References
- Baer, D. L., Bositis, D. A., & Miller, R. E. A field experimental study of a precinct committeeman’s canvassing efforts in a primary election. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook 5. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1981.
- Becker, L. B., McCombs, M. E., & McLeod, J. M. The development of political cognitions. In S. H. Chaffee (Ed.), Political communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1975.
- Blydenburgh, J. C. A controlled experiment to measure the effects of personal contact campaigning. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 1971,15. 365–381.
- Bogart, L. Measuring the effectiveness of an overseas information campaign; A case history. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1957, 21, 475–498.
- Crotty, W.J. Party effort and its impact on the vote. American Political Science Review, 1971, 65, 439–450.
- Douglas, D., Westley, B. H., & Chaffee, S. H. An information campaign that changed community attitudes. Journalism Quarterly, 1970, 47, 479–487.
- Gruenhagen, R. H. The effects of a planned communication program on change of attitudes and knowledge of the urban dweller toward chemicals and pesticides. Virginia Cooperative Extension Service, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 1969.
- Hovland, C. I., Lumsdaine, A. A., & Sheffield, F. D. Experiments on mass communication. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1949.
- Hyman, H., & Sheatsley, P Some reasons why information campaigns fail. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1947,11, 412–423.
- McGuire, W.J. The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 3, 2nd ed). Reading, MA: Addison-Weslev. 1969.
- Mendelsohn, H. Some reasons why information campaigns can succeed. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1973,37, 50–61.
- Miller, R. E. Literature drops in county-level political campaigns: What do they accomplish? Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Political Science Association, Dallas, March 26–28, 1981.
- Miller, R. E., & Richey, W. M. The effects of a campaign brochure “drop” in a county level race for state’s attorney. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 4. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1980.
- Miller, R. E., & Robyn, D. L. A field experimental study of direct mail in a congressional campaign: What effects last until election day? Experimental Study of Politics, 1975, 4, 1–37. (a)
- Miller, R. E., & Robyn, D. L. A field experimental study of direct mail in a 1974 congressional primary campaign: Immediate effects. Paper delivered at the Annual Meeting of the Political Communications Division of the International Communication Association, Chicago, April 23–26, 1975. (b)
- Miller, R. E., Bositis, D. A. & Baer, D. L. A field experimental study of a precinct committeeman’s efforts at stimulating voter turnout in a primary election: Telephone vs. mail vs. face-to-face appeals. International Political Science Review, 1981, 2, 445–460.
- Salcedo, R. N., Read, H., Evans, J. F., & Kong, A. C. A successful information campaign on pesticides. Journalism Quarterly, 1974, 51, 91–95, 110.
- Star, S. A., & Hughes, H. A report on an educational campaign: The Cincinnati plan for the United Nations. American Jounal of Sociology, 1950, 55, 389–400.
- Westerstahl, J., Sarlvik, B., & Janson, E. An experiment with information pamphlets on civil defense. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1961, 25, 236–248.