Promoting sustainable development or legitimising free trade? Civil society mechanisms in EU trade agreements

Bibliography

• Allen, Linda. “The North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation: Has It Fulfilled Its Promises and Potential? An Empirical Study of Policy.” Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 23, no. 1 (2012): 121–199.
   Google Scholar
• Adriaensen, Johan, and Monserrat González-Garibay. “The Illusion of Choice: The European Union and the Trade-labor Linkage.” Journal of Contemporary European Research 9, no. 4 (2013): 542–559.
   Google Scholar
• Altintzis, Yorgos. “Civil Society Engagement and Linkages in Eu Trade Policy.” In Linking Trade and Non Commercial Interests: The Eu as a Global Role Model?, edited by Tamara Takacs and Angelos Dimopoulos. The Hague: Centre for the Law of EU External Relations, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, Brian. “The Distinct Politics of the European Union’s ‘Fair Trade’ Linkage to Labour Standards.” European Foreign Affairs Review 14, no. 5 (2009): 643–661.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Drusilla, Deardorff Alan, and Robert Stern. “International Labour Standards and Trade: A Theoretical Analysis.” Post-printed from Fair Trade and Harmonization: Prerequisited for Free Trade, edited by Jagdish N. Bhagwati and Robert E. Hudec, 1–48. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Ha Joon. Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective. London: Anthem Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Ha Joon. “Policy Space in Historical Perspective with Special Reference to Trade and Industrial Policies.” Economic and Political Weekly 41, no. 1 (2006): 627–633.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey. Evaluation of Dg Trade’s Civil Society Dialogue in Order to Assess Its Effectiveness, Efficiency and Relevance. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, Bill, and Uma Kothari. Participation: The New Tyranny? London: Zed Books, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Robert, Cox. “Civil Society at the Turn Ofthe Millenium: Prospects for an Alternative World Order.” Review of International Studies 25 (1999): 3–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Felice, Celina. “Power in Discursive Practices, the Case of the Stop Epas Campaign.” European Journal of International Relations 20, no. 1 (2012): 145–167. Online First Version. doi:10.1177/1354066112437769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ville, Ferdi, and Gabriel Siles-Brugge. TTIP: The Truth about the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Hoboken: Wiley, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• De Ville, Ferdi, Jan Orbie, and Lore Van den Putte. In-depth Analysis: TTIP and Labour Standards. Brussels: European Parliament, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Dicaprio, Alisa, and Kevin P. Gallagher. “The Wto and the Shrinking of Development Space.” The Journal of World Investment & Trade 7, no. 5 (2006): 781–803.10.1163/221190006X00397
   Google Scholar
• Dür, Andreas, and Dirk De Bièvre. “Inclusion without Influence? Ngos in European Trade Policy.” Journal of Public Policy 27, no. 1 (2007): 79–101.10.1017/S0143814X0700061X
   Google Scholar
• EESC. Briefing Note to the Attention of Mr. Dumitru Fornea for Trade Policy Committee Dinner Organized by the Dutch Eu Presidency, Discussion about the Trade and Sustainable Development Chapters in Eu Trade Agreements, including Civil Society Monitoring Mechanisms (18 April 2016). 2016.
   Google Scholar
• EESC. Briefing of the EESC Secretariat on the Functioning of Domestic Advisory Mechanisms in Eu Trade Agreements’ , on File with the Author (Brussel 19 April 2016). 2016.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Global Europe: Competing in the World. Brussels: European Commission, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Commission Staff Working Document: Trade as a Driver of Prosperity. COM (2010) 1269. Brussels: European Commission, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Europe 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. COM (2010) 2020. Brussels: European Commission, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Trade for All: Towards a More Responsible Trade and Investment Policy. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Finbow, Robert. The Limits of Regionalism. Nafta’s Labor Accord. Surrey: Ashgate, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, Lucy. “Eu Trade Governance and Policy: A Critical Perspective.” Journal of Contemporary European Research 9, no. 3 (2013): 578–596.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, James, Mirela Barbu, Liam Campling, Ben Richardson, and Adrian Smith. “Labour Standards in Eu Free Trade Agreements: Working towards What End?” GREAT Insights 5, no. 6 (2016): 32–34.
   Google Scholar
• Heron, Tony. “Asymmetric Bargaining and Development Tradeoffs in the Cariforum-European Union Economic Partnership Agreement.” Review of International Political Economy 18, no. 3 (2011): 328–357.10.1080/09692290.2010.481916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, Patrick. “Neo-liberalism by Default? The European Union’s Trade and Development Policy in an Era of Crisis.” Journal of International Relations and Development, Online First Version (2015). doi:10.1057/jird.2015.10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopewell, Kristen. “Multilateral Trade Governance as Social Field: Global Civil Society and the WTO.” Review of International Political Economy 22, no. 6 (2015): 1128–1158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffee, Daniel. “Weak Coffee: Certification and Co-optation in the Fair Trade Movement.” Social Problems 59, no. 1 (2012): 267–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurki, Milja. “Governmentality and EU Democracy Promotion: The European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights and the Construction of Democratic Civil Societies.” International Political Sociology 5, no. 4 (2011): 349–366. doi:10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00139.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, Sandra. Europeanised or European? Representation by Civil Society Organisations in EU Policy Making. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Langan, Mark, and Sophia Price. “Extraversion and the West African EPA Development Programme: Realising the Development Dimension of ACP–EU Trade?” The Journal of Modern African Studies 53, no. 3 (2015): 263–287.10.1017/S0022278X15000579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. Legitimation Durch Verfahren. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Meunier, Sophie. “Trade Policy and Political Legitimacy in the European Union.” Comparative European Politics 1, no. 1 (2003): 67–90.10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110000
   Google Scholar
• Montoute, Annita. “Civil Society Participation in EPA Implementation: How to Make the EPA Joint CARIFORUM-EC Consultative Committee Work Effectively?” In ECDPM Discussion Paper 119. Maastricht: ECDPM, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mosley, Layna. “Globalisation and the State: Still Room to Move?” New Political Economy 10, no. 3 (2005): 355–362.10.1080/13563460500204241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muguruza, Mikel. Civil Society and Trade Diplomacy in the “Global Age”: The European Case: Trade Policy Dialogue between Civil Society and the European Commission. Washintgon DC: Inter-American Development Bank, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Orbie, Jan, Deborah Martens, and Lore Van den Putte. Civil Society Meetings in European Union Trade Agreements: Features, Purposes, and Evaluation. CLEER Papers. Edited by Tamara Takács. The Hague: Centre for the Law of EU External Relations, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Orbie, Jan, and Lore Van den Putte. “Labour Rights in Peru and the Eu Trade Agreement: Compliance with the Commitments under the Sustainable Development Chapter.” In ÖFSE Working Paper Series. Vienna: Austrian Foundation for Development Research, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, Dani. The Globalization Paradox: Why Global Markets, States, and Democracy Can’t Coexist. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, Dani. “How to Save Globalisation from Its Cheerleaders.” The Journal of International Trade and Diplomacy 1, no. 2 (2007): 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Joel, Paul. “The Cost of Free Trade.” Brown Journal of World Affairs XXII (2015): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, Gareth. “Trade Competition and Pollution Standards: “Race to the Bottom” or “Stuck at the Bottom”.” The Journal of Environment & Development 8, no. 2 (1999): 133–151.
   Google Scholar
• Rahnema, Majid. “Participation.” In The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power, edited by Wolfgang Sachs. London: Zed Books, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Scholte, Jan Aart. “Civil Society and Democratically Accountable Global Governance.” Government and Opposition 39, no. 2 (2004): 211–233.10.1111/goop.2004.39.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalden, Kenneth. “Exchanging Development for Market Access? Deep Integration and Industrial Policy under Multilateral and Regional-bilateral Trade Agreements.” Review of International Political Economy 12, no. 5 (2005): 750–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slob, Anneke, and Floor Smakman. A Voice, Not a Vote. Evaluation of the Civil Society Dialogue at Dg Trade. Rotterdam: ECORYS, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer, Karen. “Trade Embedded Development Models.” The International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 31, no. 3 (2015): 303–326.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. Trade and Development Report 2014: Global Governance and Policy Space for Development. Geneva: UNCTAD, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Putte, Lore. 2015. “What Social Face of the New European Union Trade Agreements?” Transcripts, June 23. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Putte, Lore. “The European Union’s Trade-labour Linkage. beyond the ‘Soft’ Approach?” PhD diss., Ghent University, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Putte, Lore, Jan Orbie, Fabienne Bossuyt, Deborah Martens, and Ferdi De Ville. “What Social Face of the New Eu Trade Agreements? Beyond the ‘Soft’ Approach.” ETUI Policy Brief, no. 13/2015 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• van Roozendaal, Gerda. “Labour Standards as an ‘Afterthought’ in Trade Agreements: The South Korea Case.” Paper presented at the 2016 EUIA conference, Brussels, May 11–13, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Vogt, Jeffrey. “Trade and Investment Arrangements and Labor Rights.” In Corporate Responsibility for Human Rights Impacts: New Expectations and Paradigms, edited by Lara Blecher, Nancy Kaymar Stafford, and Gretchen C. Bellamy. ABA Book Publishing, 2014.
   Google Scholar