The Resourceful Reader: Interpreting Television Characters and Narratives

References

• Allen, R. C. (1985). Speaking of soap operas. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ang, I. (1985). Watching Dallas: Soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Arlen, M. (1981). Smooth pebbles at Southfork. In R. P. Adler (Ed), Understanding television: Essays on television as a social and cultural force (pp. 173–181). New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Ashmore, R. D., & Del Boca, F. K. (1986). The social psychology of female-male relations: A critical analysis of central concepts. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bern, S. L. (1984). Androgyny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical investigation. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 32, (pp. 179–226). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blumler, J. G., Gurevitch, M., & Katz, E. (1985). Reaching out: A future for gratifications research. In K. E. Rosengren, L. A. Wenner, & P. Palmgreen (Eds.), Media gratifications research: Current perspectives (pp. 255–273). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Blumler, J. G., & Katz, E. (Eds.). (1974). The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Broverman, I., Vogel, S., Broverman, D., Clarkson, F., & Rosenkrantz, P. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28(2), 59–78.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S., & Tagiuri, R. (1954). The perception of people. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. (1987). Public secrets: EastEnders and its audience. London: British Film Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Cantor, M., & Pingree, S. (1983). The soap opera. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. W. (1985). Overcoming resistance to cultural studies. In M. Gurevitch & M. R. Levy (Eds.), Mass communication review yearbook (Vol. 5, pp. 27–40). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carveth, R., & Alexander, A. (1985). Soap opera viewing motivations and the cultivation process. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 29, 259–273.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, W. A. (1983). Interpretation and inference in children’s television viewing. In J. Bryant &D. A. Anderson (Eds.), Children’s understanding of television (pp. 125–150). New York; Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drabman, R. S., Robertson, S. J., Patterson, J. N., Jarvie, G. J., Hammer, D., & Cordua, G. (1981). Children’s perception of media-portrayed sex roles. Sex Roles, 7, 379–389.
   Google Scholar
• Durkin, K. (1985a). Television and sex-role acquisition I: Content. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 101–113.
   Google Scholar
• Durkin, K. (1985b). Television and sex-role acquisition. 2: Effects. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 191–210.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, R., Geraghty, C., Jordan, M., Lovell, T., Paterson, R., & Stewart, J. (1981). Coronation Street. London: British Film Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (1979). The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstock, B. (1984). Sex-role differences in children’s identification with counterstereotypi-cal televised portrayals. Sex Roles, 10, 417–430.
   Google Scholar
• Fejes, F. (1984). Critical mass communications research and media effects: The problem of the disappearing audience. Media, Culture and Society, 6, 219–232.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, J. (1987). Television culture. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P. (1979). Multidimensional scaling: A discovery method in social psychology. In G. P. Ginsberg (Ed.), Emerging strategies in social psychological research. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, D. L., & Fry, V. H. (1986). A scmiotic model for the study of mass communication. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 9 (pp. 463–479). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1979). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 2(5(2), 173–199.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1982). Charting the mainstream: Television’s contributions to political orientations. Journal of Communication, 32(2), 100–127.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies 1972–1979 (pp. 128–138). London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R. P., & Pingree, S. (1983). Television’s influence on social Teality. In E. Wartella & D. C. Whitney (Eds.), Mass communication review yearbook (Vol. 4, pp. 53–76). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, R., & Tripp, D. (1986). Children and television: A semiotic approach. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Holub, R. C. (1984). Reception theory: A critical introduction. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction. Psychiatry, 19, 215–229.
   Google Scholar
• Ingarden, R. (1973). The cognition of the literary work of art. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iser, W. (1980). The reading process: A phenomenological approach. In J. P. Tompkins (Ed.), Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jauss, H. R. (1982). Towards an aesthetic of reception. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jose, P. E., & Brewer, W. F. (1984). Development of story liking: Character identification, suspense, and outcome resolution. Developmental Psychology, 20, 911–924.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.), (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, E. (1980). On conceptualizing media effects. Studies in Communication, 1, 119–141.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, E., Iwao, S., & Liebes, T. (1988). On the limits of diffusion of American television: A study of the critical abilities of Japanese, Israeli and American viewers. Report to the Hoso Bunka Foundation, Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, E., & Liebes, T. (1986). Mutual aid in the decoding of Dallas-. Preliminary notes from a cross-cultural study. In P. Drummond & R. Paterson (Eds.), Television in transition. London: British Film Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, L. (1964). Development of moral character and moral ideology. In M. L. Hoffman & L. W. Hoffman (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. 1). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler, W. (1930). Gestalt psychology. London: Bell & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1941). Remarks on administrative and critical communications research. Studies in Philosophy and Science, 9, 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Liebes, T. (1986a, May). Cultural differences in the retelling of television fiction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Liebes, T. (1986b, October). On the convergence of theories of mass communication and literature regarding the role of the “reader.” Paper presented at the Conference on Culture and Communication, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Liebes, T., & Katz, E. (1986). Patterns of involvement in television Action: A comparative analysis. European Journal of Communication, 1, 151–171.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. M. (1987a). The implicit representation of characters in Dallas: A multidimensional scaling approach. Human Communication Research, 13, 399–420.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. M. (1987b). The representation of personal relationships in television drama: Realism, convention and morality. In R. Burnett, P. McGhee, & D. D. Clarke (Eds.), Accounting for relationships: Explanation, representation and knowledge (pp. 248–268). London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. M. (1988). Why people watch soap opera: An analysis of the explanations of British viewers. European Journal of Communication, 3, 55–80.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. M. (1989). Interpretive viewers and structured programs: The implicit representation of soap opera characters. Communication Research, 16( 1), 25–57.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. M. (1990). Making sense of television: The psychology of audience interpretation. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. M. (in press-a). Interpreting television narrative: How viewers see a story. Journal of Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. M. (in press-b). The role of the viewer in audience research: A case study in retelling romantic drama. In M. Gurevitch & J. Curran (Eds.), Mass communication and society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mander, M. S. (1983). “Dallas”: The mythology of crime and the moral occult. Journal of Popular Culture, 77(2), 44–50.
   Google Scholar
• Mandler, J. M. (1984). Stories, scripts, and scenes: Aspects of schema theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Modleski, T. (1982). Loving with a vengeance: Mass-produced fantasies for women. New York: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, D. (1980). The “Nationwide” audience: Structure and decoding. London: British Film Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, D. (1981). The “Nationwide” audience: A critical postscript. Screen Education, 39, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Newcomb, H. (Ed.). (1982). Television: The critical view (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, G. (1975). Children in from of the small screen. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Ur-bana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, J., Bower, G. H., & Black, I. B. (1979). The “soap opera” effect in story recall. Memory and Cognition, 7(3), 185–191.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, R., & Stewart, J. (1981). Street life. In R. Dyer, C. Geraghty, M. Jordan, T. Lovell, R. Paterson, & J. Stewart (Eds.), Coronation Street. London: British Film Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1968). Structuralism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Pingree, S. (1978). The effects of nonsexist television commercials and perceptions of reality on children’s attitudes about women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2, 262–277.
   Google Scholar
• Pingree, S., Hawkins, R. P., Rouner, D., Burns, J., Gikonyo, W., & Neuwirth, C. (1984). Another look at children’s comprehension of television. Communication Research, 11, 477–496.
   Google Scholar
• Potkay, C. R., & Potkay, C. E. (1984). Perceptions of female and male comic strip characters II: Favorability and identification are different dimensions. Sex Roles, 10, 119–128.
   Google Scholar
• Propp, V. (1968). The morphology of the folktale. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radway, J. (1985). Interpretive communities and variable literacies: The functions of romance reading. In M. Gurevitch & M. R. Levy (Eds.), Mass communication review yearbook (Vol. 5, pp. 337–361). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, B., Chaffee, S. H., & Tims, A. (1982). Social cognition and mass communication research. In M. E. Roloff & C. R. Berger (Eds.), Social cognition and communication. Lon don: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, B., & Greenberg, B. (1977). Children’s perceptions of television characters. Human Communication Research, 3, 113–127.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, B., & Lometti, G. (1978). The dimensional structure of children’s perceptions of television characters: A replication. Human Communication Research, J, 247–256.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, M., Huston, A., & Wright, J. (1987). The forms of television: Effects on children’s attention, comprehension and social behaviour. In O. Boyd-Barrett & P. Braham (Eds.), Media, knowledge and power. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. F., & Bachen, C. M. (1981). Mass communication effects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 307–356.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, W. D., & Watkins, B. (1984). Interpreting television: Current research perspectives. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, D. J., Hastorf, A. H., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1979). Person perception. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Schroder, K. C. (1987). The convergence of antagonistic traditions? The case of audience research. European Journal of Communication, 2, 7–31.
   Google Scholar
• Seiter, E. (1981). The role of the woman reader: EcO’s narrative theory and soap operas. Tabloid, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Suleiman, S., & Crosman, I. (Eds.). (1980). The reader in the text. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, A. S. (1979). TV beauty ads and role expectations of adolescent female viewers. Journalism Quarterly, 56, 283–288.
   Google Scholar
• Tompkins, J. P. (Ed.). (1980). Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1987). Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar