Addressing the Issue of Race and Drug Offenses: An Analysis of the Safety Valve Provision in Federal Sentencing

References

• Aarts, H., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Hassin, R. R. (2004). Goal contagion: Perceiving is for pursuing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albonetti, C. A. (1997). Sentencing under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentencing outcomes, 1991–1992. Law & Society Review, 31(4), 789–822. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albonetti, C. A. (2002a). The effects of the “safety valve” amendment on length of imprisonment for cocaine trafficking/manufacturing offenders: Mitigating the effects of mandatory minimum penalties and offender’s ethnicity. Iowa Law Review, 87(2), 401–434. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=301645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albonetti, C. A. (2002b). The joint conditioning effect of defendant’s gender and ethnicity on lenght of imprisonment under the federal sentencing guidelines for drug trafficking/manufacturing offenders. The Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 6, 39–60. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/jgrj6&div=7&id=&page=
   Google Scholar
• Albonetti, C. A., & Baller, R. D. (2010). Sentencing in federal drug trafficking/manufacturing cases: A multilevel analysis of extra-legal defendant characteristics, guidelines departures, and continuity of culture. The Journal of Gender, Race, and Justice, 14, 41–71. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/jgrj14&div=5&id=&page=
   Google Scholar
• Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Amodio, D. M., & Mendoza, S. A. (2010). Implicit intergroup bias: Cognitive, affective, and motivational underpinnings. In B. Gawronski & B. K. Payne (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurment, theory, and applications (pp. 353–374). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andruzzi, A. D. (2019). Circuit split on the application of the “Safety valve” provision as applied to the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act. Ocean and Coastal Law Journal, 24(2), 251–265. https://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1380&context=oclj
   Google Scholar
• Apprendi v. New Jersey,  530 U.S. 466. (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Bales, W. D., & Piquero, A. R. (2012). Racial/ethnic differentials in sentencing to incarceration. Justice Quarterly, 29(5), 742–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.659674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Bodenhausen, G. V. (1990). Stereotypes as judgmental heuristics: Evidence of circardian variations in discrimination. Psychological Science, 1(5), 319–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00226.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to dismbiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1314–1329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker, S. (2017). Stripping agency from top to bottom: The need for a sentencing guideline safety valve for bottoms prosecuted under the federal sex trafficking statutes. Northwestern University Law Review, 3(3), 753–792. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/nulr/vol111/iss3/4/
   Google Scholar
• Doerner, J. K., & Demuth, S. (2010). The independent and joint effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and age on sentencing outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts. Justice Quarterly, 27(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820902926197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2000). Aversive racism and selection decisions: 1989 and 1999. Psychological Science, 11(4), 315–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, C. (2019). Federal mandatory minimum sentences: The safety valve and substantial assistance exceptions (R41326). Congressional Research Service. https://fas.org.sgp/crs/misc/R41326.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Everett, R., & Wojtkiewicz, R. (2002). Difference, disparity, and race/ethnic bias in federal sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015258732676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Families Against Mandatory Minimums. (2013). Turning off the spigot: How sentencing safety valves can help states protect public safety and save money. https://famm.org/wp-content/uploads/State-Safety-Valve-Report-Turning-Off-the-Spigot.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Federal Bureau of Prisons. (2021, January 12). https://www.bop.gov/about/statistics/statistics_inmate_offenses.jsp
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, T. W. (2013). Sentencing Native Americans in U.S. federal courts: An examination of disparity. Justice Quarterly, 30(2), 310–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.605072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, T. W. (2015). Race and ethnicity effects in federal sentencing: A propensity score analysis. Justice Quarterly, 32(4), 653–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2013.790990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froyd, J. L. (2000). Safety valve failure: Low-level drug offenders and the federal sentencing guidelines. Northwestern University Law Review, 94(4), 1471–1508. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/illlr94&div=52&id=&page=
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022.3514.74.6.1464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hing, L. S., Li, W., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Inducing hypocrisy to reduce prejudicial responses among averse racists. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. D. (2003). Racial and ethnic disparities in sentencing departures across modes of conviction. Criminology, 41(2), 449–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00994.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. D., Ulmer, J. T., & Kramer, J. H. (2008). The social context of guidelines circumvention: The case of federal district courts. Criminology, 46(3), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00125.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. D., Whitestone, E., Jackson, L. A., & Gatto, L. (1995). Justice is still not colorblind: Differential racial effects of exposure to inadmissible evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(9), 893–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295219003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, J., Bennett, M., Carbado, D., & Casey, P. (2011). Implicit bias in the courtroom. UCLA Law Review, 59, 1124–1186. https://repository.uchastings.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2315&context=faculty_scholarship
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kautt, P. M. (2002). Location, location, location: Interdistrict and intercircuit variation in sentencing outcomes for federal drug-trafficking offenses. Justice Quarterly, 19(4), 633–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820200095381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaFrentz, C. D., & Spohn, C. (2006). Who is punished more harshly in federal court? The interaction of race/ethnicity, gender, age, employment status in the sentencing of drug offenders. Justice Research and Policy, 8(2), 25–56. https://doi.org/10.3818/JRP.8.2.2006.25
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, J. D. (2007). Forgotten racial equality: Implicit bias, decisionmaking, and misremembering. Duke Law Journal, 57, 345–424. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1336&context=dlj
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, J. D., Bennett, M. W., & Hioki, K. (2017). Judging implicit bias: A national empirical study of judicial stereotypes. Florida Law Review, 69(1), 63–113. https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1345&context=flr
   Google Scholar
• Menard, S. (2002). Applied Logistic Regression (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, O. (2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(4), 439–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-005-7362-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustard, D. B. (2001). Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. federal courts. The Journal of Law and Economics, 44(1), 285–314. https://doi.org/10.1086/320276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliss, P. (1995). Mandatory minimum sentencing: Discretion, the safety valve, and the sentencing guidelines. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 63, 1851–1892. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ucinlr63&div=60&id=&page=
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter-Davis, N., & Ulmer, J. T. (2020). Discretion and disparity under sentencing guidelines revisited: The interrelationship between structured sentencing alternatives and guidelines decision-making. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 57(3), 263–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427819874862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pampel, F. C. (2000). Logistic regression: A primer. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, B. K. (2005). Conceptualizing control in social cognition: How executive functioning modulates the expression of automatic stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 488–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pronin, E., & Kugler, M. B. (2007). Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(4), 565–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rachlinski, J. J., Johnson, S. L., Wistrich, A. J., & Guthrie, C. (2008). Does unconsious racial bias affect trial judges. Notre Dame Law Review, 84(3), 1195–1246. https://ir.vanderbilt.edu/bitstream/handle/1803/5732/Does_Unconscious_Racial_Bias.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., Ashmore, R. D., & Gary, M. L. (2001). “Unlearning” automatic biases: The malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 856–868. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sechrist, G. B., & Stangor, C. (2001). Perceived consensus influences intergroup behavior and stereotype accessiblity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), 645–654. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, K. B., Charbonneau, A. K., & Glaser, J. (2016). Implicit bias and policing. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. C. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. Criminal Justice, 427–501. https://www.ncjrs.gov/criminal_justice2000/vol_3/03i.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. C., & Holleran, D. (2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, Black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38(1), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00891.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts: Who is punished morre harshly? American Sociology Review, 65(5), 705–729. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2001). ETHNICITY AND JUDGES‘ SENTENCING DECISIONS: HISPANIC-BLACK-WHITE COMPARISONS. Criminology, 39(1), 145–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00919.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, B. D., & Payne, B. K. (2008). Bringing automatic stereotyping under control: Implementation intentions as efficient means of thought control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(10), 1332–1345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208321269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlmann, E. L., & Cohen, G. L. (2005). Constructed criteria: Redefining merit to justify discrimination. Psychological Science, 16(6), 474–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01559.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. (2012). Recent developments and new directions in sentencing research. Justice Quarterly, 29(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.624115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T., Light, M. T., & Kramer, J. (2011a). The “liberation” of federal judges’ discretion in the wake of the Booker/Fanfan decision: Is there increaxed disparity and divergence between courts? Justice Quarterly, 28(6), 799–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.553726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T., Light, M. T., & Kramer, J. (2011b). Racial disparity in the wake of the Booker/Fanfan decision: An alternative analysis to the USSC’s 2010 report. Criminology & Public Policy, 28(6), 799–837. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00761.x
   Google Scholar
• United States Sentencing Commission. (2010). Demographic differences in federal sentencing practices: An update of the Booker report’s multivariate regression analysis.
   Google Scholar
• United States v. Booker/Fanfan, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Von Hirsch, A. (1976). Doing justice: The choice of punishments. Hill & Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Wilmot, K. A., & Spohn, C. (2004). Prosecutorial discretion and real-offense sentencing: An analysis of relevant conduct under the federal sentencing guidelines. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15(3), 324–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403403259434
   Google Scholar