The balance of common vs. rare: a study of dragonfly (Insecta: Odonata) assemblages in the Brazilian Pampa biome

References

• Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett. 2004;7(7):601–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasil LS, Vieira TB, Oliveira-Júnior JMB, et al. Elements of metacommunity structure in Amazonian Zygoptera among streams under different spatial scales and environmental conditions. Ecol Evol. 2017;7(9):01–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soberón J. Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species. Ecol Lett. 2007;10(12):1115–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester SE, Ruttenberg BI, Gaines SD, et al. The relationship between dispersal ability and geographic range size. Ecol Lett. 2007;10(8):745–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor AD. Metapopulations, dispersal, and predator-prey dynamics: an overview. Ecol. 2009;71(2):429–433.
   Google Scholar
• Hanski I. Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis. Oikos. 1982;38(2):210–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez EE, Boria RA, Anderson RP. Can biotic interactions cause allopatry? Niche models, competition, and distributions of South American mouse opossums. Ecography. 2014;37(8):741–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosindell J, Cornell SJ. Species-area curves, neutral models, and long-distance dispersal. Ecol. 2009;90(7):1743–1750.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas CD, Mallorie HC. Rarity, species richness and conservation: butterflies of the Atlas Mountains in Morocco. Biol Conserv. 1985;33(2):95–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuning WE, Gaston KG. The biology of rarity: patterns, causes and consequences. Tree. 1993;8(8):298–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg A, Tjernberg M. Common and rare Swedish vertebrates – distribution and habitat preferences. Biodiv Conserv. 1996;5(1):101–128.
   Google Scholar
• Magurran AE, Henderson PA. Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distribution. Lett Nat. 2003;422(6933):714–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novelo-Gutiérrez R, Gómez-Anaya JA. A comparative study of Odonata (Insecta) assemblages along an altitudinal gradient in sierra de Coalcomán Mountains, Michoacán, Mexico. Biodiv Conserv. 2009;18(3):679–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro-Junior CS, Juen L, Hamada N. Effects of urbanization on stream habitats and associated adult dragonfly and damselfly communities in central Brazilian Amazonia. Landsc Urb Plan. 2014;127:28–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira-Junior JMB, Shimano Y, Gardner TA. Neotropical dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) as indicators of ecological condition of small streams in the eastern Amazon. Austr Ecol. 2015;40(6):733–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Gucht K, Cottenie K, Muylaert K, et al. The power of species sorting: local factors drive bacterial community composition over a wide range of spatial scales. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(51):20404–20409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner H, Wildi O, Ewald KC. Additive partitioning of plant species diversity in an agricultural mosaic landscape. Landsc Ecol. 2000;15(3):219–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trend in Ecol Evol. 2003;18(4):182–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrickx F, Maelfait JP, van Wingerden W, et al. How landscape structure, land-use intensity and habitat diversity affect components of total arthropod diversity in agricultural landscapes. J Appl Ecol. 2007;44(2):340–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renner S, Périco E, Sahlén G. Testing dragonflies as species richness indicators in a fragmented subtropical Atlantic forest environment. Neot Entomol. 2016;43(3):231–239.
   Google Scholar
• Chesson P. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 2000;31(1):343–366.
   Google Scholar
• Tilman D. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology. 1994;75(1):2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulmer MG. On fitting the poisson lognormal distribution to species-abundance data. Biometrics. 1974;30(1):101–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz D. Seven forms of rarity. In: Synge H, editor. The biological aspects of rare plant conservation. New York (NY): Wiley; 1981. p. 205–217.
   Google Scholar
• Lennon JJ, Koleff P, Greenwood JJD, et al. Contribution of rarity and commonness to patterns of species richness. Ecol Lett. 2004;7(2):81–87.
   Google Scholar
• Mouillot D, Graham NAJ, Villéger S. A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances. Trends Ecol Evol. 2013;28(3):167–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimm SL, Jenkins CN, Abell R, et al. The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Sci. 2014;344:1246752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkov I, Banavar JR, Hubbell SP, et al. Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology. Nat. 2003;424(6952):1035–1037.
   Google Scholar
• Gärdenfors U. Classifying threatened species at national versus global levels. Trend in Ecol Evol. 2001;16(9):511–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier P, Debussche M, Thompson JD. Regional priority setting for rare species based on a method combining three criteria. Biol Conserv. 2010;143(6):1501–1509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juen L, Cabette HSR, de Marco P. Odonate assemblage structure in relation to basin and aquatic habitat structure in Pantanal wetlands. Hydrobiol. 2007;579(1):125–134.
   Google Scholar
• de Block M, Pauwels K, van den Broeck M, et al. Local genetic adaptations generates latitude-specific effects of warming in predator-prey interactions. Glob Ch Biol. 2013;19(3):689–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Jawaheri R, Sahlén G. Negative impact of lake liming programmes on the species richness of dragonflies (Odonata): a study from southern Sweden. Hydrobiol. 2016;788(1):99–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlén G, Ekestubbe K. Identification of dragonflies (Odonata) as indicators of general species richness in boreal forest lakes. Biodiv Conserv. 2001;10(5):673–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbet PS. Dragonflies: behavior and ecology of Odonata. Ithaca, USA: Cornell University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Renner S, Périco E, Sahlén G, et al. Dragonflies (Odonata) from the Taquari River valley region, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Check List. 2015;11(5):1740.
   Google Scholar
• Overbeck GE, Hermann JM, Andrade BO, et al. Restoration ecology in Brazil – time to step out of the forest. Nat Conserv. 2013;11(1):92–95.
   Google Scholar
• MMA - Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Maps of plant distribution in the Brazilian biomes [Inetnet]. Brasília (DF): Governo do Brasil; 2009 [Cited 2019 Feb 25]. Available from: http://www.mma.gov.br/estruturas/sbf_chm_rbbio/_arquivos/mapas_cobertura_vegetal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Behling H, Pillar VP, Orlóci L, et al. Late Quaternary Araucaria forest, grassland (campos), fire and climate dynamics, studied by high-resolution pollen, charcoal and multivariate analysis of the Cambará do Sul core in southern Brazil. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclim Palaeoecol. 2004;203(3–4):277–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bencke GA, editor. Brasília (DF): Ministério do Meio Ambiente; 2009. Pillar VP, Müller SC, Castilhos ZMS, et al. editors. Diversidade e conservação da fauna dos campos do sul do Brasil. Campos Sulinos - conservação e uso sustentável da biodiversidade. p. 101–121.
   Google Scholar
• INPE - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais [Internet] Brasília (DF): Centro de Previsão de Tempo e Estudos Climáticos, Banco de Dados Meteorológicos. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia; 2009 [cited 2020 mar 19]. Available from: http://bancodedados.cptec.inpe.br/
   Google Scholar
• Scheiner SM. Measuring pattern diversity. Ecology. 1992;73(5):1860–1867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renner S, Périco E, Dalzochio MS, et al. Ecoregions within the Brazilian Pampa biome reflected in Odonata species assemblies. Austr Ecol. 2018;44(3):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Renner S, Périco E, Dalzochio MS, et al. Water body type and land cover shape the dragonfly communities (Odonata) in the Pampa biome, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. J Ins Conserv. 2018;22(1):113–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison RW, von Ellenrieder N, Louton JA. Dragonfly genera of the new world: an illustrated and annotated key to the Anisoptera. Baltimore (USA): The John Hopkins University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison RW, von Ellenrieder N, Louton JA. Damselfly genera of the new world: an illustrated and annotated key to the Zygoptera. Baltimore (USA): The John Hopkins University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman CW. Encyclopedia of South American aquatic insects: Odonata - Anisoptera. Dordrecht (The Netherlands): Springer; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman CW. Encyclopedia of South American aquatic insects: Odonata - Zygoptera. Washington (DC): Springer; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Lencioni FAA. The damselflies of Brazil: an illustrated identification guide II - coenagrionidae family. São Paulo (Brazil): All Print Editora; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Lencioni FAA. Damselflies of Brazil: an illustrated identification guide, Southeast region. Jacareí (Brazil): Editora do Autor; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley S, Kunin WE. Scale dependency of rarity, extinction risk, and conservation priority. Conserv Biol. 2003;17(6):1559–1570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fattorini S. Relations between species rarity, vulnerability, and range contraction for a beetle group in a densely populated region in the Mediterranean Biodiversity Hotspot. Conserv Biol. 2013;28(1):169–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhling F, Sahlén G, Martens A, et al. Dragonfly assemblage composition and diversity in arid tropical environments: a case study from western Namibia. Biodiv Conserv. 2006;15(1):311–332.
   Google Scholar
• Moran PAP. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika. 1950;37(1–2):17–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press SJ, Wilson S. Choosing between logistic regression and discriminant analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 1978;73(364):699–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Huang Z, Shen HT, et al. Dimensionality reduction by mixed kernel canonical correlation analysis. Patt Recogn. 2012;45(8):3003–3016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer Ø. PAST, PAleontological STatistics, Version 3.06. Oslo: Natural History Museum; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Siqueira T, Bini LM, Roque FO. Common and rare species respond to similar niche processes in macroinvertebrate metacommunities. Ecogr. 2012;35(2):183–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhling I, Suhling F. Thermal adaptation affects interactions between a range-expanding and a native odonate species. Freshw Biol. 2013;58(4):705–714.
   Google Scholar
• Borthagaray AI, Barreneche JN, Sebastian A, et al. Modularity along organism dispersal gradients challenges a prevailing view of abrupt transitions in animal landscape perception. Ecogr. 2014;37(6):564–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylin S, Gotthard K. Plasticity in life-history traits. Ann Rev Entomol. 1998;43(1):63–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johansson F, Rowe L. Life history and behavioural responses to time constraints in a damselfly. Ecol. 1999;80(4):1242–1252.
   Google Scholar
• Therry L, Nilsson-Örtmann V, Bonte D, et al. Rapid evolution of larval life history, adult immune function and flight muscles in a poleward-moving damselfly. J Evol Biol. 2014;27(1):141–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwell WK, Ackerly DD. A link between plant traits and abundance: evidence from coastal California woody plants. J Ecol. 2010;98(4):814–821.
   Google Scholar
• Kassen R. The experimental evolution of specialists, generalists, and the maintenance of diversity. J Evol Biol. 2002;15(2):173–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulson D. The importance of forests to neotropical dragonflies. In: Cordero-Rivera A, editor. Forest and Dragonflies. Sofia: Pensoft Publishers; 2006:79–101.
   Google Scholar
• Clavel, Julliard R, Devictor V. Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization? Front Ecol Env. 2011;9(4):222–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yenni G, Adler PB, Ernest KM. Do persistent rare species experience stronger negative frequency dependence than common species? Gl Ecol Biogeogr. 2017;26(5):513–523.
   Google Scholar
• Renner S, Périco E, Sahlén G. Man-made lakes form species-rich dragonfly communities in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest (Odonata). Odonatologica. 2016;45(3–4):135–154.
   Google Scholar
• Suhling F, Jödicke SW. Odonata of African arid regions – are there desert species. Cimbebasia. 2003;18:207–224.
   Google Scholar
• Southwood TER. The croonian lecture 1995. Natural communities: structure and dynamics. Phil Trans Royal Soc London. 1996;351(1344):1113–1129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos S, Silva LG. Mapeamento por imagens de sensoriamento remoto evidencia o bioma Pampa Brasileiro sob Ameaça. Boletim geográfico. 2007;29(2):49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Juen L, Shimano Y, Gardner TA. Neotropical dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) as indicators of ecological condition of small streams in the eastern Amazon. Austr Ecol. 2015;40(6):733–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupatini M, Jacques RJS, Antoniolli ZI. Land-use change and soil type are drivers of fungal and archaeal communities in the Pampa biome. W J Microbiol Biotech. 2013;29(2):223–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mörtberg UM. Resident bird species in urban forest remnants; landscape and habitat perspectives. Landsc Ecol. 2001;16(3):193–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atauri JA, de Lucio JV. The role of landscape structure in species richness distribution of birds, amphibians, reptiles and lepidopterans in Mediterranean landscapes. Landsc Ecol. 2001;16(2):147–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch K, Wagner C, Sahlén G. Farmland versus forest: comparing changes in Odonata species composition in western and eastern Sweden. Ins Conserv Div. 2014;7(1):22–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raebel EM, Merckx T, Feber RE, et al. Multi-scale effects of farmland management on dragonfly and damselfly assemblages of farmland ponds. Agric Ecosyst Env. 2012;161:80–87.
   Google Scholar
• Kadoya T, Suda S, Tsubaki Y, et al. The sensitivity of dragonflies to landscape structure differs between life-history groups. Landsc Ecol. 2008;23(2):149–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samways MJ, Steytler NS. Dragonfly (Odonata) distribution patterns in urban and forest landscapes, and recommendations for riparian management. Biol Conserv. 1996;78(3):279–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausnitzer V, Kalkman VJ, Ram M. Odonata enter the biodiversity crisis debate: the first global assessment of an insect group. Biol Conserv. 2009;142(8):1864–1869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUCN. The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2021-3. [cited 2022 Jan 16]. https://www.iucnredlist.org
   Google Scholar
• Gaston KJ. Biodiversity and extinction: the importance of being common. Progr Phys Geogr. 2008;32(1):73–79.
   Google Scholar
• Mao CX, Colwell RK. Estimation of species richness: mixture models, the role of rare species, and inferential challenges. Ecol. 2005;86(5):1143–1153.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon AL. Conservation of stream fishes: patterns of diversity, rarity, and risk. Conserv Biol. 1998;2(2):149–156.
   Google Scholar
• Arita HT, Robinson G, Redford KH. Rarity in neotropical forest mammals and its ecological correlates. Conserv Biol. 1990;4(2):181–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughley G, Gunn A. Conservation biology in theory and practice. Oxford (UK): Blackwell Science; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM. Pattern and process in macroecology. Oxford (UK): Blackwell Science; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Baillie JEM, Hilton-Taylor C, Stuart SN. IUCN red list of threatened species. a global species assessment. Switzerland: Gland; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson JG. Commonness and rarity in British butterflies. J Appl Ecol. 1993;30(3):407–427.
   Google Scholar
• Bispo PC, Balzter H, Malhi Y, et al. Drivers of metacommunity structure diverge for common and rare Amazonian tree species. PloS ONE. 2017;1(11):e0188300.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Pu Z, Li Y, et al. Stochastic processes play more important roles in driving the dynamics of rarer species. J Plant Ecol. 2015;9(3):328–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster SE, Soluk DA. Protecting more than the wetland: the importance of biased sex ratios and habitat segregation for conservation of the Hine’s emerald dragonfly, Somatochlora hineana Williamson. Biol Conserv. 2006;127(2):158–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar