Credibility for the 21st Century: Integrating Perspectives on Source, Message, and Media Credibility in the Contemporary Media Environment

References

• Abel, J. D., & Wirth, M. O. (1977). Newspapers vs. TV credibility for local news. Journalism Quarterly, 54, 371–375.
   Google Scholar
• Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. (1999). Criteria for assessing the quality of health information on the Internet—policy paper. Retrieved April 24, 2002 from http://www.ahcpr.gov/data/infoqual.htm
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, J. E., & Tate, M. A. (1999). Web wisdom: How to evaluate and create information quality on the Web. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Newspaper Editors. (1985). Newspaper credibility: Building reader trust. Washington DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Andreoli, V., & Worchel, S. (1978). Effects of media, communicator, and message position on attitude change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, D. R., Brady, S., & Casas, J. M. (1981). Sexual preference similarity, attitude similarity, and perceived counselor credibility and attractiveness. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 504–509.
   Google Scholar
• Aune, R. K., & Kikuchi, T. (1993). Effects of language intensity similarity on perceptions of credibility, relational attributions, and persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 224–237.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, E. W., & Dong, Q. (1994). Source v. content effects on judgments of news believability. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 973–983.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, F. T. (1979). Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 241–252.
   Google Scholar
• Begg, I. M., Anas, A., & Farinacci, S. (1992). Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 446–458.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (1987). Argumentation and credibility appeals in persuasion. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 52, 181–197.
   Google Scholar
• Berlo, D. K., Lemert, J. B., & Mertz, R. J. (1969). Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33, 563–576.
   Google Scholar
• Bobinski, G. S., Jr., Cox, D., & Cox, A. (1996). Retail “sale” advertising, perceived retailer credibility, and price rationale. Journal of Retailing, 72, 291–306.
   Google Scholar
• Boehm, L. E. (1994). The validity effect: A search for mediating variables. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 285–293.
   Google Scholar
• Bradac, J. J., Bowers, J. W., & Courtright, J. A. (1980). Lexical variations in intensity, immediacy, and diversity: An axiomatic theory and causal model. In R. N. St. Clair & H. Giles (Eds.), The social and psychological contexts of language (pp. 193–223). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, D. S. (1996). Evaluating information on the Internet. Computers in Libraries, 16, 44–46.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. N., Freeman, K. E., & Williamson, C. L. (2000). The importance of critical thinking for student use of the Internet. College Student Journal, 34, 391–398.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, G. C., & Kumar, A. (2000). Webpage background and viewer attitudes. Journal of Advertising Research, 40, 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Burbules, N. C. (1998). Rhetorics of the Web: Hyperreading and critical literacy. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 102–122). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Bengtsson, B., Cederberg, C., Lundeberg, M., & Allspach, L. (2000). Interactivity in human-computer interaction: A study of credibility, understanding, and influence. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 553–574.
   Google Scholar
• Burrell, N. A., & Koper, R. J. (1998). The efficacy of powerful/powerless language on attitudes and source credibility. In M. Allen & R. W. Preiss (Eds.), Persuasion: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 203–215). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (1969). Attitudes and attraction. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 34–89). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, R. F., & Greenberg, B. S. (1965). Newspapers or television: Which do you believe? Journalism Quarterly, 42, 29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Caruso, D. (1999, November 22). Digital commerce: After a year on the credibility trail, a columnist finds that the Internet industry is still dangerously self-indulgent. The New York Times, p. C5.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, S. A. (2001). Communicating trust in e-commerce interactions. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 653–658.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffee, S. H. (1982). Mass media and interpersonal channels: Competitive, convergent, or complementary? In G. Gumpert & R. Cathcart (Eds.), Inter/Media: Interpersonal communication in a media world (pp. 57–77). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffee, S. H. (2001). Studying the new communication of politics. Political Communication, 18, 237–244.
   Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran, R. (1999, May 13). SEC targets more online investment scams. Washington Post, p. E1.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, L. K. H., & Lemert, J. B. (1968). The invisible newsman and other factors in media competition. Journalism Quarterly, 45, 436–444.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., & Wells, W. D. (1999). Attitude toward the site. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(5), 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, H., & Griffiths, K. M. (2000). The Internet and mental health literacy. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 34, 975–979.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. (1984). Influence: The new psychology of modern persuasion. New York: Quill.
   Google Scholar
• Cline, R. W., & Engel, J. L. (1991). College students’ perceptions of sources of information about AIDS. Journal of American College Health, 40(2), 55–63.
   Google Scholar
• Cortes, C. E. (1992). Media literacy: An educational basic for the information age. Education and Urban Society, 24, 489–497.
   Google Scholar
• Cronkhite, G., & Liska, J. (1976). A critique of factor analytic approaches to the study of credibility. Speech Monographs, 43, 91–107.
   Google Scholar
• Culnan, M. J., & Armstrong, P. K. (1999). Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organization Science, 10(1), 104–115.
   Google Scholar
• December, J., & Randall, N. (1994). The World Wide Web: Unleashed. Indianapolis, IN: Sams Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Delia, J. G. (1976). A constructivist analysis of the concept of credibility. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 62, 361–375.
   Google Scholar
• Dellaert, B., & Kahn, B. E. (1999). How tolerable is delay? Consumers’ evaluations of Internet Web sites after waiting. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 13, 41–54.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Eastin, M. S. (2001). Credibility assessments of online health information: The effects of source expertise and knowledge of content. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(4). Retrieved January 12, 2002, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue4/eastin.html
   Google Scholar
• Edelstein, A. S. (1978). An alternative approach to the study of source effects in mass communication. Communications, 4, 71–90.
   Google Scholar
• Eighmey, J., & McCord, L. (1998). Adding value in the information age: Uses and gratifications of sites on the World Wide Web. Journal of Business Research, 41, 187–194.
   Google Scholar
• Erskine, H. (1970). The polls: Opinion of the news media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 630–643.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2000). Perceptions of Internet information credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 515–540.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2001). Internet use in the contemporary media environment. Human Communication Research, 27, 153–181.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2002a). The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification behaviors on the perceived credibility of Web-based information. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2002b). The perceived credibility of personal Web page information as influenced by the sex of the source. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Fleshler, H., Ilardo, J., & Demoretcky, J. (1974). The influence of field dependence, speaker credibility set, and message documentation on evaluations of speaker and message credibility. The Southern Speech Communication Journal, 39, 389–402.
   Google Scholar
• Fogg, B. J., Marshall, J., Kameda, T., Solomon, J., Rangnekar, A., Boyd, J., et al. (2001a). Web credibility research: A method for online experiments and early study results. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Fogg, B. J., Marshall, J., Laraki, O., Osipovich, A., Varma, C., Fang, N., et al. (2001b). What makes Web sites credible? A report on a large quantitative study. CHI 2001, ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI Letters, 3(1), 61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Frazee, V. (1996). Internet literacy is the key to career success. Personnel Journal, 75, 24.
   Google Scholar
• Gannett Center for Media Studies. (1985). The media and the people: Soundings from two communities. New York: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Gantz, W. (1981). The influence of researcher methods on television and newspaper news credibility evaluations. Journal of Broadcasting, 25, 155–169.
   Google Scholar
• Gass, R. H., & Seiter, J. S. (1999). Persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Gaziano, C. (1988). How credible is the credibility crisis? Journalism Quarterly, 65, 267–278.
   Google Scholar
• Gaziano, C., & McGrath, K. (1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63, 451–462.
   Google Scholar
• Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B. A., & Newell, S. J. (2000). The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements and brands. Journal of Advertising, 29, 43–54.
   Google Scholar
• GomdaWeb. (1998). Perceptions of reliability. Retrieved July 24, 2001, from http://www.stanford.edu/class/comm217/reliability/perceptions
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, B. S. (1966). Media use and believability: Some multiple correlates. Journalism Quarterly, 43, 665–671.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, B. S., & Roloff, M. E. (1974, November). Mass media credibility: Research results and critical issues. News Research Bulletin of the American Newspaper Publishers Association, 6, 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, K. M., & Christensen, H. (2000). Quality of web based information on treatment of depression: Cross sectional survey. British Medical Journal, 321, 1511–1515.
   Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C. (1988). Attitude extremity and trust in media. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 279–287.
   Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C. (1992). Biased press or biased public? Attitudes toward media coverage of social groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 147–167.
   Google Scholar
• Gurak, L. J. (2001). Cyberliteracy: Navigating the Internet with awareness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, J. (2001, May). Questioning Internet credibility: A test on the cyber marketplace. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Haley, E. (1996). Exploring the construct of organization as source: Consumers’ understanding of organizational sponsorship of advocacy advertising. Journal of Advertising, 25, 19–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. A. (1998). Message variables that mediate and moderate the effect of equivocal language on source credibility. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 109–143.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. A., & Hunter, J. E. (1998a). A framework for understanding: Meta-analysis of the persuasion literature. In M. Allen & R. W. Preiss (Eds.), Persuasion: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 1–28). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. A., & Hunter, J. E. (1998b). The effect of language intensity on receiver evaluations of message, source, and topic. In M. Allen & R. W. Preiss (Eds.), Persuasion: Advances through metaanalysis (pp. 99–138). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, S. (1987). Health advertising: The credibility of organizational sources. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 613–628). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C. (1996). An Internet education: A guide to doing research on the Internet. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, S. (1998). Credibility: Does it drive the bottom line? Retrieved July 24, 2001, from http://www.nas.org
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, R. (1998). Literacy in the information age. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, & S. B. Heath (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 7–14). NewYork: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, J. J. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635–650.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, M. P., & Alessi, N. E. (1996). The Internet and the future of psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 861–869.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, H. K. (1969). Mass media believability: A study of receiver judgments. Journalism Quarterly, 46, 20–28.
   Google Scholar
• Jadad, A. R., & Gagliardi, A. (1998). Rating health information on the Internet: Navigating to knowledge or to Babel? Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 611–614.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (1998). Cruising is believing?: Comparing Internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 325–340.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2000). Using is believing: The influence of reliance on the credibility of online political information among politically interested Internet users. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 865–879.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2002). Webelievability: A path model examining how convenience and reliance predict online credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 619–642.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. (1998). Exploring the Internet: Using critical thinking skills. New York: Neal-Schuman.
   Google Scholar
• Jurma, W. E. (1981). Evaluations of credibility of the source of a message. Psychological Reports, 49, 778.
   Google Scholar
• Kapoun, J. (1998). Teaching undergrads WEB evaluation: A guide for library instruction. Retrieved June 25, 2001, from http://www.ala.org/acrl/undwebev.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kasper-Fuehrer, E. C., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2001). Communicating trustworthiness and building trust in interorganizational virtual organizations. Journal of Management, 27, 235–254.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. T, Weaver, D., & Willnat, L. (2001). Media reporting and perceived credibility of online polls. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 846–864.
   Google Scholar
• Kiousis, S. (2001). Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the Information Age. Mass Communication & Society, 4, 381–403.
   Google Scholar
• Kubey, R. (Ed.). (1997). Media literacy in the information age: Current perspectives. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Lafferty, B. A., & Goldsmith, R. E. (1999). Corporate credibility role in consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus low credibility endorser is used in the ad. Journal of Business Research, 44, 109–116.
   Google Scholar
• Leathers, D. G. (1992). Successful nonverbal communication: Principles and applications. New York: Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. S. (1978). Credibility of newspaper and TV news. Journalism Quarterly, 55, 282–287.
   Google Scholar
• Lowery, S. A., & DeFleur, M. L. (1995). Milestones in mass communication research: Media effects (3rd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lubans, J. (1999). Students and the Internet. Retrieved July 23, 2001, from http://www.lib.duke.edu/staff/orgnztn/lubans/docs/study3.htm
   Google Scholar
• Luchok, J. A., & McCroskey, J. C. (1978). The effect of quality of evidence on attitude change and source credibility. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 43, 371–383.
   Google Scholar
• Lui, L., & Standing, L. (1989). Communicator credibility: Trustworthiness defeats expertness. Social Behavior and Personality, 17, 219–221.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, J., Wyatt, R., Gaines, J., Pearce, R., & Vanden Bergh, B. (1978). How source affects responses to public service announcements. Journalism Quarterly, 55, 716–720.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53, 48–65.
   Google Scholar
• Mashek, J. W. (1997). Lethargy ‘96: How the media covered a listless campaign. Arlington, VA: The Freedom Forum.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. (1966). Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs, 33, 65–72.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. (1967, December). Studies of the effects of evidence in persuasive communication (SCRL 4–67). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Speech Communication Research Library.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. (1969). A summary of experimental research on the effects of evidence in persuasive communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 55, 169–176.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., Holdridge, W., & Toomb, J. K. (1974). An instrument for measuring the source credibility of basic speech communication instructors. Speech Teacher, 23, 26–33.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Jenson, T. A. (1975). Image of mass media news sources. Journal of Broadcasting, 19, 169–181.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Mehrley, R. S. (1969). The effects of disorganization and nonfluency on attitude change and source credibility. Speech Monographs, 36, 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, P. (1988). Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 567–574.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, T. J. (1974). Media credibility: The state of the research. Public Telecommunications Review, 2, 48–56.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. T., & Hoppe, R. A. (1973). The effect of regional similarity-dissimilarity on communicator credibility. Language and Speech, 16, 211–217.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. R., & Hewgill, M. A. (1964). The effect of variations in nonfluency on audience ratings of source credibility. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 50, 36–44.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M., & Ogan, C. (1996). The Internet as mass medium. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 39–49.
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, R. (1980). Media credibility: A use-gratifications approach. Journalism Quarterly, 57, 474–477.
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, R. (1981). A log-linear analysis of media credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 58, 635–638.
   Google Scholar
• Nadarajan, B., & Ang, P. (1999, August). Credibility and journalism on the Internet: How online newspapers handle errors and corrections. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• National Consumers’ League. (2000). National Consumers League warns consumers millions are lost to Internet fraud. Retrieved June 15, 2001, from http://www.fraud.org/internet/99final.htm
   Google Scholar
• Newhagen, J., & Nass, C. (1989). Differential criteria for evaluating credibility of newspapers and TV news. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 277–284.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (1999). Trust or bust: Communicating trustworthiness in Web design. Retrieved June 23, 2001, from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990307.html
   Google Scholar
• Null, C. (January 2000). Web of lies: Your online credibility faces an uphill battle. PC/Computing, 13, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19, 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Ohanian, R. (1991). The impact of celebrity spokespersons’ perceived image on consumers’ intention to purchase. Journal of Advertising Research, 31, 46–54.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (1990). Persuasion: Theory and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Online News Association. (2001). Digital journalism credibility survey. Retrieved June 25, 2001, from http://www.journalists.org/Programs/ResearchText.htm
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., III, & Roberts, K. H. (1976). Relationships among components of credibility and communication behaviors in work units. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 99–102.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, J. W., Bailey, J. P., & Faraj, S. (2000). The role of intermediaries in the development of trust on the WWW: The use and prominence of third-parties and privacy statements. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 5(3), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. (1993). The dynamics of persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1988). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–203.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (1999). The Internet news audience goes ordinary. Retrieved June 24, 2001, from http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=72
   Google Scholar
• Potter, W. J. (1998). Media literacy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, F. C., & Wanzenried, J. W. (1995). Do current measures of dimensions of source credibility produce stable outcomes in replicated tests? Perceptual & Motor Skills, 81, 675–687.
   Google Scholar
• Reagan, J., & Zenalty, J. (1979). Local news credibility: Newspapers vs. TV news revisited. Journalism Quarterly, 56, 168–172.
   Google Scholar
• Reinard, J. C. (1988). The empirical study of the persuasive effects of evidence: The status after fifty years of research. Human Communication Research, 15, 3–59.
   Google Scholar
• Rieh, S. Y., & Belkin, N. J. (1998). Understanding judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the WWW. Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences, 35, 279–289.
   Google Scholar
• Rimmer, T., & Weaver, D. (1987). Different questions, different answers? Media use and media credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 64, 28–36.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. J., & Kohut, A. (1988). Believability and the press. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 174–189.
   Google Scholar
• Roper Organization. (1991). America’s watching: Public attitudes toward television. New York: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, D. J. (1998). Driver education for the information superhighway: How adult learners and practitioners use the Internet. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, P. I. (1971). Specificity, verifiability, and message credibility. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 57, 393–401.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. M. (1994). Source credibility scale—Berlo. In R. B. Rubin, P. Palmgreen, & H. E. Sypher (Eds.), Communication research measures: A sourcebook (pp. 327–331). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin R. B. (1994). Source credibility scale—McCroskey. In R. B. Rubin, P. Palmgreen, & H. E. Sypher (Eds.), Communication research measures: A sourcebook (pp. 332–337). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sargent, L. W. (1965). Communicator image and news reception. Journalism Quarterly, 42, 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Saul, A. (1999). Newspapers’ brand strength gives online information credibility. Retrieved April 23, 2001, from http://www.gannett.com/go/newswatch/99/july/nw0702–1/htm
   Google Scholar
• Schenkman, B. N., & Jonsson, F. U. (2000). Aesthetics and preferences of Web pages. Behaviour and Information Technology, 19(5), 367–377.
   Google Scholar
• Schweiger, W. (2000). Media credibility—Experience or image? A survey on the credibility of the World Wide Web in Germany in comparison to other media. European Journal of Communication, 15, 37–59.
   Google Scholar
• Self, C. C. (1996). Credibility. In M. B. Salwen & D. W. Stacks (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 421–441). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, H., & McClung, T. (1966). Effects of organization on the speaker’s ethos. Speech Monographs, 33, 182–183.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, D. (1998, August 6). New media playing field opens ways to more errors. Los Angeles Times, p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, E. F. (1973). Media credibility: Taking the measure of a measure. Journalism Quarterly, 50, 306–311.
   Google Scholar
• Shon, J., Marshall, J., & Musen, M. A. (2000). The impact of displayed awards on the credibility retention of Web site information. In Proceedings of the 2000 American Medical Informatics Association Symposium (pp. 794–798). Bethesda, MD: American Medical Informatics Association.
   Google Scholar
• Silberg, W. M., Lundberg, G. D., & Musacchio, R. A. (1997). Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor—let the reader and viewer beware. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, 1244–1246.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, J. (1999, July 30). FTC enforcer aggressively targets online fraud. Wall Street Journal, p. A20.
   Google Scholar
• Singletary, M. W. (1976). Components of credibility of a favorable news source. Journalism Quarterly, 53, 316–319.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (1997). How message evaluation and source attributes may influence credibility assessment and belief change. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 974–991.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. G. (1997). Testing the surf: Criteria for evaluating Internet information resources. The Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 8. Retrieved April 25, 2001, from http://www.aut.ac.nz/depts/commstud/theory/smith.htm
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. G. (1978). The message measurement inventory: A profile for communication analysis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, I. (1998). Page to screen. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. xx-xxxvi). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Soreno, K. K., & Hawkins, G. J. (1967). The effects of variations in speakers’ nonfluency upon audience ratings of attitude toward the speech topic and speakers’ credibility. Speech Monographs, 34, 58–64.
   Google Scholar
• Stamm, K., & Dube, R. (1994). The relationship of attitudinal components to trust in media. Communication Research, 21, 105–123.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, J. S., Bruner, G. C., & Kumar, A. (2000). Webpage background and viewer attitudes. Journal of Advertising Research, 40, 29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (1998). Effect of source attribution on perceptions of online news stories. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 55–68.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (1999). Exploring receivers’ criteria for perception of print and online news. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 373–386.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., & Nass, C. (2000). Source orientation in human-computer interaction: Programmer, networker, or independent social actor? Communication Research, 27, 683–703.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., & Nass, C. (2001). Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication, 51, 52–72.
   Google Scholar
• Tichenor, P., Donohue, G., & Olien, C. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 159–170.
   Google Scholar
• Times Mirror Company. (1986). The people and the press: A Times Mirror investigation of public attitudes toward the news media. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, S., & Fogg, B. J. (1999). Credibility and computing technology. Communications of the ACM, 42, 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce. (October, 2000). Falling through the net: Toward digital inclusion, a report on Americans’ access to technology. Available from National Telecommunications and Information Administration Web site, http://digitaldivide.gov/reports.htm
   Google Scholar
• Vanden Bergh, B. G., Soley, L. C., & Reid, L. N. (1981). Factor study of dimensions of advertiser credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 58, 629–632.
   Google Scholar
• Wanta, W., & Hu, Y.W. (1994). The effects of credibility, reliance, and exposure on media agenda-setting: A path analysis model. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 90–98.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzenried, J. W., & Powell, F. C. (1993). Source credibility and dimensional stability: A test of the Leathers personal credibility scale using perceptions of three presidential candidates. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 77, 403–406.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, M. (1997). Surfing for the suckers. New Scientist, 156, 29.
   Google Scholar
• West, M. D. (1994). Validating a scale for the measurement of credibility: A covariance structure modeling approach. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Westley, B. H., & Severin, W. J. (1964). Some correlates of media credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 41, 325–335.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J. L. (1968). Factors of source credibility. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 54, 59–63.
   Google Scholar
• Widgery, R. N., & Webster, B. (1969). The effects of physical attractiveness upon perceived initial credibility. Michigan Speech Association Journal, 4, 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (1975). Television: Technology and cultural form. New York: Schoken.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. E., & Howard, D. M. (1978). Public perception of media accuracy. Journalism Quarterly, 55, 73–76.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. J., & Sherrell, D. L. (1993). Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 21, 101–112.
   Google Scholar
• Witmer, D. (1998). Introduction to computer-mediated communication: A master syllabus for teaching communication technology. Communication Education, 47, 162–173.
   Google Scholar
• Worchel, S., Andreoli, V., & Eason, J. (1975). Is the medium the message? A study of the effects of media, communicator, and message characteristics on attitude change. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5, 157–172.
   Google Scholar
• Worthington, R. L., & Atkinson, D. R. (1996). Effects of perceived etiology attribution similarity on client ratings of counselor credibility. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 423–429.
   Google Scholar
• Zanna, M. P., & Del Vecchio, S. M. (1973). Perceived credibility of television news: A matter of viewers’ attitudes and the position taken by the media. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 213–216.
   Google Scholar