The Impact of Pretrial Release Programming on Rearrest: Results from an Eastern Pennsylvania County Sample

References

• American Bar Association. (2007). Criminal Justice Standards. ABA standards for criminal justice: Pretrial release. American Bar Association. http://www.americanbar.org/publications/criminal_justice_section_archive/criminaljust_standards_pretrialrelease_toc.html
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128705281756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ares, C., Rankin, A., & Sturz, H. (1963). The Manhattan bail project: An interim report on the pre-trial use of pre-trial parole. New York University Law Review, 38(1), 67–95.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J., Krisberg, B., & Litsky, P. (1984). Evaluation of the field test of supervised pretrial release final report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J., & Murray, T. (2009). Re-validation of the actuarial risk assessment instrument for Harris County pretrial services. The JFA Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Barno, M., Martínez, D. N., & Williams, K. R. (2020). Exploring alternatives to cash bail: An evaluation of Orange County’s Pretrial Assessment and Release Supervision (PARS) Program. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(1), 363–378.
   Google Scholar
• Bechtel, K., Holsinger, A. M., Lowenkamp, C. T., & Warren, M. J. (2017). A meta-analytic review of pretrial research: Risk assessment, bond type, and interventions. American. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(2), 443–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-016-9367-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtel, K., Lowenkamp, C. T., & Holsinger, A. M. (2011). Identifying the predictors of pretrial failure: A meta-analysis. Federal Probation, 75(2), 78–87.
   Google Scholar
• Cadigan, T., & Lowenkamp, C. T. (2011). Implementing risk assessment in the federal pretrial services system. Federal Probation, 75(2), 30–34.
   Google Scholar
• Colorado Division of Criminal Justice. (2007). Evidence based correctional practices. National Institute of Corrections. https://www.dcjs.virginia.gov/sites/dcjs.virginia.gov/files/publications/corrections/evidence-based-correctional-practices.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dobbie, W., Goldin, J., & Yang, C. S. (2018). The effects of pretrial detention on conviction, future crime, and employment: Evidence from randomly assigned judges. American Economic Review, 108(2), 201–240. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20161503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskridge, C. (1981). Predicting and protecting against failure to appear in pretrial release: The state of the art. Pretrial Services Resource Center.
   Google Scholar
• Glaze, L. E., & Kaeble, D. (2014). Correctional populations in the United States. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
   Google Scholar
• Goldkamp, J. S., & White, M. (2006). Restoring accountability in pretrial release: The Philadelphia pretrial release supervision experiments. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2(2), 142–181.
   Google Scholar
• Latessa, E., Smith, P., Lemke, R., Makarios, M., & Lowenkamp, C. (2009). Creation and validation of the Ohio risk assessment system. Final report. University of Cincinnati School of Criminal Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Latessa, E. J., Listwan, S. J., & Koetzle, D. (2015). What works (and doesn’t) in reducing recidivism. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Lemke, R., & Latessa, E. (2008). The development and validation of a pretrial screening tool. Federal Probation, 72(3), 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., VanNostrand, M., & Holsinger, A. M. (2013). Investigating the impact of pretrial detention on sentencing outcomes. LJAF.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., & Whetzel, J. (2009). The development of an actuarial risk assessment instrument for US pretrial services. Federal Probation, 73(1), 50–55.
   Google Scholar
• Mamalian, C. A. (2011). State of the science of pretrial risk assessment. Pretrial Justice Institute.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Pretrial Services Agencies. (2004). Standards on Pretrial Release. Third edition. https://info.nicic.gov/nicrp/system/files/napsa-standards-2004.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. R., VanBenschoten, S., Alexander, M., & Lowenkamp, C. T. (2011). A random (almost) study of staff training aimed at reducing re-arrest (STARR): Reducing recidivism through intentional design. Federal Probation, 75(2), 57–63.
   Google Scholar
• Saks, M., & Ackerman, A. R. (2014). Bail and sentencing: Does pretrial detention lead to harsher punishment? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403412461501
   Google Scholar
• VanNostrand, M. (2003). Assessing risk among pretrial defendants in Virginia. Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services.
   Google Scholar
• VanNostrand, M., & Keebler, G. (2009). Pretrial risk assessment in the federal court. Federal Probation, 73(2), 2–29.
   Google Scholar
• VanNostrand, M., & Rose, K. J. (2009). Pretrial risk assessment in Virginia. Virginia Department of Criminal Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Vose, B. (2016). Risk assessment and reassessment. An evidence-based approach to offender management. Criminology & Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q., & Petersilia, J. (2011). Crime and public policy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, Z. (2018). Jail inmates in 2016. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar