508
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Mitogenome Announcement

The mitochondrial genome of the endemic Brazilian paradoxical frog Pseudis tocantins (Hylidae)

, &
Pages 1106-1107 | Received 16 Jul 2018, Accepted 29 Jul 2018, Published online: 26 Oct 2018

References

  • Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 215:403–410.
  • Bernt M, Donath A, Jühling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, Pütz J, Middendorf M, Stadler PF. 2013. MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 69:313–319.
  • Busin CS, Andrade GV, Bertoldo J, Del Grande ML, Uetanabaro M, Recco-Pimentel SM. 2008. Cytogenetic analysis of four species of Pseudis (Anura, Hylidae), with the description of ZZ/ZW sex chromosomes in P. tocantins. Genetica. 133:119–127.
  • Caramaschi U, Cruz CAG. 1998. Notas taxonômicas sobre Pseudis fusca Garman e P. bolbodactyla A. Lutz, com a descrição de uma nova espácie correlata (Anura, Pseudidae). Rev Bras Zool. 15:929–944.
  • Duellman WE, Marion AB, Hedges SB. 2016. Phylogenetics, classification, and biogeography of the treefrogs (Amphibia: Anura: Arboranae). Zootaxa. 4104:1–109.
  • Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32: 1792–1797.
  • Faivovich J, Haddad CFB, Garcia PCA, Frost DR, Campbell JA, Wheeler WC. 2005. Systematic review of the frog family Hylidae, with special reference to Hylinae: phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision. Bull Am Museum Nat Hist. 294:1–240.
  • Frost DR. 2018. Amphibian Species of the World 6.0: An Online Reference. New York: American Museum of Natural History; [accessed 2018 Jul 06]. http://research.amnh.org/vz/herpetology/amphibia/.
  • Garda AA, Santana DJ, São-Pedro V. d A. 2010. Taxonomic characterization of paradoxical frogs (Anura, Hylidae, Pseudae): geographic distribution, external morphology, and morphometry. Zootaxa. 2666:1–28.
  • Gatto KP, Busin CS, Lourenço LB. 2016. Unraveling the sex chromosome heteromorphism of the paradoxical frog Pseudis tocantins. PLoS One. 11:e0156176.
  • Koch P, Platzer M, Downie BR. 2014. RepARK – de novo creation of repeat libraries from whole-genome NGS reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 42:e80.
  • Pyron RA, Wiens JJ. 2011. A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 61:543–583.
  • Sambrook J, Fritschi EF, Maniats T. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  • Santana DJ, Magalhães F. de M, São-Pedro V. de A, Mângia S, Amado TF, Garda AA. 2016. Calls and tadpoles of the species of Pseudis (Anura, Hylidae, Pseudae). Herpetol J. 26:139–148.
  • Shaw G. 1802. General zoology or systematic natural history. Volume III, Part 1. Amphibia. London (UK): Thomas Davison.
  • Stamakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 30: 1312–1313.
  • Sun Q, Xie Y, Zhao W, Liu P. 2017. Sequencing and analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of Hyla ussuriensis (Anura: Hylidae). Mitochondr DNA part A. 28: 328–329.
  • Wang X, Wang Y, Yue B, Zhang X, Liu S. 2017. The complete mitochondrial genome of the Bufo tibetanus (Anura: Bufonidae). Mitochondr DNA. 24: 186–188.
  • Wiens JJ, Kuczynski CA, Hua X, Moen DS. 2010. An expanded phylogeny of treefrogs (Hylidae) based on nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 55:871–882.
  • Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18:821–829.