The plurinational cycling revolution in Santiago de Chile: demands for mobility justice

References

• Blickstein, S., and S. Hanson. 2001. “Critical Mass: Forging a Politics of Sustainable Mobility in the Information Age.” Transportation 28 (4): 347–362. doi:10.1023/A:1011829701914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, C., ed. 2002. Critical Mass: Bicycling’s Defiant Celebration. Edinburgh, Scotland ; Oakland, CA: AK Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, C., L. Elliott, and A. Camarena, eds. 2012. Shift Happens! Critical Mass at 20. San Francisco, Calif: Full Enjoyment Books.
   Google Scholar
• Castañeda, P. 2020. “« From the Right to Mobility to the Right to the Mobile City: Playfulness and Mobilities in Bogotá’s Cycling Activism ».” Antipode 52 (1): 58–77. doi:10.1111/anti.12581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 1983. The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements. London, Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 1986. Los pobladores y el Estado: la dialéctica entre integración social y cambio social: Lima, México y Santiago de Chile. La ciudad y las masas, Madrid. M. Castells. edited by. 269–291.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, P., ed. 2015. Cycling Cultures. Chester: University of Chester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fajardo, M., 2013, « La explosión de la bicicleta en Santiago, una opción urbana e ideológica –El Mostrador, https://www.elmostrador.cl/cultura/2013/11/08/la-explosion-de-la-bicicleta-en-santiago-una-opcion-ideologica.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrell, J. 2001. Tearing down the Streets: Adventures in Urban Anarchy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Furness, Z. 2007. In Mobilities. vol. 2, 299‑319.
   Google Scholar
• Furness, Z. 2010. One Less Car: Bicycling and the Politics of Automobility. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furness, Z., 2020, « Le Vélo, ce Mode de Déplacement Super Résilient. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/le-velo-ce-mode-de-deplacement-super-resilient-138039
   Google Scholar
• Héran, Frédéric . 2020. Le retour de la bicyclette: Une histoire des déplacements urbains en Europe, de 1817 à 2050. Paris: Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, D. 2006a. Social Movements and the Bicycle Available at: https://thinkingaboutcycling.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/social-movements-and-the-bicycle.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Horton, D. 2006b. “Environmentalism and the Bicycle.” Environmental Politics 15 (1): 41–58. doi:10.1080/09644010500418712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illich, I. 1973. Tools for Conviviality. London: Calder and Boyars.
   Google Scholar
• Iveson, K. 2013. “Cities within the City: Do-It-Yourself Urbanism and the Right to the City: Do-It-Yourself Urbanism and the Right to the City.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (3): 94156. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jirón, P. 2020. Desafíos de la ciudad post pandemia ». Núcleo Milenio Movilidades y Territorios. URL: https://www.movyt.cl/index.php/prensa/noticias-movyt/portada/foro-desafios-de-la-ciudad-post-pandemia/.
   Google Scholar
• Koglin, T., and T. Rye. 2014. “« The Marginalisation of Bicycling in Modernist Urban Transport Planning ».” Journal of Transport & Health 1 (4): 214‑22. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2014.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaFrambois, E. H. M. 2018. « The Processes, Potholes, Power Struggles, and Possibilities of DIY Urbanism: The Case of Critical Mass in Chicago.» Reframing the Reclaiming of Urban Space: A Feminist Exploration into Do-It-Yourself Urbanism in Chicago. Lanham: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1974. Le droit à la ville. Paris, Anthropos.
   Google Scholar
• Mundler, M., and P. Rérat. 2018. “« Le vélo comme outil d’empowerment. Les impacts des cours de vélo pour adultes sur les pratiques socio-spatiales ».” Les cahiers scientifiques du transport, no. 73: 139–160.
   Google Scholar
• Murga Frassinetti, A. 2006. “« Los movimientos sociales en América Latina (1980-2000): Una revisión bibliográfica ».” Pollis 2 (2): 163–196.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenziel, R., and M. Emanuel. 2016. A Albert de la Bruhèze, edited by F. Veraart. Eindhoven: Foundation for the History of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Prati, G., V. Marín Puchades, L. Pietrantoni . 2017. “Cyclists as a Minority Group?”. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 47: 34‑41. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rérat, P., and E. Ravalet. 2022. “The Politics of Velomobility: Analysis of the Vote to Include Cycling in the Swiss Constitution.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. doi:10.1080/15568318.2022.2068388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez Vignoli, J. 2008. “Movilidad Cotidiana, Desigualdad Social y Segregación Residencial En Cuatro Metrópolis de América Latin Revista Eure.” 34 (103): 49–71.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2016. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. Oxford: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, J. 2020. The Bicycle as a Vehicle of Protest. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/the-bicycle-as-a-vehicle-of-protest.
   Google Scholar
• Sagaris, L. 2019. Otra clase de amor: Ciudad viva y el nacimiento de un urbanismo ciudadano en Chile. Santiago, Ril editores.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. 2018. Mobility Justice: The Politics of Movement in the Age of Extremes. Londres, Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Stamm, C. 2017. “Conflictos, Autopistas Urbanas y discursos sobre da (in)iusticia en Santiago de Chile.” Geografares 88–99.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2004. “The System’ of Automobility.” Theory, Culture & Society 21: 25–39. doi:10.1177/0263276404046059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, Ted , 1999, We are Traffic!: A Movie about Critical Mass, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lpsdy24xbLY
   Google Scholar