Community-Scale Spatial Mapping to Prioritize Green and Grey Infrastructure Locations to Increase Flood Resilience

References

• Alves, A., Gersonius, B., Kapelan, Z., Vojinovic, Z., & Sanchez, A. (2019). Assessing the Co-Benefits of green-blue-grey infrastructure for sustainable urban flood risk management. Journal of Environmental Management, 239, 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, A., Gersonius, B., Sanchez, A., Vojinovic, Z., & Kapelan, Z. (2018a). Multi-criteria approach for selection of green and grey infrastructure to reduce flood risk and increase CO-benefits. Water Resources Management, 32(7), 2505–2522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1943-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, A., Patiño Gómez, J., Vojinovic, Z., Sánchez, A., & Weesakul, S. (2018b). Combining co-benefits and stakeholders perceptions into green infrastructure selection for flood risk reduction. Environments, 5(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments5020029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, A., Vojinovic, Z., Kapelan, Z., Sanchez, A., & Gersonius, B. (2020). Exploring trade-offs among the multiple benefits of green-blue-grey infrastructure for urban flood mitigation. Science of the Total Environment, 703, 134980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boroushaki, S., & Malczewski, J. (2010). Using the fuzzy majority approach for GIS-based multicriteria group decision-making. Computers & Geosciences, 36(3), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2009.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, S. D., Highfield, W. E., & Kang, J. E. (2011). Rising waters: the causes and consequences of flooding in the United States. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CDC/ATSDR Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). (2022, June 13). https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/index.html
   Google Scholar
• CDC/ATSDR SVI Data and Documentation Download | Place and Health | ATSDR. (2021, August 27). https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/data_documentation_download.html
   Google Scholar
• CDC/ATSDR SVI Fact Sheet | Place and Health | ATSDR. (2021, August 30). https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/fact_sheet/fact_sheet.html
   Google Scholar
• Chatham county flood zones 2018. (n d). Retrieved August 26, 2022, from https://data-sagis.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/SAGIS::chatham-county-flood-zones-2018/explore?location=31.970117,-81.038441,10.82
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, K. M., Clark, R., Deffley, N., Mathews, R., Lorenzo, E. D., Polepeddi, L., Chavan, A., Cone, T., Koval, J., Robel, A., Hyde, A., Ramirez, J. M. L., Tien, I., Park, K., McSorley, M., Shabaka, D., & McClain, M. (2022January24). Research to action frameworks for equitable coastal resilience: a case study from savannah, Georgia. 102nd American Meteorological Society Annual Meeting. https://ams.confex.com/ams/102ANNUAL/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/399502
   Google Scholar
• Daxikar, A., Hillier, T., Makarem, F., & Stone, S. (2012). Application of GIS technology in coastal flood hazard mitigation Solutions to Coastal Disasters 2008. https://doi.org/10.1061/40968(312)36
   Google Scholar
• De Sousa, M. R. C., Montalto, F. A., & Spatari, S. (2012). Using life cycle assessment to evaluate green and grey combined sewer overflow control strategies. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16(6), 901–913. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00534.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, X., Guo, H., & Zeng, S. (2017). Enhancing future resilience in urban drainage system: Green versus grey infrastructure. Water Research, 124, 280–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Cuerva, L., Berglund, E. Z., & Rivers, L. (2018). An integrated approach to place Green Infrastructure strategies in marginalized communities and evaluate stormwater mitigation. Journal of Hydrology, 559, 648–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GCAMP. (n d). Retrieved August 24, 2022, https://geospatial.gatech.edu/GCAMP/
   Google Scholar
• Georgia’s sea level rise—sea level rise. (n d). Retrieved February 22, 2022, from https://sealevelrise.org/states/georgia/
   Google Scholar
• Ghanbari, M., Arabi, M., Kao, S.-C., Obeysekera, J., & Sweet, W. (2021). Climate change and changes in compound coastal-riverine flooding hazard Along the U.S. coasts. Earth’s Future, 9(5), e2021EF002055. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanbarpour, M. R., Salimi, S., & Hipel, K. W. (2013). A comparative evaluation of flood mitigation alternatives using GIS-based river hydraulics modelling and multicriteria decision analysis. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 6(4), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, C., Horney, J., & Tien, I. (2017). Metrics for evaluating and improving community resilience. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 23(2), 04016032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundzewicz, Z. W., Kanae, S., Seneviratne, S. I., Handmer, J., Nicholls, N., Peduzzi, P., Mechler, R., Bouwer, L. M., Arnell, N., Mach, K., Muir-Wood, R., Brakenridge, G. R., Kron, W., Benito, G., Honda, Y., Takahashi, K., & Sherstyukov, B. (2014). Flood risk and climate change: Global and regional perspectives. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.857411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., Uyttenhove, P., & Van Eetvelde, V. (2020). Planning green infrastructure to mitigate urban surface water flooding risk – A methodology to identify priority areas applied in the city of Ghent. Landscape and Urban Planning, 194, 103703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, C., Vojinovic, Z., & Sanchez, A. (2021). Multi-objective model-based assessment of green-grey infrastructures for urban flood mitigation. Hydrology, 8(3), 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8030110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. M., & Montalto, F. A. (2019). Stakeholder perceptions of the ecosystem services provided by green infrastructure in New York City. Ecosystem Services, 37, 100928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MPC comprehensive plan. (2021). Retrieved April 22, 2022, from https://www.thempc.org/Comprehensive/Compplan#gsc.tab=0
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. Q., Radhakrishnan, M., Bui, T. K. N., Tran, D. D., Ho, L. P., Tong, V. T., Huynh, L. T. P., Chau, N. X. Q., Ngo, T. T. T., Pathirana, A., & Ho, H. L. (2019). Evaluation of retrofitting responses to urban flood risk in Ho Chi Minh City using the Motivation and Ability (MOTA) framework. Sustainable Cities and Society, 47, 101465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruangpan, L., Vojinovic, Z., Plavšić, J., Doong, D.-J., Bahlmann, T., Alves, A., Tseng, L.-H., Randelović, A., Todorović, A., Kocic, Z., Beljinac, V., Wu, M.-H., Lo, W.-C., Perez-Lapeña, B., & Franca, M. J. (2021). Incorporating stakeholders’ preferences into a multi-criteria framework for planning large-scale Nature-Based Solutions. Ambio, 50(8), 1514–1531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01419-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAGIS. (n d). Retrieved February 22, 2022, https://www.sagis.org/
   Google Scholar
• Shafique, M., & Kim, R. (2017). Green stormwater infrastructure with low impact development concept: A review of current research. DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 83, 16–29. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.20981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterzel, T., Lüdeke, M. K. B., Walther, C., Kok, M. T., Sietz, D., & Lucas, P. L. (2020). Typology of coastal urban vulnerability under rapid urbanization. PLOS ONE, 15(1), e0220936. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stormwater. (2021). ASCE’s 2021 infrastructure report card. https://infrastructurereportcard.org/cat-item/stormwater-infrastructure/
   Google Scholar
• Sweet, W., Horton, R., Kopp, R., & Romanou, A. (2017). Sea level rise. Publications. Agencies and Staff of the U.S. Department of Commerce. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdeptcommercepub/581
   Google Scholar
• Tate, E. (2013). Uncertainty analysis for a social vulnerability index. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(3), 526–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2012.700616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien, I. (2022). Recommendations for investing in infrastructure at the intersection of resilience, sustainability, and equity. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 28(2), 02522001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vineyard, D., Ingwersen, W. W., Hawkins, T. R., Xue, X., Demeke, B., & Shuster, W. (2015). Comparing green and grey infrastructure using life cycle cost and environmental impact: a rain garden case study in Cincinnati, OH. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 51(5), 1342–1360. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vojinovic, Z., Keerakamolchai, W., Weesakul, S., Pudar, R. S., Medina, N., & Alves, A. (2017). Combining ecosystem services with cost-benefit analysis for selection of green and grey infrastructure for flood protection in a cultural setting. Environments, 4(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments4010003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, K. D., Kibler, D. F., Benham, B. L., & Loganathan, G. V. (2009). Application of the analytical hierarchical process for improved selection of storm-water BMPs. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 135(4), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:4(264)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagonari, F., & Rossi, C. (2013). A heterogeneous multi-criteria multi-expert decision-support system for scoring combinations of flood mitigation and recovery options. Environmental Modelling & Software, 49, 152–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar