Classification and mathematical modeling of infrastructure interdependencies

References

• Albert, R., Albert, I., & Nakarado, G. L. (2004). Structural vulnerability of the North American power grid. Physical Review, E69, 025103.
   Google Scholar
• Ang, A. S., Pires, J. A., & Villaverde, R. (1996). A model for the seismic reliability assessment of electric power transmission systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 51(1), 7–22. doi:10.1016/0951-8320(95)00101-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, S., & Shinozuka, M. (2008). Mechanistic quantification of RC bridge damage states under earthquake through fragility analysis. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 23(1), 12–22. doi:10.1016/j.probengmech.2007.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocchini, P., & Frangopol, D. M. (2011). A stochastic computational framework for the joint transportation network fragility analysis and traffic flow distribution under extreme events. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 26(2), 182–193. doi:10.1016/j.probengmech.2010.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). (2018). 2018 transmission plan. http://www.bpa.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Boore, D. M., & Atkinson, G. M. (2008). Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 99–138. doi:10.1193/1.2830434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T., Hörsch, J., & Schlachtberger, D. (2018). PyPSA: Python for power system analysis. Journal of Open Research Software, 6(1). doi:10.5334/jors.188
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choe, D., Gardoni, P., & Rosowsky, D. (2007). Closed- form fragility estimates, parameter sensitivity and Bayesian updating for RC columns. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 133(7), 833–843. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:7(833)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choe, D., Gardoni, P., Rosowsky, D., & Haukaas, T. (2009). Seismic fragility estimates for reinforced concrete bridges subject to corrosion. Structural Safety, 31(4), 275–283. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, S., & Lakoff, A. (2008). The vulnerability of vital systems: How ‘critical infrastructure’ became a security problem. In M. Dunn & S. Kristensen (eds.), The politics of securing the homeland: Critical infrastructure, risk and securitisation (pp. 40–62). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Contento, A., Pande, A., & Gardoni, P. (2019). Time-dependent probabilistic formulation for predictions of storm surge. (in preparation).
   Google Scholar
• Corotis, R. (2009). Societal issues in adopting life-cycle concepts within the political system. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 5(1), 3906. doi:10.1080/15732470701322867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudenhoeffer, D. D., Permann, M. R., & Manic, M. (2006). CIMS: A framework for infrastructure interdependency modeling and analysis. In L. F. Perrone, F. P. Wieland, J. Liu, B. G. Lawson, D. M. Nicol, and R. M. Fujimoto (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2006 winter simulation conference. Monterey, California.
   Google Scholar
• El- Rayes, K., & Moselhi, O. (2001). Optimizing resource utilization for repetitive construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(1), 18–27. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:1(18)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingwood, B. R., Cutler, H., Gardoni, P., Peacock, W. G., van de Lindt, J. W., & Wang, N. (2016). The centerville virtual community: A fully integrated decision model of interacting physical and social infrastructure systems. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 1(3–4), 95–107. doi:10.1080/23789689.2016.1255000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2014). Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology: Earthquake model (HAZUS-MH 2.1 technical manual). Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Gardoni, P. (2019). Routledge handbook of sustainable and resilient infrastructure. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gardoni, P., Der Kiureghian, A., & Mosalam, K. M. (2002). Probabilistic capacity models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete columns based on experimental observations. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 128(10), 1024–1038. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:10(1024)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardoni, P., & LaFave, J. M. (2016). Multi-hazard approaches to civil infrastructure engineering. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gardoni, P., Mosalam, K. M., & Der Kiureghian, A. (2003). Probabilistic seismic demand models and fragility estimates for RC bridges. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 7(sup001), 79–106. doi:10.1080/13632460309350474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardoni, P., & Murphy, C. (2009). Capabilities-based approach to measuring the societal impacts of natural and man-made hazards in risk analysis. ASCE Natural Hazards Review, 10(2), 29–37. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2009)10:2(29)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardoni, P., & Murphy, C. (2010). Gauging the societal impacts of natural disasters using a Capabilities-based Approach. Disasters, 34(3), 619–636. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01160.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardoni, P., & Murphy, C. (2014). A scale of risk. Risk Analysis, 34(7), 1208–1227. doi:10.1111/risa.12150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardoni, P., & Murphy, C. (2018). Society-based design: Promoting well-being by designing sustainable and resilient infrastructure. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure. doi:10.1080/23789689.2018.1448667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardoni, P., Murphy, C., & Rowell, A. (eds). (2016). Societal risk management of natural hazards. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, J. D., Sarma, M. S., & Overbye, T. (2008). Power system analysis & design (4th ed.). Toronto, ON, Canada: Thomson.
   Google Scholar
• Guidotti, R., Cavalieri, F., Gardoni, P., & Franchin, P. (2019a). Bayesian updating of hazard and vulnerability models for regional risk analysis using spatio-temporally distributed heterogeneous data. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, (under review).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guidotti, R., Chmielewski, H., Unnikrishnan, V., Gardoni, P., McAllister, T., & van de Lindt, J. W. (2016). Modeling the resilience of critical infrastructure: The role of network dependencies. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 1(3–4), 153–168. doi:10.1080/23789689.2016.1254999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidotti, R., Gardoni, P., & Chen, Y. (2017a). Network reliability analysis with link and nodal weights and auxiliary nodes. Structural Safety, 65, 12–26. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidotti, R., Gardoni, P., & Chen, Y. (2017b). Multi-layer heterogeneous network model for interdependent infrastructure systems. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Structural Safety & Reliability (ICOSSAR 2017). Vienna, Austria: TU Wien.
   Google Scholar
• Guidotti, R., Gardoni, P., & Rosenheim, N. (2019b). Integration of physical infrastructure and social systems in communities’ reliability and resilience analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 185, 476–492. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2019.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidotti, R., Tien, S., & Gardoni, P. (2020). Simulation of seismic wave propagation in the Metro Memphis Statistical Area (MMSA). Seismological Research Letters, (in preparation).
   Google Scholar
• Guikema, S., & Gardoni, P. (2009). Reliability estimation for networks of reinforced concrete bridges. ASCE Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 15(2), 61–69. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2009)15:2(61)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannacone, L., & Gardoni, P. (2018). Physics- based repair rates for pipelines subject to seismic excitations. Proceedings of 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Thessaloniki, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Jia, G., Tabandeh, A., & Gardoni, P. (2017). Life- cycle analysis of engineering systems: Modeling deterioration, instantaneous reliability, and resilience. In P. Gardoni (Ed.), Risk and reliability analysis: Theory and applications (pp. 465–494). Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jia, G., & Gardoni, P. (2018). State-dependent stochastic models: A general stochastic framework for modeling deteriorating engineering systems considering multiple deterioration processes and their interactions. Structural Safety, 72, 99–110. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, W.-H., Song, J., & Gardoni, P. (2008). Matrix-based system reliability method and applications to bridge networks. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 93(11), 1584–1593. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2008.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, W. (2008). Critical infrastructures at risk: A need for a new conceptual approach and extended analytical tools. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93(12), 1781–1787. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2008.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz, N., Song, J., & Gardoni, P. (2016). Seismic reliability analysis of deteriorating representative us west coast bridge transportation networks. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(8), C4015010. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. E., Mitchell, J. E., & Wallace, W. A. (2007). Restoration of services in interdependent infrastructure systems: A network flows approach. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C:(Applications and Reviews), 37(6), 1303–1317. doi:10.1109/TSMCC.2007.905859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. J., Song, L., Gardoni, P., & Lim, H. W. (2011). Post- hazard flow capacity of bridge transportation network considering structural deterioration of bridges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 7, 509–521. doi:10.1080/15732479.2010.493338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihram, G. A. (1970). A cost-effectiveness study for strategic airlift. Transportation Science, 4(1), 79–96. doi:10.1287/trsc.4.1.79
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, C., & Gardoni, P. (2006). The role of society in engineering risk analysis: A capabilities-based approach. Risk Analysis, 26(4), 1073–1083. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00801.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, C., & Gardoni, P. (2007). Determining public policy and resource allocation priorities for mitigating natural hazards: A capabilities-based approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(4), 489–504. doi:10.1007/s11948-007-9019-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, C., & Gardoni, P. (2008). The acceptability and the tolerability of societal risks: A capabilities-based approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(1), 77–92. doi:10.1007/s11948-007-9031-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. (2001). Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review, E64, 016132.
   Google Scholar
• Nocera, F., Tabandeh, A., Guidotti, R., Boakye, J., & Gardoni, P. (2019). Physics-based fragility functions: Their mathematical formulation and use in the reliability and resilience analysis of transportation infrastructure. In P. Gardoni (Ed.), Routledge handbook of sustainable and resilient infrastructure (pp. 237–258). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nocera, F., & Gardoni, P. (2019a). Modeling business interruption as a function of the reliability and resilience of physical infrastructure and social systems. In P. Gardoni (Ed.), Routledge handbook on sustainable and resilient infrastructure (pp. 841–865). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nocera, F., & Gardoni, P. (2019b). A ground-up approach to estimate the likelihood of business interruption. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 41, 101314. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, T. D., Jeon, S. S., Toprak, S., Cubrinovski, M., Hughes, M., van Ballegooy, S., & Bouziou, D. (2014). Earthquake response of underground pipeline networks in Christchurch, NZ. Earthquake Spectra, 30(1), 183–204. doi:10.1193/030413EQS062M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang, M. (2014). Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 121, 43–60. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2013.06.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolucci, R., Griffini, S., & Mariani, S. (2010). Simplified modelling of continuous buried pipelines subject to earthquake fault rupture. Earthquakes and Structures, 1(3), 253–267. doi:10.12989/eas.2010.1.3.253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PCCIP. (1997, October). Critical foundations: Protecting America’s infrastructures, the report of the president’s commission on critical infrastructure protection. https://www.fas.org/sgp/library/pccip.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Porter, K., Terentieff, S., McMullin, R., & Irias, X. (2017). Water supply damage, recovery, and lifeline interaction in an earthquake sequence. In Congress on Technical Advancement 2017, 10-13 September. Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Rinaldi, S. M., Peerenboom, J. P., & Kelly, T. K. (2001). Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 21, 11–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, N., Tabandeh, A., & Gardoni, P. (2019a). Regional resilience analysis: A multi-scale approach to model the recovery of interdependent infrastructure.”. In P. Gardoni (Ed.), Routledge handbook of sustainable and resilient infrastructure (pp. 521–544). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, N., & Gardoni, P. (2019b). Modeling the time-varying performance of electrical infrastructure during post disasterrecovery using tensors. In P. Gardoni (Ed.), Routledge handbook of sustainable and resilient infrastructure (pp. 259–276). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, N., & Gardoni, P. (2019a). Mathematical modeling of interdependent infrastructure: An object-oriented approach for generalized network-system analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, (submitted).
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, N., Tabandeh, A., & Gardoni, P. (2018). Resilience analysis: A mathematical formulation to model resilience of engineering systems. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 3(2), 49–67. doi:10.1080/23789689.2017.1345257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, N., Tabandeh, A., & Gardoni, P. (2019b). Regional resilience analysis: A multi-scale approach to optimize the recovery of interdependent infrastructure. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, (submitted).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabandeh, A., & Gardoni, P. (2015). Empirical Bayes approach for developing hierarchical probabilistic predictive models and its application to the seismic reliability analysis of FRP- retrofitted RC bridges. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 1(2), 04015002. doi:10.1061/AJRUA6.0000817
   Google Scholar
• Tabandeh, A., Gardoni, P., & Murphy, C. (2018a). A reliability- based capability approach. Risk Analysis, 38(2), 410–424. doi:10.1111/risa.12843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabandeh, A., Gardoni, P., Murphy, C., & Myers, N. (2018b). Societal risk and resilience analysis: Dynamic bayesian network formulation of a capability approach. ASCE- ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering. doi:10.1061/AJRUA6.0000996
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440. doi:10.1038/30918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, D. M., Wu, Y., Chen, F. D., Wang, J., Zhang, H. J., & Liu, W. D. (2010). Application of helicopter patrol technology in UHV AC transmission line. Power System Technology, 34(2), 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, P., & Peeta, S. (2011). A generalized modeling framework to analyze interdependencies among infrastructure systems. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 45(3), 553–579. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2010.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, R. (2001). Social implications of infrastructure network interactions. Journal of Urban Technology, 8(3), 97–119. doi:10.1080/106307301753430764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar