285
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

An Organizational Communication Challenge to the Discourse of Work and Family Research: From Problematics to Empowerment

, , , &
Pages 1-43 | Published online: 18 May 2016

References

  • Albrecht, T. L. (1988). Communication and personal control in empowering organizations. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 11 (pp. 380–390). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  • Allen, T. D., & Russell, J. E. (1999). Parental leave of absence: Some not-so-family friendly implications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 166–191. Andrews, A., & Bailyn, L. (1993). Segmentation and synergy: Two models of linking work and family. In J. C. Hood (Ed.), Men, work, and family (pp. 262–275). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
  • Aryee, S., & Luk, V. (1996). Balancing two major parts of adult life experience: Work and family identity among dual-earner couples. Human Relations, 49, 465–487
  • Ashcraft, K. L. (2000). Empowering “professional” relationships: Organizational communication meets feminist practice. Management Communication Quarterly, 13, 347–392
  • Auerbach, J. D. (1988). In the business of child care: Employer initiative and working women. New York: Praeger.
  • Bailyn, L. (1992). Issues of work and family in different national contexts: How the United States.
  • Britain, and Sweden respond. Human Resource Management, 31, 201–208. Bailyn, L. (1993). Breaking the mold: Women, men, and time in the new corporate world. New York: Free Press.
  • Bailyn, L., Fletcher, J. K., & Kolb, D. (1997). Unexpected connections: Considering employees’ personal lives can revitalize your business. Sloan Management Review, 38, 11–19.
  • Bardo, D. H., Shehan, C. L., & Leslie, G. R. (1987). A residue of tradition: Jobs, careers, and spouses’ time in housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 381–390.
  • Barker, J. R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 408–437.
  • Barker, J. R. (1999). The discipline of teamwork: Participation and concertive control. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Barnett, R. C. (1994). Home-to-work spillover revisited: A study of full-time employed women in dual-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 647–656.
  • Barnett, R. C., & Hyde, J. S. (2001). Women, men, work, and family: An expansionist theory. American Psychologist, 56, 781–796.
  • Barnett, R. C., Marshall, N., & Pleck, J. (1992). Men’s multiple roles and their relationship to men’s psychological distress. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 358–367.
  • Barnett, R. C., & Rivers, C. (1996). She works/he works: How two-income families are happier, healthier, and better off. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Barrett, F., Thomas, G., & Hocevar, S. (1995). The central role of discourse in large-scale change: A social construction perspective. Journal of Applied Behavior Science, 31, 352–372.
  • Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York: Guilford.
  • Bedeian, A. G., Burke, B. G., & Moffett, R. G. (1988). Outcomes of work-family conflict among married male and female professionals. Journal of Management, 14, 475–491.
  • Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
  • Benokraitis, N. V., & Feagin, J. R. (1986). Modern sexism: Blatant, subtle, and covert discrimination. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Blaisure, K. R., & Allen, K. R. (1995). Feminists and the ideology and practice of marital equality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 5–19.
  • Blau, F. D., & Ferber, M. A. (1986). The economics of women, men, and work. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652–688.
  • Burden, D. S., & Googins, B. (1987). Balancing job and homelife study. Boston: Boston University, School of Social Work.
  • Burke, R. J. (1989). Some antecedents and consequences of work-family conflict. In E. B. Goldsmith (Ed.), Woik and family: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 287–302). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Burpitt, W. J., & Bigoness, W. J. (1997). Leadership and innovation among teams: The impact of empowerment. Small Group Research, 28, 414–423.
  • Buzzanell, P. M. (1997). Toward an emotion-based feminist framework for research on dual career couples. Women and Language, 20(2), 40–48.
  • Buzzanell, P. M. (2000). The promise and practice of the new career and social contract: Illusions exposed and suggestions for reform. In P. M. Buzzanell (Ed.), Rethinking organizational and managerial communication from feminist perspectives (pp. 209–235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Buzzanell, P. M. (2001, November). Maternity leave discourse: A feminist standpoint analysis of different women’s experiences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Atlanta, GA.
  • Buzzanell, P. M., & Goldzwig, S. (1991). Linear and nonlinear career models: Metaphors, paradigms, and ideologies. Management Communication Quarterly, 4, 466–505.
  • Buzzanell, P. M., & Turner, L. H. (in press). Emotion work revealed by job loss discourse: Backgrounding-foregrounding of feelings, construction of normalcy, and (re)instituting of traditional masculinities. Journal of Applied Communication Research.
  • Cameron, D., Frazer, E., Harvey, P., Rampton, B., & Richardson, K. (1993). Ethics, advocacy, and empowerment: Issues of method in researching language. Language and Communication, 13, 81–94.
  • Caproni, P. (1997). Work/life balance: You can’t get there from here. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 33, 46–56.
  • Chiles, A. M., & Zorn, T. E. (1995). Empowerment in organizations: Employees’ perceptions of the influences on empowerment. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 1–25.
  • Chow, E. N., & Berheide, C. W. (1988). The interdependence of family and work: A framework for family life education, policy, and practice. Family Relations, 37, 23–28.
  • Ciulla, J. (2000). The working life: The promise and betrayal of modern work. New York: Crown.
  • Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53, 747–770.
  • Clinton, H. R. (1996). It takes a village: And other lessons children teach us. NewYork: Simon & Schuster.
  • Coontz, S. (1992). The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap. New York: Basic Books.
  • Covin, T. J., & Brush, C. C. (1993). A comparison of student and human resource professional attitudes toward work and family issues. Group & Organization Management, 18, 29–49.
  • Deetz, S. A. (1992). Democracy in the age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Demos, J. (1979). Images of the American family, then and now. In V. Tufte & B. Myerhoff (Eds.), Changing images of the family (pp. 43–60). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Dinnerstein, D. (1976). The mermaid and the minotaur. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Duxbury, L. E., & Higgins, C. A. (1991). Gender differences in work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 60–74.
  • Eagle, B. W., Miles, E. W., & Icenogle, M. L. (1997). Interrole conflicts and the permeability of work and family domains: Are there gender differences? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 168–184.
  • Edley, P., & Bihn, G. (2001, May). How single mothers balance work and family: Identity work and family/friends. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Washington, DC.
  • Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25, 178–199.
  • English-Lueck, J. A. (2002). Cultures@Silicon Valley. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Erickson, F., & Shultz, J. (1977). The counselor as gatekeeper: Social interaction in interviews. New York: Academic Press.
  • Faludi, S. (1991). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Crown.
  • Farley-Lucas, B. (2000). Communicating the (in)visibility of motherhood: Family talk and the ties to motherhood with/in the workplace. Electronic Journal of Communication, 10. Available from http://www.cios.org/www/ejcrec2.htm
  • Fletcher, J., & Bailyn, L. (1996). In M. B. Arthur & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era (pp. 256–267). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Flynn, G. (1996). No spouse, no kids, no respect: Backlash, why single employees are angry. Personnel Journal, 75, 59–69.
  • Fondas, N. (1995). The biological clock confronts complex organizations: Women’s ambivalence about work and implications for feminist management research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 4, 57–65.
  • Friedman, S. D., Christensen, P., & DeGroot, J. (1998, November 1). Work and life: The end of the zero-sum game. Harvard Business Review, 76, 119–129.
  • Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 67–78.
  • Galinsky, E. (1999). Ask the children: What America’s children really think about working parents. New York: Morrow.
  • Galinsky, E., Bond, J. T., & Friedman, D. E. (1993). The changing workforce: Highlights of the national study. New York: Families & Work Institute.
  • Geisler, C., Campbell, N., Deery, J., & Golden, A. (2001). Border crossings: Representation and use of mobile technologies in work-life balance (Unpublished report). Troy, NY: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
  • Gerson, K. (1993). No man’s land: Men’s changing commitments to family and work. New York: Basic Books.
  • Gerstel, N., & Gross, H. E. (Eds.). (1987). Families and work. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: An outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Gilbert, L. A. (1993). Two careers/one family. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Gilbert, L. A. (1994). Current perspectives on dual-career families. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 101–105.
  • Gilbert, L. A., & Rachlin, V. (1987). Mental health and psychological functioning of dual-career families. Counseling Psychologist, 15, 7–49.
  • Goff, S. J., Mount, M. K., & Jamison, R. L. (1990). Employer supported childcare, work/family conflict, and absenteeism: A field study. Personnel Psychology, 43, 793–809.
  • Goldberger, N., Tarule, J., Clinchy, B., & Belenky, M. (Eds.). (1996). Knowledge, difference, and power: Essays inspired by women’s ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books.
  • Golden, A. G. (2000). What we talk about when we talk about work and family: A discourse analysis of parental accounts. Electronic Journal of Communication, 10(3). Available from http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/v10n3400.htm
  • Golden, A. G. (2001). Modernity and the communicative management of multiple role-identities: The case of the worker-parent. Journal of Family Communication, 1, 233–264.
  • Golden, A. G. (2002). Speaking of work and family: Spousal collaboration on defining role-identities and developing shared meanings. Southern Communication Journal, 67, 122–141.
  • Gonyea, J. G., & Googins, B. K. (1992). Linking the worlds of work and family: Beyond the productivity trap. Human Resource Management, 31, 209–226.
  • Goodstein, J. D. (1994). Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: Employer involvement in work-family issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 350–382.
  • Gove, W. R., & Zeiss, C. (1987). Multiple roles and happiness. In F. J. Crosby (Ed.), Spouse, parent, worker (pp. 125–137). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Graham, L. D. (1999). Domesticating efficiency: Lillian Gilbreth’s scientific management of home-makers, 1924–1930. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 24, 633–675.
  • Greenberger, E., & O’Neil, R. (1993). Spouse, parent, worker: Role commitments and role-related experiences in the construction of well-being. Developmental Psychology, 29, 181–197.
  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88.
  • Gregory, K. W. (2001). “Don’t sweat the small stuff’: Employee identity work in the new economy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, Tampa.
  • Grossman, H. Y., & Chester, N. L. (Eds.). (1990). The experience and meaning of work in women’s lives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Grover, S. L., & Crooker, K. J. (1995). Who appreciates family-responsive human resource policies: The impact of family-friendly policies on the organizational attachment of parents and non-parents. Personnel Psychology, 48, 271–288.
  • Grzywacz, J. G., & Marks, N. F. (2000). Reconceptualizing the work-family interface: An ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 111–126.
  • Gutek, B. A., Searle, S., & Klepa, L. (1991). Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 560–568.
  • Haas, L., & Hwang, P. (1995). Company culture and men’s usage of family leave benefits in Sweden. Family Relations, 44, 28–36.
  • Haas, T., & Deetz, S. (2000). Between the generalized and the concrete other: Approaching organizational ethics from feminist perspectives. In P. M. Buzzanell (Ed.), Rethinking organizational and managerial communication from feminist perspectives (pp. 24–46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hall, D. T. (1990). Promoting work/family balance: An organization-change approach. Organizational Dynamics, 18, 4–18.
  • Hall, D. T. (Ed.). (1996). The career is dead—Long live the career: A relational approach to careers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Hardill, I., & MacDonald, S. (1998). Choosing to relocate: An examination of the impact of expatriate work on dual-career households. Women’s Studies International Forum, 21, 21–29.
  • Harding, S. (1991). Whose science whose knowledge: Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Harre, R. (1984). Personal being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hartsock, N. (1998). The feminist standpoint revisited and other essays. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Heacock, D., & Spicer, C. H. (1986). Communication and the dual career: A literature assessment. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 51, 260–266.
  • Hessing, M. (1992). Talking on the job: Office conversations and women’s dual labour. In G. Creese & V. Strong-Boag (Eds.), British Columbia reconsidered: Essays on women (pp. 391–415). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Britims Gang.
  • Higgins, C., Duxbury, L., & Lee, C. (1994). Impact of life-cycle stage and gender on the ability to balance work and family responsibilities. Family Relations, 43, 144–150.
  • Hobfoll, S. E., & Hobfoll, I. H. (1994). The dual career couple’s survival guide: Work won’t love you back. New York: W. H. Freeman.
  • Hochschild, A. R (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Hochschild, A. R. (1989). The second shift. New York: Avon Books.
  • Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.
  • Honeycutt, T. L., & Rosen, B. (1997). Family friendly human resource policies, salary levels, and salient identity as predictors of organizational attraction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 271–290.
  • Hooks, b. (2000). Feminism is for everybody. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
  • Jacobsen, L., & Edmonson, B. (1993). Father figures. American Demographics, 15, 22–25.
  • Johnson, F. L. (2001). Ideological undercurrents in the semantic notion of “working mothers.” Women & Language, 24, 21–27.
  • Jorgenson, J. (2000). Interpreting the intersections of work and family: Frame conflicts in women’s work. Electronic Journal of Communication, 10. Available from http://www.cios.org/www/ejcrec2.htm
  • Jorgenson, J., Gregory, K. W., & Goodier, B. C. (1997). Working the boundaries: The enfamilied self in the traditional organization. Human Systems, 8, 139–151.
  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Work and family in the United States: A critical review and agenda for research and policy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
  • Kelly, R. F., & Voydanoff, P. (1985). Work/family role strain among employed parents. Family Relations, 34, 367–374.
  • Kim, S. (1998). Toward understanding family leave policy in public organizations: Family leave use and conceptual framework for the family leave implementation process. Public Productivity and Management Review, 22, 71–87.
  • Kingston, P. W. (1989). Studying the work-family connection: Atheoretical progress, ideological bias, and shaky foundations for policy. In E. B. Goldsmith (Ed.), Work and family: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 55–60). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Kinnier, R. T., Katz, E. C., & Berry, M. A. (1991). Successful resolutions to the career-versus-family conflict. Journal of Counseling & Development, 69, 439–444.
  • Kirby, E. L. (2000a). Communicating organizational tension: Balancing work and family. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska at Lincoln.
  • Kirby, E. L. (2000b). Should I do as you say, or do as you do?: Mixed messages about work and family. Electronic Journal of Communication, 10. Available from http://www.cios.org/www/ejcrec2.htm
  • Kirby, E. L. (2001, May). Blurring personal and professional boundaries: Perceptions of men and women regarding talking about family and personal life at work. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Washington, DC.
  • Kirby, E. L. (2002, March). “Gendering” careers: Discourses about work versus family at Regulators. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western States Communication Association, Long Beach, CA.
  • Kirby, E. L., & Krone, K. J. (2002). “The policy exists but you can’t really use it”: Communication and the structuration of work-family policies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 50–77.
  • Kolb, D. M. (1992). Women’s work: Peacemaking in organizations. In D. M. Kolb & J. M. Bartunek (Eds.), Hidden conflict in organizations (pp. 63–91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Kossek, E. E., Dass, P., & DeMarr, B. (1994). The dominant logic of employer-sponsored work and family initiatives: Human resource managers’ institutional role. Human Relations, 47, 1121–1149.
  • Krueger, D. L. (1986). Communication strategies and patterns in dual-career couples. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 51, 274–281.
  • Lamphere, L. (1985). Bringing the family to work: Women’s culture on the shop floor. Feminist Studies, 11, 518–540.
  • Leidner, R. (1991). Serving hamburgers and selling insurance: Gender, work, and identity in interactive service jobs. Gender & Society, 5, 154–177.
  • Levine, J. A. (1991, June 11). The invisible dilemma: Working fathers in corporate America (Testimony at the hearing “Babies and briefcases: Creating a family-friendly workplace for fathers”). Washington, DC: U.S. House of Representatives, Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families.
  • Levine, J. A., & Pittinsky, T. L. (1997). Working fathers: New strategies for balancing work and family. New York: Harcourt.
  • Levine, S. B. (2000). Father courage: What happens when men put family first. New York: Harcourt.
  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Lobel, S . A., & St. Clair, L. (1992). Effects of family responsibilities, gender, and career identity salience on performance outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 1057–1069.
  • Lopata, H. Z. (1993). The interweave of public and private: Women’s challenge to American society. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 176–190.
  • Loscocco, K. A., & Roschelle, A. R. (1991). Influences on the quality of work and nonwork life: Two decades in review. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 39, 182–225.
  • Luxton, M. (1980). More than a labor of love: Three generations of women’s work in the home. Toronto, ON, Canada: Women’s Press.
  • MacDermid, S. M., Williams, M., & Marks, S. (1994). Is small beautiful? Work family tension, work conditions, and organizational size. Family Relations, 43, 159–167.
  • Mallia, K. L., & Ferris, S. P. (2000). Telework: A consideration of its impact on individuals and organizations. Electronic Journal of Communication, 10. Available from http://www.cios.org/www/ejcrec2.htm
  • Marks, S. R., & MacDermid, S. M. (1996). Multiple roles and the self: A theory of role balance. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 417–432.
  • Martin, J. (1990). Deconstructing organizational taboos: The suppression of gender conflict in organizations. Organization Science, 1, 339–357.
  • McCall, G., & Simmons, J. L. (1978). Identities and interactions. New York: Free Press.
  • Medved, C. E. (2000, November). A feminist standpoint challenge to women’s career development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Seattle, WA.
  • Medved, C. E. (2002). The everyday accomplishment of work and family routines: Practical actions and commonsense rules as building blocks for theorizing about communication. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Milkie, M. A., & Peltola, P. (1999). Playing all the roles: Gender and the work-family balancing act. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 476–490.
  • Milliken, F., Dutton, J., & Beyer, J. (1990). Understanding the organizational adaptation to change: The case of work-family issues. Human Resource Planning, 13, 91–107.
  • Miranda, F. J., & Murphy, B. E. (Eds.). (1993). Work-family: Redefining the business case. New York: Conference Board.
  • Mirchandani, K. (1998). Protecting the boundary: Teleworker insights on the expansive concept of “work.” Gender and Society, 12, 168–187.
  • Morgan, H., & Milliken, F. J. (1992). Keys to action: Understanding differences in organizations’ responsiveness to work-and-family issues. Human Resource Management, 31, 227–248.
  • Mumby, D. K. (1988). Communication and power in organizations: Discourse, ideology, and domination. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Mumby, D. K. (1998). Organizing men: Power, discourse, and the social construction of masculinity(s) in the workplace. Communication Theory, 8, 164–183.
  • Mumby, D. K., & Stohl, C. (1996). Disciplining organizational communication studies. Management Communication Quarterly, 10, 50–72.
  • Munck, B. (2001, November 1). Changing a culture of face time. Harvard Business Review, 79, 125–131.
  • Murphy, A. G. (1998). Hidden transcripts of flight attendant resistance. Management Communication Quarterly, 11, 499–535.
  • Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation of work-family conflict and family-work conflict scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 400–410.
  • Nippert-Eng, C. (1996). Home and work: Negotiating the boundaries through everyday life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • O’Brien-Hallstein, D. L. (2000). Where standpoint stands now: An introduction and commentary. Women’s Studies in Communication, 23, 1–15.
  • O’Keefe, B. (1997). [Review of the book Home and work: Negotiating boundaries through everyday life]. Communication Theory, 7, 186–188.
  • O’Neil, R., & Greenberger, E. (1994). Patterns of commitment to work and parenting: Implications for role strain. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 101–112.
  • Orthner, D. K., & Pittman, J. F. (1986). Family contributions to work commitment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 573–581.
  • Osmond, M. W. (1996). Work-family linkages in early industrialization: The public-private split. In P. J. Dubeck & K. Borman (Eds.), Women and work: A handbook (pp. 385–391). New York: Garland.
  • Pacanowsky, M. (1988). Communication in the empowering organization. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 11 (pp. 356–379). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Papa, M. J., Singhal, A., Ghanekar, D. V., & Papa, W. H. (2000). Organizing for social change through cooperative action: The [dis]empowering dimensions of women’s communication. Communication Theory, 10, 90–123.
  • Perlow, L. A. (1995). Putting the work back into work/family. Group and Organization Management, 20, 227–239.
  • Perlow, L. A. (1997). Finding time: How corporations, individuals, and families can benefit from new work practices. Ithaca, NY: Industrial & Labor Relations Press.
  • Perlow, L. A. (1998). Boundary control: The social ordering of work and family time in a high-tech corporation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 328–357.
  • Perry-Jenkins, M., Repetti, R. L., & Crouter, A. C. (2000). Work and family in the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 981–998.
  • Pleck, J. H. (1985). Working wives/working husbands. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Pleck, J. H. (1993). Are family-supportive employer policies relevant to men? In J. C. Hood (Ed.), Men, work, and family (pp. 217–237). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Putnam, L. L., Phillips, N., & Chapman, P. (1996). Metaphors of communication and organization. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 375–408). London: Sage.
  • Raabe, P., & Gessner, J. (1988). Employer family-supportive policies: Diverse variations on a theme. Family Relations, 37, 196–202.
  • Rakow, L. F. (1992). Gender on the line: Women, the telephone, and community life. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  • Rapoport, R., & Bailyn, L. (1996). Relinking life and work: Toward a better future. New York: Ford Foundation.
  • Ray, E. B., & Miller, K. I. (1994). Social support, home/work stress, and burnout: Who can help? Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 30, 357–373.
  • Rees-Edwards, M. R. (1997, November). The problems employed mothers face: A call for communication research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Rees-Edwards, M. R., & Kline, S. L. (2001, May). The problems of employed mothers and their experience of spousal support: A research summary. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Washington, DC.
  • Renshaw, J. R. (1976). An exploration of the dynamics of the overlapping worlds of work and family. Family Process, 15, 143–165.
  • Rexroat, C., & Shehan, C. (1987). The family life cycle and spouses’ time in housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 737–750.
  • Richter, J. (1990). Crossing boundaries between professional and private life. In H. Grossman & N. Chester (Eds.), The experience and meaning of work in women’s lives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Rosenbluth, S. C., Steil, J. M., & Whitcomb, J. (1998). Marital equality: What does it mean? Journal of Family Issues, 19, 227–244.
  • Rosenfeld, L. B., Bowen, G. L., & Richman, J. M. (1995). Communication in three types of dual-career marriages. In M. A. Fitzpatrick & A. L. Vangelisti (Eds.), Explaining family interactions (pp. 257289). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Rosenfeld, L. B., & Welsh, S. M. (1985). Differences in self-disclosure in dual-career and single-career marriages. Communication Monographs, 52, 253–263.
  • Russo, T. C. (1998, November). Separation and integration of work and personal lives among home-based teleworkers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, New York.
  • Sandberg, J. C. (1999). The effects of family obligations and workplace resources on men’s and women’s use of family leaves. In T. L. Parcel (Ed.), Research in the sociology of work: Work and family. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
  • Schor, J. B. (1991). The overworked American: The unexpected decline of leisure. NewYork: Basic Books.
  • Schroedel, J. R. (1990). Blue-collar women: Paying the price at home and on the job. In H. Y. Grossman & N. L. Chester (Eds.), The experience and meaning of work in women’s lives (pp. 241–260). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Seery, B., & Crowley, M. S. (2000). Women’s emotion work in the family: Relationship management and the process of building father-child relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 100–127.
  • Shellenbarger, S. (1992). Lessons from the workplace: How corporate policies and attitudes lag behind workers’ changing needs. Human Resource Management, 31, 157–169.
  • Sigel, R. S. (1996). Ambition and accommodation: How women view gender relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Silberstein, L. R. (1992). Dual-career marriage: A system in transition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Sillars, A. L. (1995). Communication and family culture. In M. A. Fitzpatrick & A. L. Vangelisti (Eds.), Explaining family interactions (pp. 375–399). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Sloan Foundation. (n.d.). Work-family researchers electronic network. Retrieved February 6, 2002, from http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/wfnetwork/
  • Smith, D. E. (1993). The standard North American family: SNAF as an ideological code. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 50–65.
  • Sotirin, P., Buzzanell, P. M., Turner, L., Sullivan, P., & Rosback, K. (2001). Family teams on The Oprah Winfrey Show: Resisting corporate colonization of our families and our selves. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Spradlin, A. (1998). The price of “passing:” Lesbian perspectives on authenticity in organizations. Management Communication Quarterly, 11, 598–605.
  • Stamp, G. H. (1994). The appropriation of the parental role through communication during the transition to parenthood. Communication Monographs, 61, 89–112.
  • Stephen, T. (1994). Communication in the shifting context of intimacy: Marriage, meaning, and modernity. Communication Theory, 4, 191–218.
  • Thomas, R. J. (1989). Blue-collar careers: Interests, networks, and environments. In M. B. Arthur, D. T. Hall, & B. S. Lawrence (Eds.), Handbook of career theory (pp. 354–379). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Thorne, B. (1992). Rethinking the family: Some feminist questions. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
  • Trethewey, A. (1997). Resistance, identity, and empowerment: A postmodern feminist analysis of clients in a human service organization. Communication Monographs, 64, 281–301.
  • U.S. Census Bureau. (1998). March update, household and families characteristics. Available from http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/cb98–228.html
  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2001). Profiles of general demographic characteristics: 2000 Census of Population and Housing. U.S. Department of Commerce. Available from http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hh-fam.html
  • Voydanoff, P. (1989). Work and family: A review and expanded conceptualization. In E. B. Goldsmith (Ed.), Work and family: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 1–22). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Warren, J. A., & Johnson, P. J. (1995). The impact of workplace support on work-family role strain. Family Relations, 44, 163–169.
  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151.
  • Williams, J. (2000). Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Williams, K. J., & Alliger, G. M. (1994). Role stressors, mood spillover, and perceptions of work-family conflict in employed parents. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 837–868.
  • Wood, J. T. (1986). Maintaining dual-career bonds: Communicative dimensions of internally structured relationships. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 51, 267–273.
  • Wood, J. T. (1994). Who cares? Women, care, and culture. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Woods, J. D. (1993). The corporate closet: The professional lives of gay men in America. New York: Free Press.
  • Young, M. (1996). Career issues for single adults without dependent children. In D. T. Hall (Ed.), The career is dead—Long live the career: A relational approach to careers (pp. 196–222). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.