References
- Argyris, C. (1994). On organizational learning. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
- Argyris, C., & Schon, D.A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Arlt, H. J. (1998). Kommunikation, Oeffentlichkeit, Oeffentlichkeitsarbeit. PR von Gestern, PR fur Morgen -das Beispiel Gewerkschaft [Communication, public sphere, public relations: PR of yesterday, PR for tomorrow. The example Gewerkschaft]. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
- Banks, S. P. (1995). Multicultural public relations: A social-interpretive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Banton, M. (1996). Role. In A. Kuper & J. Kuper (Eds.), The social science encyclopaedia (pp. 749751). London: Routledge.
- Baran, S. J., & Davis, D. K. (2000). Mass communication theory. Foundations, ferment, and future. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
- Barge, J. K., & Little, M. (2002). Dialogical wisdom, communicative practice, and organizational life. Communication Theory, 12, 375–397.
- Bauer, R. A. (1963). Communication as a transaction: a comment on the concept of influence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 27, 83–86.
- Bauer, R.A. (1964). The obstinate audience: The influence process from the point of view of social communication. American Psychologist, 19, 319–328.
- Bentele, G. (1997). Public relations and reality: A contribution to a theory of public relations. In D. Moss, T. MacManus, & D. Vercic (Eds.), Public relations research: An international perspective (pp. 89–109). London: International Thompson Business Press.
- Bentele, G., & Wehmeier, S. (2003). From literary bureaus to a modern profession: The development and current structure of public relations in Germany. In K. Sriramesh & D. Vercic (Eds.), The global public relations handbook: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 199–221). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Bentele, G., & Ruhl, M. (Eds.). (1993). Theorien oeffentlicher Kommunikation [Theories of public communication]. Munich, Germany: Olschlager.
- Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Penguin Books.
- Berlo, D. K. (1960). The process of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart, &Winston.
- Bernays, E. L. (1923). Crystallizing public opinion. New York: Boni & Liveright.
- Broom, G. M. (1982). A comparison of sex roles in public relations. Public Relations Review, 5(3), 47–59.
- Broom, G. M., & Smith, G. D. (1979). Testing the practitioner’s impact on clients. Public Relations Review, 5(3), 47–59.
- Burkart, R. (1996). Verstandigungsorientierte Oeffentlichkeitsarbeit: Der Dialog als PR-Konzeption [Public relations oriented at understanding: The dialogue as concept in public relations]. In G. Bentele, H. Steinmann, & A. Zerfass (Hrsg.), Dialogorientierte Unternehmenskommunikation. Grundlagen, Praxiserfahrungen, Perspektiven [Dialogoriented business communication. Basics, Praxis, Perspectives] (pp. 245–270). Berlin: Vistas.
- Burkart, R. (2000). Kommunikationswissenschaft [Communication Science]. Vienna, Austria: Bohlau.
- Carey, J. W. (1975). A cultural approach to communication. Journal of Communication, 2(1), 1–22.
- Cialdini, R. B. (1984). Influence. New York: William Morrow.
- Carty, F. X. (1992). Farewell to hype: The emergence of real public relations. Dublin, Ireland: Able Press.
- Castells, M. (1996). The information age: Economy, society and culture: Vol. I. The rise of the network society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
- Cole, G. A. (2000). Management: Theory and practice. (5th ed.). New York: Continuum.
- Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (1998). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. London: Random House.
- Cutlip, S. C. (1994). The unseen power: Public relations. A history. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Cutlip, S. C., Center, A. H., & Broom, G. M. (2000). Effective public relations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Dance, F. E. X. (1970). The “concept” of communication. Journal of Communication, 20(2), 201–210.
- D’Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multi-paradigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 870–888.
- Davis, A. (2002). Public relations democracy: Public relations, politics, and the mass media in Britain. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
- David, P. (2004). Extending symmetry: Toward a convergence of professionalism, practice, and pragmatics in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 16, 185–211.
- Deetz, S. A. (2001). Conceptual foundations. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 3–46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Deetz, S. A., & Putnam, L. L. (2001). Thinking about the future of communications. In W.B. Gudy-kunst (Ed.), Communication yearbook 24 (pp. 1–16). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Deetz, S. A., Tracy, S. J., & Simpson, J. L. (2000). Leading organizations through transition. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Dervin, B. (2004a). Communication gaps and inequities: Moving toward a reconceptualization. In B. Dervin & L. Foreman-Wernet (Eds.), Sense-making methodology reader: Selected writings of Brenda Dervin (pp. 17–46). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
- Dervin, B. (2004b). Information democracy: An examination of underlying assumptions. In B. Dervin & L. Foreman-Wernet (Eds.), Sense-making methodology reader: Selected writings of Brenda Dervin (pp. 73–100). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
- Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
- Dolphin, R. R. (1999). The fundamentals of corporate communications. Oxford, UK: Butterworth Heinemann.
- Dozier. D. M. (1984). Program evaluation and roles of practitioners. Public Relations Review, 10(2), 13–21.
- Dozier, D. M. (1992). The organizational roles of communications and public relations practitioners. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 327355). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Dozier, D. M., & Ehling, W. P. (1992). Evaluation of public relations programs: What the literature tells us about their effects. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 159–184). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Dozier, D. M., with Grunig, L. A., & Grunig, J. E. (1995). Manager’s guide to excellence in public relations and communication management. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Ehling, W. P. (1992). Estimating the value of public relations and communication to an organization. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 617638). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
- Ewen, S. (1996). PRl A social history of spin. New York: BasicBooks
- Faulstieg, W. (1992). Oeffentlichkeitsarbeit. Grundwissen: kritische Einfuhrung in Problemfelder [Public relations. Basics: critical introduction into problems]. Bardowick, Germany: Wissen-schaftlicher Verlag.
- Fearing, F. (1967). Toward a psychological theory of human communication. Journal of Personality, 22, 71–78. Reprinted in F. W. Matson & A. Montagu (Eds.), The human dialogue: Perspectives on communication (pp. 179–194). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1953)
- Foreman-Wernet, L. (2004). Rethinking communication: Introducing the sense-making methodology. In B. Dervin & L. Foreman-Wernet (Eds.), Sense-making methodology reader: Selected writings of Brenda Dervin (pp. 4–16). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
- Foster, R. N., & Kaplan, S. (2001). Creative destruction: From “built to last” to “built to perform.” London: Financial Times & Prentice Hall.
- Foster, T. R. V., & Jolly, A. (Eds.) (1997). Corporate communications handbook. London: Kogan Page.
- Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase profit. New York Times Magazine, p. 122.
- Gitlin, T. (2002). Media sociology: The dominant paradigm. In D. McQuail (Ed.), McQuail’s reader in mass communication theory (pp. 25–35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
- Groenendijk, J. N. A. (1997). Public relations management. In J. N. A. Groenendijk, G. A. T. Haze-kamp & J. Mastenbroek (Eds.), Public relations, beleid, organisatie en uitvoering [Public Relations, policy, organization and execution] (pp. 14–27). Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Samsom BedrijfsInformatie.
- Grunig, J. E. (1976). Organizations and public relations: Testing a communication theory, Journalism Monographs, nr. 46.
- Grunig, J. E. (1989). Symmetrical presuppositions as a framework for public relations theory. In C. H. Botan & V. Hazleton Jr. (Eds.), Public relations theory (pp. 17–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Grunig, J. E. (Ed.). (1992a). Excellence in public relations and communication management. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Grunig, J. E. (1992b). Communication, public relations, and effective organizations: An overview of the book. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 1–28). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
- Grunig, L. A., Grunig, J. E., & Dozier, D. M. (2002). Excellent public relations and effective organizations: A study of communication management in three countries. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Habermas, J. (1962). Strukturwandel der Oeffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bur-gerlichen Gesellschaft [Change of the structure of public sphere. Investigation into a category of citizen’s society]. Darmstadt, Germany: Luchterhand.
- Hassard, J., & Parker, M. (Eds.). (1993). Postmodernism and organizations. London: Sage.
- Heath, R. L. (1994). Management of corporate communication: From interpersonal contacts to external affairs. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Heath, R. L. (Ed.). (2001a). Handbook of public relations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Heath, R. L. (2001b). Shifting foundations: Public relations as relationship building. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), Handbook of public relations (pp. 1–9). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Heath, R. L. (2001c). A rhetorical enactment rationale for public relations: The good organization communicating well. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), Handbook of public relations (pp. 31–50). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive information. Journal of Psychology, 21, 107–112.
- Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1993). Management of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, CA: Prentice Hall.
- Hollander, E. (1988). Lokale communicatie en locale openbaarheid. Openbaarheid als communi-catiewetenschappelijk concept [Local communication and local public sphere: Public sphere as communication scientific concept]. Nijmegen, Netherlands: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.
- Holmstrom, S. (2000, July). The reflective paradigm: Turning into ceremony? Paper presented at the 7th International Public Relations Research Symposium, Bled, Slovenia.
- Hutton, J. G. (1999). The definition, dimensions, and domain of public relations. Public Relations Review, 25, 199–214.
- Jablin, F. M., & Putnam, L. L. (Eds.). (2001). The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Jensen, I. (1997). Legitimacy and strategy of different companies: A perspective of external and internal public relations. In D. Moss, T. MacManus, & D. Vercic (Eds.), Public relations research: An international perspective (pp. 225–246). London: ITP.
- Jensen, I. (2000, July). Public relations and the public sphere in the future. Paper presented at the 7th International Public Relations Research Symposium, Bled, Slovenia.
- Krippendorf, K. (1994). A recursive theory of communication. In D. Crowley & D. Mitchell (Eds.), Communication theory today (pp. 78–104). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
- Kruckeberg, D., & Starck, K. (1988). Public relations and community: A reconstructed theory. New York: Praeger.
- Kuckelhaus, A. (1998). Public relations: die Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit. Kommunikationstheoreti-sche Annaherungen an ein neuzeitliches Phanomen [Public relations: The construction of reality. Communication scientific perspectives into a current phenomenon]. Opladen, Germany: West-deutscher Verlag.
- Kunczik, M. (1997). Geschichte der Oeffentlichkeitsarbeit in Deutschland [History of public relations in Germany]. Koln, Germany: Bohlau.
- Langer, S. (1967). Mind: An essay on human feeling. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Cited in S. W. Littlejohn (1992), Theories of human communication (pp. 67–70). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas. New York: Harper. Also reprinted in W. Schramm, Ed. (1960), Mass communications (pp. 117–130). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
- Lauzen, M. M., & Dozier, D. M. (1992). The missing link: The public relations manager role as mediator of organizational environments and power consequences for the function. Journal of Public Relations Research, 4, 205–220.
- Lauzen, M. M., & Dozier, D. M. (1994). Issues management mediation of linkages between environmental complexity and management of the public relations function. Journal of Public Relations Research, 6, 163–184.
- Lawniczak, R. (Ed.). (2001). Public relations contribution to transition in Central and Eastern Europe: Research and practice. Poznan, Poland: Poznan University of Economics (informal publication, [email protected].
- Ledingham, J. A., & Bruning, S. D. (1998). Relationship management in public relations: Dimensions of an organization-public relationship. Public Relations Review, 24, 55–65.
- Ledingham, J. A., & Bruning, S. D. (Ed.). (2000). Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
- Leeper, K. A., & Leeper, R. V. (2000). Creating community as social responsibility: A case study. Paper presented at the 50th International Communication Association Conference, Acapulco, Mexico, June 1–5.
- Lesly, P. (1997). Lesly’s handbook of public relations and communications. Lincolnwood, Ill: NTC Business Books.
- L’ Etang, J., & Pieczka, M. (1996). Critical perspectives in public relations. London: International Thomson Business Press.
- Littlejohn, S. W. (1987). Theories of human communication. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- Littlejohn, S. W. (1992). Theories of human communication. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- London, S. (2002, February). Corporations with hard and soft centers. Financial Times, 20, p. 15.
- Long, L. W., & Hazleton, V., Jr. (1987). Public relations: A theoretical and practical response. Public Relations Review, 13(3), 3–13.
- March, J. G. (1994). A primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York: Free Press.
- McQuail, D. (2000). McQuail’s mass communication theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- McQuail, D., & Windahl, S. (1981). Communication models: For the study of mass communication. London: Longman.
- McLain Smith, D. (2002). Keeping a strategic dialogue moving. In P. Simcic Bronn & R. Wiig (Eds.), Corporate communication. A strategic approach to building reputation (pp. 151–176). Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal Akademisk.
- McLeod, J. M., & Chaffee, S. H. (1973). Interpersonal approaches to communication research. American Behavioral Scientist, 16, 469–499.
- Meiden, A. van der. (1978). Wat zullen de mensen ervan zeggen? Enkele visies op het publiek in de ontwikkelingsgang van de public relations [What will people say? Some views on the public in the development of public relations]. The Hague, Netherlands: NGPR (inaugural lecture).
- Miller, G. R. (1989). Persuasion and public relations: Two “ps” in a pod. In C. H. Botan & V. Hazleton Jr. (Eds.), Public relations theory (pp. 45–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.
- Mogel, L. (2002). Making it in public relations: An insider’s guide to career opportunities. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Mumby, D. K. (1987). The political function of narrative in organizations. Communication Monographs, 54, 113–127.
- Mumby, D. K. (2000). Communication, organization and the public sphere. In P. M. Buzzanell (Ed.), Rethinking organizational and managerial communication from feminist perspectives (pp. 3–23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Munck Nielsen, J. (2001). The legitimacy concept and its potentialities: A theoretical reconstruction with relevance to public relations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Roskilde, Denmark.
- Newcomb, T. M. (1953). An approach to the study of communicative acts. Psychology Review, 60, 393–404.
- Newcomb, T. M. (1958). Communicative behavior. In R. Young (Ed.), Approaches to the study of politics (pp. 244–265). Evanston, IL: Atlantic Books.
- Nistelrooij, A. Van. (2000). Collectief organiseren. Een sociaal-constructionistisch onderzoek naar het werken met grote groepen [Collective organizing. A social-constructionistic research project into large scale group work]. Utrecht, Netherlands: Lemma.
- Oeckl, A. (1976). PR-praxis. Der Schlussel zur Oeffentlichkeitarbeit [Public relations practice: The key to public relations]. Dusseldorf, Germany: Econ.
- Olasky, M. N. (1989). The aborted debate within public relations: An approach through Kuhn’s paradigm. In J. E. Grunig & L. A. Grunig (Eds.), Public Relations Research Annual, Vol. 1 (pp. 87–96). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Perloff, R. M. (1993). The dynamics of persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Peters, J. D. (1999). Speaking into the air: A history of the idea of communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Wm. Brown.
- Pratkanis, A., & Aronson, E. (1991). Age of propaganda. The everyday use and abuse of persuasion. New York: W. H. Freeman.
- Preyer, G., Peter, G., & Ulkan, M. (2003). Concepts of meaning: Framing an integrated theory of linguistic behavior. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Price, V. (1992). Public opinion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Putnam, L. L. (1983). The interpretive perspective: An alternative to functionalism. In L. L. Putnam & M. E. Pacanowsky (Eds.), Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach (pp. 31–54). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Putnam, L. L., & Pacanowsky, M. E. (Eds.). (1983). Communication and organizations. An interpretive approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Riel, C. B. M. van. (1995). Principles of corporate communication. London: Prentice Hall.
- Riel, C. B. M. van. (2000). Corporate communication orchestrated by a sustainable corporate story. In M. Schultz, M. J. Hatch, & M. Holten Larsen (Eds.), The expressive organization: Linking identity, reputation, and the corporate brand (pp. 157–181). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Ritzer, G. (2000). Classical sociological theory. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
- Rogers, E. M. (1994). History of communication study. New York: Free Press.
- Ronneberger, F. (1977). Legitimation durch Information [Legitimation through information]. Dussel-dorf, Germany: Econ.
- Ronneberger, F., & Ruhl, M. (1992). Theorie der Public Relations, ein Entwurf [Theory of public relations: A design]. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
- Rosengren, K. E. (2000). Communication: An introduction. London: Sage.
- RSA (1995). Tomorrow’s company. London: Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures & Commerce.
- Ruler, B. van. (1996). Communicatiemanagement in Nederland [Communication management in the Netherlands]. Houten, Netherlands: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.
- Ruler, B. van. (1997). Communication: Magical mystery or scientific concept? Professional views of public relations practitioners in the Netherlands. In D. Moss, T. MacManus, & D. Vercic (Eds.), Public relations research: An international perspective (pp. 247–263). London: International Thomson Business Press.
- Ruler, B. van. (2000). Communication management in the Netherlands. Public Relations Review, 26, 403–423.
- Ruler, B. van. (2003). Public relations in the Polder: The case of the Netherlands. In K. Sriramesh & D. Vercic (Eds.), The global public relations handbook: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 222243). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Ruler, B. van. (2004a). The communication grid: An introduction of a model of four communication strategies. Public Relations Review, 30, 123–143.
- Ruler, B. van. (2004b). Framedoctoring. Het strategisch gebruik van frames in storytelling [Frame doctoring: The strategic use of frames in storytelling]. In G. Rijnja & R. van der Jagt (Eds.), Storytelling. De kracht van verhalen in communicatie [Storytelling: The power of stories in communication; pp. 39–46]. Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Kluwer.
- Ruler, B. van, & Vercic, D. (2002a). 21st century communication management—the people, the organization. In P. Simcic Bronn & R. Wiig (Eds.), Corporate communication: A strategic approach to building reputation (pp. 277–294). Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal Akademisk.
- Ruler, B. van, & Vercic, D. (2002b). The Bled Manifesto on public relations. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Pri-stop Communications.
- Ruler, B. van, & Vercic, D. (Eds.). (2004). Public relations and communication management in Europe: A nation-by-nation introduction into public relations theory and practice. New York: Mou-ton DeGruyter.
- Ruler, B. van, Vercic, D., Buetschi, G., & Flodin, B. (2000). European body of knowledge on public relations/Communication management: Report of the Delphi Research Project 2000. Ljubljana, Slovenia: European Association for Public Relations Education and Research.
- Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
- Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Schramm, W. (1965). How communication works. In W. Schramm (Ed.), The process and effects of mass communication (pp. 3–26). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
- Scott, W. R. (1987). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
- Servaes, J. (1999). Communication for development: One world, multiple cultures. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
- Servaes, J., Jacobson, T. L., & White, S. A. (Eds.). (1996). Participatory communication for social change. Thousand Oaks, NJ: Sage.
- Signitzer, B. (1992). Aspekte der Produktion von Public Relations-Wissen: PR-Forschung in studen-tischen Abschlussarbeiten [Aspects of production of public relations knowledge: PR research in student theses]. In H. Avenarius & W. Armbrecht (Eds.), Ist Public Relations eine Wissenschaft? [Is public relations a science?] (pp. 171–206). Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
- Shannon, C.E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
- Sriramesh, K., & Vercic, D. (Eds.). (2003). The global public relations handbook: Theory, research, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Stacks, D. W. (2002). Primer of public relations research. New York: Guilford Press.
- Stappers, J. G., Reijnders, A. D., & Moller, W. A. J. (1990). De werking van massamedia. Een over-zicht van inzichten [How media work; an overview of insights]. Amsterdam: Arbeiderspers.
- Starck, K., & Kruckeberg, D. (2000). Public relations and community: A reconstructed theory revisited. In R. Heath (Ed.), Handbook of public relations (pp. 51–59). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Stoner, J. R. F., & Freeman, R. E. (1992). Management (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
- Susskind, L., McKearnan, S., & Thomas-Larmer, J. (Eds.). (1999). The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Tampere, K. (2003). Public relations in a transition society 1989–2002. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Jyvaskyla, Finland.
- Thayer, L. (1987). On communication: Essays in understanding. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
- Tompkins, P. K. (1984). Translating organisational theory: Symbolism over substance. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 70–96). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Tompkins, P. K., & Wanca-Thibault, M. (2001). Organizational communication: Prelude and prospects. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. xvii-xxxi). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Toth, E.L. (1992). The case for pluralistic studies of public relations: Rhetorical, critical and system perspectives. In E. L. Toth & R. L. Heath (Eds.), Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations (pp. 3–16). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Toth, E. L., & Heath, R. L. (Eds.). (1992). Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Vasquez, G., & Taylor, M. (2001). Research perspectives on “the public.” In R. L. Heath (Ed.), Handbook of public relations (pp. 139–154). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Vercic, D., Ruler, B. van, Butschi, G. & Flodin, B. (2001). On the definition of public relations: A European view. Public Relations Review 27(4), 373–387.
- Vreese, C. de. (2003). Framing Europe: Television news and European integration. Amsterdam: Aksant.
- Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematics of communication. Scientific American, 181, 11–15.
- Weick, K. E. (1987). Theorizing about organizational vommunication. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 97–122). Newbury Park CA: Sage.
- Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- White, J., & Mazur, L. (1995). Strategic communications management: Making public relations work. Wokingham, UK: Addison-Wesley.
- Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics or control and communication in the animal and the machine. New York: Wiley.
- Wiig, R. (2002). Communication models. In P. Simcic Bronn & R. Wiig (Eds.), Corporate communication: A strategic approach to building reputation (pp. 151–176). Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal Akademisk.
- Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691–718.
- Zerfass, A. (1996). Dialogkommunikation und strategische Unternehmensfuhrung [Dialogical communication and strategic management]. In G. Bentele, H. Steinmann, & A. Zerfass (Eds.), Dialog orientierte Unternehmenskommunikation. Grundlagen, Praxiserfahrungen, Perspektiven [Dialogue-oriented business communication: Basics, praxis, perspectives] (pp. 23–58). Berlin: Vistas.
- Zijderveld, A. C. (2000). The institutional imperative: The interface of institutions and networks. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
- Zweekhorst, P. A. M. (2001). Communicatiemanagers: Visies van topmanagers [Communication managers: Perspectives of top managers]. Amsterdam: Boom.