Identification of penaeid shrimp from Chilika Lake through DNA barcoding

References

• Besbes N, Jérôme M, Bergé JP, Sadok S. 2015. Authenticating the origin of different shrimp products on the Tunisian markets by PCR/RFLP method. Afr J Biotechnol. 14:2273–2281.
   Google Scholar
• CIBA Annual Report. 2013–2014. Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture (CIBA). Chennai, India: Indian Council of Agriculture Research.
   Google Scholar
• Dholakia AD. 2010. Identification of prawns/shrimps of India and their culture. Daya Publishing House. New Delhi, India.
   Google Scholar
• Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Marine Biol Biotechnol. 3:294–299.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holthuis LB. 1980. Shrimp and prawn of the World (FAO species catalog). FAO Fish Synop. Vol. 1. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Isabel PF, Kensley BF. 1997. Penaeids and Sergestoid shrimps and prawns of the world: keys and diagnoses for the families and genera. Paris: Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN. 2017. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2017-1. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed on 10 October 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Jayachandran KV. 2001. Palaemonid prawns biodiversity, taxonomy, biology and management. Kolkata: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. PVT. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Jose D, Nidhin B, Anil Kumar KP, Pradeep PJ, Harikrishnan M. 2015. A molecular approach towards the taxonomy of fresh water prawns Macrobrachium striatum and M. equidens (Decapoda, Palaemonidae) using mitochondrial markers. Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 27:2585–2593.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liao IC, Chien YH. 2011. The Pacific White Shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, in Asia: The world’s most widely cultured alien crustacean. Invading Nature - Springer Series in Invasion Ecol Spr Stut Technol. 6:489–519.
   Google Scholar
• Mamatha DM, Jyothi S, Sharmila S, Khedkar GD. 2016. Molecular phylogeny of South Indian prawn species by DNA barcoding using COI gene as a marker. Computational Science, Mathematics and Biology. 1:56–58.
   Google Scholar
• Maralit BA, Aguila RD, Ventolero MFH, Perez SKL, Santos MD. 2013. Detection of mislabeled commercial fishery by-products in the Philippines using DNA barcodes and its implications to food traceability and safety. Food Control. 33:119–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolè S, Negrisolo E, Eccher G, Mantovani R, Patarnello T, Erickson DL, Kress WJ, Barcaccia G. 2012. DNA barcoding as a reliable method for the authentication of commercial seafood products. Food Technol Biotechnol. 50:387–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PrasannaKumar C, John BA, Khan SA, Lyla PS, Jalal KCA. 2012. Limit of DNA Barcode in Delineating Penaeus monodon and in its developing stages. Sains Malaysiana. 41(12):1527–1533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajkumar G, Saravana Bhavan P, Udayasuriyan R, Vadivalagan C. 2015. Molecular identification of shrimp species, Penaeus semisulcatus, Metapenaeus dobsoni, Metapenaeus brevicornis, Fenneropenaeus indicus, Parapenaeopsis stylifera and Solenocera crassicornis inhabiting in the coromandel coast (Tamil Nadu, India) using MT-COI gene. Int J Fish Aquat Sci. 2(4):96–106.
   Google Scholar
• Rath S, Dev Roy MK. 2009. Prawns (Crustacea: Decapoda). Estuarine Ecosystem Series. 5. Fauna of Krishna Estuary. Calcutta: Zoological Survey of India.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy KN. 1995. Crustacea: Decapoda. Zool. Surv. India, Wetland Ecosystem Series 1: fauna of Chilika Lake. 367–389. Edited by The Director, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, India.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi N, Mantelatto FL. 2013. Molecular analysis of the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium olfersii (Decapoda, Palaemonidae) supports the existence of a single species throughout its distribution. PLoS One. 8:e54698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad YM, El-Sadek HEA. 2017. The efficiency of cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 gene (cox1) in reconstruction of phylogenetic relations among some Crustacean species. Int Schol Sci Res Innov. 11:515–520.
   Google Scholar
• Sambrook J, Russell DW. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. New York: Cold Spring 509 Harbor Laboratory Press.
   Google Scholar
• Subbaiya R, Narasimman S, Lawanya R, Mahavinod Angrasan JKV, Masilamani Selvam M. 2017. Studies on proximal composition and DNA barcoding of marine shrimps from Thondi, Tamilnadu, India. Int Res J Pharma. 8:59–62.
   Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 30:2725–2729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. 1997. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:4876–4882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergamini FG, Pileggi LG, Mantelatto FL. 2011. Genetic variability of the Amazon River prawn Macrobrachium amazonicum (Decapoda, Caridea, Palaemonidae). Contr Zool. 80(1): 67–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakida-Kusunoki AT, Angel LEA, Alejandro PC, Brahms CQ. 2011. Presence of Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) in the Southern Gulf of Mexico. Aquat Invasions. 6(1):S139–S142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WWF India. 2008. Chilika Lake. http://wwfindia.org. Accessed on 10 October 2017.
   Google Scholar