Vocal activity of the rufous nightjar (Antrostomus rufus) in subtropical Yungas Andean forests of Argentina

References

• York JE, Young AJ, Radford AN. Singing in the moonlight: dawn song performance of a diurnal bird varies with lunar phase. Biol Let. 2014;10(1):20130970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Granados C, Schuchmann KL. Illuminating the nightlife of two Neotropical nightjars: vocal behavior over a year and monitoring recommendations. Ethol Ecol Evol. 2020a;32(5):466–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Granados C, Schuchmann KL. Monitoring the annual vocal activity of two enigmatic nocturnal Neotropical birds: the Common Potoo (Nyctibius griseus) and the Great Potoo (Nyctibius grandis). J Ornithol. 2020b;161(4):1129–1141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchac LS, Lesmeister DB, Dugger KM, et al. Passive acoustic monitoring effectively detects Northern Spotted Owls and Barred Owls over a range of forest conditions. Condor. 2020;122(3):1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Granados C, Schuchmann KL, Marques MI. Addicted to the moon: vocal output and diel pattern of vocal activity in two Neotropical nightjars is related to moon phase. Ethol Ecol Evol. 2021b;34:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugai LSM, Silva TSF, Ribeiro JW Jr, et al. Terrestrial passive acoustic monitoring: review and perspectives. BioScience. 2019;69(1):15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Granados C, Schuchmann KL, Marques MI. Vocal activity of the Ferruginous pygmy-owl (Glaucidium brasilianum) is strongly correlated with moon phase and nocturnal temperature. Ethol Ecol Evol. 2021a;33(1):62–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zárate V, Juncosa-Polzella AS. Vocal activity of the Great potoo (Nyctibius grandis) in relation to moonlight: detections in Costa Rica. Ornitol Neotrop. 2021;32(1):74–76.
   Google Scholar
• Holyoak DT. Nightjars and their allies: the Caprimulgiformes. Vol. 7. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann D, Epifânio AD, de Vasconcelos MF. Nesting of Band-winged Nightjar Caprimulgus l. longirostris in eastern Brazil, including the first description of chicks. Cotinga. 2010;32:142–145.
   Google Scholar
• Pople RG. Breeding biology of the White-winged Nightjar (Eleothreptus candicans) in eastern Paraguay. Rev Bras Ornitol. 2014;22(2):219–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaaf AA, Peralta G, Luczywo A, et al. Biologia reproductiva y comportamientos de cuidado parental de dos especies de atajacaminos de Córdoba, Argentina. Ornitol Neotrop. 2015;26:25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Bodrati A, Areta JI. Dos nuevos dormilones para la avifauna Argentina (Chordeiles acutipennis y Caprimulgus maculicaudus) y comentarios sobre hábitat, comportamiento y geonemia en Paraguay. Hornero. 2010;25(2):67–73.
   Google Scholar
• Narosky T, Yzurieta D. Aves de Argentina y Uruguay: guía de identificación. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Vasquez Mazzini Editores; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Sigurdsson S, Cracraft J. Deciphering the diversity and history of New World nightjars (Aves: caprimulgidae) using molecular phylogenetics. Zool J Linnean Soc. 2014;170(3):506–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleere N. Family Caprimulgidae (Nightjars). In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A Sargatal J, editors. Handbook of the birds of the world, Volume 4: barn-owls to hummingbirds. Barcelona, España: Lynx Edicions; 1999. pp. 302–386.
   Google Scholar
• Salvador SA, Bodrati A, Salvador LA. Aportes al conocimiento de la reproducción del Atajacaminos Colorado (Antrostomus rufus) en Argentina. Nuestras aves. 2014;59:54–57.
   Google Scholar
• Malizia L, Pacheco S, Blundo C, et al. Caracterización altitudinal, uso y conservación de las Yungas Subtropicales de Argentina. Ecosistemas. 2012;21(1–2):53–73.
   Google Scholar
• Boullhesen M, Vaira M, Barquez RM, et al. Evaluating the efficacy of visual encounter and automated acoustic survey methods in anuran assemblages of the Yungas Andean forests of Argentina. Ecol Indic. 2021;127:107750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Conservation Bioacoustics. 2014. Raven Pro: interactive Sound Analysis Software. Version 1.5. Computer software. The Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. updated 2016 Nov 2 Available from: http://ravensoundsoftware.com.
   Google Scholar
• Zar, J. H. Biostatistical Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Mardia KV, Jupp PE. Basic concepts and models. Mardia KV, Jupp PE. Basic concepts and models. 2nd edition ed. Chichester (UK): John Wiley and Sons; 2000. pp. 25–56.
   Google Scholar
• Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, et al. Software Infostat, versión 2008. Argentina: Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res. 2004;33(2):261–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuur A, Ieno EN, Walker N, et al. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Barton K, Barton MK 2015. Package ‘mumin’ Version, 1,18.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Møller AP. When climate change affects where birds sing. Behav Ecol. 2010;22:212–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigham RM, Barclay RM. Lunar influence on foraging and nesting activity of Common Poorwills (Phalaenoptilus nuttallii). Auk. 1992;109(2):315–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson HD. A review of foraging and feeding behaviour, and associated anatomical adaptations, in Afrotropical nightjars. Ostrich. 2003;74(3–4):187–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar