247
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Part I. Communication Reviews And Commentaries

Social Judgment Theory

Pages 304-329 | Published online: 18 May 2016

References

  • Aronson, E., Turner, J., & Carlsmith, J. Communicator credibility and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 67, 31–36.
  • Bern, D. Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 183–200.
  • Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, R, & McPhee, W. Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1954.
  • Bochner, S., & Insko, C. Communicator discrepancy, source credibility and opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4, 614–621.
  • Brent, E., & Granberg, D. Subjective agreement with the presidential candidates of 1976 and 1980. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982,42, 393–403.
  • Broder, D. Brock a good choice. Columbia Daily Tribune, February 2, 1977, p. 6.
  • Bruner, J. On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 1957, 64, 123–152.
  • Byrne, D., & Blalock, B. Similarity and assumed similarity of attitudes between husbands and wives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 67, 636–640.
  • Cohen, E. Stimulusconditions as factors in social change. Sociometry, 1957, 20, 135–144.
  • Divine, R. The Cuban missile crisis. Chicago: Quadrangle, 1971.
  • Eagly, A., & Telaak, K. Width of the latitude of acceptance as a determinant of attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972,23, 388–397.
  • Eiser, J. Enhancement of contrast in the absolute judgment of attitude statements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971,17, 1–10.
  • Eiser, J., & Stroebe, W. Categorization and social judgment. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
  • Festinger, L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson, 1957.
  • Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1959, 58, 203–211.
  • Garrow, D. The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr.: From “solo” to Memphis. New York: W. W. Norton, 1981.
  • Granberg, D. Family size preferences and sexual permissiveness as factors differentiating abortion activists. Social Psychology Quarterly, 1982, 45, 15–23.
  • Granberg, D., & Aboud, J. A contextual effect in judgments of visual numerousness. American Journal of Psychology, 1969,82, 221–227.
  • Granberg, D., & Brent, E. Dove-hawk placements in the 1968 election: Application of social judgment and balance theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974,29, 687–695.
  • Granberg, D., & Brent, E. Perceptions of issue positions of presidential candidates. American Scientist, 1980, 68, 617–625.
  • Granberg, D., & Campbell, K. Effect of communication ambiguity and discrepancy on placement and opinion change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1977, 7, 137–150.
  • Granberg, D., Harris, W., & King, M. Assimilation but little contrast in the 1976 U.S. presidential election. Journal of Psychology, 1981,108, 241–247.
  • Granberg, D., Jefferson, L., Brent, E., &King, M. Membership group, reference group and the attribution of attitudes to groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981,40, 833–842.
  • Granberg, D., & Jenks, R. Assimilation and contrast in the 1972 election. Human Relations, 1977, 30, 623–640.
  • Granberg, D., & King, M. Cross-lagged panel analysis of the relation between attraction and perceived similarity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1980, 16, 573581.
  • Granberg, D., & Seidel, J. Social judgments on the urban and Vietnam issues in 1968 and 1972. Social Forces, 1976, 55, 1–15.
  • Granberg, D., & Steele, L. Procedural considerations in measuring the latitudes of acceptance, rejection, and noncommitment. Social Forces, 1974, 52, 538–542.
  • Harvey, O., & Rutherford, J. Gradual and absolute approaches to attitude change. Sociometry, 1958, 21, 61–68.
  • Heider, F. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley, 1958.
  • Helson, H. Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Row, 1964.
  • Hinckley, E. The influence of individual opinion on construction of an attitude scale. Journal of Social Psychology, 1932,37, 283–296.
  • Hovland, C. Reconciling conflicting results derived from experimental and survey studies of attitude change. American Psychologist, 1959,14, 8–17.
  • Hovland, C., Harvey, O., & Sherif, M. Assimilation and contrast effects in reaction to communication and attitude change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1957, 55, 242–252.
  • Hovland, C., & Sherif, M. Judgmental phenomena and scales of attitude measurement: Item displacement in Thurstone scales. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1952, 47, 822–832.
  • Kennedy, R. Thirteen days: A memoir of the Cuban missile crisis. New York: WW. Norton, 1969.
  • Kiesler, C., Collins, B., & Miller, N. Attitude change: A critical analysis of theoretical approaches. New York: John Wiley, 1969.
  • Kinder, D. Political person perception: The asymmetrical influence of sentiment and choice on perceptions of presidential candidates. Journal of Personality and Socio/Psychology, 1978,36, 859–871.
  • King, M. Assimilation and contrast of presidential candidates’ issue positions, 1972. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1978,41, 515–522.
  • LaFave, L., & Sherif, M. Reference scales and placement of items with the own categories technique. Journal of Social Psychology, 1968, 76, 75–82.
  • Manchester, W. American Caesar: Douglas MacArthur, 1880–1964. Boston: Little, Brown, 1979.
  • Manis, M. The interpretation of opinion statements as a function of message ambiguity and recipient attitude. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961,63, 78–81. (a)
  • Manis, M. The interpretation of opinion statements as a function of recipient attitude and source prestige. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961,63, 82–86. (b)
  • Manis, M., & Moore, J. Summarizing controversial messages: Retroactive effects due to subsequent information. Socio/Psychology, 1978,41, 62–68.
  • McGuinnis, J. The selling of the president 1968. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1969.
  • Osgood, C., Suci, G., &Tannenbaum, R The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1957.
  • Page, B., & Brody, R. Policy voting and the electoral process: The Vietnam war issue. American Political Science Review, 1972, 66, 979–995.
  • Page, B., & Jones, C. Reciprocal effects of policy preferences, party loyalties and the vote. American Political Science Reuiew, 1979, 73, 1071–1089.
  • Pepitone, A., & DeNubile, M. Contrast effects in judgments of crime severity and the punishment of criminal violators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 33, 448–459.
  • Peterson, P, & Koulack, D. Attitude change as a function of latitudes of acceptance and rejection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969,11, 309–311.
  • Petty, R., & Cacioppo, J. Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979,37, 1915–1926.
  • Pinter, R., & Forlano, G. The influence of attitude upon scaling of attitude items. Journal of Social Psychology, 1937, 8, 39–45.
  • Reinhold, R. Issues run second in campaign. New York Times News Service, February 21, 1976.
  • Rhine, R., & Severance, L. Ego-involvement, discrepancy, source credibility and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970,16, 175–190.
  • Rogers, L. The influence of ego-involvement on attitude structures for issues of varying degrees of personal relevance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 1978.
  • Shaffer, S. Balance theory and political cognitions. American Politics Quarterly, 1981, 9, 291–320.
  • Shaw, M, & Constanzo, R Theories of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.
  • Shepsle, K. The strategy of ambiguity: Uncertainty and electoral competition. American Political Science Review, 1972, 66, 555–568.
  • Sherif, C. W. Orientation in social psychology. New York: Harper & Row, 1976.
  • Sherif, C. W. Social values, attitudes, and the involvement of the self. Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1980, 27, 1–64. (Available from the University of Nebraska Press).
  • Sherif, C. W., & Jackman, N. Judgments of truth by participants in collective controversy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1966,30, 173–186.
  • Sherif, C. W., Kelly, M., Rodgers, H., Sarup, G., & Tittlcr, B, Personal involvement, social judgment and action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 27, 311–328.
  • Sherif, C.W., Sherif, M., & Nebergall, R. Attitude and attitude change: The social judgment-involvement approach. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1965.
  • Sherif, M. A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology, 1935,187.
  • Sherif, M. The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper & Row, 1936.
  • Sherif, M. Experiments in group conflict. Scientific American, 1956,195, 54–58.
  • Sherif, M. Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflicts. American Journal of Sociology, 1958, 63, 349–356.
  • Sherif, M. In common predicament Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1966.
  • Sherif, M., & Cantril, H. The psychology of ego-involvements. New York: John Wiley, 1947.
  • Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. Judgmental phenomena and scales of attitude measurement: Placement of items with individual choice of number of categories. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1953,48, 135–141.
  • Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1961.
  • Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. Groups in harmony and tension. New York: Harper & Row, 1953.
  • Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. WAn outline of social psychology. New York: Harper & Row, 1956.
  • Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. Attitude as the individual’s own categories: The social judgment-involvement approach to attitude and attitude change In C. W. Sherif & M. Sherif (Eds.), Attitude, ego-involvement, and change. New York: John Wiley, 1967.
  • Sherif, M., Taub, D., & Hovland, C. Assimilation and contrast effects of anchoring stimuli on judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958, 55, 150–155.
  • Sherrod, D, Selective perception of political candidates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1972, 35, 554–562.
  • Tajfel, H. Social and cultural factors in perception. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 3). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
  • Thurstone, L. Attitudes can be measured. American Journal of Sociology, 1928, 33, 529–554.
  • TRB. Gracious interval. The New Republic, November 13, 1976.
  • Upshaw, H. The personal reference scale: An approach to social judgment. InL. Berkowitz (Ed.), Ad uances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press, 1969.
  • Whittaker, J. Parameters of social influence in the autokinetic situation. Sociometry, 1964, 27, 88–95.
  • Zimbardo, P, & Ebbesen, E. Influencing attitudes and changing behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1969.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.