Comparative analysis of codon usage between Gossypium hirsutum and G. barbadense mitochondrial genomes

References

• Akashi H. 1994. Synonymous codon usage in drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy. Genetics. 136:927–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya D, Uddin A, Das S, Chakraborty S. 2019. Mutation pressure and natural selection on codon usage in chloroplast genes of two species in pisum l. (Fabaceae: Faboideae). Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 30(4):664–673.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bulmer M. 1991. The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. Genetics. 129(3):897–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaney JL, Clark PL. 2015. Roles for synonymous codon usage in protein biogenesis. Annu Rev Biophys. 44:143–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SL, Lee W, Hottes AK, Shapiro L, Mcadams HH. 2004. Codon usage between genomes is constrained by genome-wide mutational processes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101(10):3480–3485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen ZW, Nie HS, Wang YM, Pei HL, Li SS, Zhang LD, Hua JP. 2017. Rapid evolutionary divergence of diploid and allotetraploid Gossypium mitochondrial genomes. BMC Genomics. 18:876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiapello H, Lisacek F, Caboche M, Henaut A. 1998. Codon usage and gene function are related in sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene. 209(1–-2):GC1–GC38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drouin G, Daoud H, Xia J. 2008. Relative rates of synonymous substitutions in the mitochondrial, chloroplast and nuclear genomes of seed plants. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 49(3):827–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duret L. 2002. Evolution of synonymous codon usage in metazoans. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 12(6):640–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duret L, Mouchiroud D. 1999. Expression pattern and, surprisingly, gene length shape codon usage in Caenorhabditis, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96(8):4482–4487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frumkin I, Lajoie MJ, Gregg CJ, Hornung G, Church GM, Pilpel Y. 2018. Codon usage of highly expressed genes affects proteome-wide translation efficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 115(21):E4940–E4949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenacre MJ. 1993. Correspondence analysis in practice. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenacre M. 2010. Correspondence analysis of raw data. Ecology. 91(4):958–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan DL, Qian ZQ, Ma LB, Bai Y, Xu SQ. 2019. Different mitogenomic codon usage patterns between damselflies and dragonflies and nine complete mitogenomes for odonates. Sci Rep. 9:678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershberg R, Petrov DA. 2008. Selection on codon bias. Annu Rev Genet. 42:287–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang M, Zhong Y, Ma X, Hu Q, Fu M, Han Y. 2019. Analysis of codon usage in the mitochondrion genome of Spirodela polyrhiza. Aquat Bot. 156:65–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikemura T. 1985. Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. Mol Biol Evol. 2(1):13–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingvarsson PK. 2007. Gene expression and protein length influence codon usage and rates of sequence evolution in Populus tremula. Mol Biol Evol. 24(3):836–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James JE, Piganeau G, Eyre-Walker A. 2016. The rate of adaptive evolution in animal mitochondria. Mol Ecol. 25(1):67–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia W, Higgs PG. 2008. Codon usage in mitochondrial genomes: distinguishing context-dependent mutation from translational selection. Mol Biol Evol. 25(2):339–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Deng F, Wang H, Hu Z. 2008. An extensive analysis on the global codon usage pattern of baculoviruses. Arch Virol. 153(12):2273–2282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kano A, Andachi Y, Ohama T, Osawa S. 1991. Novel anticodon composition of transfer RNAs in micrococcus luteus, a bacterium with a high genomic G + C content. Correlation with codon usage. J Mol Biol. 221(2):387–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawabe A, Miyashita NT. 2003. Patterns of codon usage bias in three dicot and four monocot plant species. Genes Genet Syst. 78(5):343–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu G, Cao D, Li S, Su A, Geng J, Grover CE, Hu S, Hua J. 2013. The complete mitochondrial genome of Gossypium hirsutum and evolutionary analysis of higher plant mitochondrial genomes. PLoS One. 8(8):e69476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Dou S, Ji Z, Xue Q. 2005. Synonymous codon usage and gene function are strongly related in Oryza sativa. BioSystems. 80(2):123–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Feng Y, Xue Q. 2004. Analysis of factors shaping codon usage in the mitochondrion genome of Oryza sativa. Mitochondrion. Mitochondrion. 4(4):313–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Hu H, Wang H. 2015. Mutational bias is the driving force for shaping the synonymous codon usage pattern of alternatively spliced genes in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol Genet Genomics. 290(2):649–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu XY, Li Y, Ji KK, Zhu J, Ling P, Zhou T, Fan LY, Xie SQ. 2020. Genome-wide codon usage pattern analysis reveals the correlation between codon usage bias and gene expression in Cuscuta australis. Genomics. 112(4):2695–2702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marais G, Duret L. 2001. Synonymous codon usage, accuracy of translation, and gene length in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Mol Evol. 52(3):275–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriyama EN, Powell JR. 1998. Gene length and codon usage bias in Drosophila melanogaster, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 26(13):3188–3193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muftuoglu M, Mori MP, Souza-Pinto N. 2014. Formation and repair of oxidative damage in the mitochondrial DNA. Mitochondrion. 17:164–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neron B, Menager H, Maufrais C, Joly N, Maupetit J, Letort S, Carrere S, Tuffery P, Letondal C. 2009. Mobyle: a new full web bioinformatics framework. Bioinformatics. 25(22):3005–3011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osawa S, Ohama T, Yamao F, Muto A, Jukes TH, Ozeki H, Umesono K. 1988. Directional mutation pressure and transfer RNA in choice of the third nucleotide of synonymous two-codon sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 85(4):1124–1128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah K, Cheng Y, Hahn B, Bridges R, Bradbury NA, Mueller DM. 2015. Synonymous codon usage affects the expression of wild type and F508del CFTR. J Mol Biol. 427(6 Pt B):1464–1479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang MZ, Liu F, Hua JP, Wang KB. 2011. Analysis on codon usage of chloroplast genome of Gossypium hirsutum. Scientia Agricultura Sinica. 044:245–253.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp PM. 1991. Determinants of DNA sequence divergence between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: codon usage, map position, and concerted evolution. J Mol Evol. 33(1):23–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp PM, Cowe E, Higgins DG, Shields DC, Wolfe KH, Wright F. 1988. Codon usage patterns in Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens; a review of the considerable within-species diversity. Nucleic Acids Res. 16(17):8207–8211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp PM, Li WH. 1986. An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms. J Mol Evol. 24(1–2):28–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp PM, Li WH. 1987. The rate of synonymous substitution in enterobacterial genes is inversely related to codon usage bias. Mol Biol Evol. 4:222–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp PM, Tuohy TM, Mosurski KR. 1986. Codon usage in yeast: cluster analysis clearly differentiates highly and lowly expressed genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 14(13):5125–5143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi X, Wang X, Li Z, Zhu Q, Tang W, Ge S, Luo J. 2006. Nucleotide substitution pattern in rice paralogues: implication for negative correlation between the synonymous substitution rate and codon usage bias. Gene. 376(2):199–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirihongthong T, Jitobaom K, Phakaratsakul S, Boonarkart C, Suptawiwat O, Auewarakul P. 2019. The relationship of codon usage to the replication strategy of parvoviruses. Arch Virol. 164(10):2479–2491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith DR, Hua JM, Lee RW, Keeling PJ. 2012. Relative rates of evolution among the three genetic compartments of the red alga porphyra differ from those of green plants and do not correlate with genome architecture. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 65(1):339–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song H, Gao H, Liu J, Tian P, Nan Z. 2017. Comprehensive analysis of correlations among codon usage bias, gene expression, and substitution rate in Arachis duranensis and Arachis ipaënsis orthologs. Sci Rep. 7(1):14853.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sueoka N. 1995. Intrastrand parity rules of DNA base composition and usage biases of synonymous codons. J Mol Evol. 40(3):318–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sueoka N. 1999. Translation-coupled violation of parity rule 2 in human genes is not the cause of heterogeneity of the DNA G + C content of third codon position. Gene. 238(1):53–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang M, Chen Z, Grover CE, Wang Y, Li S, Liu G, Ma Z, Wendel JF, Hua J. 2015. Rapid evolutionary divergence of Gossypium barbadense and G. hirsutum mitochondrial genomes. BMC Genomics. 16:770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uddin A, Choudhury MN, Chakraborty S. 2018. Codon usage bias and phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial Nd1 gene in pisces, aves, and mammals. Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 29(1):36–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Victor MP, Acharya D, Begum T, Ghosh TC. 2019. The optimization of mRNA expression level by its intrinsic properties-insights from codon usage pattern and structural stability of mRNA. Genomics. 111(6):1292–1297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Xing H, Yuan Y, Wang X, Saeed M, Tao J, Feng W, Zhang G, Song X, Sun X. 2018. Genome-wide analysis of codon usage bias in four sequenced cotton species. PLoS One. 13(3):e0194372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Y, Silke JR, Xia X. 2019. An improved estimation of tRNA expression to better elucidate the coevolution between tRNA abundance and codon usage in bacteria. Sci Rep. 9(1):3184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright F. 1990. The ‘effective number of codons’ used in a gene. Gene. 87(1):23–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao S, Nguyen DT, Wu B, Hao W. 2017. Genetic drift and indel mutation in the evolution of yeast mitochondrial genome size. Genome Biol Evol. 9(11):3088–3099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Yu CH, Zhao F, Dang Y, Wu C, Xie P, Sachs MS, Liu Y. 2019. Erf1 mediates codon usage effects on mRNA translation efficiency through premature termination at rare codons. Nucleic Acids Res. 47(17):9243–9258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang WJ, Zhou J, Li ZF, Wang L, Gu X, Zhong Y. 2007. Comparative analysis of codon usage patterns among mitochondrion, chloroplast and nuclear genes in Triticum aestivum L. J Integrative Plant Biology. 49(2):246–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Li X. 2009. Analysis of synonymous codon usage patterns in different plant mitochondrial genomes. Mol Biol Rep. 36(8):2039–2046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar