463
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The road ahead: using the “Sharrow” in new cycling infrastructure

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 26-48 | Received 18 Apr 2017, Accepted 29 Aug 2017, Published online: 12 Sep 2017

References

  • Albert, E. 1999. Dealing with danger: The normalization of risk in cycling. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 34, no. 2: 157–71.10.1177/101269099034002005
  • Aldred, R. 2015. A matter of utility? Rationalising cycling, cycling rationalities. Mobilities 10, no. 5: 686–705.10.1080/17450101.2014.935149
  • Aldred, R., and S. Crosweller. 2015. Investigating the rates and impacts of near misses and related incidents among UK cyclists. Journal of Transport and Health 2: 379–93.10.1016/j.jth.2015.05.006
  • Barker, P. 2014. Absolutely positively cycling – A Wellington perspective. Presentation for the 2WalkandCycle conference, Auckland, October 10.
  • Buehler, R., and J. Dill. 2016. Bikeway networks: A review of effects on cycling. Transport Reviews 36, no. 1: 9–27.10.1080/01441647.2015.1069908
  • CDM Research (for VicRoads). 2013. Evaluation of shared lane markings of cyclists. Melbourne: VicRoads.
  • Chieng, M., H. Lai, and A. Woodward. 2017. How dangerous is cycling in New Zealand? Journal of Transport & Health, Online early version.
  • Dant, T. 2004. The driver-car. Theory, Culture and Society 21, no. 4–5: 61–79.10.1177/0263276404046061
  • Dill, J., and T. Carr. 2003. Bicycling commuting and facilities in major US cities: If you build them, commuters will use them – Another look. Transportation Research Record 1828: 116–23.10.3141/1828-14
  • Downey, L., and M. Forbes. 2016. Island Bay Cycleway likely to change after damning report for NZTA. The Dominion Post, June 1.
  • Ferenchak, N.N., and W.E. Marshall. 2016. The relative (in)effectiveness of bicycle sharrows on ridership and safety outcomes. Paper presented at Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, USA.
  • Flow Transportation Specialists. 2016. Sharrow markings: Best practice guidance note. https://www.nzta.govt.nz/assets/Walking-Cycling-and-Public-Transport/docs/cycling-network-guidance/Sharrows-R1E160203-Best-Practice-Guidance-Note-Feb-2016.pdf.
  • Freudendal-Pedersen, M. 2015. Whose commons are mobilities spaces? – The case of Copenhagen’s cyclists. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 14, no. 2: 598–621.
  • Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Garfinkel, H. 2002. Ethnomethodology’s program. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Haddington, P., and M. Rauniomaa. 2014. Interactions between road users. Space and Culture 17, no. 2: 176–90.10.1177/1206331213508498
  • Jensen, O. 2014. Bike: Cycling assemblages in Copenhagen, Odense and Aarhus. In Designing Mobilities, ed. O. Jensen, 96–143. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
  • Jensen, O., D. Bendix Lanng, and S. Wind. 2016. Mobilities design – Towards a research agenda for applied mobilities research. Applied Mobilities 1, no. 1: 26–42.10.1080/23800127.2016.1147782
  • Kullman, K. 2009. Enacting traffic spaces. Space and Culture 12, no. 2: 205–17.10.1177/1206331209331598
  • Lam, T. 2017. Hackney: A cycling borough for whom? Applied Mobilities, Online early version.
  • Latham, A., and P. Wood. 2015. Inhabiting infrastructure: Exploring the interactional spaces of urban cycling. Environment and Planning A 47: 300–19.10.1068/a140049p
  • Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Laurier, E. 2014. The graphic transcript. Geography Compass 8, no. 4: 235–48.10.1111/gec3.v8.4
  • Liberman, K. 2013. More studies in ethnomethodology. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Liew, W. 2016. Road users perception of cycle lane and sharrow markings. MET thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
  • Livingston, E. 2016. Ethnographies of reason. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • McIlvenny, P. 2015. The joy of biking together: Sharing everyday experiences of velomobility. Mobilities 10, no. 1: 55–82.10.1080/17450101.2013.844950
  • Ministry of Transport. 2015. Comparing travel modes: New Zealand household travel survey 2011–2014. Wellington: Ministry of Transport.
  • Nevile, M., P. Haddington, T. Heinemnann, and M. Rauniomaa. 2014. Interacting with objects: Language, materiality and social activity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.186
  • New Zealand Transport Authority. 2016. Traffic control devices amendment 2016. https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/rules/traffic-control-devices-amendment-2016/.
  • Oldenziel, R., and A. de la Bruheze. 2011. Contested spaces: Bicycle lanes in urban Europe, 1900–1995. Transfers 1, no. 2: 29–49.
  • Pinch, T. 2010. On making infrastructure visible: Putting non-humans to rights. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34: 77–89.10.1093/cje/bep044
  • Smith, M. 2016. Cycling on the verge: The disruptive marginalisation of cycling in contemporary New Zealand transport policy. Energy Research & Social Science 18: 151–61.10.1016/j.erss.2016.02.002
  • Smith, R.J. 2017. Membership categorisation, category-relevant spaces, and perception-in-action: The case of disputes between cyclists and drivers. Journal of Pragmatics, early online version.
  • Spinney, J. 2010. Improvising rhythms: Re-reading urban time and space through everyday practices of cycling. In Geographies of rhythm, ed. T. Edensor, 113–27. London: Routledge.
  • Steinbach, R., J. Green, J. Datta, and P. Edwards. 2011. Cycling and the city: A case study of how gendered, ethnic and class identities can shape healthy transport choices. Social Science & Medicine 72, no. 7: 1123–30.10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.033
  • Vreugdenhil, R., and S. Williams. 2013. White line fever: A sociotechnical perspective on the contested implementation of an urban bike lane network. Area 45, no. 3: 283–91.10.1111/area.2013.45.issue-3
  • Wong, W. 2015. “Analysis of sharrow markings in New Zealand.” MET thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.