Affectedness in international institutions: promises and pitfalls of involving the most affected

Bibliography

• Banks, N., D. Hulme, and M. Edwards. “NGOs, States, and Donors Revisited: Still Too Close for Comfort?” World Development 66 (February 2015): 707–718. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. N., and M. Finnemore. “The Politics, Power and Pathologies of International Organizations.” International Organization 53, no. 4 (1999): 699–732. doi:10.1162/002081899551048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., and D. A. Snow. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26, no. 1 (2000): 611–639. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bob, C. The Marketing of Rebellion: Insurgents, Media, and International Activism. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdandy, A., R. Wolfrum, J. von Bernstorff, P. Dann, and M. Goldmann, eds. The Exercise of Public Authority through International Institutions, Advancing International Institutional Law. Berlin: Springer, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Brem-Wilson, J. “Towards Food Sovereignty: Interrogating Peasant Voice in the United Nations Committee on World Food Security.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 1 (2015): 73–95. doi:10.1080/03066150.2014.968143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brem-Wilson, J. “La Vía Campesina and the UN Committee on World Food Security: Affected Publics and Institutional Dynamics in the Nascent Transnational Public Sphere.” Review of International Studies 43, no. 2 (2017): 302–329. doi:10.1017/S0260210516000309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brem-Wilson, J. “Legitimating Global Governance: Publicisation, Affectedness, and the Committee on World Food Security.” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal. doi:10.1080/23802014.2018.1552536.
   Google Scholar
• Brühl, T. “Representing the People? NGOs in International Negotiations.” In Evaluating Transnational NGOs: Legitimacy, Accountability, Representation, edited by J. Steffek and K. Hahn, 181–199. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Búrca, G. D., R. O. Keohane, and C. Sabel. “New Modes of Pluralist Global Governance.” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 45 (2013): 723–786.
   Google Scholar
• Chimni, B. S. “International Institutions Today: An Imperial Global State in the Making.” European Journal of International Law 15, no. 1 (2004): 1–37. doi:10.1093/ejil/15.1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Chimni, B. S. “The Limits of the All Affected Principle: Attending to Deep Structures.” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal doi:10.1080/23802014.2018.1600954.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., and C. Sabel. “Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy.” European Law Journal: Review of European Law in Context 3, no. 4 (1997): 313–342. doi:10.1111/1468-0386.00034.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. Post-Democracy. Malden: Polity, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, J. The Indigenous Space and Marginalized Peoples in the United Nations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, S., and S. Kimm. “The Co-Optation of Feminisms: A Research Agenda.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 19, no. 2 (2017): 185–200. doi:10.1080/14616742.2017.1299582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., M. Andretta, L. Mosca, and H. Reiter. Globalization from Below: Transnational Activists and Protest Networks. Minneapolis, Bristol: University of Minnesota Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry. Athens, Ohio: Swallow Press, 2016 [1927].
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrov, R. S. “The Paris Agreement on Climate Change: Behind Closed Doors.” Global Environmental Politics 16, no. 3 (2016): 1–11. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, J. Global Food Security Governance: Civil Society Engagement in the Reformed Committee on World Food Security. London: Routledge, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., and K. Sikkink. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 887–917. doi:10.1162/002081898550789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text, no. 25/26 (1990): 56–60. doi:10.2307/466240.
   Google Scholar
• Fraundorfer, M. “Experiments in Global Democracy: The Cases of UNITAID and the FAO Committee on World Food Security.” Global Constitutionalism 4, no. 3 (2015): 328–364. doi:10.1017/S2045381715000088.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E. “Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 35, no. 1 (2007): 40–68. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2007.00098.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granzow, T. “Between Threat and Infantilisation: How Frames Impede Meaningful Participation of the Disaster Affected in Haiti.” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal. doi:10.1080/23802014.2018.1575768.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. F., and W. Bradnee Chambers, eds. The Politics of Participation in Sustainable Development Governance. New York: United Nations University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, K., and A. Holzscheiter. “The Ambivalence of Advocacy: Representation and Contestation in Global NGO Advocacy for Child Workers and Sex Workers.” Global Society 27, no. 4 (2013): 497–520. doi:10.1080/13600826.2013.823914.
   Google Scholar
• Hasenclever, A., and H. Narr. “The Dark Side of the Affectedness-Paradigm: Lessons from the Indigenous Peoples’ Movement at the United Nations.” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal. doi:10.1080/23802014.2018.1553505.
   Google Scholar
• Hasl, M. “Shifting the Paradigm: A Typology of Affected Persons’ Participation in International Institutions.” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal. doi:10.1080/23802014.2018.1553506.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D. “Reframing Global Governance: Apocalypse Soon or Reform!” New Political Economy 11, no. 2 (2006): 157–176. doi:10.1080/13563460600655516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzscheiter, A. “Affectedness, Empowerment and Norm Contestation: Children and Young People as Social Agents in International Politics.” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal doi:10.1080/23802014.2018.1600382.
   Google Scholar
• Jokubauskaite, G. “Tied Affectedness? Grassroots Resistance and the World Bank.” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal doi:10.1080/23802014.2018.1595125.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M. E., and K. Sikkink. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, J. E., D. Suozzi, and A. L. Taylor. “Lessons from the Experience of U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Addressing the Democratic Deficit in Global Health Governance.” The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38, no. 3 (2010): 564–579. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00512.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeon, N. Food Security Governance: Empowering Communities, Regulating Corporations. London: Routledge, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Montanaro, L. “The Democratic Legitimacy of Self-Appointed Representatives.” The Journal of Politics 74, no. 4 (2012): 1094–1107. doi:10.1017/S0022381612000515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näsström, S. “The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle.” Political Studies 59, no. 1 (2011): 116–134. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00845.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panel of Eminent Persons on United Nations–Civil Society Relations. “We the Peoples: Civil Society, the United Nations and Global Governance.” UN, A/58/817, June 11, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Reimann, K. D. “A View from the Top: International Politics, Norms and the Worldwide Growth of NGOs.” International Studies Quarterly 50, no. 1 (2006): 45–68. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00392.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, O. P. “A Post-Liberal Peace: Eirenism and the Everyday.” Review of International Studies 35, no. 3 (2009): 557. doi:10.1017/S0260210509008651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saward, M. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Scholte, J. A., ed. Building Global Democracy? Civil Society and Accountable Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Scholte, J. A. “Conclusion.” In Building Global Democracy? Civil Society and Accountable Global Governance, edited by J. A. Scholte, 306–342. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Scholte, J. A., ed. “Reinventing Global Democracy.” European Journal of International Relations 20, no. 1 (2012): 3–28. doi: 10.1177/1354066111436237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schramm, A., and J. Sändig. “Affectedness Alliances: Affected People at the Centre of Transnational Advocacy.” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal. doi:10.1080/23802014.2018.1575767.
   Google Scholar
• Steffek, J., C. Kissling, and P. Nanz. Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance: A Cure for the Democratic Deficit? Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, R. “Remedying Disregard in Global Regulatory Governance: Accountability, Participation, and Responsiveness.” American Journal of International Law 108, no. 2 (2014): 211–270. doi:10.5305/amerjintelaw.108.2.0211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroup, S. S., and W. H. Wong. The Authority Trap: Strategic Choices of International NGOs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J., T. Sommerer, T. Squatrito, and C. Jonsson. The Opening up of International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, L., and P. Tsolekile de Wet. “BRICS Civil Society Initiatives: Towards the Inclusion of Affected Communities in Collective Development?” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal doi:10.1080/23802014.2018.1599690.
   Google Scholar
• Toussaint, P. “Voices Unheard: Affected Communities and the Climate Negotiations on Loss and Damage.” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal doi:10.1080/23802014.2018.1597640.
   Google Scholar
• von Bernstorff, J. “Zivilgesellschaftliche Partizipation in Internationalen Organisationen: Form globaler Demokratie oder Baustein westlicher Expertenherrschaft?” In Demokratie in der Weltgesellschaft, edited by H. Brunkhorst, 277–302. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• von Bernstorff, J. “Authority Monism in International Organisations: A Historical Sketch.” In Allocating Authority: Who Should Do What in European and International Law? edited by J. Mendes and I. Venzke, 99–113. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, J. “Prologue: Amsterdam and the Quest for Constitutonal Democracy.” In Legal Issues of the Amsterdam Treaty, edited by D. O’Keeffe and P. Twomey, 1–20. Oxford: Hart, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Wallbott, L., and E. Recio. “Practicing Human Rights across Scale: Indigenous Peoples‘ Affectedness and Recognition in REDD+ Governance.” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal doi: 10.1080/23802014.2018.1599691.
   Google Scholar
• Youtube. “Greta Thunberg Full Speech at UN Climate Change COP24 Conference.” uploaded by Connect4Climate. Accessed January 8, 2019. www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFkQSGyeCWg.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. A Theory of Global Governance. Authority, Legitimacy and Contestation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar