23
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Part I. Communication Reviews And Commentaries

Cognitive Schemata and Persuasive Communication: Toward a Contingency Rules Theory

Pages 330-363 | Published online: 18 May 2016

References

  • Abelson, R. R Script processing in attitude formation and decision-making. In J. S. Carroll & J. W. Payne (Eds.), Cognition and social behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1976.
  • Ajzen, 1. Attitudinal vs. normative messages: An investigation of the differential effects of persuasive communication on behavior. Sociometry, 1971,34, 263–280.
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. The prediction of behavior from attitudinal and normative variables. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1970. 6, 466–487.
  • Ajzen, 1., & Fishbein, M. Factors influencing intentions and the intention-behavior relation. Human Relations, 1974, 26, 1–15.
  • Bandura, A. Social learning theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, 1971.
  • Bandura, A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
  • Bartlett, EC. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. London: Cambridge University Press, 1932.
  • Bauer, R. A. The obstinate audience: The influence process from the point of view of social communication. American Psychologist, 1964,19, 319–328.
  • Bern, D.J. Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 6). New York: Academic Press, 1972.
  • Berg, K. R. Ethnic attitudes and agreement with a negro person. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 1966, 4, 216–220.
  • Berger, C. R. The covering law perspective as a theoretical basis for the study of human communication. Communication Quarterly, \911,25, 7–18.
  • Bormann, E.G. Generalizing about significant form: Science and humanism compared and contrasted. In K.K. Campbell and K.H. Jamieson (Eds.), Form and genre: Shaping rhetorical action. Falls Church, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1978.
  • Bormann, E.G. Communication Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1980.
  • Burgoon, M., & Bettinghaus, E. R Persuasive message strategies. In M. E. Roloff and G. R. Miller (Eds.), Persuasion: New directions in theory and research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.
  • Buss, A. R. Causes and reasons in attribution theory: A conceptual critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978,36, 1311–1321.
  • Buss, A. R. On the relationship between causes and reasons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 1458–1461.
  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E, Attitudes and cognitive responses: An electrophysiological approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979,37, 2181–2199.
  • Campbell, D. T. Social attitudes and other acquired behavioral dispositions. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A Study of a Science (Vol. 6). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.
  • Cappella, J. N., & Folger, J. F An information-processing explanation of attitude-behavior inconsistency. In D. P Cushman and R. D. McPhee (Eds.), Message-attitude-behavior relationship: Theory, methodology, and application. New York: Academic Press, 1980.
  • Carr, L., & Roberts, S. O. Correlates of civil rights participation. Journal of Social Psychology, 1965, 67, 259–267.
  • Clark, R. A. The impact of selection of persuasive strategies on self-interest and desired liking. Communication Monographs, 1979, 46, 257–273.
  • Cody, M.J. The dimensions of persuasiue situations: Implications for communication research and assessments of taxonomy construction methodologies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1978.
  • Cody, M. J., & McLaughlin, M. L. Perceptions of compliance-gaining situations: A dimensional analysis. Communication Monographs, 1980, 47, 132–148.
  • Cody, M. J., & McLaughlin, M. L., & Jordan, W.J. A multidimensional scaling of three sets of compliance-gaining strategies. Communication Quarterly, 1980,28, 34–46.
  • Cushman, D.P, & McPhee, R. D. (Eds.). Message-attitude-behavior relationship: Theory, . methodology, and application. New York: Academic Press, 1980.
  • Cushman, D. P, & Pearce, W. B. Generality and necessity in three types of theory about human communication, with special attention to rules theory. Human Communication Research, 1977,3, 344–353.
  • Cushman, D. P, & Whiting, G. C. An approach to communication theory: Towards consensus on rules, Journal of Communication, 1972, 22, 217–238.
  • Cushman, D. P, Valentinsen, B., & Whiting, G. Self-concept as a generative mechanism in interpersonal communication. Presented at the International Communication Association Convention, Acapulco, 1980.
  • Darroch, R. K. Attitudinal variables and perceived group norms as predictors of behavioral intentions and behavior in the signing of photographic releases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1971.
  • Davison, W. P. On the effects of communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1959, 23, 343–360.
  • DeFleur, M. L., & Westie, F R. Attitude as a scientific concept. Social Forces, 1963–1964, 42, 17–31.
  • Delia, J. G. Constructivism and the study of human communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1977, 63, 66–83.
  • Dick, W., & Hagerty, N. Topics in measurement: Reliability and validity. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
  • Dulany, D. E. Hypotheses and habits in verbal “operant conditioning.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961,63, 251–263.
  • Dulany, D. E. Awareness, rules, and propositional control: A confrontation with S-R behavior theory. In D. Horton and T. Dixon (Eds.), Verbal behavior and S-R behavior theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1968.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Himmelfarb, S. Current trends in attitude theory and research. In S. Himmelfarb and A. H. Eagly (Eds.), Readings in attitude change. New York: John Wiley, 1974.
  • Ebbinghaus, H. Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Leipzig, Germany: Duncker & Humblot, 1885.
  • Ehrlich, H.J. Attitudes, behavior, and the intervening variables. American Sociologist, 1969, 4, 29–34.
  • Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P Attitudinal qualities relating to the strength of the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1978,14, 398–408.
  • Festinger, L. Behavioral support for opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1964,28, 404–417.
  • Fishbein, M. Attitude and the prediction of behavior. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement. New York: John Wiley, 1967.
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. Attitudes and opinions. Annual Review of Psychology, 1972,23, 487–544.
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review, 1974,81, 59–74.
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
  • Fishbein, M., & Coombs, F. S. Basis for decision: An attitudinal analysis of voting behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1974, 4, 95–124.
  • Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Winke, J. You always hurt the one you love: Strategies and tactics in interpersonal conflict. Communication Quarterly, 1979,27, 3–11.
  • Forgas, J.P The perception of social episodes: Categorical and dimensional representations of two different social milieus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976,34, 199–209.
  • Gaes, G.G., Kalle, R. J., & Tedeschi, J.T. Impression management in the forced compliance situation: Two studies using the bogus pipeline. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1978,14, 483–510.
  • Green, B.F. Attitude measurement. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 1). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1954.
  • Greenwald, A. G. On defining attitude and attitude theory. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, & TM. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes. New York: Academic Press, 1968. (a)
  • Greenwald, A. G. Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. In A. G. Greenwald, T C. Brock, & T M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes. New York: Academic Press, 1968. (b)
  • Harre, R., & Secord, R F. The explanation of social behavior. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1972.
  • Hastie, R. Schematic principles in human memory. In E. T. Higgins, C. P Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1981.
  • Heberlein, T. A., & Black, J. S. Attitudinal specificity and the prediction of behavior in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976,33, 474–479.
  • Hewes, D. E. An axiomatized, stochastic model of the behavioral effects of message campaigns. In D. P Cushman and R. D. McPhee (Eds.), Message-attitude-behavior relationship: Theory, methodology, and application. New York: Academic Press, 1980.
  • Higgins, E.T., Herman, C. R, Zanna, M. P (Eds.). Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1981.
  • Holman, P A. Validation of an attitude scale as a device for predicting behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1956,40, 347–349.
  • Hornik, N. A. Two approaches to individual differences in an expanded prisoner’s dilemma game. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, 1970.
  • Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1953.
  • Hume, D. Enquiries concerning human understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1902.
  • Infante, D. A. Verbal plans: A conceptualization and investigation. Communication Quarterly, 1980,28, 3–10.
  • Jaccard, J. Toward theories of persuasion and belief change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981,40, 260–269.
  • Katz, D. The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1960, 24, 163–204.
  • Kelly, G. The psychology of personal constructs. New York: W. W. Norton, 1955.
  • LaPiere, R. T. Attitudes versus actions. Social Forces, 1934,13, 230–237.
  • Larson, C. U. Persuasion: Reception and responsibility (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1979.
  • Larson, C., & Sanders, R. Faith, mystery, and data: An analysis of “scientific” studies of persuasion. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1975, 61, 178–194.
  • Lingle, J.H., Geva, N., Ostrom, T.M., Leippe, M.R., & Baumgardner, M.H. Thematic effects of person judgments on impression organization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979,37, 674–687.
  • Markus, H. Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 63–78.
  • Marwell, C., & Schmitt, D. R. Dimensions of compliance-gaining behavior: An empirical analysis. Socio me try, 1967,30, 350–364.
  • McArdle, J. B. Positive and negative communication and subsequent attitude and behavior changes in a/coho/ics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1972.
  • McArthur, L.A., Kiesler, C.A., & Cook, B. R Acting on an attitude as a function of a self-precept and inequity. Journal of Personality and Socio/Psychology, 1969, 12, 295–302.
  • McCroskey, J. C. A summary of experimental research on the effects of evidence in persuasive communication. In T. D. Beisecker & D. W. Parson (Eds.), The process of social influence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1972.
  • McLaughlin, M. L., Cody, M. J., & Robey, C. S. Situational influences on the selection of strategies to resist compliance-gaining attempts. Human Communication Research, 1980, 7, 14–36.
  • Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1960.
  • Miller, G. R., A crucial problem in attitude research. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1967,53, 235–240.
  • Miller, G. R. An introduction to speech communication. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1972.
  • Miller, G. R. The current status of theory and research in interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1978, 4, 164–178.
  • Miller, G. R. Afterword. In D. R Cushman & R. D. McPhee (Eds.), Message-attitude-behavior relationship: Theory, methodology, and application. New York: Academic Press, 1980.
  • Miller, G.R., Boster, E, Roloff, M. E., & Seibold, D. Compliance-gaining message strategies: A typology and some findings concerning effects of situational differences. Communication Monographs, 1977, 44, 37–51.
  • Miller, G. R., & Burgoon, M. Persuasion research: Review and commentary. In B. D. Ruben (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 2. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1978.
  • Miller, G. R., & Steinberg, M Between people: A new analysis of interpersonal communication. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1975.
  • Miller, G.R., & Hewgill, M. A. Some recent research in fear-arousing message appeals. Speech Monographs, 1966, 33, 377–391.
  • Minsky, M.A. framework for representing knowledge. InPH. Winston (Ed,), The Psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
  • Neisser, V. Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1976.
  • Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. G. On the role of active memory processes in perception and cognition. In C. Cofer (Ed.), The structure of human memory. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1975.
  • Norman, R. Affective-cognitive consistency, attitudes, conformity, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975,32, 83–91.
  • O’Keefe, D. J. The relationship of attitudes and behavior: A constructivist analysis. In D. P Cushman & R.D. McPhee (Eds.), Message-attitude-behavior relationship: Theory, methodology, and application. New York: Academic Press. 1980.
  • Pearce, W. B, The coordinated management of meaning: A rules-based theory of interpersonal communication. In G. R. Miller (Ed.), Explorations in interpersonal communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1976.
  • Pearce, W. B., & Cronen, V E. Communication, action, and meaning: The creation of social realities. New York: Praeger, 1980.
  • Perloff, R. M., & Brock, T. C. “And thinking makes it so”: Cognitive responses to persuasion. In M.E. Roloff & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Persuasion: New directions in theory and research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown, 1981.
  • Petty, R.E., Ostrom, T.M., & Brock, T.C., (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1981.
  • Reardon, K.K. Persuasion: Theory and context. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1981.
  • Reed, S.K. Pattern recognition and categorization. Cognitive Psychology, 1972, 3, 382407.
  • Reed, S. K. Psychological process in pattern representation. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
  • Regan, D. T., & Fazio, R. H. On the consistency between attitudes and behavior: Look to the method of attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1977, 13, 28–45.
  • Rokeach, M., & Kliejunas, P. Behavior as a function of attitude-toward-object and attitude-toward-situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 22, 194–201.
  • Roloff, M. E. Communication strategies, relationships, and relational changes. In G.R. Miller (Ed.), Explorations in interpersonal communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1976.
  • Roloff, M. E., & Barnicott, E. F. The situational use of pro-and anti-social compliance-gaining strategies by high and low Machiavellians. In B. D. Ruben (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 2. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1978.
  • Rosch, E., & Mervis, C.B. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 7, 573–605.
  • Rosenthal, P I. The concept of the paramessage in persuasive communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1972, 63, 15–30.
  • Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1977.
  • Schlenker, B. R., & Riess, M. Self-presentations of attitudes following commitment to proattitudinal behavior. Human Communication Research, 1979, 5, 325–334.
  • Schramm, W., & Roberts, D. F. (Eds.). The process and effects of mass communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1971.
  • Schwartz, S. H. Words, deeds, and the perception of consequences and responsibility in action situations. Journal of Personality and Socio/Psychology, 1968,10, 232–242.
  • Schwartz, S. H. Normative explanations of helping behavior: A critique, proposal, and empirical test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1973, 9, 349–364.
  • Schwartz, S. H. Awareness of interpersonal consequences, responsibility, denial, and volunteering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 30, 57–63.
  • Searle, J. R. Speech acts; An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.
  • Shimanoff, S. B. Communication rules: Theory and research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.
  • Sillars, A. L. The stranger and the spouse as target persons for compliance-gaining strategies: A subjective expected utility model. Human Communication Research, 1980, 6, 265–279.
  • Simons, H. W The rhetoric of science and the science of rhetoric. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 1978, 42, 37–43. (a)
  • Simons, H. W. In praise of muddleheaded anecdotalism. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 1978, 42, 21–28. (b)
  • Simons, H. W. The forum: Simons on Bormann and Osborn. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1980, 66, 206–208.
  • Smith, M. B., Bruner, J. S., & White, R. W. Opinions and personality. New York: John Wiley, 1956.
  • Smith, M. J. The effects of threats to attitudinal freedom as a function of message quality and initial receiver attitude. Communication Monographs, 1977, 44, 195–206.
  • Smith, M.J. Discrepancy and the importance of attitudinal freedom. Human Communication Research, 1978, 4, 308–314.
  • Smith, M.J. Cognitive schema theory and the perseverance and attenuation of unwarranted empirical beliefs. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1981.
  • Smith, M.J. Persuasion and human action: A review and critique of social influences theories. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1982.
  • Taylor, S.E., & Crocker, J. Schematic bases of social information processing. In E.T. Higgins, C. P Herman, & M. P Zanna (Eds.), Socia/cognition. the Ontario symposium (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum, 1981.
  • Tedeschi, J. T, Schlenker, B. R., & Bonoma, T V. Cognitive dissonance: Private raciocina-tion or public spectacle? American Psychologist, 1971, 26, 685–695.
  • Tesser, A. Self-generated attitude change. In L. Berkowitz (Ed), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 11). New York: Academic Press, 1978.
  • Tittle, C. R., & Hill, R. J. Attitude measurement and prediction of behavior: An evaluation of conditions and measurement techniques. Sociometry, 1967,30, 199–213.
  • Triandis, H.C. Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. In H. Howe & M. Page (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 27). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1980.
  • Tversky, A. Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 1977,84, 327–352.
  • Warner, L. G., & DeFleur. M. L. Attitude as an interactional concept: Social constraint and social distance as intervening variables between attitudes and action. American Sociological Review, 1969,34, 153–169.
  • Weary, G. Self-serving attributional biases: Perceptual or response distortions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979,37, 1418–1420.
  • Weigel, R. H., & Newman, L.S. Increasing attitude-behavior correspondence by broadening the scope of the behavior measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976,33, 793–802.
  • Wicker, A. W. Attitudes vs. actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 1969, 25, 41–78.
  • Wicker, A. W. An examination of the “other variables” explanation of attitude-behavior inconsistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971,19, 18–30.
  • Wish, M. Role and personal expectations about interpersonal communication. U.S.-Japan seminar on multidimensional scaling, San Diego, August 1975.
  • Wrightsman, L. Wallace supporters and adherence to “law and order.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969,13, 17–22.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.