279
Views
71
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Section 6. Public Opinion and Agenda-Setting

Agenda-Setting Research: Where Has It Been, Where Is It Going?

&
Pages 555-594 | Published online: 18 May 2016

References

  • Adams, W. C. (1986). Whose lives count? TV coverage of natural disasters. Journal of
  • Communication, 36, 113–122. Almond, G. A. (1950). The American people and foreign policy. New York: Harcourt Brace. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1986). Media coverage of the shuttle disaster: A critical look. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Anokwa, K., & Salwen, M. B. (1986). Newspaper agenda-setting among elites and non-elites in Ghana. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Norman, OK.
  • Asp, K. (1983). The struggle for the agenda: Party agenda, media agenda, and voter agenda in the 1979 Swedish election campaign. Communication Research, 10(3), 333–355.
  • Atwater, T., Salwen, M. B.,& Anderson, R. B. (1985). Media agenda-setting with environmental issues. Journalism Quartery, 62(2), 393–397.
  • Atwood, L. E. (1981). From press release to voting reasons: Tracing the agenda in a congressional campaign. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 4. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
  • Auh, T. S. (1977). Issue conflict and mass media agenda-setting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
  • Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (1985). The origins of individual media-system dependency: A sociological framework. Communication Research, 12, 485–510.
  • Ball-Rokeach, S. J., & Cantor, M. G. (Eds.). (1986). Media, audience, and social structure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Barkin, S. M., & Gurevitch, M. (1987). Out of work and on the air: Television news of unemployment. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 4, 1–20.
  • Bauer, R. A., de Sola Pool, I., & Dexter, L. A. (1963). American business and public policy: The politics of foreign trade. New York: Atherton.
  • Becker, L. B. (1977). The impact of issue saliences. InD. L. Shaw& M. E. McCombs(Eds.), The emergence of American public issues: The agenda-setting function of the press (pp. 121–131). St. Paul, MN: West.
  • Becker, L. B. (1982). The mass media and citizen assessment of issue importance: A reflection on agenda-setting research. In D. C. Whitney, E. Wartella, & S. Windahl (Eds.), Mass communication review yearbook 3 (pp. 521–536). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Becker, L. B., McCombs, M. E., & McLeod, J. M. (1975). The development of political cognitions. In S. H. Chaffee (Ed.), Political communication: Issues and strategiesfor research (pp. 21–63). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Becker, L. B., & McLeod, J. M. (1976). Political consequences of agenda-setting. Mass Communication Research, 3, 8–15.
  • Becker, L. B., Weaver, D. H., Graber, D. A., & McCombs, M. E. (1979). Influence on public agendas. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford 1976 (pp. 418–428). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Behr, R. L., & Iyengar, S. (1985). Television news, real-world cues, and changes in the public agenda. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 38–57.
  • Beniger, J. R. (1976). Winning the presidential nomination: National polls and state primary elections, 1936–1972. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 22–38.
  • Beniger, J. R. (1978). Media content as social indicators: The Greenfield Index of agenda-setting. Communication Research, 5, 437–453.
  • Beniger, J. R. (1983). Trafficking in drug users: Professional exchange networks in the control of deviance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Beniger, J. R. (1984). Mass media, contraceptive behavior, and abortion: Toward a comprehensive model of subjective social change. In C. F. Turner & E. Martin (Eds.), Surveying subjective phenomena (Vol. 2, pp. 475–500). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Benton, M., & Frazier, P. J. (1976). The agenda setting function of the mass media at three levels of “information holding.” Communication Research, 3(3), 261–274.
  • Black, E. R., & Snow, P. (1982). The political agendas of three newspapers and city governments. Canadian Journal of Communication, 8, 11–25.
  • Bloj, A. G. (1975). Into the wild blue yonder: Behavioral implications of agenda setting for air travel. In M. E. McCombs & G. Stone (Eds.), Studies in agenda setting. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, Newhouse Communications Research Center.
  • Blood, W. (1982). Agenda setting: A review of the theory. Media Information Australia, 26, 3–12.
  • Bowers, T. A. (1973). Newspaper political advertising and the agenda-setting function. Journalism Quarterly, 50, 552–556.
  • Bowers, T. A. (1977). Candidate advertising: The agenda is the message. In D. L. Shaw & M. E. McCombs (Eds.), The emergence of American public issues: The agenda-setting function of the press (pp. 53–67). St. Paul, MN: West.
  • Boyer, P. J. (1986). Famine in Ethiopia: The TV accident that exploded. In M. Emery & T. C. Smythe (Ed), Readings in mass communication: Concepts and issues in the mass media. Dubuque, IA: Brown.
  • Carey, J. (1976). How media shape campaigns. Journal of Communication, 26, 50–57. Caspi, D. (1962). The agenda-setting function of the Israeli press. Knowledge: Creation
  • Diffusion, Utilization, 3(3), 401–414. Chaffee, S. H. (1987). Assumptions and issues in communication science. In C. Berger & S.
  • Chaffee (Ed.), Handbook of communication science. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Chaffee, S. H., & Izcaray, F. (1975). Mass communication functions in a media-rich developing society. In S. H. Chaffee (Ed.), Political communication: Issues and strategies for research (pp. 367–395). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Chaffee, S. H., & Wilson, D. G. (1977). Media rich, media poor: Two studies of diversity in agenda-holding. Journalism Quarterly, 54, 466–476.
  • Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1971). The politics of agenda-building: An alternative perspective for modern democratic theory. Journal of Politics, 33, 892–915.
  • Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1981). Communication and public policy. In D. D. Nimmo & K. R. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of political communication (pp. 391–416). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1983). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda-building (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Cobb, R. W., Ross, J., & Ross, M. H. (1976). Agenda building as a comparative political process.
  • American Political Science Review, 70, 126–138. Cohen, B. C. (1963). The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Cohen, B. C. (1965). Foreign policy in American government. Boston: Little, Brown.
  • Cohen, B. C. (1967). Mass communication and foreign policy. In J. N. Rosenau (Ed.), Domestic sources of foreign policy. New York: Free Press. Cohen, B. C. (1970). The relationship between public opinion and foreign policy maker. In
  • M. Small (Ed.), Public opinion and historians. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. Cohen, B. C. (1983). The public’s impact on foreign policy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America. (Original work published 1973)
  • Commission on Freedom of the Press. (1947). A free and responsible press. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Cook, F. L., Tyler, T. R., Goetz, E. G., Gordon, M. T., Protess, D., Leff, D. R., &Molotch, H. L. (1983). Media and agenda-setting: Effects on the public, interest group leaders, policy makers, and policy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 16–35. Crenson, M. A. (1971). The un-politics of air pollution: A study of non-decision making in two cities. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Curran, J., Gurevitch, M., & Woollacott, J. (Eds.). (1979). Mass communication and society.
  • Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Davidson, R., & Parker, G. (1972). Positive support for political institutions: The case of
  • Congress. Western Politics Quarterly, 25, 600–612. Davis, F. J. (1952). Crime news in Colorado newspapers. American Journal of Sociology, 57, 325–330.
  • DeFleur, M. L., & Dennis, E. E. (1985). Understanding mass communication (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • DeGeorge, W. F. (1981). Conceptualization and measurement of audience agenda. In G. C. Wilhoit & H. DeBock (Eds.), Mass communication review yearbook 2 (pp. 291–222). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York: Henry Holt. Dominick, J. R. (1983). The dynamics of mass communication. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology: The issue-attention cycle. Public Interest, 28, 38–50.
  • Einsiedel, E. F., Salomone, K. L., & Schneider, F. P. (1984). Crime: Effects of media exposure and personal experience on issue salience. Journalism Quarterly, 61, 131–136.
  • Emery, M., & Smythe, T. C. (1986). Readings in mass communication: Concepts and issues in the mass media (6th ed.). Dubuque, 1A: Brown.
  • Erbring, L., Goldenberg, E. N., & Miller, A. H. (1980). Front-page news and real-world cues: A new look at agenda-setting by the media. American Journal of Political Science, 24, 16–49.
  • Erikson, R. S. (1976). The relationship between public opinion and state policy: A new look based on some forgotten data. American Journal of Political Science, 20, 25–36.
  • Erikson, R. S. (1978). Constituency opinion and congressional behavior: A reexamination of the Miller-Stokes representation data. American Journal of Political Science, 22, 511–535.
  • Eyal, C. H. (1979). Time-frame in agenda-setting research: A study of the conceptual and methodological factors affecting the time frame context of the agenda-setting process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
  • Eyal, C. H. (1981). The roles of newspapers and television in agenda-setting. In G. C. Wilhoit & H. DeBock (Eds.), Mass communication review yearbook 2 (pp. 225–234). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Eyal, C. H., Winter, J. P., & DeGeorge, W. F. (1981). The concept of time frame in agenda-setting. In G. C. Wilhoit (Ed.), Mass communication review yearbook 2 (pp. 212–218). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Eyestone, R. (1974). From social issues to public policy. New York: John Wiley.
  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Frazier, P. J., &Gaziano, C. (1979). Robert E. Park’s theory of news, public opinion and social control. Lexington, KY: Journalism Monographs.
  • Fryling, A. (1985). Setting the congressional agenda: Public opinion in a media age. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Funkhouser, G. R. (1973a). The issues of the sixties: An exploratory study in the dynamics of public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 62–75.
  • Funkhouser, G. R. (1973b). Trends in media coverage of the issues of the sixties. Journalism Quarterly, 50, 533–538.
  • Gaddy, G. D., & Tanjong, E. (1986). Earthquake coverage by the Western press. Journal of Communication, 36, 105–112.
  • Gadir, S. (1982). Media agenda-setting in Australia: The rise and fall of public issues. Media Information Australia, 26, 13–23.
  • Gandy, O. H., Jr. (1982). Beyond agenda setting: Information subsidies and public policy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Gilberg, S., Eyal, C., McCombs, M., & Nicholas, D. (1980). The State ofthe Union Address and the press agenda. Journalism Quarterly, 57(4), 584–588.
  • Gitlin, T. (1978). Media sociology: The dominant paradigm. Theory and Society, 6, 205–253.
  • Gormley, W. T., Jr. (1975). Newspaper agendas and political elites. Journalism Quarterly, 52, 304–308.
  • Grunig, J. E., & Ipes, D. A. (1983). The anatomy of a campaign against drunk driving. Public Relations Review, 9, 36–52.
  • Hauser, J. R. (1986). Agendas and consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 199–212.
  • Hezel, R. T., Andregg, C., & Lange-Chapman, D. (1986). The agenda-setting function of TV movies: Newspaper coverage of TV movie social issues. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Norman, OK.
  • Hibbs, D. A., Jr. (1979), The mass public and macroeconomic performance: The dynamics of public opinion toward unemployment and inflation. American Journal of Political Science, 23(4), 705–731.
  • Hubbard, J. C., DeFleur, M. L., & DeFleur, L. B. (1975). Mass media influences on public conceptions of social problems. Social Problems, 23, 22–34.
  • Hume, D. (1896). A treatise of human nature. Oxford: Clarendon. (Original work published 1739)
  • Iyengar, S. (1979). Television news and issue salience: A re-examination of the agenda-setting hypothesis. American Politics Quarterly, 7, 395–416.
  • Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1985). Psychological accounts of media agenda setting. InS. Kraus & R. Perloff (Eds.), Mass media and political thought (pp. 117–140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1986). More than meets the eye: TV news, priming, and public evaluations of the president. In G. Comstock (Ed.), Public communication and behavior (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.
  • Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Agenda-setting and priming in a television age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Iyengar, S., Peters, M. P., & Kinder, D. R. (1982). Experimental demonstrations of the “not-so-minimal” consequences of televison news programs. American Political Science Review, 76, 848–858.
  • Iyengar, S., Peters, M. P., Kinder, D. R., & Krosnick, J. A. (1984). The evening news and presidential evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 778–787.
  • James, W. (1896). The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt.
  • Junack, M. E., McCombs, M. E., &Shaw, D. L. (1977). Using polls and content analysis to study an election. In D. L. Shaw & M. E. McCombs (Eds.), The emergence of American public issues: The agenda-setting function of the press (pp. 157–169). St. Paul, MN: West.
  • Kaid, L. L., Hale, K., & Williams, J. (1977). Media agenda setting of a specific political event. Journalism Quarterly, 54, 584–587.
  • Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P, F. (1955). Personal influence. New York: Free Press.
  • Kepplinger, H. M., Donsbach, W., Brosius, H., & Staab, J. (1986). Media tenor and public opinion: A longitudinal study of media coverage and public opinion on Chancellor Kohl. Paper presented to the Joint World Association for Public Opinion Research/American Association for Public Opinion Research Conference, St. Petersburg, FL.
  • Kepplinger, H. M., & Roth, H. (1979). Creating a crisis: German mass media and oil supply in 1973–74. Public Opinion Quarterly, 43, 285–296.
  • Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
  • Klapper, J. T. (1960). The effects of mass communication. New York: Free Press.
  • Kraus, S. (1985). The studies and the world outside. In S. Kraus & R. M. Perloff (Eds.), Mass media and political thought. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Lambeth, E. B. (1978, Spring). Perceived influence of the press on energy policy making. Journalism Quarterly, 72, 11–18.
  • Lang, G. E., & Lang, K. (1981). Watergate: An exploration of the agenda-building process. In G. C. Wilhoit & H. DeBock (Eds.), Mass communication review yearbook 2 (pp. 447–468). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Lang, G. E., & Lang, K. (1983). The battle for public opinion: The president, the press, and the polls during Watergate. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Lasswell, H. D. (1927). Propoganda technique in the World War. New York: Knopf.
  • Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1948). Mass communication, popular taste, and organized social action [Reprinted in W. Schramm (Ed.), Mass communication (2nd ed.)]. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  • Leff, D. R., Protess, D. L., & Brooks, S. C. (1986). Cruisading journalism: Changing public attitudes and policy-making agenda. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 300–315.
  • Linsky, M. (1986). Impact: How the press affects federal policymaking. New York: W. W. Norton.
  • Linsky, M., Moore, J., O’Donnell, W., & Whitman, D. (1986). How the press affects federal policy making: Six case studies. New York: W. W. Norton.
  • Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Harcourt Brace.
  • Lowery, S., & DeFleur, M. L. (1987). Milestones in mass communication research: Media effects (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
  • MacKuen, M. B. (1981). Social communication and the mass policy agenda. In M. B. MacKuen & S. L. Coombs (Eds.), More than news: Media power in public affairs (pp. 19–144). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • MacKuen, M. B., & Coombs, S. L. (1981). More than news: Media power in public affairs. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Manheim, J. B. (1986). A model of agenda dynamics. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 499–516). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Manheim, J. B., & Albritton, R. B. (1984). Changing national images: International public relations and media agenda setting. American Political Science Review, 73, 641–647.
  • Mansbach, R. W.,& Vasquez, J. A. (1981). In search of theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Mazur, A. (1981). Media coverage and public opinion on scientific controversies. Journal of Communication, 31, 106–115.
  • McClure, R. D., & Patterson, T. E. (1976). Print vs. network news. Journal of Communication, 26, 23–28.
  • McCombs, M. E. (1976). Agenda-setting research: A bibliographic essay. Political Communication Review, /, 1–7.
  • McCombs, M. E. (1977). Newspapers versus television: Mass communication effects across time. In D. L. Shaw & M. E. McCombs (Eds.), The emergence of American political issues: The agenda-setting function of the press (pp. 89–105). St. Paul, MN: West.
  • McCombs, M. E. (1981a). The agenda-setting approach. In D. D. Nimmo& K. R. Sanders (Eds.), Mass communication review yearbook 2 (pp. 219–224). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • McCombs, M. E. (1981b). Setting the agenda for agenda-setting research: An assessment of the priority, ideas and problems. In G. C. Wilhoit & H. DeBock (Eds.), Mass communication review yearbook 2 (pp. 219–224). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • McCombs, M. E.,& Gilbert, S.(1986). News influences on our pictures of the world. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Perspectives on media effects (pp. 1–15). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • McCombs, M. E., & Masel-Waters, L. (1976). Agenda-setting: A perspective on mass communication. Mass Communication Review, 3, 3–7.
  • McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly. 36, 176–184.
  • McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1976). Structuring the “unseen environment.” Journal of Communication, 26, 18–22.
  • McCombs, M.E.,&Shaw, D. L. (1977a). Agenda-setting and the political process. In D. L. Shaw & M. E. McCombs (Eds.), The emergence of American political issues: The agenda-setting function of the press (pp. 149–156). St. Paul, MN: West.
  • McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1977b). The agenda-setting function of the press. In D. L. Shaw & M. E. McCombs (Eds.), The emergence of American political issues: The agenda-setting function of the press (pp. 1–18). St. Paul, MN: West.
  • McCombs, M. E., & Weaver, D. H. (1973, May). Voters’need for orientation and use of mass communication. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal.
  • McCombs, M. E.,&Weaver, D. H.(1985). Toward a merger of gratifications and agenda-setting research. In K. E. Rosengren, L. A. Wenner, & P. Palmgreen (Eds.), Media gratification research (pp. 95–108). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • McLeod, J. M., Becker, L. B., & Byrnes, J. E. (1974). Another look at the agenda setting function of the press. Communication Research, 1, 131–166.
  • McQuail, D., & Windahl, S. (1981). Communication models for the study of mass communication. New York: Longman.
  • Megwa, E. R., & Brenner, D. J. (1986, May). Toward a paradigm of media agenda-setting effects: Agenda-setting as process. Paper presented to Political Communications Division at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago.
  • Miller, A. H., Goldenberg, E. N., & Erbring, L. (1979). Type-set politics: Impact of newspapers on public confidence. American Political Science Review, 73, 67–84.
  • Miller, J. D. (1987). The impact of the Challenger accident on public attitudes toward the space program (Report to the National Science Foundation). Northern Illinois University, Public Opinion Laboratory.
  • Miller, S. H. (1978). Reporters and congressmen: Living in symbiosis (No. 53). Lexington, KY: Journalism Monographs.
  • Miller, W. E.,& Stokes, D. E. (1963). The politics of agenda-building: An alternative perspective for modern democratic theory. Journal of Politics, 33, 892–915.
  • Molotch, H., & Lester, M. (1974). News as purposive behavior: On the strategic use of routine events, accidents, and scandals. American Sociological Review, 39, 101–112.
  • Monroe, A. D. (1979). Consistency between public preferences and national policy decisions. American Politics Quarterly, 7(1), 3–19.
  • Mullins, L. E. (1977). Agenda-setting and the young voter. In D. L. Shaw & M. E. McCombs (Eds.), The emergence of American political issues: The agenda-setting function of the press (pp. 133–148). St. Paul, MN: West.
  • Neumann, W. R. (1985). The threshold of public attention. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans.
  • Neumann, W. R., & Fryling, A. C. (1985). Patterns of political cognition: An exploration of the public mind. In S. Kraus & R. M. Perloff (Eds.), Mass media and political thought (pp. 223–240). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Noeile-Neumann, E. (1984). The spiral of silence: Public opinion—our social skin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • O’Keefe, G. J., & Reid-Nash, K. (1987). Crime news and real-world blues. Communication Research, 14, 147–163.
  • Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77, 175–190.
  • Palmgreen, P., & Clark, P. (1977). Agenda-setting with local and national issues. Communication Research, 4, 435–452.
  • Park, R. E. (1922). The immigrant press and its control. New York: Harper.
  • Pember, D. R. (1983). Mass media in America (4th ed.). Chicago: SRA.
  • Peterson, S. (1972). Events, mass opinion, and elite attitudes. In R. L. Merritt (Ed.), Communication in international politics (pp. 252–271). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  • Pritchard, D. (1986). Homicide and bargained justice: The agenda-setting effect of crime news on prosecutors. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 19–37.
  • Protess, D. L., Leff, D. R., Brooks, S. C., & Gordon, M. T. (1985). Uncovering rape: The watchdog press and the limits of agenda setting. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 19–37.
  • Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York: John Wiley.
  • Qualter, T. H. (1985). Opinion control in the democracies. New York: St. Martin’s.
  • Rabinowitz, G., Prothro, J. W., & Jacoby, W. (1982). Salience as a factor in the impact of issues on candidate evaluation. Journal of Politics, 44, 41–63.
  • Ramaprasad, J. (1983). Agenda-setting: Is not a 1984 or is a 1984 view. Gazette, 32, 119–135.
  • Reardon, K. K. (1987). Where minds meet. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Rivers, W. L. (1970). Appraising press coverage of politics. In R. W. Lee (Ed.), Politics and the press. Washington, DC: Acropolis.
  • Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
  • Rogers, E. M. (1986). Communication technology. New York: Free Press.
  • Rosenau, J. N. (1961). Public opinion and foreign policy. New York: Random House.
  • Rosenau, J. N. (Ed.). (1980). Pre-theories and theories of foreign policy. In The scientific study of foreign policy (rev. ed., pp. 115–169). New York: Free Press.
  • Rosenau, J. N. (1987). Patterned chaos in global life: Structure and process in the two worlds of world politics. Unpublished manuscript, University of Southern California, Institute for Transnational Studies.
  • Rosengren, K. E. (1974). International news: Methods, data and theory. Journal of Peace Research. II, 145–156.
  • Rosengren, K. E. (1977). Four types of tables. Journal of Communication, 27, 67–75.
  • Rosengren, K. E. (1983). Communication research: One paradigm, or four? Journal of Communication, 33, 185–207.
  • Salwen, M. B. (1985). An agenda for agenda-setting research: Problems in the paradigm. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association of Puerto Rico, San Juan.
  • Salwen, M. B. (1986, May). Time in agenda-setting: The accumulation of media coverage on audience issue salience. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago.
  • Schudson, M. (1986). The menu of media research. In S.J. Ball-Rokeach& M. G. Cantor (Eds), Media audience and social structure (pp. 43–48). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Shaw, D. L. (1977). The press agenda in a community setting. In D. L. Shaw & M. E. McCombs (Eds.), The emergence of American public issues: The agenda-setting function of the press (pp. 19–31). St. Paul, MN: West.
  • Shaw, D. L., & Clemmer, C. L. (1977). News and the public response. In D. L. Shaw & M. E. McCombs (Eds.), The emergence of American public issues: The agenda-setting function of the press (pp. 33–51). St. Paul, MN: West.
  • Shaw, D. L.,& McCombs, M. E. (Eds.). (1977). The emergence of American political issues: The agenda-setting function of the press. St. Paul, MN: West.
  • Shaw, E. F. (1977). The interpersonal agenda. In D. L. Shaw & M. E. McCombs (Eds.), The emergence ofAmerican public issues: The agenda-setting function of the press (pp. 69–87). St. Paul, MN: West.
  • Shaw, E. F. (1977). The agenda-setting hypothesis reconsidered: Interpersonal factors. Gazette, 23, 230–240.
  • Shaw, E. F. (1979). Agenda-setting and mass communication theory. Gazette, 25(2), 96–105.
  • Shoemaker, P. J., Wanta, W., & Leggett, D. (1987, May). Drug coverage and public opinion, 1972–1986. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Hershey, PA.
  • Siune, K., & Borre, O. (1975). Setting the agenda for a Danish election. Journal of Communication, 25(1)’. 65–73.
  • Smith, K. A. (1987). Newspaper coverage and public concern about community issues: A time-series analysis. Lexington, KY: Journalism Monographs.
  • Smith, S. (1986). Theories of foreign policy: An historical overview. Review of International Studies, 12, 13–29.
  • Smith, T. W. (1980). America’s most important problem: A trend analysis, 1946–1976. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 164–180.
  • Soderlund, W. C., Wagenberg, R. H., Briggs, E. D., & Nelson, R. C. (1980). Regional and linguistic agenda-setting in Canada: A study of newspaper coverage of issues affecting political integration in 1976. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 13(2), 348–356.
  • Sohn, A. B. (1978). A longitudinal analysis of local non-political agenda-setting effects. Journalism Quarterly, 55, 325–333.
  • Stimson, J. A. (1976). Public support of American presidents: A cyclical model. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 1–21.
  • Stone, G. C., & McCombs, M. E. (1981). Tracing the time lag in agenda setting. Journalism Quarterly. 58, 51–55.
  • Sutherland, H., & Galloway, J. (1981). Role of advertising: Persuasion or agenda setting. Journalism Quarterly, 58, 51–55.
  • Swanson, L. L., & Swanson, D. L. (1978). The agenda-setting function of the first Ford-Carter debate. Communication Monographs, 45, 330–353.
  • Tardy, C. H., Gaughan, B. J., Hemphill, M. R., & Crockett, N. (1981). Media agendas and political participation. Journalism Quarterly, 58, 624–627.
  • Tipton, L., Hanley, R., & Basehart, J. (1975). Media agenda-setting in city and state election campaigns. Journalism Quarterly, 52, 15–22.
  • Walker, J. L. (1977). Setting the agenda in the U.S. Senate: A theory of problem selection. British Journal of Political Science, 7, 433–445.
  • Wallas, G. (1914). The great society. New York: Macmillan.
  • Wanta, W. (1986). The agenda-setting effects of dominant photographs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Norman, OK.
  • Watt, J. H., Jr., & van den Berg, S. (1981). How time dependency influences media effects in a community controversy. Journalism Quarterly, 55(1), 43–50.
  • Weaver, D. H. (1977). Political issues and voter need for orientation. In D. L. Shaw & M. E. McCombs (Eds.), The emergence of American public issues: The agenda-settingfunction of the press (pp. 107–119). St. Paul, MN: West.
  • Weaver, D. (1984). Media agenda-setting and public opinion: Is there a link? In R. N. Bostrom (Ed.), Communication yearbook 8 (pp. 680–691). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Weaver, D., Graber, D. A., McCombs, M. E., & Eyal, C. H. (1981). Media agenda-setting in a presidential election: Issues, images, and interest. New York: Praeger.
  • Weaver, D., McCombs, M. E., & Spellman, C. (1975). Watergate and the media: A case study of agenda-setting. American Politics Quarterly, 3, 458–472.
  • Weber, R. E., & Shaffer, W. R. (1972). Public opinion and American state policy-making. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 16, 683–699.
  • Westly, B. H. (1976). What makes a change? Journal of Communication, 26, 43–47.
  • Williams, W., Jr., & Larsen, D. C. (1977). Agenda-setting in an off-election year. Journalism Quarterly, 54, 744–749.
  • Williams, W., Jr., & Semlak, W. D. (1978a). Structural effects of TV coverage on political agendas. In G. Gerbner (Ed.), Journal of Communication, 28(4), 114–119.
  • Williams, W., Jr., & Semlak, W. D. (1978b). Campaign 76: Agenda setting during the New Hampshire Primary. Journal of Broadcasting, 22, 531–540.
  • Williams, W., Jr., Shapiro, M., & Cutbirth, C. (1983). The impact of campaign agendas on perceptions of issues in 1980 campaign. Journalism Quarterly, 60, 226–231.
  • Winter, J. P. (1981). Contingent conditions on the agenda-setting process. Mass communication review yearbook 2 (pp. 235–243). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Winter, J. P., & Eyal, C. H. (1981). Agenda setting for the civil rights issue. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 376–383.
  • Winter, J. P., Eyal, C. H., & Rogers, A. H. (1982). Issue-specific agenda-setting: The whole as less than the sum of the parts. Canadian Journal of Communication, 8, 8–10.
  • Wright, C. R. (1986). Mass communication: A sociological perspective (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.
  • Zucker, H. G. (1978). The variable nature of new media influence. In B. D. Rubin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 2 (pp. 225–245). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.