Communicating Disability: Metaphors of Oppression, Metaphors of Empowerment

References

• Agne, R., Thompson, T., & Cusella, L. (2000). Stigma in the line of face: Self-disclosure of patients’ HIV status to health care providers. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28, 235–261.
   Google Scholar
• Alston, R., & Mngadi, S. (1992). The interaction between disability status and the African American experience: Implications for rehabilitation counseling. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 23(2), 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. (2000). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Retrieved June 15, 2002, from http://www.bartleby.com/61/
   Google Scholar
• Americans with Disabilities Act. (1990). Public law 336 of the 101st Congress. Retrieved June 16, 2002, from http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., & Martin, M. (1999). The relationship of argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness to cohesion, consensus, and satisfaction in small groups. Communication Reports, 12, 21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Augoustinos, M., & Walker, I. (1995). Social cognition: An integrated introduction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, B. (1984). Motivations for television viewing among deaf and hearing students. American Annals of the Dea f, 129, 17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, B., & Myers, J. (1984). Hearing-impaired viewers of prime-time television. Journal of Communication, 34(4), 60–71.
   Google Scholar
• Axley, S. (1984). Mangerial and organizational communication in terms of the conduit metaphor. Academy of Management Review, 9, 428–437.
   Google Scholar
• Barile, M. (2000). Understanding the personal and political role of multiple minority status. Disability Studies Quarterly, 20, 123–128.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. (1996). Theories of disability and the origins of the oppression of disabled people in western society. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability & society: Emerging issues and insights (pp. 34–60). London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, E. (2001). Textual practices of erasure: Representations of disability and the founding of the United Way. In J. Wilson & C. Lewiecki-Wilson (Eds.), Embodied rhetorics: Disability in language and culture (pp. 169–199). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, L. (1996). Sociology and disability: Some emerging issues. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability & society: Emerging issues and insights (pp. 3–17). London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L., & Travers, M. (1999). Stigma, secrecy, and isolation: The impact of HIV/AIDS on women in an Australian study. In W. Elwood (Ed.), Power in the blood: A handbook on AIDS, politics, and communication (pp. 231–241). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Berube, M. (1998). Foreword: Pressing the claim. In S. Linton (Ed.), Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity (pp. vii-xi). New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biklen, D. (1986). Framed: Journalism’s treatment of disability. Social Policy, 16, 45–51.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, S. E. (1996). CJ’s revenge: Media, folklore, and the cultural construction of AIDS. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 13, 44–58.
   Google Scholar
• Blumberg, L. (1994). Public stripping. In B. Shaw (Ed.), The ragged edge: The disability experience from the pages of the first fifteen years of the disability rag (pp. 74–77). Louisville, KY: Avocado Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonstetter, C. (1986). Magazine coverage of mentally handicapped. Journalism Quarterly, 63, 623–626.
   Google Scholar
• Booth-Butterfield, M., Heare, D., & Booth-Butterfield, S. (1991). The effect of communication anxiety upon signing effectiveness among the profoundly hearing-impaired. Communication Quarterly, 39, 241–250.
   Google Scholar
• Booth-Butterfield, M., & Booth-Butterfield, S.(1994). Communication anxiety and signing effectiveness: Testing an interference model among deaf communicators. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 273–286.
   Google Scholar
• Booth-Butterfield, M., & Booth-Butterfield, S. (1995). The study of anxiety and signing as social science. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 163–166.
   Google Scholar
• Borchert, M. (1998). The challenge of cyberspace: Internet access and persons with disabilities. In E. Bosah (Ed.), Cyberghetto or cybertopia: Race, class and gender on the Internet (pp. 49–63). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D. (1990). From majority to minority: An analysis of cultural change from ablebodied to diabled. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 14, 465–483.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D. (1991). “Just how much did that wheelchair cost?”: Management of privacy boundaries by persons with disabilities. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55, 254–274.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D. (1993, February). Interpretive analyses of how persons with disabilities communicate to manage helping situations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western States Communication Association, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D., & Harter, L. (2000). Communication and the management of dialectical tensions in the personal relationships of people with disabilities. In D. Braithwaite & T. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and people with disabilities (pp. 17–36). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D., & Labrecque, D. (1994). Responding to the Americans with Disabilities Act: Contributions of interpersonal research and training. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 287–294.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D., Waldron, V., & Finn, J. (1999). Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for people with disabilities. Health Communication, 11, 123–151.
   Google Scholar
• Brashers, D., Haas, S., Klingle, R., & Neidig, J. (2000). Collective AIDS activism and individuals’ perceived self-advocacy in physician-patient interaction. Human Communication Research, 26, 372–402.
   Google Scholar
• Brashers, D., Neidig, J., Haas, S., Dobbs, L., Cardillo, L., & Russell, J. (2000). Communication in the management of uncertainty: The case of persons living with HIV or AIDS. Communication Monographs, 67, 63–84.
   Google Scholar
• Brinckerhoff, L., Shaw, S., & McGuire, J. (1992). Promoting access, accommodations, and independence for college students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 417–429.
   Google Scholar
• Brisenden, S. (1986). Independent living and the medical model of disability. Disability, Handicap & Society, 1, 173–178.
   Google Scholar
• Brolley, D., & Anderson, S. (1988). Advertising and attitudes. Journal of Leisure, 15(3), 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. (1991). Conceptualizing and defining disability. In S. Thompson-Hoffman & I. Storck (Eds.), Disability in the United States: A portrait from national data (pp. 1–14). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B., & Caplan, S. (1998). Cognitive complexity. In J. McCroskey, J. Daly, M. Martin, & M. Beatty (Eds.), Communication and personality: Trait perspectives (pp. 233–286). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, E., & Elliott, T. (1985). Feature films and disability: A descriptive study. Rehabilitation Psychology, 30, 47–51.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, K. (1989). Theory regarding attitudes and how they may relate to media portrayals of disability. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 20(4), 36–38.
   Google Scholar
• Cahill, S., & Eggleston, R. (1995). Reconsidering the stigma of physical disability: Wheelchair use and public kindness. Sociological Quarterly, 36, 681–698.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, K., Witte, K., & Nzyuko, S. (1999). Perceptions of condoms and barriers to condom use among the trans-Africa highway in Kenya. In W. Elwood (Ed.), Power in the blood: A handbook on AIDS, politics, and communication (pp. 149–163). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton, J. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability, oppression and empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cogswell, B. (1968). Self-socialization: Readjustment of paraplegics in the community. Journal of Rehabilitation, 34(3), 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, L. (1997). Stigma: An enigma demystified. In L. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 216–231). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, L., & DePaulo, B. (1991). Uncovering the human spirit: Moving beyond disability and “missed” communications. In N. Coupland, H. Giles, & J. Wiemann (Eds.), “Miscommunication” and problematic talk (pp. 61–84). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coopman, S. (2001, October). Independence, identity, and credibility: Persons with disabilities commandeer the Net. Paper presented at the Association of Internet Researchers conference, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Condit, C., & Williams, M. (1997). Audience responses to the discourse of medical genetics: Evidence against the critique of medicalization. Health Communication, 9, 219–235.
   Google Scholar
• Corker, M. (1998a). Deaf and disabled or deafness disabled? Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corker, M. (1998b). Disability in a postmodern world. In T. Shakespeare (Ed.), The disability reader: Social science perspectives (pp. 221–233). London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Cragan, J., & Shields, D. (1998). Understanding communication theory: The communicative forces for human action. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, M. (1999). Making sense of HIV infection: Discourse and adaptation to life with a long-term HIV diagnosis. Health, 3, 95–119.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, N., & Crossley, M. (1998). HIV, empowerment and the sick role: An investigation of a contemporary moral maze. Health, 2, 157–174.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. (1997). Constructing normalcy: The bell curve, the novel, and the invention of the disabled body in the nineteenth century. In L. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 9–28). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Do, T., & Geist, P. (2000). Embodiment and dis-embodiment: Identity trans-formation of persons with physical disabilities. In D. Braithwaite & T. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and people with disabilities: Research and application (pp. 49–65). Mahwah, NJ: Erbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dolnick, E, (1993, September). Deafness as culture. The Atlantic, 272, 37–53.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, J. (1981). The visibility and image of handicapped people on television. Exceptional Children, 47, 413–416.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, R. (1996). A critique of the role of traditional charities. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability & society: Emerging issues and insights (pp. 147–166). London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Eakin, E., & Glasgow, R. (1997). The patients’ perspective on the self-management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 245–253.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. (1997). Constructions of physical disability in the ancient Greek world: The community concept. In D. Mitchell & S. Snyder (Eds.), The body and physical difference: Discourses of disability (pp. 29–51). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eiesland, N. (1994). The disabled God: Toward a liberatory theology of disability. Nashville, TN: Abingdon.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, T. R., & Byrd, E. K. (1982). Media and disability. Rehabilitation Literature, 43, 348–355.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, T. R., & Byrd, E. K. (1984). Attitude change toward disability through television: Portrayal with male college students. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 7, 320–322.
   Google Scholar
• Emry, R., & Wiseman, R. (1987). An intercultural understanding of ablebodied and disabled persons’ communication. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 11, 7–27.
   Google Scholar
• Epp, T. (2000). Disability: Discourse, experience and identity. Disability Studies Quarterly, 20, 134–144.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, J., & Omark, D. (1980). Social perceptions and communicative interactions of handicapped and normal children in a preschool classroom. Instructional Science, 9, 253–268.
   Google Scholar
• Farnall, O., & Smith, K. (1999). Reactions to people with disabilities: Personal contact versus viewing of specific media portrayals. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 659–672.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, S., Paine-Andrews, A., Francisco, V., Schultz, J. Richter, K., Lewis, R., Williams, E., Harris, K., Berkley, J., Fisher, J., & Lopez, C. (1995). Using empowerment theory in collaborative partnerships for community health and development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 677–697.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, S., White, G., Balcazar, F., Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Matthews, R., Paine-Andrews, A., Seekins, T., & Smith, J. (1994). A contextual-behavioral model of empowerment: Case studies involving people with physical disabilities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 471–496.
   Google Scholar
• Fernback, J. (1999). There is a there there: Notes toward a definition of cybercommunity. In S. Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net (pp. 203–220).
   Google Scholar
• Fichten, C., Amsel, R., Bourdon, C., & Creti, L. (1988). Interaction between college students with physical disabilities and their professors. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 1, 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Flora, J., Schooler, C., Mays, V., & Cochran, S. (1996). Exploring a model of symbolic social communication: The case of “Magic” Johnson. Journal of Health Psychology, 1, 353–366.
   Google Scholar
• Fonosch, G., & Schwab, L. (1981). Attitudes of selected university faculty members toward disabled students. Journal of College Student Personnel, 22, 229–235.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1973). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S. (2000).The uses and abuses of computer-mediated communication for people with disabilities. In D. Braithwaite & T. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and people with disabilities (pp. 319–336). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S., Giles, H., Orbe, M., & Bourhis, R. (2000). Interability communication: Theoretical perspectives. In D. Braithwaite & T. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and people with disabilities (pp. 193–222). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A. (1998). Stories of illness as care of the self: A Foucauldian dialogue. Health, 2, 329–348.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York: Seabury.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, L., Adelman, M., Flint, L., & Query, J. (2000). Weaving meaning together in an AIDS residence: Communicative practices, perceived health outcomes, and the symbolic construction of community. Health Communication, 5, 53–72.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, L., Adelman, M., & Query, J. (1996). Communication practices in the social construction of health in an AIDS residence. Journal of Health Psychology, 1, 383–397.
   Google Scholar
• Funk, R. (1987). Disability rights: From caste to class in the context of civil rights. In A. Gartner & T. Joe (Eds.), Images of the disabled, disabling images (pp. 7–30). New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, J., & Radel, M. (1978). Portrait of the disabled in the media. Journal of Community Psychology, 6, 269–274.
   Google Scholar
• Gelb, S. (1989). “Not simply bad and incorrigible”: Science, morality, and intellectual deficiency. History of Education Quarterly, 29, 359–379.
   Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher, M., Tallent, K., & Bolliger, C. (1999). Disordered discourse in schizophrenia described by the structure building framework. Discourse Studies, 1, 355–372.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, C. (1994). Questioning continuum. In B. Shaw (Ed.), The ragged edge: The disability experience from the pages of the first fifteen years of the disability rag (pp. 42–49). Louisville, KY: Avocado Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, R. (2001). The politics of breathing: Asthmatic Medicaid patients under managed care. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 97–116.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Green, G., Platt, S., Eley, S., & Green S. (1996). “Now and again it really hits me”: The impact of an HIV-positive diagnosis upon psychosocial well-being. Journal of Health Psychology, 1, 125–141.
   Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, C., & Goette, T. (1999). The Internet and the independence of individuals with disabilities. The Internet: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 9, 272–280.
   Google Scholar
• Groce, N. (1992) “The town fool”: An oral history of a mentally retarded individual in small town society. In P. Ferguson, D. Ferguson, & S. Taylor (Eds.), Interpreting disability: A qualitative reader (pp. 175–196). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, H. (1987). Advertising the acceptably employable image: Disability and capitalism. Policy Studies Journal, 15, 551–570.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, H. (1988a). The politics of physical differences: Disability and discrimination. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, H. (1988b). Can disability be beautiful? Social Policy, 18, 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, B. (1999). AIDS as a legally defined disability: Implications from news media coverage. In W. Elwood (Ed.), Power in the blood: A handbook on AIDS, politics, and communication (pp. 267280). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, B. (2000a). How the news frames disability: Print media coverage of the Americans with Disabilities Act. In B. Altman & S. Barnartt (Eds.), Expanding the scope of social science research on disability (Vol. 1, pp. 55–83). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, B. (2000b). If they limp they lead? News representations and the hierarchy of disability images. In D. Braithwaite & T. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and people with disabilities (pp. 273–288). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, B., & Ralph, S. (2001a). Content analysis methodology for studying news and disability: Case studies from the United States and England. In S. Barnartt & B. Altman (Eds.), Exploring theories and expanding methodologies: Where we are and where we need to go (pp. 229–253). New York: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, B., & Ralph, S. (2001b). Not worth keeping alive? News framing of physician-assisted suicide in the United States and Great Britain. Journalism Studies, 2, 407–421.
   Google Scholar
• Hardaway, B. (1991). Imposed inequality and miscommunication between physically impaired and physically nonimpaired interactants in American society. Howard Journal of Communications, 3, 139–148.
   Google Scholar
• Harney, D. (1999). Lesbians on the frontline: Battling AIDS, gays, and the myth of community. In W. Elwood (Ed.), Power in the blood: A handbook on AIDS, politics, and communication (pp. 167179). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, R., & Williams, D. (1995). Able-bodied instructors and students with physical disabilities: A relationship handicapped by communication. Communication Education, 44, 140–154.
   Google Scholar
• Heijmans, M., & De Ridder, D. (1998). Structure and determinants of illness representations in chronic disease: A comparison of Addison’s disease and chronic fatigue syndrome. Journal of Health Psychology, 3, 523–537.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, D., & Hendershott, A. (1991). ASL and the family system. American Annals of the Deaf, 136, 325–329.
   Google Scholar
• Hevey, D. (1997). Controlling interests. In A. Pointon & C. Davies (Eds.), Framed: Interrogating disability in the media (pp. 209–213). London: British Film Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hewes, D. (1995). Introduction. In D. Hewes (Ed.), The cognitive bases of interpersonal communication (pp. 1–4). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hillyer, B. (1993). Feminism and disability. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgetts, D., & Chamberlain, K. (1999). Medicalization and the depiction of lay people in television health documentary. Health, 3, 317–333.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, A. (1998a). Carving out a space to act: Acquired impairment and contested identity. Health, 2, 75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, A. (1998b). The business of hearing. Health, 2, 485–501.
   Google Scholar
• Houck, C., Asselin, S., Troutman, G., & Arrington, J. (1992). Students with learning disabilities: A study of faculty and student perceptions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 678–684.
   Google Scholar
• Hyler, S. (1988). DSM-III at the cinema: Madness in the movies. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 29, 195–206.
   Google Scholar
• Hyler, S., Gabbard, G., & Schneider, I. (1991). Homicidal maniacs and narcissistic parasites: Stigma-tization of mentally ill persons in the movies. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 42, 1044–1048.
   Google Scholar
• Imrie, R. (1998). Oppression, disability and access in the built environment. In T. Shakespeare (Ed.), The disability reader: Social science perspectives (pp. 129–146). London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. (1995). Teaching students to understand and control verbal aggression. Communication Education, 44, 51–63.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D., Myers, S., & Buerkel, R. (1994). Argument and verbal aggression in constructive and destructive family and organizational disagreements. Western Journal of Communication, 58, 73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D., & Wigley, C. (1986). Verbal aggressiveness: An interpersonal model and measure. Communication Monographs, 53, 61–69.
   Google Scholar
• Ingstad, B. (1995). Mpho ya modimo—a gift from God: Perspectives on “attitudes” toward disabled persons. In B. Ingstad & S. Whyte (Eds.), Disability and culture (pp. 246–263). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Itzhaky, H., & Schwartz, C. (1998). Empowering the disabled: A multidimensional approach. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 21, 301–310.
   Google Scholar
• Iwakuma, M., & Nussbaum, J. (2000). Intercultural views of people with disabilities in Asia and Africa. In D. Braithwaite & T. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and people with disabilities (pp. 239–255). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Jankowski, K. (1997). Deaf empowerment. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaramillo, E. (1999). Tuberculosis and stigma: Predictors of prejudice against persons with tuberculosis. Journal of Health Psychology, 4, 71–79.
   Google Scholar
• Jeon, Y., & Haider-Markel, D. (2001). Tracing issue definition and policy change: An analysis of disability issue images and policy response. Policy Studies Journal, 29, 215–231.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R., & Wolinsky, F. (1993). The structure of health status among older adults: Disease, disability, functional limitation, and perceived health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34(2), 105–121.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. (1998). Two faces of AIDS in Hong Kong: Culture and the construction of the “AIDS celebrity.” Discourse & Society, 9, 309–338.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, D. (1992). The new ADA: Compliance and costs. Kingston, MA: RSMeans.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, C., Hallahan, D., McShane, E., Crowley, E., & Blandford, B. (1990). The coverage of persons with disabilities in American newspapers. Journal of Special Education, 24, 271–282.
   Google Scholar
• Kensicki, L. (2001). Deaf president now! Positive media framing of a social movement within a hegemonic political environment. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 25, 147–166.
   Google Scholar
• Koerber, A. (2001). Postmodernism, resistance, and cyberspace: Making rhetorical spaces for feminist mothers on the Web. Women’s Studies in Communication, 24, 218–240.
   Google Scholar
• Kreps, G. (2000). Disability and culture: Effects on multicultural relations in modern organizations. In D. Braithwaite & T. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and people with disabilities (pp. 177–190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, S., Durrah, T., & Winkler, K. (1997). Coverage of AIDS in popular African American magazines. Health Communication, 9, 273–288.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liachowitz, C. (1988). Disability as a social construct. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linton, S. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Livneh, H. (1991). On the origins of negative attitudes toward people with disabilities. In R. Marinelli & A. Dell Orto (Eds.), The psychological and social impact of disability (3rd ed., pp. 181–196). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, A., & Hogan, K. (1999). The use and abuse of models of disability. Disability & Society, 15, 157–165.
   Google Scholar
• Longmore, P. (1997). Conspicuous contribution and American cultural dilemmas: Telethon rituals of cleansing and renewal. In D. Mitchell & S. Snyder (Eds.), The body and physical difference: Discourses of disability (pp. 134–158). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luey, H., Glass, L., & Elliott, H. (1995). Hard-of-hearing or deaf: Issues of ears, language, culture, and identity. Social Work, 40, 177–182.
   Google Scholar
• Lull, J. (2000). Media, communication, culture: A global approach (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lumley, M., Kelley, J., & Leisen, J. (1997). Predicting pain and adjustment in rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 255–264.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, D., & Carrithers, M. (1996). From “interpretative communities” to “communities of improvisation.” Media, Culture & Society, 18, 343–352.
   Google Scholar
• MacLean, D., & Gannon, P. (1995). Measuring attitudes toward disability: The Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale revisited. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 791–806.
   Google Scholar
• Mairs, N. (1996). Waist-high in the world: A life among the nondisabled. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Makas, E. (1988). Positive attitudes toward disabled people: Disabled and nondisabled persons’ perspectives. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 49–61.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, D. (1999). Disability: Controversial debates and psychosocial perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, C. (1999). Learning to be a journalist: A feminist disability critique of cyborgs, college newsworkers, and RSI work culture. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 23, 266–287.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, C., Miles, C., & Metsch, L. (1999). The medicalization of discourse within an AIDS research setting. In W. Elwood (Ed.), Power in the blood: A handbook on AIDS, politics, and communication (pp. 39–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, A. (2000). When the deaf and the hearing interact: Communication features, relationships, and disability issues. In D. Braithwaite & T. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and people with disabilities (pp. 353–368). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Meekosha, H. (1997). Body battles: Bodies, gender and disability. In T. Shakespeare (Ed.), The disability reader: Social science perspectives (pp. 163–180). London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Mele, C. (1999). Cyberspace and disadvantaged communities: The Internet as a tool for collective action. In M. Smith & P. Kollack (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 290–310). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Michalko, R., & Titchkosky, T. (2001). Putting disability in its place: It’s not a joking matter. In J. Wilson & C. Lewiecki-Wilson (Eds.), Embodied rhetorics: Disability in language and culture (pp. 200–228). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirzoeff, N. (1997). Blindness and art. In L. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 382–398). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. (1997). Modernist freaks and postmodernist geeks. In L. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 348–365). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D., & Snyder, S. (1997). Introduction: Disability studies and the double bind of representation. In D. Mitchell & S. Snyder (Eds.), The body and physical difference: Discourses of disability (pp. 1–31). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monks, J., & Frankenberg, R. (1995). Being ill and being me: Self, body, and time in multiple sclerosis narratives. In B. Ingstad & S. Whyte (Eds.), Disability and culture (pp. 107–134). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nakayama, T., & Martin, J. (Eds.). (1999). Whiteness: The communication of social identity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. (2000). The media role in building the disability community. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 15, 180–193.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J., & Berens, B. (1997). Spoken daggers, deaf ears, and silent mouths: Fantasies of deafness in early modern England. In L. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 52–74). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norden, M. (1990). Victims, villains, saints, and heroes: Movie portrayals of people with physical disabilities. In P. Loukides & K. Fuller (Eds.), Beyond the stars: Stock characters in American popular films (pp. 222–233). Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University Popular Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, E. (2001). The rhetoric of AIDS: A new taxonomy. In J. Wilson & C. Lewiecki-Wilson (Eds.), Embodied rhetorics: Disability in language and culture (pp. 229–243). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, B., Delia, J., & O’Keefe, D. (1980). Interaction analysis and the organization of interaction. In N. Denzin (Ed.), Studies in symbolic interaction (Vol. 3, pp. 25–57). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (1986). Social policy and disability: Some theoretical issues. Disability, Handicap & Society, 1, 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (1987). Re-defining disability: A challenge to research. Research Policy and Planning, 5, 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J. (1990). AIDS as a globalizing panic. In M. Featherstone (Ed.), Global culture: Nationalism, globalization and modernity (pp. 329–342). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Orbe, N. (1998). Constructing co-cultural theory: An explication of culture, power, and communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Papa, M., Auwal, M., & Singhal, A. (1997). Organizing for social change with concertive control systems: Member identification, empowerment, and the masking of discipline. Communication Monographs, 64, 219–249.
   Google Scholar
• Parasnis, I. (1996). On interpreting the deaf experience within the context of cultural and language diversity. In I. Parasnis (Ed.), Cultural and language diversity and the deaf experience (pp. 3–19). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, S. (1996). The politics of disability identity. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability and society: Emerging issues and insights (pp. 215–234). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, D. (1999). The problem of disability definition: again. Disability and Rehabilitation, 21, 392–395.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, D. (2000). An annotated bibliography of recent works in disability studies, 1995–2000. Disability Studies, 20, 442–446.
   Google Scholar
• Philo, G., & Secker, J. (1999). Media and mental health. In Bob Franklin (Ed.), Social policy, the media, and misrepresentation (pp. 135–145). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pittam, J., & Gallois, C. (1997). Language strategies in the attribution of blame for HIV and AIDS. Communication Monographs, 64, 201–218.
   Google Scholar
• Pittam, J., & Gallois, C. (2000). Malevolence, stigma, and social distance: Maximizing intergroup differences in HIV/AIDS discourse. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28, 24–43.
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast, C. (2001). On the rhetorics of mental disability. In J. Wilson & C. Lewiecki-Wilson (Eds.), Embodied rhetorics: Disability in language and culture (pp. 45–60). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L., Phillips, N., & Chapman, P. (1996). Metaphors of communication and organization. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 375–408). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, M. (1979). The conduit metaphor—A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–324). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reisine, S., & Fifield, J. (1992). Expanding the definition of disability: Implications for planning, policy, and research. Millbank Quarterly, 70, 491–508.
   Google Scholar
• Robillard, A. (1999). Meaning of a disability: The lived experience of paralysis. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, H. (1992). A semiotic analysis of artistic American Sign Language and a performance of poetry. Text and Performance Quarterly, 12, 146–159.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, H. (1994). Stylistic features in American Sign Language literature. Text and Performance Quarterly, 14, 144–157.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, H. (1995). Apprehending deaf culture. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 156–162.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, H., & Smith, A. (2000). Sighting sound/sounding sight: The “violence” of deaf-hearing communication. In D. Braithwaite & T. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and people with disabilities (pp. 369–388). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, K. (1997). But where’s me in it? Disability, broadcasting, and the audience. Media, Culture & Society, 19, 669–677.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, K. (1998). Disability and the media: A suitable case for treatment? Media Development, 45(2), 14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, K. (2001). All ears: Radio, reception and discourses of disability. Media, Culture & Society, 23, 419–437.
   Google Scholar
• Roulstone, A. (1998). Researching a disabling society: The case of employment and new technology. In T. Shakespeare (Ed.), The disability reader: Social science perspectives (pp. 110128). London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Royse, D., & Edwards, T. (1989). Communicating about disability: Attitudes and preferences of persons with physical handicaps. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 32, 203–209.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M. (1998). Beyond ramps: Disability at the end of the social contract. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, H. (1988). Further thoughts on a “sociology of acceptance” for disabled people. Social Policy, 27, 36–39.
   Google Scholar
• Sendelbaugh, J. (1978). Television viewing habits of hearing-impaired teenagers in the Chicago metropolitan area. American Annals of the Deaf, 123, 536–541.
   Google Scholar
• Shefner-Rogers, C., Rao, N., Rogers, E., & Wayangankar, A. (1998). The empowerment of women dairy farmers in India. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 319–337.
   Google Scholar
• Schuchman, J. (1984). Silent movies and the deaf community. Journal of Popular Culture, 17(4), 58–78.
   Google Scholar
• Scotch, R. (2000). Models of disability and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 21, 213–222.
   Google Scholar
• Shilling, C. (1997). The body and difference. In K. Woodward (Ed.), Identity and difference (pp. 63107). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shultz, K. (2000). Deaf activists in the rhetorical transformation of the construct of disability. In D. Braithwaite & T. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and people with disabilities (pp. 257–270). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Shultz, K., & Germeroth, D. (1998). Should we laugh or should we cry? John Callahan’s humor as a tool to change societal attitudes toward disability. Howard Journal of Communications, 9, 229–244.
   Google Scholar
• Signorielli, N. (1989). The stigma of mental illness on television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 33, 325–331.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., & Kandath, K. (2000). Communication and the blind or visually impaired. In D. Braithwaite & T. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and people with disabilities (pp. 389–403). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sontag, S. (1997). AIDS and its metaphors. In L. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 232238). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sprague, J., & Hayes, J. (2000). Self-determination and empowerment: A feminist standpoint analysis of talk about disability. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 671–695.
   Google Scholar
• Stineman, M. (2000). Medical humanism and empowerment medicine. Disability Studies, 20(1), 11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D., & Colella, A. (1996). A model of factors affecting the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 21, 352–401.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, J. (1996). Minority empowerment and the education of deaf people. In I. Parasnis (Ed.), Cultural language diversity and the deaf experience (pp. 171–180). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, K. (1997). Awakening to disability: Nothing about us without us. Volcano, CA: Volcano Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbins, J. (1988). The politics of disability. In H. Yuker (Ed.), Attitudes toward persons with disabilities (pp. 22–32). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sutter, D., & Martin, M. (1998). Verbal aggression during disengagement of dating relationships. Communication Research Reports, 15, 318–326.
   Google Scholar
• Sypher, H., & Higgins, E. (1989). Social cognition and communication: An overview. Communication Research, 16, 309–313.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Bogdan, R. (1991). On accepting relationships between people with mental retardation and nondisabled people: Towards an understanding of acceptance. In R. Marinelli & A. Dell Orto (Eds.), The psychological and social impact of disability (3rd ed., pp. 165180). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S., & Wolfensberger, W. (1982). The importance of social imagery in interpreting societally devalued people to the public. Rehabilitation Literature, 43, 356–358.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, T. (1981a). The development of communication skills in physically handicapped children. Human Communication Research, 7, 312–324.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, T. (1981b). The impact of a physical handicap on communicative characteristics of a marital dyad. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 45, 227–240.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, T. (1982a). The development of listener-adapted communication in physically handicapped children: A cross-sectional study. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 46, 32–44.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, T. (1982b). “You can’t play marbles—you have a wooden”: Communication with the handicapped. Communication Quarterly, 30, 108–115.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, T. (1983). Communication with the handicapped: A three year study of the effectiveness of mainstreaming. Communication Education, 32, 185–195.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, R. (1997). Feminist theory, the body, and the disabled figure. In L. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 279–292). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, B. (1997). The ADA and Deaf culture: Contrasting precepts, conflicting results. Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 549, 24–36.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, H., Bateman, D., & Turnbull, A. (1993). Family empowerment. In P. Wehman (Ed.), The ADA mandate for social change (pp. 157–173). Baltimore: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Uprety, S. (1997). Disability and postcoloniality in Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children and third-world novels. In L. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 366–381). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, J. (2001). Disabled discourse: Hearing accounts of deafness constructed through Japanese television and film. Discourse & Society, 16, 707–721.
   Google Scholar
• Verbrugge, L., Reoma, J., Gruber-Baldini, A. (1994). Short-term dynamics of disability and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35(2), 97–117.
   Google Scholar
• Vernon, A. (1998). Multiple oppression and the disabled people’s movement. In T. Shakespeare (Ed.), The disability reader: Social science perspectives (pp. 201–210). London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, C. (1994). Disability culture rap. In B. Shaw (Ed.), The ragged edge: The disability experience from the pages of the first fifteen years of the disability rag (pp. 15–18). Louisville, KY: Avocado Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warin, M. (2000). The glass cage: An ethnography of exposure in schizophrenia. Health, 4, 115–133.
   Google Scholar
• Warnath, C., & Dunnington, L. (1981). Disabled students on the campus. Journal of College Student Personnel, 22, 236–241.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, N. (1988). Another perspective: Attitudes of people with disabilities. In H. Yuker (Ed.), Attitudes toward persons with disabilities (pp. 141–153). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Virtual communities as communities: Net surfers don’t ride alone. In M. Smith & P. Kollack (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 167–194). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wendell, S. (1996). The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wendell, S. (1997). Toward a feminist theory of disability. In L. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 260–278). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Westhaver, S. (2000). Opening up spaces for difference via a feminist phenomenological approach to disability. In D. Braithwaite & T. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and people with disabilities (pp. 85–100). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Whaley, B., & Golden, M. (2000). Communicating with persons who stutter: Perceptions and strategies. In D. Braithwaite & T. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and people with disabilities (pp. 423–438). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Whaley, B., & Parker, R. (2000). Expressing the experience of communicative disability: Metaphors of persons who stutter. Communication Reports, 13, 115–125.
   Google Scholar
• Whitt, L., & Slack, J. (1994). Communities, environments, and cultural studies. Cultural Studies, 8, 5–31.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, S. (1995). Disability between discourse and experience. In B. Ingstad & S. Whyte (Eds.), Disability and culture (pp. 267–291). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, S. (1998). Health as moral performance: Ritual, transgression and taboo. Health, 2, 435–457.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. (1997). Signs of definitions. In A. Pointon & C. Davies (Eds.), Framed: Interrogating disability in the media (pp. 179–181). London: British Film Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J., & Lewiecki-Wilson, C. (2001). Disability, rhetoric, and the body. In J. Wilson & C. Lewiecki-Wilson (Eds.), Embodied rhetorics: Disability in language and culture (pp. 1–24). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winzer, M. (1997). Disability and society before the eighteenth century. In L. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 75–109). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, T., Antoni, M., Ironson, G., & Kling, D. (1999). Religiosity is associated with affective status in symptomatic HIV-infected African-American women. Journal of Health Psychology, 4, 317–326.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, J. (1994). Boutonnieres. In B. Shawn (Ed.), The ragged edge: The disability experience from the pages of the first fifteen years of the disability rag (pp. 25–27). Louisville, KY: Advocado Press.
   Google Scholar
• Worley, D. (2000). Communication and students with disabilities on college campuses. In D. Braithwaite & T. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and people with disabilities (pp. 125–139). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, K. (1999). AIDS, the status quo, and the elite media: An analysis of the guest lists of “The MacNeil/Lehrer News Hour” and “Nightline.” In W. Elwood (Ed.), Power in the blood: A handbook on AIDS, politics, and communication (pp. 281–292). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Yedidia, M., Barr, J., & Berry, C. (1993). Physicians’ attitudes toward AIDS at different career stages: A comparison of internists and surgeons. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34, 272–284.
   Google Scholar
• Yedidia, M., Berry, C., & Barr, J. (1996). Changes in physicians’ attitudes toward AIDS during residency training: A longitudinal study of medical school graduates. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 37, 179–191.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, S., & Spano, S. (1995, February). Do faculty weave students’ diverse abilities into the classroom?: Disabled students speak out. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western States Communication Association, Portland, Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Zola, I. K. (1991). Communication barriers between “the able-bodied” and “the handicapped.” In R. Marinelli & E. Dell Orto (Eds.), The psychological and social impact of disability (3rd ed., pp. 157–164). New York: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Zorn, T. (2002). Converging with divergence: Overcoming the disciplinary fragmentation in business communication, organizational communication, and public relations. Business Communication Quarterly, 65(2), 44–53.
   Google Scholar