18
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Part II. Information Systems

Attitude Change and Attitudinal Trajectories: A Dynamic Multidimensional Theory

&
Pages 364-394 | Published online: 18 May 2016

References

  • Abelson, R. R Mathematical models of the distribution of attitudes under controversy. In N. Frederiksen & H. Gulliksen (Eds.), Contributions to mathematical psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1964.
  • Anderson, N. Cognitive algebra: Information theory applied to social attribution. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press, 1974.
  • Aronson, E., & Linder, D. Gain and loss of esteem as determinants of interpersonal attractiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1965,1, 156–171.
  • Aronson, E., Turner, J. A. & Carlsmith, M. Communicator credibility and communication discrepancy as determinants of attitude change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 67, 31–37.
  • Attneave, F. Application of information theory to psychology: A summary of basic concepts, methods and results. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1959.
  • Baird, J.C., & Noma, E. Fundamentals of scaling and psychophysics. New York: John Wiley, 1978.
  • Barnett, G. A. Bilingual semantic organization: A multidimensional analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1977, 8, 315–330. (a)
  • Barnett, G. A. Linguistic relativity: The role of the bilingual. In B. Ruben (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 1. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1977. (b)
  • Barnett, G. A., & Woelfel, J. On the dimensionality of psychological processes. Quality and Quantity, 1979,13, 215–232.
  • Bell, W., & Robinson, R. V. Cognitive maps of class and racial inequalities in England and the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 1980,86, 320–349.
  • Berger, P. , & Luckmann, T. The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1967.
  • Berscheid, E. Opinion change and communicator-communicatee similarity and dissimilarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4, 670–680.
  • Bochner, S., & Insko, C. A. Communicator discrepancy, source credibility and opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4, 614–621.
  • Brewer, M. B., & Crano, W. D. Attitude change as a function of discrepancy and source of influence. Journal of Social Psychology, 1968, 76, 13–18
  • Brock, T. C. Communicator-recipient similarity and decision change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965,1, 650–654.
  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. Attitudes and cognitive responses: An electrophysiological approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979,37, 2181–2199. (a)
  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. The effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 97–109.
  • Cliff, N. Adverbs as multipliers. Psychological Review, 1959, 66, 27–44.
  • Cook, T. D., & Ray, B. R. The persistence of experimentally induced attitude change. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11). New York: Academic Press, 1978.
  • Craig, R. T Models of cognition, models of messages, and theories of communication effects: Spatial and network paradigms. Paper presented to the International Communication Association, Chicago, April 1975.
  • Danes, J. E., Hunter, J. E., & Woelfel, J. Mass communication and belief change: A test of three mathematical models. Human Communication Research, 1978, 4, 243–252.
  • Ebbinghaus, H. E. Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Dover, 1964. (Originally published, 1885).
  • Festinger, L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1957.
  • Fink, E. L. Kaplowitz, S.A., & Bauer, C. L. Multiple discrepant messages and attitude change: Experimental tests of some mathematical models. Paper presented at meetings of the American Sociological Association, New York, 1980.
  • Fishbein, J., & Ajzen, I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
  • Greenberg, D. F Mathematical criminology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1980.
  • Haberman, R. Mathematical models: Mechanical vibrations, population dynamics and traffic flow. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
  • Hamblin, R. L. Social attitudes: Magnitude estimation and theory. In H. M. Blalock, Jr. (Ed), Measurement in the social sciences. Chicago: Aldine, 1974.
  • Hass, R. G. Effects of source characteristics on cognitive responses and persuasion. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence J. Erlbaum, 1981.
  • Heider, E Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 1946, 21, 107–112.
  • Heider, F Psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley, 1958.
  • Heston, J. Ideal source credibility: Re-examination of the semantic differential. Paper presented at meetings of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada, April 1973.
  • Himmelfarb, S. “Resistance” to persuasion induced by information integration. In S. Himmelfarb & A. H. Eagly (Eds.), Readings in attitude change. New York: John Wiley, 1974.
  • Hunter, J. E., & Cohen, S.H. Mathematical models of attitude change in the passive communication context. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University, 1972.
  • Jones, L. E , & Young, E W. Structure of a social environment: Longitudinal individual differences scaling of an intact group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 108–121.
  • Kac, M. Some mathematical models in science. Science, 1969,166, 695–699.
  • Kaplowitz, S. A., & Fink, E. L. A dynamic multidimensional theory of attitude and belief change. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University, 1981.
  • Kaplowitz, S. A., Fink, E. L., & Bauer, C. L. Cognitive dynamics I: A model of the effect of discrepant information on unidimensional attitude change. Paper presented at meetings of the Society for Mathematical Psychology, Madison, Wisconsin, August 1980.
  • Kelman, H. Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1961,25, 57–78.
  • Laroche, M. A model of attitude change in groups following a persuasive communication: An attempt at formalizing research findings. Behavioral Science, 1977, 22, 246–257.
  • Lave, C. A., & March, J. G. An introduction to models in the social sciences. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.
  • Leatherdale, W. H. The role of analogy, model, and metaphor in science. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1974.
  • Mandler, G., & Kessen, W. The language of psychology. New York: John Wiley, 1959.
  • McGuire, W.J. Cognitive consistency and attitude change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960, 60, 345–353.
  • McGuire, W. J. Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press, 1964.
  • McGuire, W. J. The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 3). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
  • McGuire, W. J. The probabilogical model of cognitive structure and attitude change. In R.E. Petty, T.M. Ostrom, & T.C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence J. Erlbaum, 1981.
  • McPhee, R., & Poole, M.S. Mathematical modeling in communication research. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 5. Rutgers, NJ: Transaction, 1981.
  • Miller, R. L. The temporal persistence of psychological reactance: A double boomerang. Paper presented at meetings of the American Sociological Association, New York, August 1980.
  • Mills, J., & Jellison, J.M, Effects on opinion change of similarity between the communicator and the audience he addresses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 9, 153–156.
  • Nemeth, C., & Markowski, J. Conformity and discrepancy of position. Sociometry, 1972, 35, 562–575.
  • Osgood, C.E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, PH. The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1957.
  • Osgood, C. E., & Tannenbaum, P H. The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. Psychological Review, 1955, 62, 42–55.
  • Paulos, J. A. Mathematics and humor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • Petrovskii, I. G. Ordinary differential equations. In A. D. Aleksandrov, A. N. Kolmogorov, & M. A. Lavrent’ev (Eds.), Mathematics, its content, methods, and meaning (S. H. Gould & T. Bartha, trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press, 1969.
  • Petty, R. E. The role of cognitive responses in attitude change processes. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence J. Erlbaum, 1981.
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J.T. Forewarning, cognitive responding and resistance to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Socia/Psychology, 1977,35, 645–655.
  • Petty, R.E., Wells, G. L., & Brock, TC. Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption vs. effort justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976,34, 874–884.
  • Phillips, J.L., & Thompson, E.G. An analysis of the conceptual representation of relations: Components in a network model of cognitive organization. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 1977, 7, 161–184.
  • Pierce, P. L., & Amato, P R. A taxonomy of helping: A multi-dimensional scaling analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 1980,43, 363–371.
  • Poole, M.S., & Hunter, J.E. Change in hierarchical systems of attitudes. In D. Nimmo (Ed), Communication Yearbook3. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1979.
  • Poole, M. S., & Hunter, J. E. Behavior and hierarchies of attitudes: A deterministic model. In D. P. Cushman & R.D. McPhee (Eds.), Message-attitude-behavior relationships: Theory, methodology and application. New York: Academic Press, 1980.
  • Prigogine, O. Time, structure, and fluctuations. Science, 1978, 201, 777–785.
  • Roedinger, H.L., III. Memory metaphors in cognitive psychology. Memory and Cognition, 1980, 8, 231–246.
  • Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C., & Vivekananthan, P S. A multi-dimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 9, 283–294.
  • Saltiel, J., & Woelfel, J. Inertia in cognitive processes: The role of accumulated information. Human Communication Research, 1975,1, 333–344.
  • Sawyer, A. Repetition, cognitive response, and persuasion. In R. E. Petty, T., M. Ostrom, & T.C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence J. Erlbaum, 1981.
  • Serota, K. B., Cody, M. J., Barnett, G. A., & Taylor, J. A. Precise procedures for optimizing campaign communication. In B. Ruben (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 1. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1977.
  • Shepard, R. N. Multidimensional scaling, tree-fitting and clustering. Science, 1980, 210, 390–398.
  • Sherif, C. W., Sherif, M., & Nebergall, R. E. Attitude and attitude change: The social judgment-involvement approach. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1965.
  • Tannenbaum, R H. Attitude toward source and concept as factors in attitude change through communication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1953.
  • Taylor, M. Towards a mathematical theory of influence and attitude change. Human Relations, 1968,21, 121–137.
  • Tesser, A. Self-generated attitude change. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11). New York: Academic Press, 1978.
  • Tesser, A., & Conlee, M. C. Some effects of time and thought on attitude polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 262–270.
  • Thorn, R. Structural stability and morphogenesis: An outline of a general theory of models. Reading, MA: Benjamin, 1975.
  • Walster, E. The temporal sequence of post-decision processes. In L. Festinger (Ed.), Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1964.
  • Walster, E., Aronson, E., & Abrahams, D. On increasing the persuasiveness of a low prestige communicator. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1966,2, 325–342.
  • Walster, E.L., Berscheid, E., & Barclay, A. M. A determinant of preferences among modes of dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 7, 211–216.
  • Whittaker, J.B. Attitude change and communication attitude discrepancy. Journal of Social Psychology, 1965, 65, 141–147.
  • Wilson, W., & Miller, H. Repetition, order of presentation and timing of arguments as determinants of opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 9, 184–188.
  • Wingfield, A., & Byrnes, D. L. The psychology of human memory. New York: Academic Press, 1981.
  • Wish, M. A model for the perception of Morse Code like signals. Human Factors, 1967, 9, 529–539.
  • Wish, M. Individual differences in perceptions and preferences among nations. In C. W. King & D. Taggart (Eds.), Attitude research reaches new heights. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 1971.
  • Wish, M., Deutsch, M., & Biener, L. Differences in perceived similarity of nations. In A.K. Romney, R.N. Shepard, & S. Nerlove (Eds), Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences (Vol. 2). New York: Seminar Press, 1972.
  • Woelfel, J., Cody, M. J., Gillham, J. R., & Holmes, R. Basic premises of multi-dimensional attitude change theory. Human Communication Research, 1980, 6, 153–167.
  • Woelfel, J., & Fink, E. L. The measurement of communication processes: Galileo theory and method. New York: Academic Press, 1980
  • Woelfel, J., & Saltiel, J. Cognitive processes as motions in a multidimensional space. In F. Casmir (Ed.), International and intercultural communication. New York: University Press, 1978.
  • Worchel, S., & Brehm, J. W. Effects of threats to attitudinal freedom as a function of agreement with communicator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 44, 18–22.
  • Zimbardo, P. G. Involvement and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion conformity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960, 60, 86–94.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.