Language and Speech Communication

References

• Ausubel, D. P The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1960, 51, 267–272.
   Google Scholar
• Barclay, J R., Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., McCarrell, N. S., &Nitsch, K. Comprehension and semantic flexibility. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974, 13, 471–481.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. C/ass, codes, and control. New York: Schocken, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, L. Language. New York: Henry Holt, 1933.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, J. W. Language intensity, social introversion, and attitude change. Speech Monographs, 1963,30, 345–352.
   Google Scholar
• Bradac, J. J., Bowers, J. W., & Courtright, J. A. Three language variables in communication research; Intensity, immediacy, and diversity. Human Communication Research, 1979, 5, 257–269.
   Google Scholar
• Bradac, J. J., Hosman, L. A., & Tardy, C. H. Reciprocal disclosures and language intensity: Attributional consequences. Communication Monographs, 1978, 45, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, P H. The folk-linguistics of women’s speech: An empirical examination. Communication Monographs, 1981,48, 73–90.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R, & Fraser, C. Speech as a marker of situation. In K. R. Scherer & H. Giles (Eds.), Social markers in speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J.S. The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of Child Language, 1975, 2, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, M., & Miller, G. R. Prior attitude and language intensity as predictors of message style and attitude change following counterattitudinal advocacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 20, 246–253.
   Google Scholar
• Carbone, T. Stylistic variables as related to source credibility: A content analysis approach. Speech Monographs, 19 75, 42, 99–106.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. Cartesian linguistics. New York: Harper & Row, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H.H., & Clark E. V. Semantic distinctions and memory for complex sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 20, 129–138.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, H.W., & Renshaw, S.L. SLCA 111: A metatheoretic approach to the study of language. Human Communication Research. 1979, 5, 291–300.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, T. D., & Whitman, R. F. The effects of message introduction, message structure, and verbal organizing ability upon learning of message information. Human Communication Research, 1981, 7, 147–160.
   Google Scholar
• De la Zerda Flores, N., & Hopper, R. Mexican Americans’ evaluations of spoken Spanish and English. Speech Monographs, 1975,42, 91–98.
   Google Scholar
• Delia, J. G. Alternative perspectives for the study of human communication: Critique and response. Communication Quarterly, 1977, 25, 46–62.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, D. G., Hawes, L. C., & Avery, R. K. Some pragmatics of talking on talk radio. Urban Life, 1981,10, 155–177.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, B. A. Perspectives on human communication. New York: Macmillan, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Frentz, T. S., & Farrell, T. B. Language-action: A paradigm for communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1976, 62, 333–349.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H., Scherer, K.R., & Taylor, D.M. Speech markers in social interaction. In K. R. Scherer & H. Giles (Eds.), Social markers in speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H., Bourhis, R., Trudgill, R, & Lewis, A. The imposed norm hypothesis: A validation. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1974, 60, 405–410.
   Google Scholar
• Goss, B. The effect of sentence context on associations to ambiguous, vague, and clear nouns. Speech Monographs, 1972, 39, 286–289.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, M.J. Aspects of varieties differentiation. Journal of Linguistics, 1967,3, 177–198.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, H. R Logic and conversation. In P Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics. Volume 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, 1975, 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M.A.K. Language as social semiotic. The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. Cohesion in English. New York: Longman, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Hockett, C. The origin of speech. Scientific American, 1960,203, 88–96.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, R. The taken-for-granted. Human Communication Research, 1981, 7, 195–211.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1980, 66, 251–265.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G., & Schenkein, J. Some sequential negotiations in conversation: Unex-panded and expanded action sequences. In J. Schenkein (Ed), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press. 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, J.J. Semantic theory and the meaning of “good.” Journal of Philosophy, 1964, 61. 739–766.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, M. L., Hopper, R., & Scott, L. Couples’ personal idioms: Exploring intimate talk. Journal of Communication, 1981, 31, 23–33.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W. The logic of nonstandard English. In PR Giglioli (Ed), Language and social context. New York: Penguin, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N. Communication effects: Review and commentary. In B. Rueben (Ed.), Communication yearbook 1. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Lull, J. The social uses of television. Human Communication Research, 1980.6, 197–209.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, M. Mythic rhetoric in Mein Kampf: A structuralist critique. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1977, 63, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. L., Cody, M. J., Kane, M. J., & Robey, C. S. Sex differences in story receipt and story sequencing behaviors in dyadic conversations. Human Communication Research, 1981, 6, 99–116.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. T. The effects of dialect and ethnicity on communicator effectiveness. Speech Monographs, 1975,42, 69–74.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. Semantic relations among words. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan, & G. Miller (Eds), Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A., & McNeill, D. Psycholinguistics. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),Handbook of social psychology (Rev. ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Motley, M. T. An analysis of spoonerisms as psycholinguistic phenomena. Speech Monographs, 1973,40, 66–71.
   Google Scholar
• Motley, M.T., & Baars, B.J. Encoding sensitivities to phonological markedness and transitional probability: Evidence from spoonerisms. Human Communication Research, 1975, J, 353–361.
   Google Scholar
• Motley, M.T., Camden, C.T., & Baars, B.J. Toward verifying the assumptions of laboratory-induced slips of the tongue: The output-error and editing issues. Human Communication Research, 1981, 8, 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Mowrer, O. H. The autism theory of speech development and some clinical applications. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1952,17, 263–268.
   Google Scholar
• Mulac, A., Hanley, T. D., & Prigge, D. Y Effects of phonological speech foreignness upon three dimensions of attitude of selected American listeners. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1974, 60, 411–420.
   Google Scholar
• Mulac, A. Assessment and application of the revised speech dialect attitudinal scale. Communication Monographs, 1976,43, 238–245.
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., & Tannenbaum, FH. The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Philipsen, G. Places for speaking in Teamsterville. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1976,62, 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Piche, G. L., Michlin, M., Rubin, D., & Sullivan, A. Effects of dialect-ethnicity, social class and quality of written compositions on teachers’ subjective evaluations of children. Communication Monographs, 1977, 44, 60–72.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, W. G. A research note on “the effect of sentence context on association to ambiguous, vague, and clear nouns.” Speech Monographs, 1975,42, 80–82.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 1974, 50, 696–735.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. Concepts of language and meaning: A comparative study. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1972, 58, 123–133.
   Google Scholar
• Warnick, B. Structuralism vs. phenomenology: Implications for rhetorical criticism. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1979, 65, 250–261.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, M., & Mehrabian, A. Language within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J. L., Williams, E, Civikly, J. M., & Albino, J. W. Latitude of attitude in ratings of dialect variations. Speech Monographs, 1974,41, 397–407.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, F., & Naremore, R. C. Language attitudes: An analysis of teacher differences. Speech Monographs, 1974, 41, 391–396.
   Google Scholar