Thoughts About Floors Not Eaten, Lungs Ripped, and Breathless Dogs: Issues in Language and Dominance

References

• Berger, C. R. (1989). Goals, plans, and discourse comprehension. In J. J. Bradac (Ed.), Message effects in communication science (pp. 52–74). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99–112.
   Google Scholar
• Bradac, J. J. (1990). Language attitudes and impression formation. In H. Giles & W. P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 387–412). New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bradac, J. J., Bowers, J. W., & Courtright, J. A. (1979). Three language variables in communication research: Intensity, immediacy, and diversity. Human Communication Research, 5, 257–269.
   Google Scholar
• Bradac, J. J., & Muiac, A. (1984). A molecular view of powerful and powerless speech styles: Attributional consequences of specific language features and communicator intentions. Communication Monographs, 51, 307–319.
   Google Scholar
• Bradac, J. J., Mulac, A., & House, A. (1988). Lexical diversity level and magnitude of convergent versus divergent style shifting: Perceptual and evaluative consequences. Language <6 Communication, 8, 213–228.
   Google Scholar
• Bradac, J. J., & Street, R. L., Jr. (1989–1990). Powerful and powerless styles of talk: A theoretical analysis of language and impression formation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 23, 195–242.
   Google Scholar
• Bradac, I. J., & Wisegarver, R. (1984). Ascribed status, lexical diversity, and accent: Determinants of perceived status, solidarity, and control of speech style. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 3, 239–255.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B. L. (1980). Effects of speech rate on personality attributions and competency evaluations. In H. Giles, W. P. Robinson, & P. Smith (Eds.), Language: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 294–300). Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B. L., Giles, H., & Thackerar, I. N. (1985). Speaker evaluations as a function of speech rate, accent, and context. Language & Communication, 5, 207–220.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, M. (1990). Language and social influence. In H. Giles & W. P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 51–72). New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, M., & Miller, G. R. (1985). An expectancy interpretation of language and persuasion. In H. Giles & R. N. St. Clair (Eds.), Recent advances in language, communication, and social psychology (pp. 199–229). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Genessee, F., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1982). The social psychological significance of code switching in cross-cultural communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 1, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, P., Busch, J., & Bradac, J. J. (in press). Powerful and powerless language styles: Consequences for persuasion, impression formation, and cognitive response. Journal of Language and Social Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H. (1973). Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics, IS, 87–105.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H., Mulac, A., Bradac, J. J., Sl Johnson, P. (1987). Speech accommodation theory: The first decade and beyond. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 13–48). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H., & Powesland, P. (1975). Speech style and social evaluation. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H., & Ryan, E. B. (1982). Prolegomena for developing a social psychological theory of language attitudes. In E. B. Ryan & H. Giles (Eds.), Attitudes toward language variation: Social and applied contexts (pp. 208–223). London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H., & Sassoon, C. (1983). The effect of speaker’s accent, social class background and message style on British listeners’ social judgments. Language & Communication, 3, 305–313.
   Google Scholar
• Gudykunst, W. B., & Ting-Toomey, S. (1990). Ethnic identity, language and communication breakdowns. In H. Giles & W. P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 293–308). New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hosman, L. A. (1989). The evaluative consequences of hedges, hesitations, and intensifiers: Powerful and powerless speech styles. Human Communication Research, 15, 383–406.
   Google Scholar
• Howeler, M. (1972). Diversity of word usage as a stress indicator in an interview situation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1, 243–248.
   Google Scholar
• Kellermann, K., & Reynolds, R. (1990). The role of motivation to reduce uncertainty in uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research, 17, 5–77.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, T. S., & Bowers, J. W. (1991). Politeness: Solidarity, approbation, and tact. Human Communication Research, 17, 415–450.
   Google Scholar
• Mulac, A., Incontro, C. R., & lames, M. R. (1985). A comparison of the gender-linked language effect and sex-role stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1099–1110.
   Google Scholar
• Mulac, A., & Lundell, T. L. (1980). Differences in perceptions created by semantic-syntactic productions of male and female speakers. Communication Monographs, 47, 111–118.
   Google Scholar
• Mulac, A., Lundell, T. L., & Bradac, J. J. (1986). Male/female language differences and attri-butional consequences in a public speaking situation: Toward an explanation of the gender-linked language effect. Communication Monographs, S3, 115–129.
   Google Scholar
• O’Barr, W. M. (1981). Linguistic evidence: Language, power, and strategy in the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, E. B., & Bulik, C. M. (1982). Evaluations of middle class speakers of Standard American and German-accented English. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, I, 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Siegman, A. W., & Pope, B. (1972). The effects of ambiguity and anxiety on interviewee verbal behavior. In A. W. Siegman & B. Pope (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 29–68). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Sunnafrank, M. (1986). Predicted outcome value during initial interactions: A reformulation of uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research, 13, 3–33.
   Google Scholar
• Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Winefield, H. R., Chandler, M. A., & Bassett, D. L. (1989). Tag questions and powerfulness: Quantitative and qualitative analyses of a course of psychotherapy. Language in Society, 18, 77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Zahn, C. I. (1989). The basis for differing evaluations of male and female speech: Evidence from ratings of transcribed conversation. Communication Monographs, 56, 59–74.
   Google Scholar