Employment and Housing Challenges Experienced by Sex Offenders during Reentry on Parole

References

• Bernard, H. R. (2006). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brockway, Z. R. (1877). The ideal of a true prison system for a state. Retrieved from http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moa/ACV2799.0001.001?view=toc.
   Google Scholar
• Burchfield, K. B., & Mingus, W. (2008). Not in my neighborhood: Assessing registered sex offenders’ experiences with local social capital and social control. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(3), 356–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, J. M., & Taxman, F. S. (2005). Crime (control) is a choice: Divergent perspectives on the role of treatment in the adult corrections system. Criminology & Public Policy, 4(2), 291–310.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, E. A., & Anderson, E. (2016). Prisoners in 2015. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Sex Offender Management. (2007). Managing the challenges of sex offender reentry. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Author.
   Google Scholar
• Colorado Department of Public Safety (2004). Report on safety issues raised by living arrangements for and location of sex offenders in the community. Denver, CO: Sex Offender Management Board.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Duwe, G. (2013). Can Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA) work in the United States? Preliminary results from a randomized experiment in Minnesota. Sexual Abuse, 25(2),143–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. N., & Porter, J. R. (2015). Criminal history and landlord rental decisions: A New York quasi-experimental study. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 21–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelhor, D., & Jones, L. M. (2004). Explanations for the decline in child sexual abuse cases. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, E. B. (1987). “Uncontrolled desires”: The response to the sexual psychopath, 1920–1960. Journal of American History, 74(1), 83–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeste, M. A., Fradella, H. F., & Vogel, B. (2012). Sex offender myths in print media: Separating fact from fiction in U.S. newspapers. Western Criminology Review, 13(2), 4–24.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, B., Wodahl, E. J., & Mayfield, J. (2011). Prisoner reentry in a small metropolitan community: Obstacles and policy recommendations. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22(1), 90–110.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield, L. A. (1997). Sex offenses and offenders: An analysis of data on rape and sexual assault. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Grommon, E. L. (2013). Prisoner reentry programs: Penetrating the black box for better theory and practice. El Paso, TX: LFB Scholarly Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grossi, L. M. (2017). Sexual offenders, violent offenders, and community reentry: Challenges and treatment considerations. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 59–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat, K. (2005). Criminogenic needs and the transformative risk subject: Hybridizations of risk/need in penality. Punishment & Society, 7(1), 29–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(9), 865–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, D. J. (2003). Jean Valjean’s dilemma: The management of ex-convict identity in the search for employment. Deviant Behavior, 24(6), 571–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, P. M., & Beck, A. J. (2006). Prison and jail inmates at midyear 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, G. T. (1990). Practical sampling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hipp, J. R., Turner, S., & Janetta, J. (2010). Are sex offenders moving into social disorganization? Analyzing the residential mobility of California parolees. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47(4), 558–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzer, H. J., Raphael, S., & Stoll, M. A. (2004). Will employers hire former offenders?: Employer preferences, background checks, and their determinants. In M. Pattillo, D. Weiman, & B. Western (Eds.), Imprisoning America: The social effects of mass incarcertion (pp. 205–243). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Huebner, B. M., & Berg, M. T. (2011). Examining the sources of variation in risk for recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 28(1), 146–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huebner, B. M., DeJong, C., & Cobbina, J. (2010). Women coming home: Long-term patterns of recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 27(2), 225–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huebner, B. M., Kras, K. R., Rydberg, J., Bynum, T. S., Grommon, E., & Pleggenkuhle, B. (2014). The effect and implications of sex offender residence restrictions. Criminology & Public Policy, 13(1), 139–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, L. A., & Burchfield, K. B., (2008). Sex offender residence restrictions in Chicago: An environmental injustice? Justice Quarterly, 25(4),647–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, T. A., & Wilson, D. J. (2003). Reentry trends in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, P. (1998). Moral panic: Changing concepts of the child molester in Modern America. New Haven. CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaeble, D., & Bonczar, T. P. (2017). Probation and parole in the United States, 2015. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Kras, K. R., Pleggenkuhle, B., & Huebner, B. M. (2016). A new way of doing time on the outside: Sex offenders’ pathways in and out of a transitional housing facility. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(5), 512–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBel, T. P., & Maruna, S. (2012). Life on the outside: Transitioning from prison to the community. In J. Petersilia & K. R. Reitz (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sentencing and corrections (pp. 657–683). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leon, C. S. (2011). Sex fiends, perverts, and pedophiles: Understanding sex crime policy in America. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, J. S. (2008). Collateral consequences of sex offender residence restrictions. Criminal Justice Studies, 21(2), 153–166.
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, J. S., Brannon, Y. N., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1), 137–161.
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, J. S., & Cotter, L. P. (2005). The impact of sex offender residence restrictions: 1,000 feet from danger or one step from absurd? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49(2), 168–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, J. S., D’Amora, D. A., & Hern, A. L. (2007). Megan’s law and its impact on community re-entry for sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25(4), 587–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (2002). Pedophiles and cyber-predators as contaminating forces: The language of disgust, pollution, and boundary invasions in federal debates on sex offender legislation. Law & Social Inquiry, 27(3), 529–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini, C., Shields, R. T., Mears, D. P., & Beaver, K. M. (2010). Sex offender residence restriction laws: Parental perceptions and public policy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(5), 1022–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Maruna, S. (2011). Reentry as a rite of passage. Punishment & Society, 13(1), 3–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCleary, R. (1978). Dangerous men: The sociology of parole. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mears, D. P., & Cochran, J. C. (2015). Prisoner reentry in the era of mass incarceration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mears, D. P., Mancini, C., Gertz, M., & Bratton, J. (2008). Sex crimes, children, and pornography: Public views and public policy. Crime & Delinquency, 54(4), 532–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meloy, M. (2006). Sex offenses and the men who commit them. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercado, C. C., Alvarez, S., & Levenson, J. (2008). The impact of specialized sex offender legislation on community reentry. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20(2), 188–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morani, N. M., Wikoff, N., Linhorst, D. M., & Bratton, S. (2011). A description of the self-identified needs, service expendidutes, and social outcomes of participants in a prisoner-reentry program. The Prison Journal, 91(3), 347–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morash, M. (2010). Women on probation and parole: A feminist critique of community programs and services. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, D. L., & Olson, J. (2013). Offender reentry and reintegration: Policy and research. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24(1), 3–8. doi:10.1177/0887403412452426
   Google Scholar
• National Bureau of Economic Research. (2010). Business cycle dating committee. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/cycles/sept2010.html.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Missing and Exploited Children [NCMEC] (2012). Map of registered sex offenders in the United States. Retrieved October 17, 2017 from http://www.missingkids.com/en_US/documents/Sex_Offenders_Map.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Conference of State Legislatures. (2009). Top 10 issues of 2010. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/press-room/ncsls-top-10-issues-of-2010.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M., Deess, P., & Allen, C. (1999). The first month out: Post-incarceration experiences in New York City. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Noaks, L., & Wincup, E. (2004). Criminological research: Understanding qualitative methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hear, M. M. (2007). The second chance act and the future of reentry reform. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 20(2), 75–83.
   Google Scholar
• Pager, D. (2007). Marked: Race, crime, and finding work in an era of mass incarceration. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. (2001). Prisoner reentry: Public safety and reintegration challenges. The Prison Journal, 81(3), 360–375.
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford, England and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. (2004). What works in prisoner reentry? Reviewing and questioning the evidence. Federal Probation, 68(2), 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. (2005). From cell to society: Who is returning home? In J. Travis & C. Visher (Eds.), Prisoner reentry and crime in America (pp. 15–49). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, J. F., Forsyth, C. J., & Mullen-Quinn, C. (2004). Societal reaction to sex offenders: A review of the origins and results of myths surrounding their crimes and treatment amenability. Deviant Behavior, 25(3), 215–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, B., Grommon, E., & Rydberg, J. (2016). Anticipated stigma and defensive individualism during post-incarceration job searching. Sociological Inquiry, 86(3), 348–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman, C. G., & Travis, J. (2004). Taking stock: Housing, homelessness, and prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rydberg, J., & Grommon, E. (2016). A multimethod examination of the dynamics of recidivism during reentry. Corrections, 1(1), 40–60.
   Google Scholar
• Rydberg, J., Grommon, E., Huebner, B. M., & Bynum, T. (2014). The effect of statewide residency restrictions on sex offender post-release housing mobility. Justice Quarterly, 31(2), 421–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sample, L. L., & Kadleck, C. (2008). Sex offender laws: Legislators’ accounts of the need for policy. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19(1), 40–62.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, J. (1993). Poor discipline: Parole and the social control of the underclass, 1890–1990. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, J. (1998). Managing the monstrous: Sex offenders and the new penology. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 4(1/2), 452–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, J. (2007). Governing through crime: How the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. Oxford, England and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Socia, K. M. (2011). The policy implications of residence restrictions on sex offender housing in Upstate NY. Criminology & Public Policy, 10(2), 351–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socia, K. M., & Rydberg, J. (2016). Sex offender legislation and policy. In T. G. Blomberg, J. M. Brancale, K. M. Beaver, & W. D. Bales (Eds.), Advancing criminology and criminal justice policy (pp. 187–202). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sprague, J. (2005). Feminist methodologies for critical researchers. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., & Copes, H. (2013). Incarcerated sex offenders’ expectations for reentry. The Prison Journal, 93(1), 102–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., & Higgins, G. (2005). What can be learned from an online sex offender registry site? Journal of Community Corrections, 14(3), 9–11. 15–16.
   Google Scholar
• Travis, J. (2005). But they all come back: Facing the challenges of prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Travis, J., & Petersilia, J. (2001). Reentry reconsidered: A new look at an old question. Crime & Delinquency, 47(3), 291–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travis, J., Solomon, A. L., & Waul, M. (2001). From prison to home: The dimensions and consequences of prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Troshynski, E. I. (2011). Surveillance technology and the transformation of criminal justice: Monitoring sex offenders with GPS technology ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California-Irvine.
   Google Scholar
• Truman, J. L., & Langton, L. (2015). Criminal victimization, 2014. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice (2013). National sex offender public website: Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from http://www.nsopw.gov/en-US/Home/Faq#top.
   Google Scholar
• Uggen, C., Wakefield, S., & Western, B. (2005). Work and family perspectives on reentry. In J. Travis & C. Visher (Eds.), Prisoner reentry and crime in America (pp. 209–243). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Visher, C., & Farrell, J. (2005). Chicago communities and prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• Visher, C., LaVigne, N., & Travis, J. (2004). Returning home: Understanding the challenges of prisoner reentry. Maryland pilot study: Findings from Baltimore. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Visher, C. A., & Courtney, S. M. E. (2007). One year out: Experiences of prisoners returning to Cleveland. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Visher, C. A., Debus-Sherrill, S. A., & Yahner, J. (2011). Employment after prison: A longitudinal study of former prisoners. Justice Quarterly, 28(5), 698–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visher, C. A. & Travis, J. (2003). Transitions from prison to community: Understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 89–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werth, R. J. (2012). I do what I’m told, sort of: Reformed subjects, unruly citizens, and parole. Theoretical Criminology, 16(3), 329–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Western, B. (2007). The penal system and the labor market. In S. Bushway, M. A. Stoll, & D. F. Weiman (Eds.), Barriers to re-entry? The labor market for released prisoners in postindustrial America (pp. 335–360). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Zevitz, R. G., & Farkas, M. A. (2000). Sex offender community notification: Managing high risk criminals or exacting further vengeance? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 375–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zgoba, K. M., Levenson, J., & McKee, T. (2009). Examining the impact of sex offender residence restrictions on housing availability. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20(1), 91–110.
   Google Scholar