References

• Aldrich, R. J, & Kausku, J. (2012). Escaping from American intelligence: Culture, ethnocentrism, and the Angloshpere. International Affairs, 88(5), 1009–1028. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.2012.01116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andregg, M. M., & Gill, P. (2014). Comparing the democratization of intelligence. Intelligence and National Security, 29(4), 487–497. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2014.915174
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, C. (2004). Intelligence, international relations and ‘Undertheorization’. Intelligence and National Security, 19(2), 170–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0268452042000302949
   Google Scholar
• Assembleia da República. (1981). Diário da Assembleia da República. I Series no. 17.
   Google Scholar
• Assembleia da República. (2019). Parecer do CFSIRP Relativo ao Primeiro Semestre de 2019 (Report), p. 171.
   Google Scholar
• Bermeo, N. (1999). A Teoria da Democracia e as Realidades da Europa do Sul [The Theory of Democracy and the realities in Southern Europe]. Miraflores, Portugal: difel 82 – Difusão Editorial SA.
   Google Scholar
• Best, R. A., Jr. (2011). Intelligence Information: Need-to-Know vs. Need-to-Share. CRS Report for Congress, Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Bigo, D. (2019). Shared secrecy in a digital age and a transnational world. Intelligence and National Security, 34(3), 379–394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2019.1553703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruneau, T. C. (2001). Controlling intelligence in new democracies. International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, 4(3), 323–341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08850600152386837
   Google Scholar
• Bruneau, T. C. (2008). Democracy and effectiveness: Adapting intelligence for the fight against terrorism. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 21(3), 448–460. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08850600701854094
   Google Scholar
• Caparini, M. (2007). Controlling and overseeing intelligence services in democratic states. In H. Born & M. Caparini (Eds.), Democratic control of intelligence services: Containing Rogue elephants (pp. 3–24). Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, P. (2004). As Informações em Portugal [Intelligence in Portugal]. Lisbon, Portugal: Gradiva.
   Google Scholar
• Cepik, M., & Ambros, C. (2014). Intelligence, crisis, and democracy: Institutional punctuations in Brazil, Colombia, South Africa, and India. Intelligence and National Security, 29(4), 523–551. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2014.915176
   Google Scholar
• Cerezales, D. P. (2010). Repressive legacies and the democratisation of Iberian police systems. South European Society and Politics, 15(3), 429–448. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2010.513603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, P. H. J. (2004). Intelligence culture and intelligence failure in Britain and the United States. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17(3), 495–520. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0955757042000298188
   Google Scholar
• De Bruijn, H. (2006). One fight, one team: The 9/11 commission report on intelligence, fragmentation, and information. Public Administration, 84(2), 267–287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.2006.84.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dearlov, R. (2010). National security and public anxiety: Our changing perceptions. In L. K. Johnson (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of national security intelligence (pp. 33–39). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dumitru, I. (2014). Building an intelligence culture from within: The SRI and Romanian society. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 27(3), 569–589. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08850607.2014.900298
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (1998). Coming to terms with the past: A framework for the study of justice in the transition to democracy. Archives Europeénes De Sociologie, 39(1), 7–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600007785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estevens, J. (2018). Mudança institucional e informações durante o período democrático [Institutional change and intelligence in democratic times]. Análise Social, 228(3), 752–782. doi:https://doi.org/10.31447/AS00032573.2018228.09
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, T. (2018). Institutional legacies. In D. Della Porta, M. Andretta, T. Fernandes, E. Romanos, & M. Vogiatzoglou (Eds.), Legacies & memories in movements. Justice and democracy in Southern Europe (pp. 54–79). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A. M. (2007). O sistema de informações da República Portuguesa [The Intelligence System of the Portuguese Republic]. In J. B. Gouveia & R. Pereira (Eds.), Estudos de Direito e Segurança (pp. 67–93). Coimbra, Portugal: Almedina.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, R. M. (1990). Rethinking state and regime: Southern Europe’s transition to Democracy. World Politics, 42(3), 422–440. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2010418
   Google Scholar
• Gill, P. (1994). Policing politics: Security intelligence and the liberal democratic state. London, UK: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, P. (2016). Intelligence governance and democratization: A comparative analysis of the limits of reform. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ginter, K. (2008). Latin American intelligence services and the transition to democracy. Journal of Intelligence History, 8(1), 69–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/16161262.2008.10555150
   Google Scholar
• Gouveia, J. B. (2013). Os Serviços de Informações de Portugal: Organização e Fiscalização [Intelligence services in Portugal: Organization and control]. Revista De Direito E Segurança, 1, 63–85.
   Google Scholar
• Graaf, B. D., & Nyce, J. M. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of European intelligence cultures. Lanham, Maryland: Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman, OH: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Konstantopoulos, I. L. (2017). Democracy and Ethics vs. Intelligence and security: From WikiLeaks to Snowden. In G. Bitros & N. Kyriazis (Eds.), Democracy and an open-economy world order (pp. 3–23). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lahneman, W. J. (2004). Knowledge-sharing in the intelligence community After 9/11. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 17(4), 614–633. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08850600490496425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobo, M. C., Pinto, A. C., & Magalhães, P. C. (2016). Portuguese democratisation 40 years on: Its meaning and enduring legacies. South European Society and Politics, 21(2), 163–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2016.1153490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matei, F. C. (2007). Romania’s intelligence community: From an instrument of dictatorship to serving democracy. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 20(4), 629–660. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08850600701492762
   Google Scholar
• Mendee, J., & Tuvshintugs, A. (2013). Consolidating democracy: The Reform of Mongolian intelligence. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 26(2), 241–259. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08850607.2013.757995
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro, R. L. (2004). Subsídios para a história recente das informações em Portugal [Complements of the recent history of intelligence in Portugal]. In A. Moreira (Ed.), Informações e Segurança: Estudos em Honra do General Pedro Cardoso (pp. 459–469). Lisbon, Portugal: Prefácio.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, K. A. (2010). The South African intelligence services: From Apartheid to Democracy, 1948–2005. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, M. C. (2003). Partisanship and the decline of intelligence oversight. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 16(1), 69–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/713830378
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, J. (2012). El sistema de inteligencia de la República de Portugal [The Intelligence System of Portugal]. Inteligencia y seguridad: Revista de análisis y prospectiva, 12, 15–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.5211/iys.12.article2
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel, I. F. (2007). A História da PIDE [The History of PIDE]. Lisbon, Portugal: Círculo de Leitores, Temas e Debates.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, A. C. (2010a). The authoritarian past and South European democracies: An introduction. South European Society and Politics, 15(3), 339–358. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2010.513598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, A. C. (2010b). Coping with the double legacy of authoritarianism and revolution in Portuguese democracy. South European Society and Politics, 15(3), 395–412. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2010.513601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, M. C. (2012). Portugal’s intelligence evolution in the Post-9/11 World. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 25(1), 160–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08850607.2012.622700
   Google Scholar
• Prunckun, H. (2019). Counterintelligence theory and practice. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, T., & Jesus, J. D. (2016). Portugal: Particulars of the Portuguese intelligence services. In B. de Graaf & J. M. Nyce (Eds.), Handbook of European Intelligence Cultures (pp. 291–306). Lanham, Maryland: Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. C. (1999). Portugal: Do Autoritarismo à Democracia [Portugal: From authoritarianism to democracy]. Lisbon, Portugal: Instituto de Ciências Sociais.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, L. L. (2001). Intelligence reform in Europe’s emerging democracies. Studies in Intelligence, 48(1), 11–25.
   Google Scholar