Molecular and morphological evidences resolve taxonomic ambiguity between Systomus sarana sarana (Hamilton, 1822) and S. sarana subnasutus (Valenciennes) and suggest elevating them into distinct species

References

• Cavalcanti MJ, Monteiro LR, Lopes PRD. 1999. Landmark-based morphometric analysis in selected species of serranid fishes (percifomes: Teleostei). Zool Stud. 38:287–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandanshive NE, et al. 2007. Fish fauna of Pavanariver Pune. Zoos' Print J. 22:2693–2694.
   Google Scholar
• Cuvier G, Valenciennes A. 1842. Histoire naturelle des poissons. Tome seizième. P. Bertrand, Paris, 472 p.
   Google Scholar
• Dahanukar N, Raut R, Bhat A. 2004. Distribution, endemism and threat status of freshwater fishes in the Western Ghats of India. J Biogeography. 31:123–136. IUCN. 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (ver. 2011.1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahanukar N. 2010. Labeo dyocheilus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2010: e.T166625A6249964. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2010-4.RLTS. T166625A 6249964.en. Downloaded on 05 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Dahanukar N. 2013. Systomus sarana ssp. subnasutus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: e.T172514A6907469. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2011-1.RLTS.T172514A6907469.en downloaded on 17.05.2013.
   Google Scholar
• Eschmeyer WN, Fricke R, editors. 2011. Catalog of fishes. Updated internet version of 30 September 2011. Catalog databases of CAS cited in FishBase (website).
   Google Scholar
• Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser. 41:95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton F. 1822. An account of the fishes found in river Ganges and its branches. Edinburgh and London. p. i–vii 1–405, Pls.1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica. 4:4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Jadhav SS, Yadav BE. 2009. A note on the ichthyofauna of Solapur District, with first report of a cyprinid fish Rasboracaverii (Jerdon) from Maharashtra State, India. J Threat Taxa. 1:243–244.
   Google Scholar
• Jayaram KC. 1991. Revision of the genus Puntius Hamilton from Indian region (Pisces: Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae, Cyprininae). Records of Zoological Survey of India. Occ. Paper: 135:52–58, 61–67, 113–122.
   Google Scholar
• Jayaram KC. 2010. The freshwater fishes of the Indian region, 2nd ed. Delhi: Narendra Publishing House; p. 616; 39 plates.
   Google Scholar
• Karaoglu H, Belduz AO. 2011. Multivariate discrimination among three Trachurus species from Turkey. J Anim Vet Adv. 10:121–127.
   Google Scholar
• Kottelat M. 2013. The fishes of the inland waters of Southeast Asia: a catalogue and core bibliography of the fishes known to occur in freshwaters, mangroves and estuaries. Raffles Bull Zool. (27):1–663.
   Google Scholar
• Menon AGK. 1963. Subspecies of the cyprinid fish Puntius sarana with description of P. saranaspilurus from Ceylon. Spolia Zeylanica. 30:65–70.
   Google Scholar
• Menon AGK. 1999. Check list - fresh water fishes of India. Records of the Zoological Survey of India. Misc Publ Occas. p. 366. Pap. No. 175.
   Google Scholar
• Palumbi SR, Benzie J. 1991. Large mitochondrial DNA differences between morphologically similar Penaeid shrimp. Mol Mar Biotechnol. 1:27–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parsons L, Harris KL, Turner K, Whitington PM. 2003. Roundabout gene family functions during sensory axon guidance in the Drosophila embryo are mediated by both Slit-dependent and Slit-independent mechanisms. Dev Biol. 264:363–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohlf FJ. 2006. tpsDig2, Version 2. 1. State University of New York, Stony Brook. Available at: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph
   Google Scholar
• Ruzzante DE, Taggart C, Cook D, Goddard S. 1996. Genetic differentiation between inshore and offshore Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) off Newfoundland: microsatellite DNA variation and antifreeze level. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 53:634–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 4:406–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakai H, Iguchi K, Yamazaki Y, Sideleva VG, Goto A. 2009. Morphological and mtDNA sequence studies on three crucian carps (Carassius: Cyprinidae) including a new stock from the Ob River system, Kazakhstan. J Fish Biol. 74:1756–1773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahnawaz A, Venkateshwarlu M. 2009. A checklist of fishes from the Tunga and Bhadra rivers, Karnataka, India with a special note on their biodiversity status. Current Biotica. 3:232–243.
   Google Scholar
• Singh RK, Lal KK, Mohindra V, Punia P, Sah RS, Kumar R, Gupta A, Das R, Lakra WS, Ayyappan S. 2012. Genetic diversity of Indian Major Carp, Labeo calbasu (Hamilton, 1822) populations inferred from microsatellite loci. Biochem. Syst Ecol. 44:307–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talwar PK, Jhingran AG. 1991. Inland fishes of India and adjacent countries. Volume 2. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgens DG. 1997. The Clustal X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl Acids Res. 25:4876–4882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenciennes MA. 1842. Histoire Naturelle Poissons. Paris. 17:23–497.
   Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Tayler SZ, Bronwyn HI, Peter RL & Hebert PDN. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. doirstb.2005.1716/rstb.2005.1716
   Google Scholar
• Xiao WH, Zhang YP, Liu HZ. 2001. Molecular systematics of Xenocyprinae (Teleostei: Cyprinidae): Taxonomy, biogeography, and coevolution of a special group restricted in East Asia. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 18:163–173.
   Google Scholar