26
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Part X. Human Communication Technology

Teleconferencing, Concern for Face, and Organizational Culture

Pages 874-904 | Published online: 18 May 2016

References

  • Albertson, L. A. Telecommunication as a travel substitute: Some psychological, organizational, and social aspects. Journal of Communication, 1977, 27, 32–43.
  • Albrecht, T. L., & Cooley, R. E. Androgyny and communicative strategies for relational dominance:An empirical analysis. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 4, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1980.
  • Amara, R. Management in the 1980s. Technology Review, 1981, 83, 76–82.
  • Ayers, J., & Miura, S. Y Construct and predictive validity of instruments of coding relational control communication. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 1981,45, 159–171.
  • Bell, D. The social framework of the information society. In M. L. Dertouzos & J. Moses (Eds), The computer age: A twenty year view. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1979.
  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. N. Goody (Ed), Questions and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
  • Calder, B.J. Focus group interviews and qualitative research in organizations. In E.E. Lawler, D. A. Nadler, & C. Cammann (Eds), Organizational assessment: Perspectives on the measurement of organizational behavior and the quality of work life. New York: John Wiley, 1980.
  • Campbell, J. P Research needs appropriate for human resource development as gleaned from corporate planning documents and management interviews. Paper presented at Innovations in Methodology Conference, Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, North Carolina, March 1981.
  • Chapanis, A. Interactive human communication. Scientific American, 1975, 232, 36–42
  • Chapanis, A. Human factors in teleconferencing systems: Final report. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, 1976. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 163902)
  • Christie, B , & Holloway, S. Factors affecting the use of telecommunications by management. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1975,48, 3–9.
  • Davis, J. H. Croup performance. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
  • Dertouzos, M. L., & Moses, J. (Eds). The computer age: A twenty year view. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1979.
  • Duncanson, J.P, & Williams, A.D. Video conferencing: Reactions of users. Human Factors, 1973,15, 471–485.
  • Featheringham, T. R. Computerized conferencing and human communication. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 1977, PC 20 (4), 207–213.
  • Ferguson, J. A. PLANET: A computer conferencing system and its evaluation through a case study. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1977, 9, 92–95.
  • Flannigam, R. R. Computers and communication. Paper presented to the Northwest Communication Association Convention, Coeur D’Alene, Idaho, 1981.
  • Fowler, G. D., & Wackerbarth, M. E. Audio teleconferencing versus face-to-face conferencing: A synthesis of the literature. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 1980, 44, 236–252.
  • Goffman, E. On face work. In E. Goffman, Interaction ritual. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1967.
  • Harkins, A. M., & Joseph, E. C. Ethnotronics and human learning futures. In K. M. Redd & A. M. Harkins (Eds), Education: A time for decisions. Washington, DC: World Future Society, 1980.
  • Hawes, L. C. Development and application of an interview coding system. Central States Speech Journal, 1972, 23, 92–99.
  • Hawes, L. C. The reflexivity of communication research Western Journal of Speech Communication, 1978,42, 12–20.
  • Henderson, MM., & MacNaughton, M.J. (Eds). Electronic communication: Technology and impacts. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1980.
  • Hiemstra, G. E. Saving face in a computer conference: An empirical and cultural analysis. Paper presented to the Western Speech Communication Association Convention, Denver, February 1982.
  • Hilton, J. Adjusting to office television. Wall Street Journal, January 12, 1981, p. 18. (a)
  • Hilton, J. Face to camera at an actual teleconference. Wall Street Journal, July 13, 1981, p. 12. (b)
  • Hiltz, S. R. Computer conferencing: Assessing the social impact of a new communication medium. Technological Forcasting and Social Change, 1977,10, 225–238.
  • Hiltz, S. R. The computer conference. Journalof communication, 1978,28, 157–163. (a)
  • Hiltz, S.R. The human element in computerized conferencing systems. Computer Networks, 1978, 2, 421–428. (b)
  • Hiltz, S. R. Controlled experiments with computerized conferencing: Results of a pilot study. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 1978, 4, 11–12. (c)
  • Hiltz, S.R., Johnson, K., Aronovitch, C., & Turoff, M. Face-to face vs. computerized conferences: A controlled experiment. Research Report Number 12. Newark: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Computerized Conferencing & Communications Center, August 1980.
  • Hiltz, S. R. & Turoff, M. The network nation: Human communication uia computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1978.
  • Hulin, C. L. Representative questions from 10 years of research articles. Paper presented at Innovations in Methodology Conference, Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, North Carolina, March 1981.
  • Hymes, D. Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J.J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972.
  • Hymes, D. H. Qualitative/quantitative research methodologies in education: A linguistic perspective. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 1977, 8, 165–176.
  • Lsraelski, E. W. A user study of the Bell Systems video teleconferencing system: Applications and attitudes. Ergonomics, 1979, 22, 743.
  • Jick, T. D. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979, 24, 602–611.
  • Johansen, R., & DeGrasse, R. Computer-based teleconferencing: Effects on working patterns. Journal of Communication, 1979,29, 30–41.
  • Johansen, R., Vallee, J., & Spangler, K. Electronic meetings: Utopian dreams and complex realities. The Futurist, October 1978,12, 313–319.
  • Johansen, R., Vallee, J., & Spangler, K. Electronic meetings: Technical alternatives and social choices. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979.
  • Kelly, M. J. Studies in interactive communication: Limited vocabulary natural language dialogue (Doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, 1975). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1976, 36, 3647B. (University Microfilms No. 76–1518)
  • Kochen, M. Long-term implications of electronic information exchanges for information science. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 1978, 4, 22–23.
  • Kohl, K., Newman, T. G., Jr. & Tomey, J.F. Facilitating organizational decentralization through teleconferencing IEEE Transactions on Communications, 1975, COM-23 (10), 1098–1103.
  • Korzenny, F. A Theory of electronic propinquity: Mediated communication in organizations. Communication Research, 1978, S, 3–23.
  • Korzenny, F., & Bauer, C. A preliminary test of the theory of electronic propinquity: Organizational teleconferencing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Information Systems Division, Philadelphia, May 1979.
  • Krueger, G. P, & Chapanis, A. Conferencing and teleconferencing in three communication modes as a function of the number of conferees. Ergonomics, 1980, 23, 103–122.
  • Lawler, E. E., Nadler, D. A., & Cammann, C. (Eds.). Organizational assessment: Perspective on the measurement of organizational behavior and the quality of work life. New York: John Wiley, 1980.
  • Lowndes, J. C. Teleconferencing systems expected to reduce costs. Aviation Week & Space Technology, June 8, 1981 pp. 322–333.
  • McKendree, J. D. Project and crisis management applications of computerized conferencing. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 1978, 4, 13–15.
  • Mehan, H. Structuring school structure. Harvard Educational Review, 1978,48, 28–60.
  • Minium, E. W. Statistical reasoning in psychology and education. New York: John Wiley, 1970.
  • Mishler, E. G. Meaning in context: Is there any other kind? Harvard Educational Review, 1979, 49, 1–19.
  • O’Neill, G.K. 2081. Omni, May 1981, pp. 52–55, 95–96. (From G.K. O’Neill, The year 2081, forthcoming.)
  • Pacanowsky, M. E., & Berky, R An analysis of organizational culture: A theoretical overview. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Philadelphia, March 1979. Pateman, T. Communicating with computer programs. Language and Communication, 1981, 1, 3–12.
  • Pettigrew, A. M. On studying organizational cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly 1979, 24, 570–581.
  • Rice, R. E. The impacts of computer-mediated organizational and interpersonal communication. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 1980,15, 221–249. Robey, D. Computers and management structure: Some empirical findings reexamined. In D. Katz, R. L. Kahn, & J. S. Adams (Eds.), The study of organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980.
  • Rogers, L. E. Dyadic systems and transactional communication in a family context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University. 1972. Rogers, L. E., & Farace, R. V. Analysis of relational communication in dyads: New measurement procedures. Human Communication Research, 1975,1, 222–229.
  • Ryan, M. G. The influence of teleconferencing medium and status on participants’ perception of the aestheticism, evaluation, privacy, potency, and activity of the medium. Human Communication Research, 1976, 2, 225–261. Schneider, D. Notes toward a theory of culture. In K. R. Basso & H. A. Selby (Eds.).
  • Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1976. Shimanoff, S. B. Communication rules: Theory and research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Shutz, A. Concept and theory formation in the social sciences. In F R. Dallmayr & T. A. McCarthy (Eds.), Understanding and social inquiry. London: University of Notre Dame Press, 1977. (Reprinted from M. Natanson [Ed.], Collected papers, Vol. 1, 1967.)
  • Siegel, S. Nonparametric statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956. Sillars, A. L., & Folger, J. B. A second look at relational coding assumptions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, 1978.
  • Simons, H. W. In praise of muddleheaded anecdotalism. Western Journal of Speech
  • Communication, 1978,42, 21–36. Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford, England:
  • Oxford University Press, 1975. Spang, S., McNeal, B., & Vian Spangler, K. Interactive group modeling: Part 4. Some preliminary tests of the HUB system. Menlo Park, CA: Institute for the Future, 1979. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 182 791) Spelt, R F. Evaluation of a continuing computer conference on simulation. Behavior
  • Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1977, 9, 78–91. Stoll, F. C., Hoecker, D. G., Krueger, G. R, & Chapanis, A. The effects of four communication modes on the structure of language used during cooperative problem solving. Journal of Psychology, 1976,94, 13–26. Strickland, L.H., Guild, PD., Barefoot, J.C., & Paterson, S.A. Teleconferencing and leadership emergence. Human Relations, 1978,31, 583–596. Toffler, A. The third wave. New York: William Morrow, 1980.
  • Turoff, M. The EIES experience: Electronic information exchange system. Bulletin of the
  • American Society for Information Science, 1978, 4, 9–10. Uhlig, R. R Human factors in computer message systems. Datamation, May 1977, pp. 120–126.
  • Vallee, J., Johansen, R., & Spangler, K. The computer conference: An altered state of communication. The Futurist, June 1975, 9, 116–121. Weick, K. E. The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979.
  • Williams, E. Teleconferencing: Social and psychological factors. Journal of Communication, 1978, 28, 125–131.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.