Censorship Policy of the Colorado Department of Corrections: A Case Study of Policy Implementation in a Gender Resistive Corrections Culture

References

• Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4(2), 139–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Affidavit of SOC Roger Werholtz, Sperry v. Werholtz (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Alpert, G., & Crouch, B. (1991). Cross-gender supervision, personal privacy, and institutional security: Perceptions of jail inmates and staff. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 18(3), 304–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Correctional Association. (2012). Public correctional policy on the term “correctional officer.” Alexandria, VA: Public Correctional Policies.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update, 33(1), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Attorney General of the United States. (1986). The report of the Attorney General’s commission on pornography. Washington DC: Rutledge Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bamberger, M., Ruch, J., & Mabry, L. (2012). Real world evaluation: Working under budget, time, data, and political constraints. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. J. (2015). Staff sexual misconduct: Implications of PREA for women working in corrections. Journal of Research and Policy, 16(1), 8–36.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, D. M. (1997). Perceptions of the work environment among correctional officers: Do race and sex matter. Criminology, 35(1), 85–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, D. M. (2000). The epistemology of the gendered organization. Gender and Society, 14(3), 418–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, D. M. (2003). At work in the iron cage: The prison as gendered organization. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brodsky, C. M. (1982). Work stress in corectional institutions. Journal of Prison and Jail Health, 2(2), 74–102.
   Google Scholar
• Bulman, P., Garcia, M., & Hernon, J. (2012). Study raises questions about psychological effects of solitary confinement (NCJ 237720). National Institute of Justice Journal, 269, 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Burmeister, E., & Aitken, L. M. (2012). Sample size: How many is enough? Australian Critical Care, 25(4), 271–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, C. D., & Tewksbury, R. (2011). Policies on sexually explicit materials in state prisons. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20(10), 1–13. doi: 10.1177/0887403411426773
   Google Scholar
• Calvert, C., & Carnley, K. M. (2012). Big censorship in the big house – A quarter-century after Turner v. Safley: Muting movies, music, and books. Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, 7(2), 257–300.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, J., Thomas, G., & Anson, R. (2004). Cross-gender perceptions of corrections officers in gender-segregation prisons. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 39(1), 83–103.
   Google Scholar
• Colorado Department of Corrections. (1998). Statistical report fiscal year 1998. Retrieved August 20, 2016 from https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8WLSXAb0Mg8YnQ2Mm9zd3o4dUk/view
   Google Scholar
• Colorado Department of Corrections. (2012). Publications ( Administrative Regulation No. 300-26). Retrieved from https://www.doc.state.co.us/sites/default/files/ar/0300_26_111512.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cusack, C. M. (2014). No stroking in the pokey: Promulgating penological policies prohibiting masturbation among inmate populations. Journal of Law and Social Deviance, 7, 80–124.
   Google Scholar
• Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321, 330, (1977).
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, A. (1987). Pornography is a civil rights issue. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 55, 26–40.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, A., & MacKinnon, C. A. (1988). Porngraphy and civil rights: A new day for women’s equality. Retrieved from http://www.nostatus-quo.com/ACLU/Porn/newday.htm
   Google Scholar
• Esselstyn, T. C. (1966). The social system of correctional workers. Crime & Delinquency, 12(1), 117–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, R. (1977). Cynicism: A factor in corrections work. Journal of Criminal Justice, 5(1), 237–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P. (2003). Methodological quality standards for evaluation research. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587, 49–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J. D., & Cox, S. M. (2001). Research methods and statistics in criminal justice: An introduction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408–1416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer, K. (2008). When women hold the keys: Gender, leadership, and correctional policy. Centerville, UT: MTC Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, M. L., Armstrong, G. S., & Hepburn, J. R. (2005).Correctional officers’ perceptions of equitable treatment in the masculinized prison environment. Criminal Justice Review, 30(2), 189–206. doi: 10.1177/0734016805284306
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. doi: 10.1177/1525822x05279903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutek, B. A., & Cohen, A. G. (1987). Sex ratios, sex role spillover, and sex at work: A comparison of men’s and women’s experiences. Human Relations, 40(2), 97–115. doi:10.1177/001872678704000202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. D., Rauch, W. H., & Phillips, R. L. (1997). Guidelines for the development of a security program (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, L. (2005). ‘Waking up the sleeping giant’: Change management, policy transfer & the search for collaboration. Public Policy and Administration, 20(3), 69–89. doi:10.1177/095207670502000307
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klofas, J., & Toch, H. (1982). The guard subculture myth. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 19(1), 238–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S. E., & Jurik, N. C. (2007). Doing justice, doing gender: Women in legal and criminal justice occupations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Micieli, J. (2008). Stress and effects of working in a high security prison, NCJ 224105. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=246060.
   Google Scholar
• New Times, Inc. v. Ortiz, Case No. 00-F-612, 2004, U.S. (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Nieva, V., & Gutek, B. (1981). Women and work: A psychological perspective. New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Collins, K. M. T. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 281– 316.
   Google Scholar
• Paolucci, E. O., Genuis, M., & Violato, C. (2000). A meta-analysis of the published research on the effects of pornography. Medicine, Mind, and Adolescence, 71( 1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Patenaude, A. L. (2004). No promises, but I’m willing to listen and tell what I hear: Conducting qualitative research among prison inmates and staff. The Prison Journal, 84(4), 69S–91S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogrebin, M. R., & Poole, E. D. (1997). The sexualized work environment: A look at women jail officers. The Prison Journal, 77(1), 41–57.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, F. W. (1888). Female life in prison. London, UK: Spencer Blackett.
   Google Scholar
• Savicki, V., Cooley, E., & Gjesvold, J. (2003). Harassment as a predictor of job burnout in correctional officers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(5), 602–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperry v Werholtz, 413 Fed. Appx. 31 (10th Cir. Feb. 14, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sykes, G. M. (1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. E. (2004). Controversies in criminal justice research. Albany, NY: Lexus Nexus/Anderson.
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. E. (2005). Insiders’ views of prison amenities. Criminal Justice Review, 30(21), 174–188. doi: 10.1177/0734016805284305
   Google Scholar
• Torrey, M. (1992). We get the message: Pornography in the workplace Southwestern University Law Review, 22(53), 53–103.
   Google Scholar
• Wicks, R. J. (1980). Guard: Society’s professional prisoner. Houson, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar