Explaining the diversity of small states’ foreign policies through role theory

Bibliography

• Adigbuo, Richard. “Beyond IR Theories: The Case for National Role Conceptions.” Politikon 34, no. 1 (2007): 83–97.10.1080/02589340701336286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggestam, Lisbeth. “Role Conceptions and the Politics of Identify in Foreign Policy.” Arena Working Paper 99/8, University of Stockholm, Stockholm, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Aggestam, Lisbeth. “Role Theory and European Foreign Policy: A Framework of Analysis.” In The European Union’s Roles in International Politics: Concepts and Analysis, edited by Ole Elgström and Michael Smith, 11–29. Abingdon: Routledge, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Aras, Bülent, and Aylin Gorener. “National Role Conceptions and Foreign Policy Orientation: The Ideational Bases of the Justice and Development Party’s Foreign Policy Activism in the Middle East.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 12, no. 1 (2010): 73–92.10.1080/19448950903507453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, Michael. “Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change: Israel’s Road to Oslo.” European Journal of International Relations 5, no. 1 (1999): 5–36.10.1177/1354066199005001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, Michael. “Institutions, Roles, and Disorder: The Case of the Arab States System.” International Studies Quarterly 37, (1993): 271–296.10.2307/2600809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, Rikard, and Ole Elgström. “Conflicting Role Conceptions? The European Union in Global Politics.” Foreign Policy Analysis 8, no. 1 (2012): 93–108.10.1111/fpa.2011.8.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuning, Marijke. “Role Theory Research in International Relations: State of the Art and Blind Spot.” In Role Theory in International Relations, edited by Sebastian Harnisch, Cornelia Frank, and Hanns W. Maull, 16–35. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Breuning, Marijke. “Words and Deeds: Foreign Assistance Rhetoric and Policy Behavior in the Netherlands, Belgium, and the United Kingdom.” International Studies Quarterly 39, no. 2 (1995): 235–254.10.2307/2600848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, John L., and John A. Hall. “National Identity and the Political Economy of Small States.” Review of International Political Economy 16, no. 4 (2009): 547–572.10.1080/09692290802620378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantir, Cristian. “The Roles of Weak States: Post-Soviet Moldova’s National Role Conceptions.” Paper Prepared for Presentation at the International Studies Association Catalytic Research Workshop on Extensions and Applications of Role Theory to International Relations, ISA Convention, San Francisco, CA, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cantir, Cristian, and Juliet Kaarbo. “Contested Roles and Domestic Politics: Reflections on Role Theory in Foreign Policy Analysis and IR Theory.” Foreign Policy Analysis 8, no. 1 (2012): 5–24.10.1111/fpa.2011.8.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafetz, Glenn, Hillel Abramson, and Suzette Grillot. “Role Theory and Foreign Policy: Belarussian and Ukrainian Compliance with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime.” Political Psychology 17, no. 4 (1996): 727–757.10.2307/3792136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Carvalho, Benjamin, and B. Iver Neumann. Small State Status Seeking: Norway’s Quest for International Standing. New York: Routledge, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Doeser, Fredrik. “Domestic Politics and Foreign Policy Change in Small States: The Fall of the Danish ‘footnote Policy’.” Cooperation and Conflict 46, no. 2 (2011): 222–241.10.1177/0010836711406417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• East, Maurice A. “Size and Foreign Policy Behavior: A Test of Two Models.” World Politics 25, no. 4 (1973): 556–576.10.2307/2009952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, Miriam F. “The Foreign Policies of Small States: Challenging Neorealism in Its Own Backyard.” British Journal of Political Science 25, no. 2 (1995): 171–217.10.1017/S0007123400007146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetschel, Laurent. “The Foreign and Security Policy Interests of Small States in Today’s Europe.” In Small States inside and outside the European Union, edited by Laurent Goetschel, 10–32. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.10.1007/978-1-4757-2832-3
   Google Scholar
• Goetschel, Laurent. “Introduction to Special Issue: Bound to Be Peaceful? The Changing Approach of Western European Small States to Peace.” Swiss Political Science Review 19, no. 3 (2013): 259–278.10.1111/spsr.2013.19.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gstöhl, Sieglinde. Reluctant Europeans: Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland in the Process of Integration. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsson, Jakob. “How Should We Study Foreign Policy Change?” Cooperation and Conflict 34, no. 1 (1999): 73–95.10.1177/00108369921961780
   Google Scholar
• Gvalia, Giorgi, David Siroky, Bidzina Lebanidze, and Zurab Iashvili. “Thinking outside the Bloc: Explaining the Foreign Policies of Small States.” Security Studies 22, no. 1 (2013): 98–131.10.1080/09636412.2013.757463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harnisch, Sebastian. “Role Theory: Operationalization of Key Concepts.” In Role Theory in International Relations: Approaches and Analyses, edited by Sebastian Harnisch, Cornelia Frank, and Maull W. Hanns, 7–15. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hey, Jeanne A. K. “Luxembourg’s Foreign Policy: Does Small Size Help or Hinder?” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 15, no. 3 (2002): 211–225.
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, Kalevi J. “National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy.” International Studies Quarterly 14, no. 3 (1970): 233–309.10.2307/3013584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, Valerie M. “Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations.” Foreign Policy Analysis 1, no. 1 (2005): 1–30.10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00001.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingebritsen, Christine. “Norm Entrepreneurs Scandinavia’s Role in World Politics.” Cooperation and Conflict 37, no. 1 (2002): 11–23.10.1177/0010836702037001689
   Google Scholar
• Jaschik, Kevin. “Small States and International Politics: Climate Change, the Maldives and Tuvalu.” International Politics 51, no. 2 (2014): 272–293.10.1057/ip.2014.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaarbo, Juliet. “Foreign Policy Analysis in the Twenty-First Century: back to Comparison, Forward to Identity and Ideas”. Edited by Garrison, A. J. International Studies Review 5, no. 2 (2003): 155–202.10.1111/misr.2003.5.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Kaarbo, Juliet, and Cristian Cantir. “Role Conflict in Recent Wars: Danish and Dutch Debates over Iraq and Afghanistan.” Cooperation and Conflict 48, no. 4 (2013): 465–483.10.1177/0010836713482815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, Peter. Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Krotz, Ulrich. “National Role Conceptions and Foreign Policies: France and Germany Compared.” Program for the Study of Germany and Europe, Working Paper 02.1, Harvard University, Cambridge, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Le Prestre, Philippe G. Role Quests in the Post-Cold War Era: Foreign Policies in Transition. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Moosung. How Do Small States Affect the Future Development of the EU. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• McCourt, David M. “Role-Playing and Identity Affirmation in International Politics: Britain’s Reinvasion of the Falklands, 1982.” Review of International Studies 37, no. 4 (2011): 1599–1621.10.1017/S026021051000104X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCourt, David M. “The Roles States Play: A Meadian Interactionist Approach.” Journal of International Relations and Development 15, no. 3 (2012): 370–392.10.1057/jird.2011.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouritzen, Hans, and Anders Wivel. “Contrasting Allison, Challenging Waltz: Geopolitics and the Study of Foreign Policy.” International Politics Review 2, no. 1 (2014): 43–47.
   Google Scholar
• Nabers, Dirk. “Identity and Role Change in International Politics.” In Role Theory in International Relations: Approaches and Analyses, edited by Sebastian Harnisch, Cornelia Frank, and Hanns W. Maull, 74–92. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, Iver B., and Sieglinde Gstöhl. “Introduction: Lilliputians in Gulliver’s World?” In Small States in International Relations, edited by C. Ingebritsen, I. Neumann, S. Gstöhl, and J. Beyer, 3–36. Seattle: University of Washington Press; Reykjavik: University of Iceland Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Papadakis, Maria, and Harvey Starr. “Opportunity, Willingness, and Small States: The Relationship between Environment and Foreign Policy.” In New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy, edited by Charles F. Hermann, C. W. Kegley, and J. N. Rosenau, 409–432. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Petrova, Margarita H. “Small States as International Agenda-Setters and Law-Makers: Belgian and Norwegian Roles in Developing New Norms of Warfare.” Paper Prepared for the 6th Pan-European International Relations Conference, Turin, September 12–15, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, Jonathan. “Theorising Australia-Pacific Island Relations.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 68, no. 5 (2014): 548–568.10.1080/10357718.2014.917271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thies, Cameron G. “International Socialization Processes vs. Israeli National Role Conceptions: Can Role Theory Integrate IR Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis?” Foreign Policy Analysis 8, no. 1 (2012): 25–46.10.1111/fpa.2011.8.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thies, Cameron G. The United States, Israel and the Search for International Order: Socializing States. New York: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Thorhallsson, Baldur. “The Corporatist Model and Its Value in Understanding Small European States in the Neo-Liberal World of the Twenty-First Century: The Case of Iceland.” European Political Science 9, no. 3 (2010): 375–386.10.1057/eps.2010.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorhallsson, Baldur. “Small States in the UN Security Council: Means of Influence?” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 7, no. 2 (2012): 135–160.10.1163/187119112X628454
   Google Scholar
• Thorhallsson, Baldur, and Anders Wivel. “Small States in the European Union: What Do We Know and What Would We Like to Know?” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 19, no. 4 (2006): 651–668.10.1080/09557570601003502
   Google Scholar
• Waever, O. “Identity, Communities and Foreign Policy Discourse Analysis as Foreign Policy Theory.” In European Integration and National Identity: The Challenge of the Nordic States, edited by L. Hansen and O. Waever, 20–49. London: Routledge, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, Kenneth. Theory of International Relations. Reading, MA: Addison-Webley, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Wehner, Leslie E. “Role Expectations as Foreign Policy: South American Secondary Powers’ Expectations of Brazil as a Regional Power.” Foreign Policy Analysis 11, no. 4 (2015): 435–455.10.1111/fpa.2015.11.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehner, Leslie E., and Cameron G. Thies. “Role Theory, Narratives, and Interpretation: The Domestic Contestation of Roles.” International Studies Review 16, no. 3 (2014): 411–436.10.1111/misr.2014.16.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wivel, Anders. “The Security Challenge of Small EU Member States: Interests, Identity and the Development of the EU as a Security Actor.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 43, no. 2 (2005): 393–412.10.1111/jcms.2005.43.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar