457
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Women’s rights norms as content-in-motion and incomplete practice

Pages 675-690 | Received 16 Jan 2017, Accepted 07 Aug 2017, Published online: 22 Aug 2017

Bibliography

  • Acharya, A. “How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism.” International Organization 58, no. 2 (2004): 239–275.
  • Amnesty International. Finland. Submission to the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, 57th Session, February 2014. London: Amnesty International, 2014.
  • Basu, A. The Challenge of Local Feminisms. Women’s Movements in Global Perspective. Boulder: Westview, 1995.
  • BBC. Chile Lawmakers Lift Abortion Ban Introduced by Pinochet, March 18, 2016. Accessed September 30, 2016. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-35838760
  • Bunch, C., and S. Fried. “Beijing 1995: Moving Women’s Human Rights from Margin to Center.” Signs 22, no. 1 (1996): 200–204.
  • Bunch, C., and N. Reilly. Demanding Accountability: The Global Campaign and Vienna Tribunal for Women’s Human Rights. New York: UNIFEM, 1994.
  • Buss, Doris E. “The Christian Right, Globalization, and the ‘Natural Family’.” In Gods, Guns, and Globalization. Religious Radicalism and the International Political Economy, edited by M. A. Tétreault and R. A. Denemark, 57–77. Boulder, London: Lynne Rienner, 2004.
  • Byrnes, A. C., and E. Bath. “Violence against Women, the Obligation of Due Diligence, and the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women – Recent Developments.” Human Rights Law Review 8, no. 3 (2008): 517–533.
  • Çağlar, G., E. Prügl, and S. Zwingel (eds.). Feminist Strategies in International Governance. New York: Routledge, 2013.
  • CEM, CEDEM, CLADEM, La Morada, Corporación DOMOS, Corporación Humanas, FLACSO, Foro-Red de Salud y Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos-Chile, Instituto de la Mujer, MEMCH (2006) Informe Sombra CEDAW, CHILE 20032006 [CEDAW Shadow Report, Chile 2003-2006].
  • Chappell, L. The Politics of Gender Justice at the International Criminal Court. Legacies and Legitimacy. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
  • Cook, R. J. “Human Rights and Maternal Health: Exploring the Effectiveness of the Alyne Decision.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 41, no. 1 (2013): 103–123.
  • Epstein, C. “Stop Telling Us How to Behave: Socialization or Infantilization?” International Studies Perspectives 13, no. 2 (2012): 135–145.
  • Finnish NGOs. The Implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women in Finland. edited by S. Mustakallio and M. Pentikäinen, Helsinki, 2000.
  • Freeman, M. A. “Article 16.” In The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women : A Commentary, edited by MA Freeman, C Chinkin and B Rudolf, 409–442. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
  • Goodale, M. “Introduction. Locating Rights, Envisioning Law Between the Global and the Local.” In The Practice of Human Rights Tracking Law between the Global and the Local, edited by M Goodale and S Merry, 1–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • Halley, J. E., P. Kotiswaran, H. Shamir, and C. Thomas. “From the International to the Local in Feminist Legal Responses to Rape.” Prostitution/Sex Work and Sex Trafficking: Four Studies in Contemporary Governance Feminism’, Harvard Journal of Law and Gender 29 (2006): 335–423.
  • Holli, A. M., and J. Kantola. “State Feminism Finnish Style: Strong Policies Clash with Implementation Problems.” In Changing State Feminism, edited by J Outshoorn and J Kantola, 82–101. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
  • Iwraw, A. P. “Exploring the Potential of the UN Human Rights Treaty Body System in Addressing Sexuality Rights.” Occasional Paper Series No. 11, 2007. Accessed September 20, 2016. http://www.iwraw-ap.org/organisation/our-publications/training-materials/
  • Jain, D. Women, Development, and the UN. A Sixty-year Quest for Equality and Justice. United Nations Intellectual History Project Series. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2005.
  • Joachim, J. Agenda Setting, the UN, and NGOs. Gender Violence and Reproductive Rights. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2007.
  • Keck, M., and K. Sikkink. Activists Beyond Borders. Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998.
  • Krook, M., and J. True. “‘Rethinking the Life Cycles of International Norms: The United Nations and the Global Promotion of Gender Equality.” European Journal of International Relations 18, no. March (2012): 104–129.
  • Levitt, P., and S. Merry. “Vernacularization on the Ground: Local Uses of Global Women’s Rights in Peru, China, India and the United States.” Global Networks 9, no. 4 (2009): 441–461.
  • Liebowitz, D., and S. Zwingel. “Gender Equality Oversimplified: Using CEDAW to Counter the Measurement Obsession.” International Studies Review 16 (2014): 362–389.
  • Massey, D. For Space. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage, 2005.
  • McKean, W. “The Conventions and Declarations: Equality of the Sexes.” In Equality and Discrimination under International Law, edited by W McKean, 166–193. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.
  • Meyer, M., and E. Prügl (eds.). Gender Politics in Global Governance. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.
  • Moghadam, V. Globalizing Women. Transnational Feminist Networks. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 2005.
  • Nousiainen, K., and J. Niemi-Kiesiläinen. “Introductory Remarks on Nordic Law and Gender Identities.” In Responsible Selves Women in the Nordic Legal Culture, edited by K. Nousiainen, et al., 1–22. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001.
  • NYTKIS. Submission to the United Nation’s Committee on the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, Finland, 2008.
  • NYTKIS. Submission to the United Nation’s Committee on the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, Finland, 2014.
  • Razavi, S. “Governing the Economy for Gender Equality? Challenges of Regulation.” In Feminist Strategies in International Governance, edited by G Çağlar, E Prügl and S Zwingel, 217–232. London: Routledge, 2013.
  • Risse, T., S. Ropp, and K. Sikkink (eds.). The Power of Human Rights. International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  • Roald, A. S. “Islamists in Jordan: Promoters of or Obstacles to Female Empowerment and Gender Equality?” Religion and Human Rights 4, no. 1 (2009): 41–63.
  • Schild, V. “Care and Punishment in Latin America: The Gendered Neoliberalization of the Chilean State.” In Neoliberalism, interrupted Social Change and Contested Governance in Contemporary Latin America, edited by M. Goodale and N. Postero, 195–224. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2013.
  • SETA – LGBTI Rights in Finland. NGO Submission to the 57 Session (10–28 Feb 2014) of United Nation’s Committee on the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women Related to the Consideration of the Seventh Periodic Report Submitted by Finland Under Article 18 of the Convention, January 16, 2014.
  • Tønnessen, L. “Feminist Interlegalities and Gender Justice in Sudan: The Debate on CEDAW and Islam.” Religion and Human Rights 6 (2011): 25–39.
  • Trevizán, L. “Performing Memory and Democracy in Chile.” In Sites of Memory in Spain and Latin America: Trauma, Politics, and Resistance, edited by M. Llorente, M. Salvi and A. Diaz de Léon, 21–34. Place: Lexington Books, 2015.
  • UNDP. Género Los desafios de la igualdad [Gender: The Challenges of Equality]. Chile, 2010. Accessed September 29, 2016. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/género
  • Valdés, T. “The CEDAW and the State of Chile: Old and New Debts with the Gender Equality.” Anuario de Derechos Humanos 9 (2013): 171–181.
  • Zwingel, S. How do International Women’s Rights Become Effective Domestic Norms? An Analysis of the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women, 2005. Accessed September 30, 2016. www-brs.ub.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/netahtml/HSS/Diss/ZwingelSusanne/
  • Zwingel, S. “International Feminist Strategies: Strengths and Challenges of the Rights-based Approach.” Politics and Gender 9, no. 03 (2013): 344–351.
  • Zwingel, S. Translating International Women’s Rights: The CEDAW Convention in Context. London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2016.

UN Documents

  • CEDAW/C/CHI/1, Consideration of reports submitted by States Parties under article 18 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, Initial reports of States Parties, Chile, 1991.
  • CEDAW/C/CHI/3, Consideration of reports submitted by States Parties under article 18 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, Third periodic reports of States Parties, Chile, 1999.
  • CEDAW/C/CHL/CO/5-6, Concluding observations on the fifth and sixth periodic reports of Chile, adopted by the Committee at its fifty-third session (1–19 October 2012).
  • CEDAW/C/CHL/CO/5-6/Add.1, Concluding observations on the combined fifth and sixth periodic reports of Chile, Addendum, Information provided by Chile in follow-up to the concluding observations, April 2015.
  • CEDAW/C/FIN/2, Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties under Article 18 of the Convention, Second Periodic Reports of States Parties, Finland, 1993.
  • CEDAW/C/FIN/4, Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties under Article 18 of the Convention, Fourth Periodic Reports of States Parties, Finland, 2000.
  • CEDAW/C/FIN/5, Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties under Article 18 of the Convention, Fifth Periodic Reports of States Parties, Finland, 2004.
  • CEDAW/C/FIN/6, Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties under Article 18 of the Convention, Sixth Periodic Reports of States Parties, Finland, 2007.
  • CEDAW/C/FIN/CO/6, Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: Finland, July 2008.
  • CEDAW/C/FIN/CO/6/Add.1, Information provided in follow-up to the concluding observations of the Committee, Finland, 2010.
  • CEDAW/C/FIN/7, Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 18 of the Convention, Seventh Periodic Reports of States Parties, Finland, 2012.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.