Communication in Women’s Career Development Relationships

References

• Anderson, C., & Devanna, M. A. Mentors: Can they help women get ahead? Career Development Bulletin, 1981,2 (2), 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Babbie, E R. Survey research methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Bacharach, S. B., & Aiken, M. Structural and process constraints on influence in organizations: A level-specific analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1976,21, 623–642.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, E. A conceptual analysis of the mentor relationship in the career development of women. Adult Education, 1980,30, 195–207.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, W. C. Sampling techniques. New York: John Wiley, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Chicago: RandMcNally, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, E. G. C. & Scott, P. Everyone who makes it has a mentor. Harvard Business Review, 1978, 56 41, 89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. S. Women in middle management: Selection, training, advancement, and performance. Ridgewood, NJ: Forkner, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, H. The construction of a managerial “communication climate” inventory for use in complex organizations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Estler, S. Pp. 197-217 in Proceedings of the conference on women’s leadership and authority in the health professions. HEW contract HRA 230-76-0269, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Fitt, L. W. & Newton, D. A. When the mentor is a man and the protege is a woman. Harvard Business Review, 1981, 59 (2), 56–60.
   Google Scholar
• GemmiU, G., & DeSalvia, D. The promotion beliefs of managers as a factor in career progress: An exploratory study. S/oan Management Review, 1977, IS (2), 75–82.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb, J. Defensive communication. Journal of Communication, 1961,11, 141–148.
   Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, G. M. Organizational communication (3rd ed.). Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, C. Resource J. Cambridge: Radcliffe Institute, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, M. L. Toward a conceptualization of communication satisfaction. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1978, 64, 47–62. (a)
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, M. L. The conceptualization and measurement of communication satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 1978, 4, 253–264. (b)
   Google Scholar
• Hennig, M., & Jardim, A. The managerial woman. New York: Doubleday, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• House, R. J., Filley, A. C., & Gujarati, D. N. Leadership style, hierarchical influence, and the satisfaction of subordinate role expectations: A test of Likert’s influence proposition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1971, 55, 422–432.
   Google Scholar
• Jablin, F. M. Superior’s upward influence, satisfaction, and openness in superior-subordinate communication: A reexamination of the “Pelz Effect.” Human Communication Research 1980, 6, 210–220.
   Google Scholar
• Jablin, F. M. Formal structural characteristics of organizations and superior-subordinate communication. Human Communication Research, 1982,8, 338–347.
   Google Scholar
• Likert, R. New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, L. A survey of mentor-protege relationships among career women. Unpublished manuscript. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• McLane, H. J. Selecting, developing and retaining women executives. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• McLane, H. J. Jumping ahead by having a mentor. Data Management, 1981,19 (3), 38–39.
   Google Scholar
• Nieva, V. F., & Gutek, B. A. Women and work: A psychological perspective. New York: Praeger
   Google Scholar
• Overall, J. E., Spiegel, D. K., & Cohen, J. Equivalence of orthogonal and nonorthogonal analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 1975, 82, 182–186.
   Google Scholar
• Pelz, D. Influence: A key to effective leadership in the first line supervisor. Personnel, 1952, 29, 209–217.
   Google Scholar
• Redding, W. C, Communication within the organization. New York: Industrial Communication Council, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, K., & O’Reilly, C. Measuring organizational communication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974.59, 321–326.
   Google Scholar
• Roche, G. Much ado about mentors. Harvard Business Review, 1979, 57 (1), 14–31.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, M, P. Pp. 41 -42 in Proceedings of the conference on women’s leadership and authority in the health professions. HEW contract HRA 230-76-0269,1977.
   Google Scholar
• Sampford, M. P. An introduction to sampling theory London: Oliver & Boyd, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Schein, V E. Sex role stereotyping, ability, and performance: Prior research and new directions. Personnel Psychology, 1978,31, 259–268.
   Google Scholar
• Scott-Welch, M. Networking. New York: Warner, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E., Haseltine, F., & Rowe, M. Moving up: Role models, mentors, and the patrol system. Sloan Management Review, 1978,19 (3), 51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, C. Mentoring programs: Do they make a difference? National Association of Banking Women Journal, July/August 1982, pp. 22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, C., & Curry, J. Mentoring at Security Pacific. Nationa/Association of Banking Women Journal July /August 1982, p. 25.
   Google Scholar
• US. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employment and earnings (July). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Yankelovich, D. New rules: Searching for self-fulfillment in a world turned upside down. New York: Random House, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Zalenick, A. Power and politics in organizational life. Howard Business Review. 1970, 48 (3), 47–60.
   Google Scholar