Airport Design and Situational Passenger Flows and Practices: Exploring Design as a Method in Copenhagen Airport

References

• Adey, P. 2006. “If Mobility Is Everything Then It Is Nothing: Towards a Relational Politics of (Im)mobilities.” Mobilities 1 (1): 75–94.
   Google Scholar
• Adey, P. 2008. “Airports, Mobility and the Calculative Architecture of Affective Control.” Geoforum 39 (1): 438–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adey, P. 2009. “Getting into the Flow.” In Aeromobilities, edited by S. Cwerner, S. Kesselring, and J. Urry, 63–75. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Adey, P. 2010. Aerial Life: Spaces, Mobilities, Affects. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno, A. V. H. Forthcoming. “Becoming a Passenger: Exploring the Passenger Experience and Airport Design in CPH.” Mobilities Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Bukdahl, E. M. 2011. The Re-enchantment of Nature and Urban Space: Michael Singer Projects in Art, Design and Environmental Regeneration. Aalborg: Utzon Center.
   Google Scholar
• Cortzen, J. 2000. “Taking Off: Copenhagen Airport 1925–2000”. København: Børsens Forlag A/S
   Google Scholar
• CPH (Copenhagen Airports A/S). 2020. “Københavns Lufthavn Lancerer Spareprogram Og Udskyder Investeringer.” Accessed 21 September 2020. https://www.cph.dk/om-cph/presse/nyheder/2020/3/kobenhavns-lufthavn-lancerer-spareprogram-og-udskyder-investeringer
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2006. On the Move. Mobility in the Modern Western World. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cwerner, S., S. Kesselring, and J. Urry, eds. 2009. Aeromobilities. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, B. 2004. The Modern Airport Terminal: New Approaches to Airport Architecture. 2 ed. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, A., and D. Radford. 2015. “Terminal Experimentation: The Transformation of Experiences, Events and Escapes at Global Airports.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33 (6): 1063–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, G. 2009. “> Store > Forward >: Architectures of a Future Tense.” In Aeromobilities, edited by S. Cwerner, S. Kesselring, and J. Urry, 63–75. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, G., and R. Harley. 2004. Aviopolis: A Book About Airports. London: Black Dog.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. [1979] 2015. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hubregtse, M. 2020. Wayfinding, Consumption, and Air Terminal Design. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B. 2013. Staging Mobilities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B., S. Smith, A. V. H. Bueno, and C. B. Christensen. 2020. “Mobilities Design Methods.” In Handbook on Research Methods and Applications for Mobilities, edited by M. Büscher, M. Freuendal-Pedersen, S. Kesselring, and N. G. Kristensen, 354–364. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B., and D. B. Lanng. 2017. Mobilities Design. Urban Design for Mobile Situations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kesselring, S. 2009. “Global Transfer Points: The Making of Airports in the Mobile Risk Society.” In Aeromobilities, edited by S. Cwerner, S. Kesselring, and J. Urry, 39–59. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., and M. Dodge. 2009. “Airport Code/Spaces.” In Aeromobilities, edited by S. Cwerner, S. Kesselring, and J. Urry, 96–114. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lassen, C. 2009. “A Life in Corridors.” In Aeromobilities, edited by S. Cwerner, S. Kesselring, and J. Urry, 177–193. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lassen, C. 2020. “Airports as Mobile Method.” In Handbook on Research Methods and Applications for mobilities, edited by M. Büscher, M. Freuendal-Pedersen, S. Kesselring, and N. G. Kristensen, 292–302. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lassen, C., O. B. Jensen, and G. Larsen. 2017. “Fremtidens Luftfart [Future of Aviation].” Trafik og Veje, Fremtidens Transport (Juni/Juli): 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network- Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milbredt, O., A. Castro, A. Ayazkhani, and T. Christ. 2017. “Passenger-Centric Airport Management via New Terminal Interior Design Concepts.” Transportation Research Procedia 27 (C): 1235–1241.
   Google Scholar
• Monika, B., J. Urry, and K. Witchger. 2011. Mobile Methods. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolaeva, A. 2012. “Designing Public Space for Mobility: Contestation, Negotiation and Experiment at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 103 (5): 542–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaeva, A. 2017. ““‘Spoiled”, “Bored”, “Irritated” and “Nervous”: The Transformations of a Mobile Subject in Airport Design Discourse.” In Mobilising Design, edited by J. Spinney, S. Reimer, and P. Pinch, 25–34. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pearman, H. 2004. Airports: A Century of Architecture. New York: H. N. Abrams.
   Google Scholar
• Roseau, N. 2012. “Airports as Urban Narratives: Toward a Cultural History of the Global Infrastructures.” Transfers 2 (1): 32–54.
   Google Scholar
• Shilon, M., and R. Shamir. 2016. “Becoming an Airline Passenger: Body, Luggage, and Documents.” Subjectivity 9 (3): 246–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuchi, S., R. Drogemuller, and L. Buys. 2018. “Flexibility in Airport Terminals: Identification of Design Factors.” Journal of Airport Management 12 (1): 90–108.
   Google Scholar
• Tezcan, P., and S. Hiemstra-Van Mastrigt. 2019. “The Effect of Light Projections for Wayfinding Purposes within an Airport Context.” Journal of Navigation 72 (5): 1200–1216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibaud, J.-P., ed. 2017. The Aesthetics of Atmospheres. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Xovis. 2020. “Airport Solutions”. Accessed 16 January 2020. https://www.xovis.com/solutions/#Airports
   Google Scholar
• Yaneva, A. 2012. Mapping Controversies in Architecture. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar