–1460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otero-Bodeant EA, Hozbor FA, Torres Negreira S, et al. Guía práctica para la producción del visón (Mustela vison) en Uruguay. Montevideo: Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria-FPTA; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Montenegro F, Bessonart JM, Coitiño H, et al. Presencia de hurón melánico Galictis cuja (Carnívora Mustelidae) en la zona rural de Montevideo, Uruguay. In: Sociedad Zoológica del Uruguay, editor. Paper presented at: actas de las X Jornadas de Zoología del Uruguay y Primer Congreso de Zoología del Uruguay. Montevideo:Facultad de Ciencias; 2010. p. 25.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira-Garbero R, Barreneche JM, Laufer G, et al. Mamíferos invasores en Uruguay, historia, perspectivas y consecuencias. Rev Chil Hist Nat. 2013;86(4):403–421.
   Google Scholar
• Genovesi P. Eradications of invasive alien species in Europe: a review. Biol Invasions. 2005;7(1):127–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington LA, Macdonald DW. Spatial and temporal relationships between invasive American mink and native European polecats in the southern United Kingdom. J Mammal. 2008;89(4):991–1000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simberloff D. The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2009;40(1):81–102.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood JL, Hoopes MF, Marchetti MP. Invasion ecology. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ballari S, Anderson CB, Valenzuela AEJ. Understanding trends in biological invasions by introduced mammals in Southern South America: a review of research and management. Mammal Rev. 2016;46(3):229–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolar CS, Lodge DM. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001;16(4):199–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amestoy F, Spinetti M, Fabiano G. Aquatic species introduced in Uruguay. SIL Proceedings, 1922-2010: Verh Internat Verein Theor Angew Limnol. 1998;26:2170–2217.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer G, Gobel N, Borteiro C, et al. Current status of American bullfrog, Lithobates catesbeianus, invasion in Uruguay and exploration of chytrid infection. Biol Invasions. 2018;20(2):285–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foti R, Spinetti M. Herramientas aplicadas a la evaluación para la introducción y manejo preventivo de las especies exóticas invasoras para su uso en acuicultura. In: Aber A, Ferrari G, Porcile JFeditors. Identificación de prioridades para la gestión nacional de las especies exóticas invasoras. Montevideo: Comité Nacional de Especies Exóticas Invasoras; 2012. p. 46–54.
   Google Scholar
• Sanguinetti J, Buria L, Malmierca L. Invasive alien species management in Patagonia, Argentina: prioritization, achievements and science-policy integration challenges identified by the National Parks Administration. Ecol Austral. 2014;24(2):183–192.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer G, Gobel N, Kacevas N, et al. Una nueva población feral de rana toro (Lithobates catesbeianus) en Uruguay, encontrada con participación ciudadana. Revista Latinoamericana de Herpetología. 2018;1(2):47–50.
   Google Scholar