Belief Processing, Reasoning, and Evidence

References

• Anderson, L. An experimental study of reluctant and biased authority-based assertions. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1970, 7, 79–84.
   Google Scholar
• Arieti, S. Interpretation of schizophrenia. New York: Brunner, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, W. E., & McCroskey, J. C. The credibility of reluctant testimony. Central States Speech Journal, 1967,18, 97–103.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, O. F. Early debates. In D. W. Klopf and T. Kawashima (Eds.), Perspectives on forensics. Tokyo: Gaku Shobo, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Beardsley, M. C. Thinking straight: Principles of reasoning for readers and writers (4th ed.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, S. L. Research on emotional and logical proofs. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 1963,28, 198–207.
   Google Scholar
• Begg, 1, & Denny, J. P. Empirical reconciliation of atmosphere and conversion interpretations of syllogistic reasoning errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, SI, 351–354.
   Google Scholar
• Bettinghaus, E. P., Miller, G. R., & Steinfatt, T. M. Source evaluation, syllogistic content, and judgments of logical validity by high and tow-dogmatic persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970,16, 238–244.
   Google Scholar
• Bitzer, L. F. The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1968,1, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, R. M., & Tucker, R. K. Evidence, personality and attitude change. Communication Monographs, 1969,35, 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Bradac, J. J., Sandell, K. L., & Wenner, L.A. The phenomenology of evidence: Information-source utility in decision making. Communication Quarterly, 1979, 27, 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Brockried, W., & Ehninger, D. Toulmin on argument: An interpretation and application. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1960, 45, 44–53, Brooks, L. R. Spatial and verbal components of recall. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1968, 22, 349–368.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K. Conflicting information, attitude and message variables as predictors of learning and persuasion. Human Communication Research, 1975,1, 133–144. Burgoon, J. K., Burgoon, M., Miller, G. R., & Sunnafrank, M. Learning theory approaches to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 1981, 7, 161–179
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, M., & Burgoon J. Message strategies in influence attempts. In G. Hanneman & W. McEwen (Eds.), Communication and Behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. On the analysis and criticism of arguments: Some theoretical and methodological considerations. Journalofthe American Forensic Association, 1979,15, 137–147. (a)
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. On the foundations of rationality: Toulmin, Habermas, and the a priori of reason. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1979, 16, 112–127. (b)
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. The development of interpersonal reasoning: An analysis of message strategy justifications. Joumalof the American Forensic Association, 1980,17, 102–110. (a)
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. The place of non-discussive symbolism, formal characterizations and herme-neutics in argument analysis and criticism. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1980,16, 222–231. (b)
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. A cognitive developmental perspective on social reasoning processes. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 1981, 45, 133–147.
   Google Scholar
• Cathcart, R. S. An experimental study of the relative effectivenessof four methods of presenting evidence. Communication Monographs, 1955, 22, 227–233.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, L. J., & Chapman, J. P. Atmosphere effect re-examined. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 58, 220–226.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 1969, 76, 387–404.
   Google Scholar
• Delia, J. The logic fallacy, cognitive theory, and the enthymeme: A search for the foundations of reasoned discourse. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1970, 56, 140–148.
   Google Scholar
• Delia, J. G. A constructivist analysis of the concept of credibility, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1976, 62, 261–375.
   Google Scholar
• Delia, J. G. Constructivism and the study of human communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1977, 63, 66–83.
   Google Scholar
• DeSoto, C. B., London, M., & Handel, S. Social reasoning and spatial parlogic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965,2, 513–521.
   Google Scholar
• Dollard, J., & Miller, N. E. Personality and psychotherapy. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1950. Dubin. R. Theory building (rev. ed.). New York: Macmillan, 1978-Ehninger, D., & Brockriede, W. Decision by debate. New York: Harper & Row, 1963. Ehninger, D., & Brockriede, W. Decision by debate (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row, 1978. Evans, J. St B. T. On the problems of interpreting reasoning data: Logical and psychological approaches. Cognition, 1972,1, 373–384. (a)
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St B.T. Reasoning with negatives. British Journal of Psychology, 1972,63, 213–219. (b) Evans, J. St B.T. Interpretation and matching bias in a reasoning task. Quarterly Journal of
   Google Scholar
• Experimental Psychology, 1972, 24, 193–199. (c) Evans, J. St B. T. Linguistic factors in reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1977,29, 297–306. (a)
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St B. T. Towards a statistical theory of reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental
   Google Scholar
• Psychology, 1977,29, 621–635. (b) Evans, J. St B. T. The psychology of deductive reasoning. In A. Burton & J. Radford (Eds.)
   Google Scholar
• Thinking in perspective. London: Methuen, 1978. Evans, J. St B. T. Thinking: Experiential and information processing approaches. In G. Claxton (Ed.), Cognitive psychology: New directions. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980. (a) Evans, J. St B. T. Current issues in the psychology of reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 1980, 71, 227–239. (b)
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St B. T., & Wason, P C. Rationalization in a reasoning task. British Journal of Psychology, 1976, 67, 479–486.
   Google Scholar
• Falmagne, R. J. (Ed.), Reasoning: Representation and process. New York: John Wiley, 1975. Feather, N. T. Acceptance and rejection of arguments in relation to attitude strength, critical ability, and intolerance of inconsistency. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964,69, 127–136.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M. A behavior theory approach to the relations between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward the object. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement. New York: John Wiley, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Fleshier, H., Ilardo, J., & Demoretcky, J. The influence of field dependence, speaker credibility set, and message documentation on evaluation of speaker and message credibility. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 1974,39, 389–402.
   Google Scholar
• Florence, B, T. An empirical test of the relationship of evidence to belief systems and attitude change. Human Communication Research, 1975,1, 145–158.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, R. Q., & Wason, P. C. Degrees of insight. British Journal of Psychology, 1972, 63, 205–212.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, B. S., & Miller, G. R, The effects of low-credible sources on acceptance. Communication Monographs, 1966,33, 127–136.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, CI Testing a model of value argument and evidence Communication Monographs, 1977, 44, 106–120.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D. Predicting immediate belief change and adherence to argument claims. Communication Monographs, 1978,45, 219–228.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D. Predicting belief and belief change using a cognitive theory of argument and evidence. Communication Monographs, 1979, 46, 142–151.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D. A cognitive view of argument. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1980, 17, 151–158.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D. The cognitive context of argument. Western Journal of Speech Communication 1981, 45, 148–158.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D. The effects of imagery, negativity and ambiguity on syllogism difficulty. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Communication Association, Boston Harte, T. B. Audience ability to apply tests of evidence. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1971,8, 109–115.
   Google Scholar
• Harte, T. B. The effects of evidence in persuasive communication. Central States Speech Journal, 1976, 27, 42–46.
   Google Scholar
• Henle, M. Some effects of motivational processes on cognition. Psychological Review, 1955, 62, 423–432.
   Google Scholar
• Henle, M. On the relation between logic and thinking. Psychological Review, 1962, 69, 366–378.
   Google Scholar
• Henle, M., & Michael, M. The influence of attitudes on syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Social Psychology, 1956, 44, 115–127.
   Google Scholar
• Huttenlocher, J. Constructing spatial images: A strategy in reasoning. Psychological Review, 1968, 75, 550–560.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. In print. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1980, 17, 66–72.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. Two models of syllogistic reasoning: An empirical comparison. Communication Monographs, 1982, 49, 205–213.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, S., & Jackson, S. Arguments as a natural category: The routine grounds for arguing in conversation. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 1981, 45, 118–132.
   Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L., & Frick, F. The relationship between attitudes toward conclusions and errors in judging logical validity of syllogisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1943, 33, 73–77.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. The three-term series problem. Cognition, 1972, 1, 57–82.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, I. W. Piaget and the role of the law of noncontradiction in thinking. Psychology: A Quarterly Journal of Human Behavior, 1980, 17 (2), 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, J.A. Interaction of evidence and readers’ intelligence on the effects of short messages. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1969, 55, 407–413.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, J. A. A Q-analysis of encoding behavior in the selection of evidence. Communication Monographs, 1971,38, 190–197. (a)
   Google Scholar
• Kline, J.A. Dogmatism of the speaker and selection of evidence. Communication Monographs, 1971,38, 354–356. (b)
   Google Scholar
• Kneupper, C. W. On argument and diagrams. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1978, 14, 181–186.
   Google Scholar
• Kneupper, C. W. Paradigms and problems: Alternative constructivist/interactionist implications for argumentation theory. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1979, 15, 220227.
   Google Scholar
• Kneupper, C. W. Argument: A social constructivist perspective. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1981,17,183–1891.
   Google Scholar
• Lefford, A. The influence of emotional subject matter on logical reasoning. Journal oj General Psychology, 1946,34, 127–151.
   Google Scholar
• Long, L., & Welch, L Influence oflevelofabstractness on reasoning ability. Journal of Psychology, 1942,13, 41–59.
   Google Scholar
• Luchok, J., & McCroskey, J. C. The effect of quality of evidence on attitude and source credibility. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 1978,33, 371–383.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. The effects of evidence in persuasive communication. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 1967,32, 190–199.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. A summary of experimental research on the effect of evidence in persuasive communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1959, 55, 159–175.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. The effects of evidence as an inhibitor of counter-persuasion. Speech Monographs, 1970,37, 188–194.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Dunham, R. E. Ethos; A confounding element in communication research. Communication Monographs, 1956, 33, 464–465.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., Young, T. J., & Scott, M. D. Special reports: The effects of message sidedness and evidence on inoculation against counterpersuasion in small group communication. Communication Monographs, 1972, 39, 205–212.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, W.J. A syllogistic analysis of cognitive relationships. In C. 1. Hovland & M.J. Rosenberg (Eds.), Attitude organization and change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. R. Evidence and argument. In G. R. Miller & T. R. Nilsen (Eds.), Perspective on argumentation. Chicago: Scott, Foresman, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. R. Some factors influencing judgments of the logical validity of arguments: A search review. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1969, 55, 276–286.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. R., & Burgoon, M. New techniques of persuasion. New Ybrk: Harper & Row, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. R., & Burgoon, M. Persuasion research: Review and commentary. In B. D. Ruben (Ed.), Communication yearbook2. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, G. E. Reason in controversy (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. J. B., & Morton, J. T. The distortion of syllogistic reasoning produced by personal convictions. Journal of Social Psychology, 1944,20, 39–50.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, W. J., & Morgan, A. B. Logical reasoning: With and without training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1953,37, 399–401.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, L. Debate survives fifty years on the tournament circuit. In D. W Klopf & T. Kawashima (Eds), Perspectives on forensics. Tokyo: GakuShobo, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Ostermeier, T. H. Effects of type and frequency on reference upon perceived source credibility and attitude change. Communication Monographs, 1967,34, 137–144.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 1972, 15, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Reinard, J. C., Jr., & Reynolds, R. A. An experimental study of the effects of Toulmin’s pattern for argument development on attitude change. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Western Speech Communication Association, San Francisco, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Reinard, J. C., Jr., & Reynolds, R. A. The effects of inadmissible testimony objections and ruling on jury decision. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1978,15,91 109.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, M. N., Jr. The theoretical interpretation of errors in syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Psychology, 1957, 43, 341–344.
   Google Scholar
• Roberge, J. J. Some effects of negation on adults’ conditional reasoning abilities. Psychological Reports, 1971, 29, 838–844.
   Google Scholar
• Roberge, J.J. Reasoning with exclusive disjunctive arguments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1976,28, 419–427.
   Google Scholar
• Sells, S. B. The atmosphere effect: An experimental study of reasoning. Archives of Psychology, 1936,29,200.
   Google Scholar
• Sells, S. B., & Koota, H. F. A classroom demonstration of “atmosphere effect” in reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1937, 28, 514–518.
   Google Scholar
• Shaver, P., Pierson, L, & Lang, S. Converging evidence for the functional significance of imagery in problem solving. Cognition, 1975, 3, 359–375.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. I. Psycholinguistics (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, W. S. Formal logic in debate Southern Speech Communication Journal, 1962, 22, 330–338.
   Google Scholar
• Steinfatt, T. M. Ambiguity as a predictor of syllogistic difficulty. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Steinfatt, T.M., Miller, G.R., & Bettinghaus, E. P. The concept of logical ambiguity and judgments of syllogistic validity. Communication Monographs, 1974, 41, 317–328.
   Google Scholar
• Thistleth waite, D. Attitude and structure as factors in the distortion of reasoning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1950, 45, 442–458.
   Google Scholar
• Thouless, R. H. Effect of prejudice on reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 1959, 50, 290–293.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. Human understanding: The collective use and evolution on concepts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., & Janik, A. An introduction to reasoning. New York: Macmillan, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Von Domarus, E. The specific laws on logic in schizophrenia. In J. S. Kasinin (Ed.), Language and thought in schizophrenia. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1944.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, V. C., Jr. Evidential attitudes and attitude change. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 1972,36, 115–123.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, I. D. The effect of credibility in sources of testimony on audience attitudes toward speaker and message. Commum’cation Monographs, 1969, 36, 456–458.
   Google Scholar
• Wason, PC. Reasoning. In B.M. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology, Harmondsworth, Eng.: Penguin, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 20, 273–281.
   Google Scholar
• Wason, R C. Regression in reasoning? British Journal of Psychology, 1969, 6, 471–480.
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C., & Evans, J. St B. T. Dual processes in reasoning? Cognition, 1975, 3, 141–154.
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P N. Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. London: B. T. Batsford, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J. S. Effects of authority-based assertions on attitude and credibility. Communication Monographs, 1971,38, 311–315.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, M. C. The effect of changed material on ability to do formal syllogistic reasoning. Archives of Psychology, 1928,16,102.
   Google Scholar
• Willard, C. A. On the utility of descriptive diagrams for the analysis and criticism of arguments. Communication Monographs, 1976, 43, 308–319.
   Google Scholar
• Willard, C. A. Argument as non-discursion symbolism, Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1978,14, 187–193. (a)
   Google Scholar
• Willard, C. A. A reformation of the concept of argument: The constructivist/interactivist foundations of a sociology of argument. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1978, 14, 121–140. (b)
   Google Scholar
• Willard, C.A. The epistemic functions of argument: Reasoning and decision-making from a constructivist/interactionist point of view. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1979, 15, 169–191, 211–219. (a)
   Google Scholar
• Willard, C. A. The epistemic functions of argument: Reasoning and decision-making from a constructionist /interactionist point of view—part II. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1979,15, 211–219. (b)
   Google Scholar
• Willard, C. A. Prepositional argument is to argument what talking about passion is to passion. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1979, 16, 21–28. (c)
   Google Scholar
• Willard, C. A. Argument fields and theories of logical types. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1981,17, 190–214. (a)
   Google Scholar
• Willard, C. A. The status of the non-discursiveness thesis. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1981,17, 190–214. (b)
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. L. The effect of deliberate vagueness on receiver recall and agreement. Central States Speech Journal, 1980, 3130–41.
   Google Scholar
• Woodworth, R. S., & Sells, S. B. An atmosphere effect in formal syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1935,18, 451–460.
   Google Scholar
• Woolbert, C. Conviction and persuasion: Some considerations of theory. Quarterly Journal of Public Speaking, 1917, 3, 249–264.
   Google Scholar
• Wyer, R. S., & Goldberg, L. A probabilistic analysis of the relationships among beliefs and attitudes. Psychological Review, 1970, 77, 100–120.
   Google Scholar
• Yost, M. Argument from the point-of-view sociology. Quarterly Journal of Public Speaking, 1917, 3, 109–127.
   Google Scholar