Bicycles, cyclists and loads: a comparative analysis of cycling practices in Gothenburg and Toulouse

References

• Aldred, R. 2010. ‘On the outside’: Constructing cycling citizenship. Social & Cultural Geography 11, no. 1: 35–52.10.1080/14649360903414593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrendt, F. 2013. “Smart e-bikes as digital networks scenario of future mobilities”, “E-mobility, immobility and alt-mobility”. Paper presented at the Mobility Futures Conference, September 4–6, in Lancaster, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2004. The force of things: Steps toward an ecology of matter. Political Theory 32, no. 3: 347–372.10.1177/0090591703260853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker, W.E. 1995. Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brembeck, H. 2012. Cozy friday: An analysis of family togetherness and ritual overconsumption. In Managing overflow, ed. Barbara Czarniawska and Orvar Löfgren, 125–140. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, R.D.F., A.R. Tallon, and C.J. Thomas. 2005. City centre regeneration through residential development: contributing to sustainability. Urban Studies 42, no. 13: 2407–2429.10.1080/00420980500379537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büscher, M., and J. Urry. 2009. Mobile methods and the empirical. European Journal of Social Theory 12, no. 1: 99–116.10.1177/1368431008099642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge?, ed. J. Law, 196–223. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Canu, R., C. Calvignac, and F. Cochoy. 2013. Des détails qui comptent: pour une archéologie statistique de l’action ordinaire [Details that matter: a plea for a statistical archaeology of mundane action]. In Le sens du détail, ed. C. Datchary. Lormont: Le Bord de l’Eau, 91–104.
   Google Scholar
• Calvignac, C., and F. Cochoy. 2016. From “market agencements” to “vehicular agencies”: Insights from the quantitative observation of consumer logistics. Consumption, Markets & Culture 19, no. 1: 133–147.10.1080/10253866.2015.1067617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. 1984. The practice of everyday life. Berkley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chauvin, P.-M., and F. Reix. 2013. Intérêts et difficultés de l’usage des images comme outils de recherche en sociologie [Advantages and drawbacks of images as research tools in sociology]. CinémAction, no. 147: 149–156.
   Google Scholar
• Cherry, C., and R. Cervero. 2007. Use characteristics and mode choice behavior of electric bike users in China. Transport Policy 14, no. 3: 247–257.10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochoy, F., J. Hagberg, and R. Canu. 2015. The forgotten role of pedestrian transportation in urban life: Insights from a visual comparative archaeology (Gothenburg and Toulouse, 1875–2011). Urban Studies 52, no. 12: 2267–2286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, M., and T. Edensor. 2014. Cycling through dark space: Apprehending landscape otherwise. Mobilities 12, no. 1: 1–19. doi:10.1080/17450101.2014.956417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, P. 2013. E-mobility, immobility and alt-mobility. Paper presented at the Mobility Futures Conference, September 4–6, in Lancaster, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, P. 2015. Cycling cultures. Chester: Chester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emanuel, Martin. 2012. Trafikslag på undantag: cykeltrafiken i Stockholm 1930-1980 [Excluded trough planning: Bicycle traffic in Stockholm 1930-1980]. Diss., Stockholm: Kungl. tekniska högskolan.
   Google Scholar
• Fincham, B. 2006. Bicycle messengers and the road to freedom. The Sociological Review 54, no. s1: 208–222.10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00645.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincham, B. 2007. ‘Generally speaking people are in it for the cycling and the beer’: Bicycle couriers, subculture and enjoyment. The Sociological Review 55, no. 2: 189–202.10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00701.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman, E., S. Washington, and N. Haworth. 2012. Barriers and facilitators to public bicycle scheme use: A qualitative approach. Transportation Research: Part F 15, no. 6: 686–698.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, E., S. Washington, and N. Haworth. 2013. Bike share: A synthesis of the literature. Transport Reviews 33, no. 2: 148–165.10.1080/01441647.2013.775612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M., K. Hannam, and S. Kesselring. 2016. Applied mobilities, transitions and opportunities. Applied Mobilities 1, no. 1: 1–9.10.1080/23800127.2016.1150562
   Google Scholar
• Furness, Z. 2007. Critical mass, urban space and velomobility. Mobilities 2, no. 2: 299–319.10.1080/17450100701381607
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J.J. 1986. The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hagberg, J., and D. Normark. 2015. From basket to shopping bag: Retailers’ role in the transformation of consumer mobility in Sweden, 1941–1970. Journal of Historical Research in Marketing 7, no. 4: 452–475.10.1108/JHRM-06-2014-0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannam, K., M. Sheller, and J. Urry. 2006. Mobilities, immobilities and moorings. Mobilities 1, no. 1: 1–22.10.1080/17450100500489189
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, N. 2015. ‘Mobility-things’ and consumption: Conceptualizing differently mobile families on the move with recent purchases in urban space. Consumption Markets & Culture 18, no. 1: 72–91.10.1080/10253866.2014.899494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héran, F. 2014. Le retour de la bicyclette. Une histoire des déplacements urbains en Europe, de 1817 à 2050 [The comeback of the bicycle. A history of urban moves in Europe, from 1817 to 2050]. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, M. 2012. Urban policy engagement with social sustainability in metro Vancouver. Urban Studies February, 49, no. 3: 527–542.10.1177/0042098011403015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, D., P. Rosen, and P. Cox, eds. 2007. Cycling and society. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Jäppinen, S., T. Toivonen, and M. Salonen. 2013. Modelling the potential effect of shared bicycles on public transport travel times in Greater Helsinki: An open data approach. Applied Geography 43: 13–24.10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B.J., and S.S. White. 2010. Promoting sustainability through transportation infrastructure? Innovation and inertia in the Kansas city metropolitan area. Journal of Urban Planning & Development 136, no. 4: 303–313.10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P. 2005. Performing the city: A body and a bicycle take on Birmingham, UK. Social & Cultural Geography 6, no. 6: 813–830.10.1080/14649360500353046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P. 2012. Sensory indiscipline and affect: A study of commuter cycling. Social & Cultural Geography 13, no. 6: 645–653.10.1080/14649365.2012.713505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidder, J.L. 2006. ‘It’s the Job that I Love’: Bike messengers and edgework. Sociological Forum 21, no. 1: 31–54.10.1007/s11206-006-9002-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriese, U., and R.W. Scholz. 2011. The positioning of sustainability within residential property marketing. Urban Studies 48, no. 7: 1503–1527.10.1177/0042098010375321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahire, B. [1998] 2011. The plural actor. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, J. 2015. Bicycle parking and locking: Ethnography of designs and practices. Mobilities 12, no. 1: 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1988. Mixing humans and nonhumans together: The sociology of a door-closer. Social Problems 35, no. 3: 298–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1992. Where are the missing masses: Sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In Shaping technology-building society. Studies in sociotechnical change, eds. Wiebe Bijker and John Law, 225–259. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1993. We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1996. On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture & Activity 3, no. 4: 228–245.10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1999a. Factures/fractures. From the concept of network to the concept of attachment. Res special issue on Factura, no. 36: 20–31.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1999b. Pandoras hope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1999c. On recalling ANT. In Actor network theory and after, eds. J. Law and J. Hassard, 15–26. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and E. Hermant. 1998. Paris, ville invisible, Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Laurier, E. 1995. City of Glas/z. Unpublished thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, M. 2015. On the way to cycle rage: Disputed mobile formations. Mobilities 12, no. 3: 384–404. doi:10.1080/17450101.2015.1096031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D.R., L. Porter, A. Barber, and Ch.D.F. Rogers. 2011. Conceptualising sustainability in UK urban regeneration: A discursive formation. Urban Studies 48, no. 2: 273–296.10.1177/0042098009360690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mairie de Toulouse. 2012. Toulouse, ville durable. Direction de la démocratie locale, novembre-décembre, en ligne: https://www.toulouse.fr/documents/149943/203138/rapport_toulouse_ville_durable/8e50b233-e781-4f96-8bab-cfa480af7229.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, K. 2007. Promoting bike-and-ride: The Dutch experience. Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice 41, no. 4: 326–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIlvenny, P. 2015. The joy of biking together: Sharing everyday experiences of vélomobility. Mobilities 10, no. 1: 55–82.10.1080/17450101.2013.844950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, M. 2000. Reconnecting culture, technology and nature: From society to heterogeneity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. 1993. Les artefacts cognitifs [Technological artifacts]. In Les objets dans l’action, Raisons Pratiques, ed. B. dans Conein, N. Dodier, and L. Thevenot, n° 4, 15–34. Paris: Presses de l’EHESS.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. 2006. Enacting mobility: studies into the nature of road-related social interaction. Ph D Thesis, section for STS, Göteborg University 2006-12-09.
   Google Scholar
• Normark, D. 2012. Sutured and sundered: The order-productive cohort of carsons, mophonkers and other consumer-assemblages visiting a petrol station. In Nordic retail research: Emerging diversity, ed. J. Hagberg, U. Holmberg, M. Sundström, and L. Walter, 269–285. Gothenburg: BAS.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenziel, R. 2015. The politics of counting traffic. Paper presented at the T2M & Cosmobilities conference, September 14–17, in Caserta, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenziel, R., M. Emanuel, A.A. Albert de la Bruhèze, and F. Veraart, ed. 2016. Cycling cities: The European experience (Editors). Eindhoven: Foundation for the History of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Parkhurst, G., I. Walker, H. Sherwin, and D. Robbins. 2011. Practices and motivations of travellers making rail-cycle trips. Transport 164, no. 3: 189–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesses, M.W. 2010. Automobility, vélomobility, American mobility: An exploration of the bicycle tour. Mobilities 5, no. 1: 1–24.10.1080/17450100903435029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2007. Doing visual ethnography. London: Sage.10.4135/9780857025029
   Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, J.H. 1995. Videotape: New techniques of observation and analysis in anthropology. In Principles of visual anthropology, ed. Paul Hockings, 255–284. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2006. The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A 38, no. 2: 207–226.10.1068/a37268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2016. Mobilizing the mobilities paradigm. Applied Mobilities 1, no. 1: 10–25.10.1080/23800127.2016.1151216
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. 2010. Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A 42, no. 6: 1273–1285.10.1068/a42282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., M. Pantzar, and M. Watson. 2012. The dynamic of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446250655
   Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. 2006. A place of sense: A kinaesthetic ethnography of cyclists on Mont Ventoux. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24, no. 5: 709–732.10.1068/d66j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. 2009. Cycling the city: Movement, meaning and method. Geography Compass 3, no. 2: 817–835.10.1111/geco.2009.3.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. 2010. Performing resistance? Re-reading practices of urban cycling on London’s South Bank. Environment and Planning A 42, no. 12: 2914–2937.10.1068/a43149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Splitvision. 2013. Undersökning kring vad göteborgarna tycker om att cykla i Göteborg, 2013 [A study of what people in Gothenburg think about bicycling in Gothenburg]. Göteborg: Splitvision Research.
   Google Scholar
• Spotswood, F., T. Chatterton, A. Tapp, and D. Williams. 2015. Analysing cycling as a social practice: An empirical grounding for behaviour change. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 29: 22–33.10.1016/j.trf.2014.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, D., and B. Vedres. 2006. Social times of network spaces: Network sequences and foreign investment in Hungary. American Journal of Sociology 111, no. 5: 1367–1411.10.1086/499507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. 1993. Essai sur les objets usuels. Propriétés, fonctions, usages. In Les objets dans l’action, De la maison au laboratoire, Raisons Pratiques, dir. B. Conein & al., n° 4, 85–111. Paris: éd. de l’EHESS.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 2004. Driving in the city. Theory, Culture & Society 21, no. 4–5: 41–59.10.1177/0263276404046060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tironi, M. 2013. Usagers, technologie et mobilité durable: le cas du vélo en libre-service à Paris. thèse de doctorat, Paris, ENSMP: Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2011. Word urbanization prospects, The 2011 revision. New York, NY: United Nations. https://esa.un.org/unup/pdf/WUP2011_Highlights.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2000. Sociology beyond societies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2004. The ‘system’ of automobility. Theory, Culture and Society 21, no. 4–5: 25–39.10.1177/0263276404046059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2007. Mobilities. Oxford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2011. Climate change and society. Malden, MA; Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Velkovska, J., and M. Zouinar. 2012. Jugements et émotions dans les interactions institutionnelles. ethnographiques.org, n° 25, décembre, Filmer le travail: Chercher, montrer, démontrer, https://www.ethnographiques.org/Jugements-et-emotions-dans-les (consulté le 30 août 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Veraart, F. 2016. Cycling in numbers 1920–2015. In Cycling cities: The European experience, ed. R. Oldenziel, M. Emanuel, A.A. Albert de la Bruhèze, and F. Veraart, 201–229. Eindhoven: Foundation for the History of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Vidalis, S., F. Najafi, D. Chernick, J. Jackson, J. Parker, and S. Ryland. 2010. Modern analysis of bike sharing feasibility. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences 4, no. 11: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Vigour, C. 2005. La comparaison dans les sciences sociales. Pratiques et méthodes. Paris: La Découverte.10.3917/dec.vigou.2005.01
   Google Scholar