Does Bergmann’s rule apply in bats? Evidence from two neotropical species

References

• Mori E, Ancillotto L, Lovari S, et al. Skull shape and bergmann’s rule in mammals: hints from old world porcupines. J Zool. 2019;308(1):47–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez MA, Lopez-Sanudo IL, Hawkins BA. The geographic distribution of mammal body size in Europe. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2006;15(2):173–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNab B. On the ecological significance of bergmann’s rule. Ecology. 1971;52(5):845–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körner C, Paulsen J, Spehn EMA. definition of mountains and their bioclimatic belts for global comparisons of biodiversity data. Alp Botany. 2011;121(2):73–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser G, Leuschner C, Hertel D, et al. Elevation effects on the carbon budget of tropical mountain forests (S Ecuador): the role of the belowground compartment. Global Chang Biol. 2011;17(6):2211–2226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körner C, Spehn E. A humboldtian view of mountains. Science. 2019;365(6458):1061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körner C. The use of ‘altitude’ in ecological research. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007;22(11):569–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemer K, Guralnick RP, White EP. No general relationship between mass and temperature in endothermic species. Elife. 2018;9(7):e27166.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann C. Ueber die verha¨ ltnisse der wa¨rmeo¨ konomie der thiere zu ihrer gro¨ sse. Gottinger studien. 1847;3:595–708.
   Google Scholar
• Mayr E. Geographical character gradients and climatic adaptation. Evolution. 1956;10(1):105–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James FC. Geographic size variation in birds and its relationship to climate. Ecology. 1970;51(3):365–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt C, Mitchell S, Salewski V. Bergmann’s rule; a concept cluster? Oikos. 2010;119(1):89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meiri S, Dayan T. On the validity of bergmann’s rule. J Biogeogr. 2003;30:331–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan L, Cai T, Xiong Y, et al. Bergmann’s rule and Allen’s rule in two passerine birds in China. Avian Res. 2019;10(1):34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ, Loder N. Geographic gradients in body size: a clarification of bergmann’s rule. Diversity & Distributions. 1999;5(4):165–174.
   Google Scholar
• Meiri S, Yom-Tov Y, Geffen E. What determines conformity to bergmann’srule? Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2007;16(6):788–794.
   Google Scholar
• Geist V. Bergmann’s rule is invalid. Can J Zool. 1987;65(4):1035–1038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez MA, Olalla-Tarraga MA, Hawkins BA. Bergmann’s rule and the geography of mammal body size in the Western Hemisphere. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2008;15:173–181.
   Google Scholar
• Ashton KG, Tracy MC, Queiroz A. Is bergmann’s rule valid for mammals? Am Nat. 2000;156(4):390–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barros LA, Fortes R, Lorini ML. The application of bergmann’s rule to carollia perspicillata linnaeus 1758 (Mammalia, Chiroptera). Chiroptera Neotropical. 2014;20:1243–1251.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto de Hidrología Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales (IDEAM). Atlas climatológico de Colombia. Bogotá: IDEAM; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Safi K, Meiri S, Jones KE. Body mass evolution in bats. In: Smith FA, Lyons SK, editors. Animal body size: linking pattern and process across space, time, and taxonomic group. Chicago: Chicago University Press; 2013. p. 95–151.
   Google Scholar
• Gohli J, Voje KL. An interspecific assessment of Bergmann’s rule in 22 mammalian families. BMC Evol Biol. 2016;16(1):222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Storz JF, Balasingh J, Bhat HR, et al. Clinal variation in body size and sexual dimorphism in an Indian fruit bat, Cynopterus sphinx (Chiroptera: pteropodidae). Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 2001;72(1):17–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Jiang T, Huang X, et al. A test of rensch’s rule in greater horseshoe bat (rhinolophus ferrumequinum) with female-biased sexual size dimorphism. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e86085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens R, Johnson M, McCulloch E. Absolute and relative secondary-sexual dimorphism in wing morphology: a multivariate test of the ‘big mother’ hypothesis. Acta Chiropt. 2013;15(1):163–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mammal Diversity Database [Internet]. Version 1.6. cited 2021 Oct 23. Available from: https://www.mammaldiversity.org/taxa.html
   Google Scholar
• McLellan LJ. A morphometric analysis of Carollia (Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae). Am Mus Novit. 1984;2791:1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Owen JG, Schmidly DJ, Davis WB. A morphometric analysis of three species of Carollia (Chiroptera, Glossophaginae) from Middle America. Mammalia. 1984;48(1):85–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloutier D, Thomas DW. Carollia perspicillata. Mamm Species. 1992;417:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner AL, ed. Mammals of South America. Volume 1: marsupials, xenarthrans, shrews, and bats. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz J. Los murciélagos de Colombia: sistemática, distribución, descripción, historia natural y ecología. Medellín: Editorial Universidad de Antioquia; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Altringham JD. Bats: biology and behaviour. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega J, Guerrero JA, Maldonado JE. Aggression and tolerance by dominant males of Artibeus jamaicensis: strategies to maximize fitness in harem groups. J Mammal. 2008;89(6):1372–1378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alviz A, Pérez-Torres J. A difference between sexes: temporal variation in the diet of carollia perspicillata (chiroptera, phyllostomidae) at the macaregua cave, santander (Colombia). Anim Biodivers Conserv. 2020;43(1):27–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QGIS.org, 2021. QGIS geographic information system. QGIS Association. Cited 2021 May 12]. Available from 2021 May 12: http://www.qgis.org
   Google Scholar
• Dietz C, Dietz I, Siemers BM. Wing measurement variations in the five European horseshoe bat species (Chiroptera: rhinolophidae). J Mammal. 2006;87(6):1241–1251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo-Figueroa D. Ecological morphology of neotropical bat wing structures. Zool Stud. 2020;59:60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo-Figueroa D, Pérez-Torres J. On the development of a trait-based approach for studying neotropical bats. Pap Avulsos Zool. 2021;61:e20216124.
   Google Scholar
• Castaño JH, Carranza JA, Pérez-Torres J. Diet and trophic structure in assemblages of montane frugivorous phyllostomid bats. Acta Oecol. 2018;91:81–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guisande C, Heine J, González-DaCosta J, et al. 2014. RWizard Software. [Cited 2021 May 23]. Available from: http://www.ipez.es/rwizard.
   Google Scholar
• JASP Team (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1). Cited 2021 May 12]. Available from 2021 May 12: https://jasp-stats.org/
   Google Scholar
• Steudel KW, Porter P, Sher D. The biophysics of bergmann’s rule: a comparison of the effects of pelage and body size variation on metabolic rate. Can J Zool. 1994;72(1):70–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter WP, Munger JC, Stewart WE, et al. Endotherm energetics: from a scalable individual-based model to ecological applications. Aust J Zool. 1994;42(1):125–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freckleton RP, Harvey PH, Pagel M. Bergmann’s rule and body size in mammals. Am Nat. 2003;161(5):821–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soriano P. Functional structure of bat communities in tropical rainforests and Andean cloud forests. Ecotropicos. 2000;13(1):1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kluger MJ, Heath JE. Vasomotion in the bat wing: a thermoregulatory response to internal heating. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1970;32(2):219–226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Makanya A, Mortola J. The structural design of the bat wing web and its possible role in gas exchange. J Anat. 2007;211(6):687–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig ML. The strategy of body size in mammalian carnivores. Am Midl Nat. 1968;80(2):299–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtado N, Sepúlveda R, Pacheco V. Sexual size dimorphism of a sensory structure in a monomorphic bat. Acta Chiropt. 2015;17(1):75–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo-Figueroa D. Fluctuating asymmetry of three bat species in extensive livestock systems of córdoba department, Colombia. Rev Colomb Cienc Anim. 2018;10(2):143–153.
   Google Scholar
• McCracken GF, Wilkinson GS. Bat mating systems. In: Krutzsch PH, editor. Reproductive biology of bats. San Diego United States: Academic Press, A Harcourt Science and Technology Company; 2000. p. 321–357.
   Google Scholar
• Kerth G. Causes and consequences of sociality in bats. Bioscience. 2008;58(8):737–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss RS, Fleck DW, Strauss RE, et al. Roosting ecology of Amazonian bats: evidence for guild structure in hyperdiverse mammalian communities. Am Mus Novit. 2016;3870(3870):1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Hendges CD, Patterson B, Cáceres NC. Big in the tropics: ecogeographical clines in peccary size reveal the converse of bergmann’s rule. J Biogeogr. 2021;48(5):1228–1239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar