Methodology and academic extractivism: the neo-colonialism of the British university

Bibliography

• Acosta, A. 2013. “Extractivism and Neoextractivism: Two Sides of the Same Curse.” In Beyond Development: Alternative Visions from Latin America, edited by M. Lang and D. Mokrani, 61–86. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Alatas, S. F. 2003. “Academic Dependency and the Global Division of Labour in the Social Sciences.” Current Sociology 51 (6): 599–613. doi:10.1177/00113921030516003.
   Google Scholar
• Alatas, S. H. 2000. “Intellectual Imperialism: Definition, Traits, and Problems.” Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science 28 (1): 23–45.
   Google Scholar
• Bassett, B. R. 2010. “Iterative.” In Encyclopaedia of Case Study Research, edited by A. Mills, G. Durepos, and E. Wiebe, 504–505. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2016. Social Research Methods. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, R. G. 1993. Research Methods. Walton-on-Thames, Surrey: Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, P., K. Gilland, W. Grant, and Z. Layton-Henry. 2004. Research Methods in Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. 2003. “Toward an Afrocentric Feminist Epistemology.” In Turning Points in Qualitative Research: Tying Knots in a Handkerchief, edited by Y. S. Lincoln and N. K. Denzin, 47–73. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dahdouh-Guebas, F., J. Ahimbisibwe, R. Van Moll, N. Koedam. 2003. “Neo-colonial Science by the Most Industrialised upon the Least Developed Countries in Peer-reviewed Publishing.” Scientometrics 56 (3): 329. DOI:10.1023/A:1022374703178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Sousa Santos, B. 2014. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., and M. Keating. 2008. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dussel, E. 2000. “Europe, Modernity, and Eurocentrism.” Nepantla: Views from South 1 (3): 465–478.
   Google Scholar
• Esson, J., P. Noxolo, R. Baxter, P. Daley, and M. Byron. 2017. “The 2017 RGS-IBG Chair’s Theme: Decolonising Geographical Knowledges, or Reproducing Coloniality?” Area 49 (3): 384–388. doi:10.1111/area.12371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fals-Borda, O. 1970. Ciencia propia y colonialism intelectual. edited by D. F. Mexico. Mexico City: Editorial Nuestro Tiempo.
   Google Scholar
• Galeano, E. 2009. Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of the Pillage of a Continent. London: Serpent’s Tail.
   Google Scholar
• Gaztambide-Fernandez, R. A. 2012. “Decolonisation and the Pedagogy of Solidarity.” Decolonisation: Indigeneity, Education & Society 1 (1): 41–67.
   Google Scholar
• Grosfoguel, R. 2008. “Transmodernity, Border Thinking, and Global Coloniality.” Humandee: Human Management and Development, July 4. http://www.humandee.org/spip.php?article111
   Google Scholar
• Grosfoguel, R. 2013. “The Structure of Knowledge in Westernised Universities: Epistemic Racism/Sexism and the Four Genocides/Epistemicides of the Long 16th Century.” Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge 11 (1): 73–90.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, R. 1989. “Marxism and Philosophy: A Critique of Critical Realism.” Capital & Class 13 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1177/030981688903700106.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, B. 2004. The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love. New York: Atria Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hountondji, P. J. 1992. “Recapturing.” In The Surreptitious Speech: Présence Africaine and the Politics of Otherness 1947-1987, edited by V. Y. Mudimbe, 238–248. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiung, P. C. 2016. “Teaching Qualitative Research as Transgressive Practices: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Qualitative Inquiry 22 (2): 59–71. doi:10.1177/1077800415617204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. 2020. “Throwing Our Bodies against the White Background of Academia.” Area 52 (1): 89–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewthwaite, S., and M. Holmes. 2018. “The Pedagogy of Social Science Research Methods Textbooks: Scoping Study Research Report.” Society for Research into Higher Education. University of Southampton. https://www.srhe.ac.uk/downloads/reports-2016/Sarah-Lewthwaite-The-Pedagogy-of-Social-Science.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., and G. Stoker, eds. 2002. Theory and Methods in Political Science. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. D. 2009. “Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and De-Colonial Freedom.” Theory, Culture & Society 26 (7–8): 1–23. doi:10.1177/0263276409349275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, A., V. Kinloch, T. Burkhard, R. Randall, and A. Howard. 2016. “Black Feminist Thought as Methodology: Examining Intergenerational Lived Experiences of Black Women.” Departures in Critical Qualitative Research 5 (3): 55–76. doi:10.1525/dcqr.2016.5.3.55.
   Google Scholar
• Pizzaro, M. 1998. “’Chicana/o Power!’ Epistemology and Methodology for Social Justice and Empowerment in Chicana/o Communities.” Qualitative Studies in Education 11 (1): 57–80. doi:10.1080/095183998236890.
   Google Scholar
• Quijano, A. 2000. “Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America.” International Sociology 15 (2): 215–232. doi:10.1177/0268580900015002005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 1995. Hegel Contra Sociology. London: Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E. 2003. Orientalism. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tuhiwai Smith, L. 1999. Decolonising Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• UUK. 2018. “Higher Education 2018: International Facts and Figures.” Universities UK International. https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/policy-and-analysis/reports/Documents/International/International%20Facts%20and%20Figures%202018_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vellinga, M. L. 1971. “On Academic Colonialism: The Case of U.S.-Latin American Studies.” Sociologische Gids 18 (4): 338–353.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar