The complete mitochondrial genome of Cyphocaris challengeri (Amphipoda: Cyphocarididae)

References

• Bernt M, Donath A, Jühling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, Pütz J, Middendorf M, Stadler PF. 2013. MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 69(2):313–319. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeck A. 1871. Crustacea amphipoda borealia et arctica. Forhandlinger i Videnskabs-Selskabet i Christiana. 1870:83–280.
   Google Scholar
• Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 30(15):2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman TE, McCain JC. 1967. Variation and distribution of the pelagic amphipod Cyphocaris challengeri in the Northeast Pacific (Gammaridea: lysianassidae). Proceedings of the United States National Museum. 122(3588):1–14. doi: 10.5479/si.00963801.122-3588.1.
   Google Scholar
• Chevreux E. 1899. Sur deux espèces géantes d'amphipodes provenant des campagnes du yacht Princesse Alice. Bull Soc Zool France. 24:152–158. doi: 10.5962/bhl.part.24435.
   Google Scholar
• Chevreux E. 1916. Sur les Amphipodes du genre Cyphocaris Boeck recueillis par la "Princesse Alice" au moyen du filet Richard à grande ouverture. Bull Institut Océanogr Monaco. 319:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Costalago D, Forster I, Nemcek N, Neville C, Perry RI, Young K, Hunt BPV. 2020. Seasonal and spatial dynamics of the planktonic trophic biomarkers in the Strait of Georgia (northeast Pacific) and implications for fish. Sci Rep. 10(1):8517. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65557-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dana JD. 1849. Synopsis of the genera of Gammaracea. Am J Sci Arts 8(ser. 2):135–140.
   Google Scholar
• D'Udekem d'Acoz C, Havermans C. 2015. Contribution to the systematics of the genus Eurythenes S.I. Smith in Scudder, 1882 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Lysianassoidea: Eurytheneidae). Zootaxa. 3971: 1–80. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3971.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics. 5(1):113. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards MH. 1848. Sur un crustacé amphipode, remarquable par sa grande taille. Ann Sci Naturelles Zool. 9(Ser. 3):398.
   Google Scholar
• Haro-Garay MJ. 2003. Diet and functional morphology of the mandible of two planktonic amphipods from the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia, Parathemisto pacifica (Stebbing, 1888) and Cyphocaris challengeri (Stebbing, 1888). Crustac. 76(11):1291–1312. doi: 10.1163/156854003323009821.
   Google Scholar
• Hiltunen M, Strandberg U, Brett MT, Winans AK, Beauchamp DA, Kotila M, Keister JE. 2022. Taxonomic, temporal, and spatial variations in zooplankton fatty acid composition in Puget Sound, WA, USA. Estuaries Coasts. 45(2):567–581. doi: 10.1007/s12237-021-00973-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes LE, Lowry JK. 2015. A review of the world Cyphocarididae with description of three new species (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Lysianassoidea). Zootaxa. 4058(1):1–40. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4058.1.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin JJ, Yu WB, Yang J-B, Song Y, dePamphilis CW, Yi TS, Li DZ. 2020. GetOrganelle: a fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biol. 21(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02154-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 9(4):357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry JK, Stoddart HE. 1997. Amphipoda Crustacea IV. Families Aristiidae, Cyphocarididae, Endevouridae, Lysianassidae, Scopelocheiridae, Uristidae. Ser Memoirs Hourglass Cruises. 10:148.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry JK, Stoddart HE. 2003. Crustacea: Malacostraca: Peracarida: Amphipoda, Cumacea, Mysidacea. In: P. L. Beesly & W. W. K. Houston, editors. Zoological Catalogue of Australia, p. 92–93. Collingwood, Victoria, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Magoc T, Salzberg SL. 2011. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 27(21):2957–2963. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu C, Hermans SM, Lear G, Buckley TR, Lee KC, Buckley HL. 2020. A systematic review of sources of variability and uncertainty in eDNA data for environmental monitoring. Front Ecol Evol. 8:135. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00135.
   Google Scholar
• Meng G, Li Y, Yang C, Liu S. 2019. MitoZ: a toolkit for animal mitochondrial genome assembly, annotation and visualization. Nucleic Acids Res. 47(11):e63–e63. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morino H. 1993. A new species of the genus Jesogammarus (Amphipoda: Anisogammaridae) from brackish waters of Japan. Publication Itako Hydrobiological Station. 6:9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Moore RM, Harrison AO, McAllister SM, Polson SW, Wommack KE. 2020. Iroki: automatic customization and visualization of phylogenetic trees. PeerJ. 8:e8584. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pons J, Bauzà-Ribot MM, Jaume D, Juan C. 2014. Next-generation sequencing, phylogenetic signal and comparative mitogenomic analyses in Metacrangonyctidae (Amphipoda: Crustacea). BMC Genomics. 15(1):566. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, Lapidus A, Korobeynikov A. 2020. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 70(1):e102. doi: 10.1002/cpbi.102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sars GO. 1900. Crustacea. Scientific Results of the Norwegian North Polar Expedition 1893–1896. 1:1–141.
   Google Scholar
• Smith SI. 1882. Nomenclator Zoologicus. An alphabetical list of all generic names that have been employed by naturalists for recent and fossil animals from the earliest times to the close of the year 1879. In 2 parts: 1. Supplemental list. II. Universal index. BullUS Natl Museum. (19). i–xxi, 1–376, 1–340. doi: 10.5479/si.03629236.19.i.
   Google Scholar
• Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenetics. Bioinformatics. 30(9):1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stebbing TRR. 1888. Report on the Amphipoda collected by H.M.S challenger during the years 1873-1876. Zoology. 29:1–212.
   Google Scholar
• WoRMS Editorial Board. 2022. World Register of Marine Species. doi: 10.14284/170.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo K Il. 1970. On the distribution of the pelagic amphipod, Cyphocaris challengeri (Gammaridea: Lysianassidae) in the western North Pacific. Korean J Zool. 13(3):94–100. https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO197011919884679.page.
   Google Scholar